The Foundation of Everything is Occurence

[Fairy]

Same difference.

[Atla]

_______


Sameness is maintained through change for by change the original thing is maintained through adaptation.

Using basic binary code for example.

There is 1. There is 0.

Each value is maintained through a recursive string, a cycle.

The recursive string is a new identity by isomorphism, a "different' thing of the same nature.

Recursion is a cycle.
Isomorphism is progressive change, linear.

Both coexist as a spiral.

What is maintained is the agreement between humans to use the abstract numbers of 0 and 1 and usually binary.

[Eodnhoj7]

Simplicity is relative. Self awareness is complex for an infant.

Agreement is the cycle of a share perspective.

[Atla]

And the alternation of Joe picking his nose and not picking his nose is also a cycle then. That's amazing, thanks.

[Eodnhoj7]

All patterns are cycles, for a pattern is repetition. Habits are cycles by this very same nature, and with habit comes identity...cycles within cycles as a cycle.

[Atla]

And then habits die.

[Fairy]

And then habits are born.

[Atla]

And then habits are born.

And then all humans die and no more habits are born. By and large the known history of this universe looks a lot more like a one-way-street than a cycle.

[Fairy]

And then habits are born.

And then all humans die and no more habits are born. By and large the known history of this universe looks a lot more like a one-way-street than a cycle.

Birth and death belong to the human mind, yes.

The illusory conception of I in this conception.

If there’s a universe outside the conception of it, then it’s got no mind to know this.

[Eodnhoj7]

Objectivity is shared subjective states for given the experiential nature of consciousness the nature of subjectivity cannot be avoided thus an objective truth which spans across subjective states is reducible to aligned subjective states. To claim objectivity is to observe a looping of subjective experiences, a recursion of subjective realities that does not necessarily transcend the individual but rather aligns one individual with another through a pattern within the experiential subjective state. In these respects objectivity is the rationalization of the subjective where align subjective states form a ratio.

Given the looping of subjectivity as objectivity, objectivity can be observed as a recursive form of awareness that results in a collective psychological architecture that in turn directs and transforms the subjective by instilling patterns within it further creating a cycle between the subjective and objective where the distinctions between one and another are but an inevitable isomorphism where either can be viewed as a starting point as both are by products of not only distinct experiences but the experience of distinction.

Now given objectivity is both a distinction and the observation of distinctions, with subjectivity following the same form and function, the distinctions of objective/subjective are a dualism of multiplicity and unity.

The objective is a set (unity) of individuals (multiples).
The subjective is an individual (unity) within a set (multiples).

In these respects the ancient and universal dualism of unity and multiplicity is distinct but simultaneously the individual and group each are relative expressions of this dualism. In these respects the nature of subjective and objective truth is an expression of a foundational means of distinction.

Group awareness is a recursive pattern of subjective states, subjective awareness is a recursive pattern of objective states, where symbolically speaking objectivity and subjectivity are akin to a yin and yang dynamic as they are isomorphisms of eachother. Regardless of how one assumes a beginning point by which to measure truth a process of recursion and isomorphism is inseperable from the process for it is the process. Consciousness, both subjective and objective, is purely recursive/isomorphic distinction processes.

In these respects objectivity and subjectivity are inherently nested variations of eachother where the nature of truth becomes the a reflection and projection of asserted patterns by which phenomena become distinct. To claim consciousness or knowledge is by nature an emergence of distinction by which said things are justified by nature of further distinctions.

Objectivity and subjectivity are progressive cycles of experiences in themselves and through eachother where the distinction of the subjective and objective are but strictly the reality of a distinction.

[Eodnhoj7]

1. There is occurence.
2. One occurence is relative to another.
3. These relative occurences are an occurence.
4. Occurence is empty in itself, it is a point of transition.

5. Occurence repeats, this is recursion
6. The recursion of occurences is an occurence as an isomorphism.
7. Occurence is simultaneously recursive and isomorphic thus is a variable as both one and many things.

8. Recursion/Isomorphism/Variability are occurences.
9. One law of RIV existence relative to another law of RIV.
10. This relationship of laws is an occurence.
11. The laws are empty in themselves and exist as points of transition to the other laws.

12. By occurence distinctions are.
13. By distinction consciousness occurs for consciousness exists through distinctions as a distinction.
14. Consciousness is an occurence thus subject to the Laws of occurence and the 3 Laws of recursion/isomorphism/variability.

15. To argue against these laws is to use these laws for laws are the occurence of distinctions by further distinctions.
16. Laws are consciousness for consciousness is inseperable from distinction for consciousness is the distinction of consciousness.
17. Knowing is the occurence of the distinction that there are distinctions.
18. Knowledge is form by nature of a progressive cycle, it is synonymous to an image by nature of it being form.

19. By form things occur, by occurence there is being.
20. Being in itself is nothing for there is no comparison for it to be distinct.
21. These laws, integral to consciousness as consciousness, are empty in themselves to be justified by the other, they are transitional in themselves and by said nature are paradoxical as they "are" and "are not" thus relegating conscious reality to a foundation of paradox.

------

The observer is a distinction that occurs by the observation of observation...just as a line between two 0d points (nothing) is the distinction of the line so to is the distinction of observation.

A void of void is emergence. To observe observation is the emergence of the observer.

To observe observing is to see nothing and yet the observation is a distinct loop arising from nothing thus the distinction of observation is the nature of consciousness as cyclical form.

Existence is spontaneous, for existence is the distinction of consciousness, as evidenced by the distinction of observation in the above meditation, and this spontaneity leaves existence founded on nothing for to observe observation leaves only the distinction of nothing thus relegating consciousness to a paradoxical distinction. By observing observing the distinction of observation as a cycle occurs with no definable limit but that of a cycle leaving infinity, in a sense, axiomatic. The mere appearance of infinity from nothing justifies this spontaneity for the infinite occurs with no foundations and yet if it's foundations are itself than a finitude by degree of cyclicality occurs and yet this cycle 'just appears'.

[Eodnhoj7]

+++++

The nature of consciousness being an emergence and dissolution of distinctions, by which consciousness itself is it's own distinction that follows this same form and function, necessitates a paradoxical quality where consciousness is a process of transformation by which distinctions, thus being, occurs for consciousness is the distinction of itself through its relationship to other distinctions that in effect make consciousness simultaneously distinct for what it is by nature of what it observes. Consciousness is a cyclical recursive quality that creates isomorphic distinctions of itself by nature of distinctions occuring through further distinctions as a distinction where the rooting of said distinction is the reflection upon itself.

Consciousness is thus transcendental by nature given the process oriented nature of the emergence and dissolution of distinctions where the changes induced, by nature of further distinctions, necessitates consciousness as a centerpoint of transformation evidenced by its nature of paradox that is integral to the identity of consciousness itself given the quality of distinction by which consciousness occurs effectively is a form of simultaneous contraction and expansion of limits, and the connection and separation of phenomena simultaneously through these said limits for by the limits of distinction is a thing what it occurs as. The nature of consciousness being paradoxical is the nature of consciousness as transformative.

