Who?What Is God?

[Age]

”So many posters came into this forum and never once considered to obtain and gain the 'actual proof', for their claims, before they went ahead and made 'their claims'.”


Response: No claim, no blame.
Proofs require a prover. A prover can neither be proven or unproven.

Once more 'we' have, here, an example of a poster making another claim, without ever even just considering to obtain the actual proof, for 'the claim', before 'the claim' is presented, here.

Is the bolded statement above a claim?

Of course it is.

you appear like "belinda" now, that is, not knowing how to recognize 'a claim' when one is being presented.

Was it your claim?

To be able to answer 'your' question, here, properly and Correctly, 'I' will first need to know who and/or what is the 'your' referring to, exactly?

Is the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct answer able to be provided, here?

[Age]

Who? What is God?

Who will answer?

God, and people. Both being invisible to human eyes.

What will answer?

God, and people, through visible human bodies.

So why ask if the answer is already known?

Do 'you' mean in relation to some specific question/s, or to absolutely every question?

If the former, then which one/s, exactly?

[Fairy]

Once more 'we' have, here, an example of a poster making another claim, without ever even just considering to obtain the actual proof, for 'the claim', before 'the claim' is presented, here.


Of course it is.

you appear like "belinda" now, that is, not knowing how to recognize 'a claim' when one is being presented.

Was it your claim?

To be able to answer 'your' question, here, properly and Correctly, 'I' will first need to know who and/or what is the 'your' referring to, exactly?

Is the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct answer able to be provided, here?

I’m referring to Age. Was the bolded claim claimed by Age.
Was the bolded claim your claim so to speak.

[Fairy]

God, and people, through visible human bodies.

So why ask if the answer is already known?

Do 'you' mean in relation to some specific question/s, or to absolutely every question?

If the former, then which one/s, exactly?

I mean in relation to the specific question ( who, or what is God? Question) Which was answered by Age….I’ve put in bold black.

[Age]

Was it your claim?

To be able to answer 'your' question, here, properly and Correctly, 'I' will first need to know who and/or what is the 'your' referring to, exactly?

Is the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct answer able to be provided, here?

I’m referring to Age. Was the bolded claim claimed by Age.
Was the bolded claim your claim so to speak.

Again, of course it is

[Age]

So why ask if the answer is already known?

Do 'you' mean in relation to some specific question/s, or to absolutely every question?

If the former, then which one/s, exactly?

I mean in relation to the specific question ( who, or what is God? Question) Which was answered by Age….I’ve put in bold black.

But what you put in 'bold black' is not the answer to the 'specific question' (who, or what is God? question).

The specific answer to that specific question I have provided elsewhere.

[Fairy]

To be able to answer 'your' question, here, properly and Correctly, 'I' will first need to know who and/or what is the 'your' referring to, exactly?

Is the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct answer able to be provided, here?

I’m referring to Age. Was the bolded claim claimed by Age.
Was the bolded claim your claim so to speak.

Again, of course it is

So you knew it was your claim that you yourself claimed, but then you proceeded to seek clarification to know who or what is the “ your” was referring to. So you knew but you also wasn’t sure you knew. Okay I guess that makes absolutely no sense by your standards of what makes sense or not.

[Fairy]

Do 'you' mean in relation to some specific question/s, or to absolutely every question?

If the former, then which one/s, exactly?

I mean in relation to the specific question ( who, or what is God? Question) Which was answered by Age….I’ve put in bold black.

But what you put in 'bold black' is not the answer to the 'specific question' (who, or what is God? question).

The specific answer to that specific question I have provided elsewhere.

Well at least you know you provided a specific answer to a specific question, and not absolutely every question.
Congrats

[Fairy]

Who? What is God?

Who will answer?

God, and people. Both being invisible to human eyes.

What will answer?

God, and people, through visible human bodies.

Age wrote: “So many posters came into this forum and never once considered to obtain and gain the 'actual proof', for their claims, before they went ahead and made 'their claims'.”

Age, please prove your claim that you have already clarified it being your claim.
Prove God and people are invisible to human eyes are the who that will answer.

