If an identity is an identity because it is not another identity, an identity is an absence of other identities and the absence of absence is the identity itself thus sets the foundations of identity as self-contradiction. Under these terms identity is pure absence thus leading to a paradoxical nature.
Deeper within this paradigm absence, and the corresponding absence of absence, becomes a recursive distinction that manifests an isomorphic nature of variation by layered foundation where absence becomes a process that is nested distinctions as itself. Absence exists relative to existence, and yet existence is an absence of absence thus relegating reality to a non dualistic distinction that is ever present and contains within itself it's own dualism as absence and absence of absense.
The dualism of absence and absence of absence results in a third element where this dualism is absent and a fourth element where there is an absence of that absence as a further dualism unto infinite gradation of absence by nature of its own paradox for with each dualism of absence/absence of absence comes a further dualism following in both form and function as the first, thus maintaining the original dualism by cyclicality, while linearly progressing to infinite grades of dualism.
By absence being total as an absence of absence, where absence is both maintained cyclicality with a dual nature of linear progression, paradox becomes a fundamental rational means of formalism.
This nature of pure absence results in numerical sequencing simultaneously:
1. Absence
2. Absence of absence.
3. Absence of absence of absence.
4. Absence of absence of absence of absence.
5. .....
Thus by a fundamental qualitative distinction quantity simultaneously appears.
However within this numerical sequence is a dualism/binary code as each additional absence results in either absence of absence of absence in both form and meaning, thus with progressive variation by gradation a dualism is maintained thus resulting in a nested paradox within paradox and within this paradox are recursive cycles of the distinction of absence.
While absence effective is not a thing, obviously an absence that relegates it in one respect to "nothing", the distinction of the absence itself by nature of not simultaneously makes it a thing thus within absence is both absolute nothing, as perpetual absence is absolute, and relative nothing, as this perpetual absence becomes its own self occuring context by which identity becomes.
The nature of absence goes deeper as it follows the four laws:
1. There is absence.
2. Absence is relative to another absence.
3. The relationship of absences results in absence.
4. Absence is transitional by nature of being potential non absence with non absence being an absence as the absence of absence.
Given the four laws of occurence, or rather the four laws of absence, formalism of quantity and quality as a process of distinction manifestation appears. Absence becomes of underlying property of formal quantity and quality.
Absence in these regards is everpresent thus is an absolute, dually it forms it's own context thus manifests simultaneously as relative with each context of nested absences being absolute within the given context of further absences. This nature of absence exists as simultaneous absolute and relative assertions.
Absence relative to absence makes absence absolute while still being relative as it becomes its own context by nature of being self nesting distinctions thus absolute distinctions and relative distinctions are simultaneous.
The nature of one absence of absence and a progressive absence of absence of absence of absence results in a similar form any function to a positive of positives where a higher positive results in an absence of subsequent properties of the prior positive thus resulting in absence (positive in this case being absence of absence and furthermore the absence of absence of absence of absence being a gradient positive absent of specific qualities relative to the previous positive).
Dually nature of absence and absence of absence of absence results in a relative positive as absence of absence by nature of differences in grades of absence allowing for certain positive stages to exist between relative different absences.
Under standard terms where absence of absence results in a positive and a positive of a positive results an absence, absence corresponds to absence in term usage and absence of absence corresponds to positive in term usage.
The recursion of absence results in the isomorphism of absence as the absence of absence thus equivocating "being" with "nothing" in standard terminology.
?????
1. By absence there is a relative no thingness, a lack of specific presence.
2. This absence of presence is the distinction by which a presence occurs for absence is both a distinction and contrast necessitating the distinction of something else.
3. Pure absence is a paradox for a pure absence would require an absence of absence. This absence of absence is a presence and with absence being the grounds for this present, absence is the means by which presence occurs. A pure absence would be absence of absence and this absence of absence would manifest further absences relative to further presences.
4. The distinction of absence necessitates a distinction as empty by nature for absence and absence of absence are the fundamental nature of distinction.
5. The presence of one thing is the absence of another, and the absence of one thing is the presence of another. All absences are relative presences, all presences are relative absences. This necessitates absence and presence as contexts, as conditions and this conditional or contextual nature is a distinction thus absence and presence are distinctions.
6. Absence and presence as contexts necessitates context as paradoxical given it is both: absence is presence by nature of being an absence of absence thus to contextualize is to form distinctions by limit of the context itself thus context is a means of containing asserted distinctions through an asserted distinction as the context being the limits which contains the distinctions it justifies. Context is justification by means of definition application leaving distinctions interwoven processes.
7. A distinction is merely appearance by nature of being limits and from limits comes form. Essence is a distinction by nature of it being a distinct quality.
8. Substance is a distinction where one substance distinct from another results in an absence/presence (absence of absence) dichotomy, substance is reduced purely to a distinction, the fundamental distinction is absence by nature of recursion and isomorphism.
9. Recursion is absence as repetition requires a space between presences, a relative absence, and the space between presences is a relative presence, by nature of being a space, thus the repeating presences between these spaces are relative absences of said spaces.
10. Isomorphism is absence by nature of variations of foundations, recursive absence being the fundamental distinct foundation of a thing, being a new self similar presence that necessitates an absence of complexity, compared to the variations, in the foundations which formed the variations.
11. Absence is a variable as it is the defining context of many different things as many different things and yet is always fixed as absence.
12. A pure monism is absence of dualism, a pure dualism is absence of monism, monism and dualism are thus absences. Monism and dualism are distinctions, no more and no less.
13. The nature of the recursive isomorphic variable of absence implies that this fundamental distinction is infinite by nature and within the unlimited possibilities that occur by said infinity a simultaneous limit always occurs within these possibilities thus results further necessitating an everpresent order by nature of this said nature of this distinction.