This nature of paradox necessitates consciousness as being transcendental by nature for the distinctions of it and through it necessitate a change beyond said distinctions that effectively leave consciousness as but a central process of change through change as change. Consciousness, as pivotal change, manifests through the recursion of repeated distinctions (by which identity of phenomena, including itself, occurs), the isomorphism of layered distinctions being the mirror of its foundation (by which new identities occur as variations of foundational qualities), and the nature of consciousness being a variable in that it is both one and many things as transitional (by which all identity is a transitional point of change and yet maintains a distinct identity), thus by this triadic nature is consciousness inherently transcendent in quality for the transformation of consciousness is the maintenance of it by it moving beyond itself.

By transformation consciousness is not only transcendent but is the process of transcendence for through transcendence is a phenomenon justified by occurrence of the phenomena by change, for distinction only occurs through change as one thing transitions to another thus forming a relationship across time where the distinction of phenomena allows identities that in turn can relate. Through change is a phenomena transitional, and by being transitional is there a transcendence by nature of moving beyond itself as change. Transcendence is pivoted upon distinction for by distinction does a phenomena become transient through other distinctions and translucent in the respect a distinction is illuminated by another distinction thus implying that consciousness has a holographic quality where the distinctions are symbolically or literally luminous as a means of allowing both the distinction and other distinction to be observed through it.

By distinction does awareness occur and by awareness a symbolic and literal form of light emerges as consciousness itself for relationships of occurrences, as well as the event of the occurrence itself, emerge for what they are and consciousness is made evident by said distinctions of what is observed, the distinction of consciousness itself, and most importantly the act of distinction that is inseparable from observation. In these respects transcendental consciousness is akin to a holographic state, using physical theories as an example, as well as the symbolic light by which distinctions are made, using eastern philosophical meditative symbolism or occult philosophical western symbolism, where a holographic state can be defined as the "distinctions that occur by nature of being luminous" or "symbolic and literal light being the pivotal act of distinction itself".

For consciousness to illuminate itself, by being aware of itself, results in a transcendental process by which the consciousness is merged within itself as its own context and in doing so becomes centered in such away that is it seen as underlying a vast variety of phenomena in one respect, through the observer making distinctions, while in a dual respect consciousness provides the very same context to itself by which it can transcend by transformative change in a perpetual recontextualization that is inherent to its own nature. In other terms, consciousness transcends distinctions by being the underlying distinction by which all distinctions occur, consciousness transcends distinction by being its own transformative contextualization of itself that allows it to change. By self-referential paradox is consciousness maintained, by transformative dialectical paradox does consciousness change, by occurence is consciousness seen as empty in itself and yet the foundational distinction by which other distinctions occur.

_____

If there is an underlying principle, or principles, it or they would manifest through all things to such an extent that to grasp such a principle or principles would effectively be to use it/them in a self referential loop by which the only recourse left would be the observation of it/them. By principle is a thing known and yet in knowing the thing the act of knowing it is the principle that allows it to effectively be.

A universal principle(s) would effectively be so subtle that in effect it would be unusable for the act of use would be the principle itself thus leading to question if there is any use at all but rather the principle(s) naturally unfolding. There is an assumption that an ultimate truth would be pragmatic, a means to manifest what is wanted, unknowing that the principle of want would supersede such a percieved universal truth to an extent that pragmatism would not be the ultimate end as there would be foundations beyond it.

Truth, a universal one in these respects, lends itself less to a practical truth and more to an ingrained central awareness of how things are for the consciousness which percieves such an ultimate truth would effectively be composed of said truth. To grasp such truths would effectively be the act of grasping itself, metaphorically speaking.

In regards to ultimate truths, the Four Laws of Occurence and the 3 Laws of Process hold true to this nature given these truths may be seen as foundational as they are the means by which distinctions occur and with the means of distinction occur all further distinctions of knowledge follow suit.

1. The first law of occurence, "there is occurence" is an occurence. This first law follows itself.

2. The second law of occurence, "there is one occurence relative to another occurence" relates to the first law thus follows itself. This second law follows the first.

3. The third law of occurence, "these relative occurences are an occurence" is the the occurence of the first and second law, thus follows itself. This third law follows the first and the second.

4. The fourth law of occurence, "occurences are empty in themselves, they are points of transition to other occurences" is the occurence of he first, second and third law this follows itself. This fourth law follows the first, second and third.

To negate the laws of occurence would effectively be to use the laws for negation is an occurence, one form of negation exists relative to another, relative negation are a negation and all negation are empty in themselves without an antithesis, negation are but transitional truths.

To argue against these laws of occurence would effectively be to use them thus justifying them.

In regards to the 3 Laws of process:

1. Things occur by recursion, this law repeats itself when observing repeated qualities. To test this law would be to see it repeat by the confines of the test having repeatable qualities. To test recursion would be to use it. To negate the law of recursion would effectively be to repeatably negate, thus using it.

2. Things occur by isomorphism, this law exists when viewing repeated qualities resulting in a new appearance. To test this law would be to see a new appearance of the thing tested by the test itself. To test isomorphism would be to use it. To negate the law of isomorphism would effectively be to use a different appearance of it for what negates the law is an isomorphism of the principles of negation.

3. Thing occur as variable, this law exists when observing a quality being transitional and yet maintaining an identity. To test this law would be to see qualities within the test transition to what is being tested. To test variability would be to use it. To negate the law of variability would effectively be to use it for negation is a constant with many forms.


Using these two sets of laws, as evidenced, would be effectively to act through them thus relegating an ultimate truth as not something so much to be used but rather the act of use itself where truth is less of a tool but the unfolding of the tool. By knowing does reality unfolding and yet this unfolding is the act of awareness itself thus leaving truth to be less of a pragmatic experience and rather the transcendence of pragmatic experience by the act of experience. Dialogue of such truths is the emergence of them where a fixed set of laws exist and yet are unusable as they determine the nature of use. Philosophical problems are thus not limited by nature to what solutions are required to solve them but rather the act of awareness as to the nature of a thing. While ultimate truths may be definable, there subtley would limit practicality as not an ends but rather a distinction.

_________

The deepest God people know is the experience(s) which drive them to act or reflect for experience is the power over all consciousness. The deepest experience one can have is an awareness for by awareness do we know. And this knowledge? It is distinction for all things are by being distinct. Maybe in these respects God is unknowable, but if one makes the distinction of God being unknowable than there is a distinction of God "being unknowable" thus relegating God as not fully beyond grasp for "the unknowable" is a distinction by nature of the limits of knowing.


But to experience...

Can we really fully grasp our experiences? No, and yet their power cannot be doubted without relegating the doubt to the deepest experience of what we know, what we are. Thus what we know is paradox within paradox and from this reality becomes less of a thing in the traditional static sense and more of a process as the thing. If God truly "is" than God is process of transformation, an ineffable reality that makes sense only in accords to appearance and yet of depths so subtle little if anything can be grasped for to simply define God as "He who is" would be to look into and observe "isness" and by "isness" process or transformation becomes evident. Conceptions of God would thus be equivalent to a tool, a raft, by which to transform or traverse reality and upon the transformation or completion of travel effectively be put away or left behind for if knowledge is simply attributed to distinctions, and a distinction "just is", than even knowledge itself becomes a process within the experience of "God".

