Consciousness as Transcendental By Nature

[Eodnhoj7]

The nature of consciousness being an emergence and dissolution of distinctions, by which consciousness itself is it's own distinction that follows this same form and function, necessitates a paradoxical quality where consciousness is a process of transformation by which distinctions, thus being, occurs for consciousness is the distinction of itself through its relationship to other distinctions that in effect make consciousness simultaneously distinct for what it is by nature of what it observes. Consciousness is a cyclical recursive quality that creates isomorphic distinctions of itself by nature of distinctions occuring through further distinctions as a distinction where the rooting of said distinction is the reflection upon itself.

Consciousness is thus transcendental by nature given the process oriented nature of the emergence and dissolution of distinctions where the changes induced, by nature of further distinctions, necessitates consciousness as a centerpoint of transformation evidenced by its nature of paradox that is integral to the identity of consciousness itself given the quality of distinction by which consciousness occurs effectively is a form of simultaneous contraction and expansion of limits, and the connection and separation of phenomena simultaneously through these said limits for by the limits of distinction is a thing what it occurs as. The nature of consciousness being paradoxical is the nature of consciousness as transformative.

This nature of paradox necessitates consciousness as being transcendental by nature for the distinctions of it and through it necessitate a change beyond said distinctions that effectively leave consciousness as but a central process of change through change as change. Consciousness, as pivotal change, manifests through the recursion of repeated distinctions (by which identity of phenomena, including itself, occurs), the isomorphism of layered distinctions being the mirror of its foundation (by which new identities occur as variations of foundational qualities), and the nature of consciousness being a variable in that it is both one and many things as transitional (by which all identity is a transitional point of change and yet maintains a distinct identity), thus by this triadic nature is consciousness inherently transcendent in quality for the transformation of consciousness is the maintenance of it by it moving beyond itself.

By transformation consciousness is not only transcendent but is the process of transcendence for through transcendence is a phenomenon justified by occurrence of the phenomena by change, for distinction only occurs through change as one thing transitions to another thus forming a relationship across time where the distinction of phenomena allows identities that in turn can relate. Through change is a phenomena transitional, and by being transitional is there a transcendence by nature of moving beyond itself as change. Transcendence is pivoted upon distinction for by distinction does a phenomena become transient through other distinctions and translucent in the respect a distinction is illuminated by another distinction thus implying that consciousness has a holographic quality where the distinctions are symbolically or literally luminous as a means of allowing both the distinction and other distinction to be observed through it.

By distinction does awareness occur and by awareness a symbolic and literal form of light emerges as consciousness itself for relationships of occurrences, as well as the event of the occurrence itself, emerge for what they are and consciousness is made evident by said distinctions of what is observed, the distinction of consciousness itself, and most importantly the act of distinction that is inseparable from observation. In these respects transcendental consciousness is akin to a holographic state, using physical theories as an example, as well as the symbolic light by which distinctions are made, using eastern philosophical meditative symbolism or occult philosophical western symbolism, where a holographic state can be defined as the "distinctions that occur by nature of being luminous" or "symbolic and literal light being the pivotal act of distinction itself".

For consciousness to illuminate itself, by being aware of itself, results in a transcendental process by which the consciousness is merged within itself as its own context and in doing so becomes centered in such away that is it seen as underlying a vast variety of phenomena in one respect, through the observer making distinctions, while in a dual respect consciousness provides the very same context to itself by which it can transcend by transformative change in a perpetual recontextualization that is inherent to its own nature. In other terms, consciousness transcends distinctions by being the underlying distinction by which all distinctions occur, consciousness transcends distinction by being its own transformative contextualization of itself that allows it to change. By self-referential paradox is consciousness maintained, by transformative dialectical paradox does consciousness change, by occurence is consciousness seen as empty in itself and yet the foundational distinction by which other distinctions occur.

[Fairy]

Infinite consciousness, without beginning nor end is as close to the singularity as it gets.

This centreless centre has no movement. Just infinite stillness that IS everything. It’s like this reality is consciousness in motion. Movement immediately imposes the necessary limitations in order to sustain the experience.

Transcendental is an appearance of that which never transcends. Moves away from the singularity. From Here, self is no longer needy, and therefore, is absolutely selfless.