I am aware that you are a factionalist of the far right and have a preference for some Rupert fool. It's the same policy platform isn't it? Tax cuts, "Christian principles" and immigration. All the stuff it has to be to win people away from Reform. You just wander from one charlatan to the next getting stolen from.Maia wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 9:33 pm+++If the council has their budget for leisure centres cut then you are out of a job because you are paid for by the council subsidy. This is not difficult to understand. Your wages are paid by subsidy. You are a subsidised.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 8:58 pmIf the council has their budget for leisure centres cut then you are out of a job because you are paid for by the council subsidy. This is not difficult to understand. Your wages are paid by subsidy. You are a subsidised.Maia wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 8:28 pm
+++Of course it is subsidised. Did your company provide the site for the building, financing for construction, and now operate the site on income from ticket sales at the door? Don't be silly at me.+++
Under your definition then, it seems that any employee of any service provided by the state or local authorities, or by any company on their behalf, is in a "subsidised" job, no matter how essential that service is for a properly functioning society. If not, I can't work out what you mean.
The mega-tories you promote will cut taxes by 90 billion pounds - and that money will be going to me not you - so your local council that keeps you in paid subsidised employment will suffer huge cuts to its central government grants as well as to programs from central govt that directly support the facilities.Oh my God are you being serious right now? Google "quantitative easing uk 2020". The extra money for the NHS wasn't UK taxes being brought back from Brussells.Maia wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 8:28 pm +++And you're supposed to be one of those "facts don't care about your feelings" people, but here we are, with you whining because the facts are not going to support you, and neither will the NHS when you have won your spiteful little war.+++
Eh?
+++That was printed money. The NHS is not better funded today because of Brexit.+++
Most of it was probably transferred digitally, without any need to brother printing it at all. Or did you mean something else?
Seriously, you are one undereducated gammon. No wonder you live for populist bullshit. You need to start getting your information from something other than X or Facebook pages run by racists or whatever bullshit artists are stringing you along.
The mega-tories you promote will cut taxes by 90 billion pounds - and that money will be going to me not you - so your local council that keeps you in paid subsidised employment will suffer huge cuts to its central government grants as well as to programs from central govt that directly support the facilities.+++
You appear to have assumed that I'm a Reform supporter.
Ho hum. Now google "qe printing money". Everybody calls it printing money, don't be agressively stupid at me.Maia wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 9:33 pm +++Oh my God are you being serious right now? Google "quantitative easing uk 2020". The extra money for the NHS wasn't UK taxes being brought back from Brussells.
Seriously, you are one undereducated gammon. No wonder you live for populist bullshit. You need to start getting your information from something other than X or Facebook pages run by racists or whatever bullshit artists are stringing you along.+++
So, when they did quantitative easing, was most of this money transferred digitally, or did they print it all out? Please note that I said nothing about Brussels.