Given reality is governed by change does God evidence as everpresent through reality where distinctions become images relative to eachother.

[Eodnhoj7]

++++++

Language and thought occur both by symbols. Symbols, by nature have meaning. Meaning is the attention on a phenomena that is in turn directed beyond itself by the phenomena. Symbols are means of transitioning consciousness by directing it and by direction a recontextualization of consciousness, the act of paying attention, occurs. This direction of consciousness is the transformation of it as the limits of the symbol are the distinctions by which consciousness occurs, thus when a symbol transitions consciousness to another symbol a transformation of consciousness begins for the attention on the symbol is the contextualizing of consciousness by giving it form. By paying attention to a symbol the consciousness gains definition within the inherent energy of attention thus the symbol is a metaphorical vehicle or house that contains the psyche. The symbol is a dimension of reality whose composing relations are determined by the attentive energy invested within it thus the fusion of consciousness with a symbol is the act of awareness by which distinction occurs where consciousness is the act of distinction itself by means of its self-reflective, self-referencing and self aware nature that justifies it as its own distinction.

*


*
****
*****

There is one axiom for this system:

"A is..." or in synonymous terms "A leads to..." or "A->..." This nature of "is" or "leads to" or "directed to" is a relationship by means of A being directed to a distinction where this direction towards a distinction is its own axiom as a distinction. There is only one axiom in this system, the axiom is evident as an an axiom by nature of it occuring, with occurence being the foundation of the axiom. This directive oriented nature of "A" follows a 3 fold nature within it:

"A leads to A" is recursion of A.
"A leads to B" is isomorphism of A.
"A" is a variable, it is both recursive and isomorphic with both one and many identities simultaneously superpositioned.

This 3 fold nature enables a single axiom to exist, "A is..."/"A leads to..."/ "A->...." with no other axiom necessary to justify it as the variations of this axiom are the justification of it through isomorphized self-referentiality. There is 1 axiom as 3 processes.

The term "holographic" references the nature of the axiom being but a distinction, an appearance or form, by which another distinction occurs with the relationships of said distinctions being a distinction. "Holographic Logic" can be a term used for this logic of distinction, distinction being that by which being occurs.

Proof is defined as "distinct sequence", for example "A leads to B" observes "B as proof of A for A exists because of B." Proof in this system is not only the degree of self reference in a new variation of the axiom but is the justification of the axiom by means of a further axiom where proof is the isomorphism of the axiom as a new axiom that justifies the foundational axiom.



1. A leads to A as A,B.
2. A leads to B.
3. B leads to B as B,D and simultaneously back to A,C
4. A leads to C,D
5. C and D follows the structure of step 3.

6. A leads to B to C to D as A1.

7. A1 leads to A1 as A1,B1.
8. A1 leads to B1.
9. B1 leads to B1 as B1,D1 and simultaneously to A1 as C1
10. A1 leads to C1,D1.
11.. C1 and D1 follows the structure of step 9.

11. A1 leads to B1 leads to C1 to D1 as A2.

12. A1 leads A1 as A1,A2
13. A1 leads to A2.
14. A2 leads A2 as A2,A4 and back to A1 as A3.
15. A1 leads to A3,A4
16. A3 and A4 follows the structure of step 14.

17. A1 leads to A2 leads to A3 to A4 as Aa1.

18. Process continues and yet 'A leads to A' is always present. As the process continues B becomes ever-present, so on with C, etc. With new chains A1 becomes ever-present, same with B1 and C1, etc. With the progression of a self maintained loop new self maintained loops become present thus absolute contexts multiply as the sequence continues.

19. A leads to A1.
20. A leads to B2.
21. A leads to C3
22. A leads to Aa1.
23. B,C, etc follow same logical form as well B2, C3, Aa1, Ab3, etc.

24. Progression from a starting point results in non-linear conclusion in one respect while maintaining linear conclusions in another. A leading to B is linear. A leading to C3 is not linear. Both conclusions are correct within given context. Simultaneously all points contain self referencing A, within other layers B2, in other layers Ab3, etc. Self referencing systems maintain themselves yet lead to further self referencing systems. Absolute contexts multiply and connect simultaneously through linear and non-linear means.

25. It is perfectly logical to have a point, such as A1, lead to simultaneous different values, such as B1 and Aa1, while connecting to values that exist in different logical contexts such as B1 connecting to Ac3.


1a. A leads to A as B
1b. B is composed of A and yet is not A in appearance.
1c. A leads to B if B is -A for B is not A in appearance
1d. A leads to -A because of B
1e. -A leads to -A as -B.
1f. -B is composed of -A and yet -B is not -A in appearance.
1g. -A leads to -B if -B is --A (A)
1h. -A leads to A because of -B.

1I. A leads to A and -A simultaneously, -A leads to -A and A simultaneously. A and -A are superpositioned, both values occur until observer observes one of them, yet regardless of relative starting point, A or -A, A or -A is a result.

1j. A leading to A contains -A, -A leading to -A contains A. Logical systems are contexts which contain simultaneous other contexts. A logical sequence is a loop within a loop, thus necessitating a recursion through self referencing sequences and isomorphism by containing layered context built upon a relative starting point.

1k. All logic sequences contain within them another logical sequence thus each logical sequence is empty in itself and gains distinction through the logical sequence of what it is not (A to A leads to the chain of -A) while the loops in the logical chain expand into loops that define the prior loop by what it is not (The loop of A to A is defined by B).

1aa. One logical sequence results in antithetical logical sequence, antithetical logical sequence is relatively thetical if picked as starting point with former thetical being the new antithetical. Each logical sequence contains a superimposed dimension for the antithetical and thetical overlap as a relative presence fits within a relative absence.

2aa. Given simultaneously layered thetical and antithetical chains of reasoning all assertions have multiple values, one chain of reasoning has another existing simultaneously as a layered context.

3aa. Layered contexts are logical chains, one logical sequence connects to another while each being distinct chains. The contexts contain themselves through the others, a set of all set contains itself through other sets as the set underlies all the sets that justify it. Each logical sequence is effectively a set of other logical sequences, by underlying other logical sequences the sequence contains itself through the other logical sequences, under these terms the foundation of "A leads to A" is the sequence of sequences that contains itself through variations of itself.

4aa. Superpositioned logical sequences, within a multidimensional framework, are isomorphisms of eachother. The sequence "A leads to A as B thus -A" contains the isomorphic sequence of "-A leads to -A as -B thus A" given the sequence of A and the relative sequence of -A both contain eachother where A and -A are effectively the isomorphisms. Dually "A leads to A as B" observes B as an isomorphism of A. Thus there are sequential dimensions that exist as isomorphisms in the sequence (A leads to B) and there are sequential dimensions that exist as isomorphism overlaying the sequence (A leads to B overplayed with -A leads to -B). There are different dimensions of superpositioning.