Then prove God and people through visible human bodies are the what that will answer who or what is God.

[Walker]

William Blake was also a Romantic like Jesus was a Christian, and quite energetic.

“But does a human form display
To those who dwell in realms of day.” - William Blake

[Age]

Who? What is God?

Who will answer?

God, and people. Both being invisible to human eyes.

What will answer?

God, and people, through visible human bodies.

Age wrote: “So many posters came into this forum and never once considered to obtain and gain the 'actual proof', for their claims, before they went ahead and made 'their claims'.”

Age, please prove your claim that you have already clarified it being your claim.

The words under the label 'Age', here, are obviously 'my words', so when 'the words' are 'a claim' under the label 'Age', here, then they are 'my claims'. Now, to prove that 'a claim' is mine, and/or that if 'a claim' has been clarified as being 'my claim', then one only has to look at 'the words' under the label 'Age', here, in this forum, to find and see 'the proof' if 'my claim' has already been clarified, or not. So, in order to prove 'my claim' that I have already clarified that 'it' is 'my claim' I only have to direct you to 'the words' under the label 'Age', here.

Now, what is the actual reason you want this, most insignificant and trivial thing to me, proved?

Is there some thing in particular, here, that you are seeking out or looking for?

Prove God and people are invisible to human eyes are the who that will answer.

Well who else do you think or could you imagine would answer 'your questions', here?

Then prove God and people through visible human bodies are the what that will answer who or what is God.

But i have never ever said that God and people, through visible human bodies, are the 'what' that will answer who and what is God.

I have said that God and people, through visible human bodies, are the 'who' that will answer who and what is God.

How come you, have once more, thought the exact opposite of what I have said, written, and claimed, here?

[Age]

I’m referring to Age. Was the bolded claim claimed by Age.
Was the bolded claim your claim so to speak.

Again, of course it is

So you knew it was your claim that you yourself claimed, but then you proceeded to seek clarification to know who or what is the “ your” was referring to.

Only from 'your perspective'.

I was not seeking clarification in regards to 'my view nor perspective', obviously.

So you knew but you also wasn’t sure you knew.

What are you even on about, here, here?

I know 'the thoughts, views, and perspectives' within 'this body', but obviously without clarification i do not, yet, know 'the thoughts, views, and perspectives', within 'that body'.

Only after asking clarifying questions, to you, and you provide honest answers, do i then 'know'. Until then i am obviously 'unsure'.

How come you appear to not yet already be aware of this, to me, blatantly obvious knowledge?

Okay I guess that makes absolutely no sense by your standards of what makes sense or not.

And, I will respond to 'this' in 'the way' that it deserves.

[Age]

I mean in relation to the specific question ( who, or what is God? Question) Which was answered by Age….I’ve put in bold black.

But what you put in 'bold black' is not the answer to the 'specific question' (who, or what is God? question).

The specific answer to that specific question I have provided elsewhere.

Well at least you know you provided a specific answer to a specific question, and not absolutely every question.
Congrats

I know you like to deflect and detract quite often from what I point out and show, here, but I am now curious if you are just doing this same thing again, here, or if you really are still not yet aware of where and how you are lost and confused, here.

[Fairy]

Age, discussion with you is lost on me, I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say to me in your last 3 replies.

Call me lost and confused for all intents and purposes because quite frankly it’s a compliment.

I continue to not understand a single word you say to me. Discussing with you is likened to chewing my way through a packet of broken bits of glass flavoured crisps. It’s tedious. You’ll never change, so it’s hardly likely we’ll ever see eye to eye on anything philosophical. But then I could be wrong about that of course.

[Fairy]

In a nutshell Age, I personally don’t understand your chosen method of communication skills. The way you communicate with me is completely lost on me and is way beyond my usual personal comprehension skills to be honest. I’ve tried to get on a level with you, but it’s obvious that I’m failing to do that every time we speak. Anyways, I’ll endeavour to try to understand what you are talking about. I’ll persevere, but I’m not going to hold my breath that I’ll one day suddenly understand your communicating skills when conversing with me in particular.