5aa. Each sequence is superpositioned sequences, thus when observing a sequence there is an observation if multiple sequences, dimensions, at once thus recursive sequences and there corresponding isomorphisms do not only observe the superpositioning of the natures of recursion and isomorphism but also the superpositioning of sequences where there is a recursion of superpositioned states and isomorphism of superpositioned states, the idenity ofna sequence is the localization of a set of superpositioned stated from surrounding sequences. To observe one sequence is to observe many and to observe many is to observe one. Superpositioning, while generally a term used in physics can be used synonymously to the philosophical concept of synthesis.

+++++
6aa. Cycles in one sequence mirror a cycle in another sequence thus resulting in the sequences cycling between eachother as a new sequence. Where a sequence of "B leading to C" occurs in one sequence an isomorphic variation of "B1 leads to C1" in another sequence. While each sequence is distinct by isomorphism there is a cycling between each sequence due to foundational elements. The sequence cycling can go further where "B leading to C", "B1 leading to C1" and "B2 leading to C2" not only cycle between eachother, due to foundational qualities, but necessitates that all as isomorphic requires that the process of isomorphism occurs recursively where continual variation in appearance is a form of gradation and this gradation is a perpetual process.

7aa. Perpetual isomorphism necessitates a variation in appearance where this variation is the single axiom of "A is..." composing the variation itself. Where a sequence of "A is B" observes the variation of A as B, this new meta-sequence of B is but a superpostioning of A upon itself as a new sequence where A is progressively gradiated thus necessitating it standing apart from itself as a new sequence. "A is..." is distinct from itself simultaneously through its isomorphism as B. While being distinct from itself this nature of it being distinct from itself share the nature of "A is..." being the foundational distinction thus necessitating that individual distinction is a process that repeats where B being an isomorphism of A not only observes be as structurally the same as A, thus A, but also being distinct by appearance with A and B both sharing the same nature of being individually distinct. Unity and multiplicity are thus superposition in each sequence, "A is..." is an axiom the is superpositioned as both one and many where the individual distinction of an isomorphism of B from A necessitates that B still shares the same quality of being individually distinct as A is individually distinct thus effectively is A creating another dimension of self-referentiality.

8aa. "A is" fundamentally is its own difference and by differing itself in appearance, from itself, these differences are composed of "A is" itself where the difference of "A" from "A" can only be "A" thus the distinction of "A" is its own distinction of seperation. Where "B is C" can be observed as "(A,A) is (A,A,A)", where C is an isomorphism of B, A creates a new distinction of itself that results in the differing of appearances between B and C thus A creates its own distinct appearance within each respective sequence thus the variation of appearance between B and C is effectively still A with A being the simultaneous foundation of B and C.

9aa. Where "A" is the distinct difference in appearance of each isomorphism, "A" being the distinct difference repeats across the differences thus resulting in all differences in appearances fundamentally being the same distinction of "A". The repeated differences in appearances are effectively the same distinction of "A". In these respects "A" being the repeated difference within isomorphisms results in the recursion of A being the new appearances of things thus necessitating that different appearances are rooted in a cyclicality.
+++++
10aa. Given each sequence results in an isomorphic sequence, where each distinct variable is a meta sequence of recursive A, the sequence of:

aaa. "A leads to B leads to C...." isomorphically resulting in sequence "A1"

aab. which leads to the sequence "A1 leads to B1 leads to C1..." further isomorphically resulting in sequence A2

aac. leading to "A2 leads B2 leads to C2..."

aad. where A1 and A2 resulting in another isomorphic sequence of "A1 leads to A2 leads to A3...)

11aa. "A is" the sequence of all sequences that contains itself by underlying all sequences, that are variations of it, while being the sequential variation of itself through infinite isomorphism thus resulting in perpetual proofs as progressive contexts thus leading to the single axiom of "A" having infinite variations that still essentially as just "A".

This necessitates that the single axiom "A" is effectively providing the context of itself through various layers of recursively occuring isomorphisms, thus A is perpetually proven through the isomorphic contexts which not only maintain its identity, as A is everpresent within each sequence and meta-sequence, but effectively allows it to be empty in itself and yet justified by its own self contextualization thus the axiom "A is" is proven as self evident not only through proof maintaining it within a context but effectively allowing "A is" isomorphize as infinite other sequences.

12aa. "A" as infinite appearances necessitates each infinite sequence still effectively being finite "A", as "A" underlies the infinite sequence and yet is still finite, thus resulting in "A" as a process in one respect but also a superpositioned finite sequence on an infinite sequence where "A" is superpositioned on itself as both finite and infinite. "A" is superpositioned on itself thus resulting in an isomorphic meta sequence of B effectively influencing a relatively distant isomorphic meta-sequence of Ab4 and vice versa. Cause and effect chains are not limited to a linear perspective thus necessitating in a matrix of sequences an observation of one random sequence effectively leading another sequence which appears completely apart from it.

13aa. In a matrix of sequences there are recursive patterns that occur in layers as the sequences occur as a whole.

Sequences "A2 leads to B2 leads to C2" and "A3 leads to B3 leads to C3" observe not only "A leads to B leads to C" superimposed on both but the recursion of "A leads to B leads to C" through both while simultaneously showing an isomorphism of "A2 and A3", "B2 and B3" and "C2 and C3". Thus as sequences increase there are still basic sequences that arise at higher levels, thus with the increase in complexity comes new simple sequences.

Each layer is a new sequential pattern thus resulting in each layer fundamentally being a sequence itself where the sequences are what allow the layers to occur. Regardless of the layer the foundation axiom of "A is" still occurs while the 3 fold nature of A as recursive, isomorphic and superpositional remains active.

****
14aa. Isomorphism is polarization where one sequence exists and the variation of it is the change in appearance where the new sequence becomes distinct from the other by polarizing, this polarization is a movement away from the prior sequence thus an unfolding of the prior sequence into its variation. Thus unfolding of sequences into polarized versions results in a self-cycling, recursion, akin to how a tesseract appears in 3 dimension space, a perpetual process of a cube unfolding into itself through a new cube that as one point is within itself and at another is outside itself thus relegating a similar nature of sequences expanding and contracting through sequences.

15aa. An infinite matrix of infinite superimposed sequences would effectively appear as void, what could be called a "void matrix", for there would be infinite sequences within and without it, effectively leaving non distinction, thus relegating a perceivable point within the matrix as effectively resulting in a distinct sequence, as a localized sequence, that would contain the same 3 fold axiom of "A is..." regardless of the sequence observed thus the "void matrix", infinite superimposed sequences, is effectively the potentiality of any sequence as all sequences at once. The void matrix is the potentiality by which the foundational distinction of "A is..." occurs and as such is the means of change as recursion, isomorphism and superpositioning effectively making it the distinction of the axiom "A is..." while effectively being everpresent as the recursion, isomorphism and superpositioning by which "A is...". The "void matrix" underlies all recursion, isomorphism and superpositioning in all sequences and yet when observed on its own terms there is effectively nothing or 0.

16aa. The void matrix can only be observed distinctly through the process of recursion, isomorphism and/superpositioning by a sequence, for the actualizing of the sequence is the unfolding of distinction by said recursion, isomorphism and superposition that allow the sequence to be distinct through change that allows said distinction for without change no contrast occurs that allows said distinction. The 3 fold nature of the single axiom "A is..." is the void matrix observed distinctly as potential by which this 3 fold nature of process is by the distinction of "A is". In these respects change, through potentiality, is a 3 fold nature where this quantitative oddness of the triadic is an expression of a "standing apart", that allows said distinction for within even quantities a balance occurs thus nullifies the necessary assymetry for said distinction. Quantitatively assymetry is odd as projection and symmetry is even as balance thus quantity is an integral component to how sequences appear.

17aa. Given the trifold nature of "A is" and this trifold nature mirroring itself through sequences of A it can be said:

1aaa. Distinction is the recursion of potentiality.
2aaa. Distinction is the isomorphism of potentiality.
3aaa. Distinction is the superpostioning of potentiality.

Thus the void matrix being the means of recursion, isomorphism and superpositioning, it occurs recursively, isomorphically and superpositionally as the void matrix underlies all sequences thus follows their same nature when sequences occur recursively, isomorphically and as superpositional for "A is" having a trifold nature necessitates it as one with the void matrix where to observe the axiom "A is" is to simultaneously observe the void matrix by "A is" axioms trifold nature.


+++++

The standard number line observes this logic:

1. 1 leads to 1 as 2
2. 1 leads to 2.
3. 2 leads to 2 as 4, and simultaneously back to 1 as 3.
4. 1 leads to 4.
5. 3 and 4 follows the structure of step 3.

6. 1 leads to 1 as 2.
7. 2 is composed of 1 and yet is not 1 (-1) in appearance.
8. 1 leads to 2 if 2 is not 1 (-1) for 2 is not 1 (-1) in appearance.
9. 1 leads to -1 because of 2 (the difference of 2 and 1 is 1 where this difference is the absence of 1 (-1).
10. -1 leads to -1 as -2.
11. -2 is composed of -1 and yet -2 is not -1 in appearance.
12. -1 leads to -2 is -2 is not negative 1 (--1)
13. -1 leads to 1 because of -2.

The number sequence follows the presented Holographic Logic model thus standard numbers are akin to recursive isomophizing distinctions or holographs. All numbers are sequences in themselves, thus a number line is superimposed sequences.

++++

The fourfold nature of basic arithmetic follows holographic logic:


1. Addition is superimposed recursive isomorphic number sequences (superimposed being overlayed sequences as a new sequence):

2+3=5 as (1,1)+(1,1,1)=(1,1,1,1,1)

1a. Recursion of 1:
(1,1)
(1,1,1)
(1,1,1,1,1)

1b. Isomorphisms of 1:

(1,1)=2
(1,1,1)=3
(1,1,1,1,1)=5

1c. Superpositioned:

The sequences of 2 and 3 occur simultaneously and overlay as a new sequence of 5.

2. Multiplication is the addition of addition.

*****
3. All sequences contain simultaneous addition and multiplcation:

3a. Addition:
"A,1 leads to A,1 as B,2" or (1 and 1 as 2).
"A,1 leads to B,2 as C,3" or (1 and 2 as 3).

3b. Multiplication:
"A,1 leads to A,1 as A,1" or (1 repeating 1 as 1)
"B,2 leads to C,3 as F,6 or (2 repeating 3 as 6).

3c. Addition and multiplication simultaneously:
"B,2 leads to C,3 as E,5 and F,6"


4. Subtraction is superpositioning of thetical and antithetical number states where each number is respective recursive sequence of 1 or -1 and the sequence is a relative isomorphism of 1 and -1.

5. Division is the subtraction of subtraction where how many times a number can be subtracted from another.

6. All antithetical sequences, or sequences which contain antithetical elements contain simultaneous subtraction and division with subtraction/division occuring simultaneously like addition and multiplication occur simultaneously.

6a. Subtraction follows similar nature to point 3a.

6b. Division follows same nature of subtraction but rather sequences contain fractals within fractals where a sequence can be observed as "B,2 leads to -C,-3 as B,2/C,3" where B/C and 2/3 is the ratio of how C fits into B and the ration of how 3(1,1,1) fits into 2(1,1) where A and 1 forms it's own ratio within itself. The formation A and and 1 as ratios within itself necessitates by recursion and isomorphism A and 1 provide their own self-referential context by their recursive, isomorphic and superpositional nature. A context contains itself by manifesting contexts through which it exists where in itself it is empty.

----------
Given holographic logic is propositioned in variables, and supports arithmetic, it also provides foundations for algebra.

------
Basic geometric forms follow this nature where complex forms are superimposed basic forms, all physical phenomena can be reduced to forms and all forms can be reduced to superpositioned basic geometric forms.

1. A square is recursive: a line repeating.

2. A square is isomorphic: the form being grounded in a line as lines.

3. A square is superposition lines: mulitple lines layered within space existing simultaneously, multiple dimensions of the line existing at once, overlayed within the context of space.

*****

Dually for a symmetrical form such as a square:

1. Lines repeat recursively.

2. The direction of recursion, horizontal, isomorphizes into the opposite, vertical in this case.

3. The isomorphized recursion superimposes as the square.

4. 3 dimensional, or further, forms are an expression of further isomorphizing dimensions: 2 dimensionality isomorphizes into third dimension of depth, etc. which reflects the basic sequence of "B leads to C" or "2 leads to 3".

5. Assymetric forms can occur through isomorphism, variation in appearance, and by superpositioning, layered symmetrical forms as an assymetric form, there maintainance across change is recursion for recursion is the maintenance of a form within time.

In these respects forms are but processes with there superimposition upon other forms/isomorphism into other forms/recursion of forms, as further forms, is the means by which a specific form becomes distinct. The form itself, as superimposed forms, is potential further forms thus a form is a means by which further forms occur and as such is not only a localized expression of the void matrix but effectively contains the void matrix given the intrinsic emptiness of forms are potential further forms. Forms are the context of further forms.

Form is function as evidenced by the axiom "A is..." thus every geometric form effectively is a sequence.

****

However the fundamental nature of forms is relegated to a simple point, be it a 0d spatial entity, point particle/excitation of energy or intuitive axiomatic point with an argument or sequence of reasoning where the overlaying of this points result in multiple forms, be it a simple geometric or physical entity or an abstract one such as argument or story:

1. A point is recursive, the division of a point is its multiplication thus repetition.

2. A point is isomorphic, form being grounded in the point as points.

3. A form is superpositioned points, multiple points layered simultaneously, multiple dimensions of the point existing at once, overlayed within the context of the space there relationship creates.

****
The nature of paradox occurs if A and -A are superpositioned and yet this paradox is grounded in isomorphism for A and -A are isomorphisms of eachother, relative to one being a starting point to the other, thus observing that paradoxes have an isomorphic nature where opposites are reduced to appearance. The synthesis of opposites are the self-referencing of core attributes in the new sequence with a recursive appearance of new meta-sequences the relative prior sequences lacked that the other contained

Given paradox is an observation of simultaneous opposites co-existing, specifically differences coexisting, there is inherent superpositionality as the paradox itself and given the holographic nature of distinctions paradox is necessitated by the multidimensionality of sequences, thus holographic logic is grounded in paradox necessitating that paradox is foundationally necessary.

Void, or zero, is the qualityless quantity that is the potential for change, where void as absence or quantitative 0, for change only occurs if there is a means to occur and the means is the space of potentiality where a thing is unactualized thus leaving space for the actual, the distinct. In these respects void/0 is the nature of recursion, isomorphism and change that allows distinctions to occur through said processes as these means of change, the nature of change within A, are inherently void for by void does change occur.

A 0d point, a symbol for qualitative void or quantitative 0, underlies all distinctions as it is the potential from which distinction occurs. Geometric forms, composed of 0d points, reflect this as well as the number line expanding from 0, essentially containing it, while each point on the line is conducive to the potentiality by which the distinction of number comes, thus void/0 is the everpresent potential by which distinctions arise. All logical sequences contain void/0 by nature of the 3 fold nature of change (recursion/isomorphism/superposition) for by change do the distinctions as the sequences occur and this change is inherent in the sequence, this 3 fold nature of the single axiom of "A-->" is the void by which:

1. Recursion occurs as the means of being a cycle for through recursion the repetition observes cyclic gaps for all loops are empty, as empty they contain the potential for further self-referencing sequences.

2. Isomorphism occurs as the means of progressive change where the appearance of differences is void induced change by nature of distinction of sequences, void allowing appearance of differences
.
3. Superposition occurs as the means of overlayed dimensions where different sequences are connected by void as the overlaying of sequences is a void of space between them.

****
*****
Given void, or 0, is the means of change by which the processes of recursion, isomorphism and superpositioning occur, the distinction of "A is" necessitates the inherent 3 fold process of distinction as 3 points of transformation where void inherently is the manifestation of a triadic unity as transformation through the means of processeral actualization by nature of being everpresent potential that allows continuous change as continuous distinction for all distinction requires potentiality as the grounds of actualizing distinction. This triadic nature of change is akin to the synthesis of dualisms, recursion (cyclicality by repetition) and isomorphism (linear progression) as superpositioning (expanding or contracting cycles by multidimenionality).

****

The nature of sequence is thus superpositioned by void for void is how change occurs. The formalization of such a sequence is better defined when such a nature is interwoven within the symbolism.

Where a standard sequence may be observed as:

(A->A)->(A,B)

It may be more accurately described when void is introduced symbolically as the potentional by which A is distinct, by nature of direction, under the symbol "(○)" and the fundamental axiom of "A is" or "A leads to" as "(A○)" where "( )" is the sequence and "○" is "is" or "direction as actualization".

1. (A○A)○(A,B)
2. (A○B)
3. (B○B)○(A,B,C,D)
4. A○(C,D)
5. ...

1. (1○1)○(1,2)
2. (1○2)
3. (2○2)○(1,2,3,4)
4. 1○(3,4)
5. ....

+++++
Now there is an interesting point in the sequences that was not addressed when these specific sequences are observed:

(A○-A) and (1○-1)

(1○-1) as subtraction, addition of a negative, leads to nothing it is a sequential expression of the void matrix for the void matrix is the complete superposition of all sequences where all sequences are infinite.

(1○-1)○-1 as multiplication of a positive and negative leads to -1.

(1○-1)○1 as division, how many times 1 can be subtracted, ie -1, leads to 1.

Now given 0 does not exist as a number within the system, for it is already inherent within the single axiom "1○", the sequence of (1○-1), relative to subtraction, exists as solely as (1○-1) for 0 is inherent within the nature of 1 and -1 thus (1○-1) is akin to saying "paradox is" thus the sequence (1○-1) is the sequential expression of "superpositioning" as a process, for paradox is superpositioning. Where recursion can be observed as (1○1) and isomorphism as (1○2) then (1○-1) is an expression of superpositioning thus necessitating the full expression of the sequence of (1○-1)○(1,-1) where (1○-1) is already within (1○-1)○(1,-1) and need not be expressed any further for the superpositioning of (1○-1) is effectively formalizing (1,-1) as what necessarily leads to them as distinct sequences.

In terms of using the axiom "A○" the corresponding notation would be (A○-A)○(A,-A) which is effectively saying that a superpositioned state leads to the necessary distinctions that are overlayed so that the superpositionality is to be.


***
Superpositioning can be viewed as a form of potentiality where distinct sequences are observed within a multidimensional sequence containing many. Just as the void matrix is infinite superpositioning that observes the potential of any sequence being actualized, so is a finite superpositoned set of sequences, where the nature of superpositioning is the potential of a given sequence to be made distinct from many. The nature of void being the foundation of superpositioning given multiple sequences are effectively "fused", similar to how two metals of the exact same components can cold fuse in the vacuum of space, due to void, nothing, being between them. Superpositioning is the void matrix at a sequential scale, a localized scale.

****
In other regards:

Recursion is but an expression of potentiality for distinctions occur through symmetry grounded upon repetition thus observing a form of cyclicality for a thing occurs by nature of distinction and a distinction which does not contain repetition ceases to have form for identity requires a sense of limits, a sense of boundaries, that exist through repetition. By repetition is potentiality contained within a cycle, evidenced by the void within forms (geometric forms or physical particles), where the contained void is but the potential of further sequences to emerge from within the cycle of the sequence...much like a tesseract in 3d space.

Isomorphism is also an expression of potentiality for by assymetric occurence does variation occur by means of adaptation to a space of change, where a void occurs form fills it by nature of change induced variation, thus assymetry is but isomorphism by means of adaptation of foundational structures through changing appearance for appearance is but form and form is how phenomena occur.

Potentiality is thus trifold, as the means of change, for potentialities trifold nature is one of assymetry where what is even is balanced and not open to change for the pattern, or sequence in this case, is maintained. Yet the dualism of recursive symmetry and isomorphic assymetry are but two sides of the same coin by degree of superpositioning.

****
The void matrix is but infinite self-referencing distinctions thus is effectively one by degree of this universal self reference and in these respects is an isomorphism of "A○" or "A is..." with the recursion of "A○" effectively being the process through which this infinite isomorphism and superpositioning is maintained.


****
All distinctions, and grammar is a distinction by means of symbolism, are justified through isomorphisms that evidence the foundations as but recursive sequences superimposed upon recursive sequences. A proof is merely an isomorphism of the assertion made thus meta-logical systems, such as Holographic Logic, are by nature a process of mapping what and how interpretation works, with interpretation being the process of distinction by nature of cognition.

*****

To negate or falsity such a system as Holographic Logic, premised on distinctions, is to negate the negation of the argument by use of the distinction of the negation. In other terms to negate a system of distinctions is to use distinctions and effectively justify the system. A negation, or rather absence, is akin to the limits of a phenomenon for what is phenomena is not results effectively in the limits of what it is. By anti-thetical truths are thetical truths given definition by what they are not and what they are not is the limit of what is thus resulting in the definition of what is and by definition comes distinction and by distinction "being".

****
To scientifically test the system of Holographic Logic would require its very use thus resulting in itself proof.

Recursion occurs through the process of testing by repetition of the testing process as well as the repetition of the limits within the test as the context of the test itself.

Isomorphism occurs through the process of the testing as what is tested is but an isomorphism, a variation of appearance, of the test.

Superpositioning occurs through the test where the test and what is tested are effectively layered upon eachother.

***
Occurence by nature is holographic for what exists is an occurence. Occurence follows four laws:

1. There is an occurence.
2. There is an occurence relative to another occurence.
3. This relationship of occurences is an occurence.
4. The occurence is empty in itself, as transitional it is a paradox.

These 4 Laws are holographic, one expression of this nature is:

Law 1. A○
Law 2. A○B
Law 3. (A○B)○C
Law 4. (A○B)○(B○-A)

+++Arithmetic is embodied within basic geometric processes by nature of holograghy.

1. The addition of forms creates a new form by nature of isomorphism and super positioning where the addition of one form over another creates a isomorphism of said formsas a new form, relative to previous states, while the new superpostioning of said forms results in a new form thus necessitating a relative isomorphism through the manifestation of superpositioning.

2. The multiplication of said forms occurs by said addition within addition of said forms, not only producing an new form that effectively multiplies forms within a given time line, but effectively expressing a recursion of not only the act of addition, but the recursion of a form is its multiplication of it within a given space of time.

-Addition and multiplication is the synthesis of relative positives or negatives, this synthesis is superpositioning that leads to a relative isomorphism or recursion.

3. The substraction of one form from another is the formation of a variation, an isomorphism by negation, while the super positioning of said positive and negative form is the means of a new form that appears.

4. The division of one form by another, by nature of how many times a form can be substracted, ie recursive subtraction as the act of division, not only produces a new isomorphic form but effectively reveals the base form within the form thus necessitating a recursion by means of negation where the original form effectively is the super positioning of the revealed negative states.

-Subtraction and division is the synthesis of relative positives or negatives, this synthesis is superpositioning that leads to a relative isomorphism or recursion.


Through a form holographically occuring with another form as another form, not only are the forms potential means to further forms as they occur by process through the void matrix, but space is effectively folded for the form to occur thus necessitating the process of forms is the process of folding space.

To visualize this one effectively has to observe a simple line segment, a basis of form.

1. A single 0d point is pure space as the potential by which form actualizes. A single 0d point is the void matrix, indistinct, yet infinite potentiality for actualizing form.

2. A single 0d point holographs to another 0d point. The 0d points are now distinct as they are a set by which contrast of points occurs. This contrast is the line segment as the linear space between them.

2a. The manifestation of a second point is addition of points for one point is added to another thus forming a line segment.

2b. The manifestation of a second point is the subtraction of point for the unity of one point becomes absent, subtracted by multiplicity, thus forming a line segment.

2c. The manifestation of a second point is the multiplication of the point for the one point becomes many, thus forming a line segment.

2d. The manifestation of a second point is the division of the point for one point becomes many, thus forming a line segment.

3. In these respects basic arithmetic is not only embedded within space but evidences through the point that:

3a. Addition and subtraction are isomorphisms of eachother.

3b. Multiplication and division are isomorphisms of eachother.

3c. Addition and subtraction recursively form multiplication and division respectively.

4. The basic arithmetic functions are superimposed in space, as space, when one point turns to many.

5. The function of arithmetic, evidenced by this "point metaphysics" is grounded in the void matrix.

.......

The nature of a form through holography is effectively the folding of space for the distinction of the form, and the space within and without a form, is but space between space as space. A form folding upon itself is but a ratio of itself as evidenced by a line segment folding upon itself.

1. If a line segment is folded in 1/2 upon itself a new line segment occurs as 1/2 the original with the new line segment being superpositioned upon itself as 2 line segments in one. A line segment folded in 1/3 results in 3 lines in 1 as 1/3 the original. 1/4 result in 4 as 1 as 1/4 the original. So on an so forth.

2. If a line segment is folded outwards it does so by degree of the ratio of the point within the line from which it expands. If a line folds out completely from starting to end it doubles, if a line folds out from start to 1/3 in it adds a third to the size, from a 1/4 it adds 1/4 to the size, etc. unto a number infinitely approach 1.

3. The folding of the line segment is the division of it, 1/X, and simultaneous multiplication of it, X, where the multiplicity of lines are superimposed as 1 with this superposition of the line upon itself effectively being recursion and the variations being isomorphisms of the original. The folding line segment is but the line added to itself, in one respect, and subtract from itself by negation of the original size, in another respect. Linear folding is all basic arithmetic operations and is an expression of holography.

4. 1 manifests its own fractal nature by degree of the point of folding, change, through the 0d point, the void matrix. The line segment occurs through a folding process. Through holographic change the line segment becomes a process of change by degree of potential expanding and contract form.

5. With the change in form, in this case the line, comes a change in finite space for finite space is the distance between points that allows said line to be. Changing forms are expanding or contracting space, expanding or contracting potentiality by which further forms occur for a form is defined by its spatial dimensions and this space is the potential for further forms to occur. Change is effectively expanding and contracting potentiality, a holographic of potentiality, by degree of the finite space which becomes evident.

6. Expansion and contraction is holographic.

6a. Recursive by degree of the expansion or contraction of said form being a form occuring across the space of time as repeating through each relative point in time compared to another.

6b. Isomorphic by degree of expansion and contraction of said form being a relative variation of the original when comparing points in time.

6c. Superpostional by degree of expansion and contraction of said form as a time line is multiple forms existing simultaneously as one given the length of time is a continuous space holding many forms as one space.

7. A infinitely folded space, a line segment in these regards as argued above, is effectively the one line segment approaching zero, thus with change in form comes an approach of the form to pure potentiality where the line segment is always a non zero fractal but the change is a movement towards 0 while always a fractal of the original this necessitating process and change necessitating a movement towards 0 or the void matrix where the folding of the space, the line segment again in these regards, is effectively the self-reflection of it by degree of holography that maintains it across perpetual change.

8. The infinite fractal process of a perpetually folding line is an everpresent void matrix across all spectrum as each distinct change, relative to another change, is always an embedded movement towards 0 contained within the distinction as the change, by moving to zero a directed line segment folds upon itself or outwards thus necessitating change in space occurs as form occurs where space is its own holograph of potentiality. Space is holographic potentiality where the actualization of a distinction is the distinction of potentiality by means of actuality occuring from it, ie potentiality, which not only observes an embedded contrast between 1 and 0, distinction and the void matrix, by this contrast is superpositioned through said void matrix for actuality and void are effectively overlaid upon eachother.



.....

Given form is effectively spatial holography the nature of form in holographic potentialities by degree of form being a manifestation of the 0d point, with the 0d point being the potentiality of form. Form is the recursion, isomorphism and superpositioning of the void matrix by degree of the expression "A○". The folding of space is the degree by which change occurs that allows for distinction to be a process that self-contextualizes space through space thus effectively form is a paradox that is deemed rational when viewed as superpositioned upon itself.

+++++

Potentiality is the superposition of thetical and antithetical distinctions where the distinction of the emergence of one distinction over the other is an expression of an observer effect where percieved distinctions are projections of patterns within the observer thus creating a holographic relationship between the observer and observed potentiality.

Thetical and antithetical space is but spatial isomorphization where the negation, antithesis, results in a recursive negation of negation, or anthesis of the antithesis, as the thesis. The isomorphization of space is but spatial recursion where the distinction of space folds upon itself as repeated distinction thus necessitating space being paradoxical but this paradox is nullified in respect of superpositioning. A thetical and antithetical space is not only recursive space but effectively a relation of actual form and potential form, thus giving a reflection of time where potential form is the means by which the actual occurs.

The folding of space is the creation of space thus relegating actual space being change rooted in actualized potentiality as the limits which occur by degree of change. To make a point distinct by another point(s) is to create space by the relationship of points for a single point is akin to a void matrix of potential distinct spaces, thus the recursion of potentiality is the isomorphism of potentiality as actuality. Space is thus the means of change, by degree of potentiality, which contradicts itself by degree of actualizing further space through limits which relatively expand or contract it within a relative set of finite spatial folds. This contradiction is the distinction of space within space as space and yet is justified as all spaces are superposition as but space this the only observable nature of space is the process of it, the change of it.


Xxxxxxxx

Actuality is but the folding of potentiality, as the distinction of actuality being change as the process of folding, for when potentiality is folded a distinction occurs for the potential becomes actual by degree of change of that folding, thus potentiality becomes a ratio of itself where the relation of the actual and potential are but ratios that manifest distinction by contrast to eachother for there is potentiality and the potentiality of the potentiality being that of the actual. Potentiality is the absence of actuality thus is akin to negative space, relative to the positive, and as an absence is thus a distinction itself by the distinction of absence. The void matrix is thus present as a relative finite absence, or "-A○", that is but a relative distinction of contrast from "A○" for "-A○" is the relative finite potential that leads to "A○" and as finite potential is expressed as the distinction "-A○" for it is limited potential of change compared to the infinite potential of the void matrix. Absolute potentiality is the void matrix, relative potentiality is "-A○" where the negation of "-A○" as "-A○" is the negation of relative potentiality as actuality or in other terms the negation of negation is the actual, or the potentiality of potentiality is distinction. This folding by negation of negation, or "- -A○" is the act of recursion by which a distinction occurs thus necessitating potentiality is expressed by distinction where this distinction of being leads to the distinction of potentiality as but an absence of actuality and yet is actual by the actualized distinction of absence. Folding is but recursion in one respect, isomorphic in another and superpositioned in another as seen in the following example of a line folded in 1/2:

1. The line folded in half results in two lines thus there is recursion.

2. The line folded in half results in half a line thus there is a variation of the line as isomorphic.

3. The line folded in half is the line superpositioned upon itself.


.....

Holography's extension into forms directly links to the nature of consciousness for forms are the means by which consciousness manifests, as forms are distinctions. At the cognitive level these forms become symbols through which the psyche operates with imbued meaning upon said forms. Thus the mathematical nature of geometric forms reflects a mathematical nature within the act of conceptualizing symbols where meaning takes on a nature of distinction evidenced through said forms.

Psychological processes take on a a holographic nature where distinctions in geometry and the distinction of a symbol are effectively a distinction from eachother imbuded by whether a distinct meaning is applied, meaning being the energy of attention by which the observer and/or observed are transformed.

The psyche, in an empty state through the practice of meditation, is akin to a relative void matrix by which concepts occur not only as distinct, but through the 3 fold process of holography that reflect the basic arithmetic and geometric nature prescribed above with the distinction being of whether attention, by nature of application of meaning, is applied as a means through which the observer and observed are relatively transformed.

+++++

Given the triadic nature of the void matrix through "A○" there are dualistic subsets within it as each state is but a relative isomorphism of the other.

1. Recursion and isomorphism are but dualisms which occur as superpositioning by grades. Recursion is repetition and isomorphism is variation, the manifestation of isomorphic recursive sequences are but the various sequences superpostioned upon itself by sharing an underlying foundation that connects them leaving the isomorphic natures as but a new expression of said sequence as isomorphic sequences are superpositioned upon eachother creating a new sequence, a gradation of the originals by degree of a superpositioned state.

2. Recursion and superpositioning are but dualisms which occur as isomorphism by grades. Recursion is repetition and superpositioning is but the overlaying of dimensions, the manifestation of recursive superpositioned states are but various sequences that occur isomorphically as a new sequence for the recursive superpositioning is but a new sequence that leads to a further isomorphic variation of itself, a gradation of the originals by degree of variation.

3. Isomorphism and superposition are but dualisms which occur as recursion by grades. Isomorphism is variation and superpositioning is but the overlaying of dimensions, the manifestation of isomorphic superpositioned states are but various sequences that share an underlying Recursion as a relatively new sequence for the isomorphic superpositioning is but a new sequence that that leads to a recursion if itself, a gradation of the originals by degree of repetition.

4. Recursion, isomorphism and superpostioning all are states that exist through eachother, by degree of distinction as "A○", as processes that are interwoven by the degree of distinction that allows them to be. This triadic nature of "A○" is fundamentally a triadic potentiality by which "A○" exists for the void matrix from which "A is" is the potentiality of "A○" by which "A is". "A○" is three states in one as but quadratic for 3 in 1 observes the overlayed distinctions of 3 and 1. Given "A○" manifests this triadic nature it is but an expression of grades of itself through said nature for "A○" is the single axiom it provides its own context for with this three fold nature resulting in relative natures of "A○" interacting with itself thus creating an inherent dualism within it and grades of dualisms from said dualism. "A○" occurs in grades, by synthesis of each of the respect 3 dualistic natures within it, where each grade is but "A○" itself as both one and many. By degrees of "A○" does "A○" occur and the everpresents of "A○" across all of its degree leaves only an absence of degree.


++++

Morality, the process of experiential being, is holographic by nature for the values by which direct experiential reality are but:

1. Recursive by degree of habit which moderates behavior and with behavior being the directing of experience.

2. Isomorphic by degree of underlying values expressed across various experiences as the underlying core by which different behaviors occur.

3. Superpositonal by degree of values and behavior being overlayed as the experience itself.

Morality effectively is the means by which the value of existence manifests across a variety of experiences, that are within and of existence, as a repeating occurence that appears differently according to context and yet this variation of appearance being overlayed with the constant of what is valued.

By attention to internal and external experience, superimposed mere isomorphisms of eachother as the recursively occuring observer, does reality transform and reveal itself as a process centered upon the act of attention being the void state of observation by which the possibilities of reality unfold in infinite variation by nature of the distinctions by which they occur. Morality is fundamentally grounded upon the act of attention and attention begins with the void state of the observer that gives rise to the distinctions of both the observer and the observed itself as an integral cycle.