bahman wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 3:15 pm
Patterns can be divided into 6 categories, namely logic, rules, concepts, analogies, images, and connections. You are familiar with the pattern of logic so I give you an example rule: All students who work hard and are smart enough get good marks.
So, when we are illogical, we aren't thinking?
No.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 8:15 pm
An image is not a pattern. A series of images might be a pattern. I can see an image I've never seen before.
Do you forget how were instructive images when you were taught geometry?
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 8:15 pm
Why does everyone have to use reductionism?
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Wed Mar 29, 2023 6:53 am
Thinking certainly includes recognizing patterns. But it is a lot of other things also. The OP is asserting something. It didnt do this but it might 'give and example'. Perhaps when reading it we remember something unrelated and think about that. A later argument may use 'deduction'.
Patterns can be divided into 6 categories, namely logic, rules, concepts, analogies, images, and connections. You are familiar with the pattern of logic so I give you an example rule: All students who work hard and are smart enough get good marks.
But it is ONLY those people who COPY and FOLLOW "others" 'teachings' who get so-called 'good marks'.
SEE, and OBVIOUSLY, A 'student' could so-called 'work hard' and be VERY so-called 'smart' but NOT get so-called 'good marks' BECAUSE 'it' provides answers, which may well be FAR MORE True, Right, and/or Correct but which are NOT the answers being 'sought after'.
So, I suggest that if one would like to provide an example of a 'pattern of ACTUAL logic', then they provide an ACTUAL 'good' or 'working' example of 'logic', itself.
A good example of logic: Socrates is a man, all men are mortal, therefore Socrates is mortal.
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 3:15 pm
Patterns can be divided into 6 categories, namely logic, rules, concepts, analogies, images, and connections. You are familiar with the pattern of logic so I give you an example rule: All students who work hard and are smart enough get good marks.
But it is ONLY those people who COPY and FOLLOW "others" 'teachings' who get so-called 'good marks'.
SEE, and OBVIOUSLY, A 'student' could so-called 'work hard' and be VERY so-called 'smart' but NOT get so-called 'good marks' BECAUSE 'it' provides answers, which may well be FAR MORE True, Right, and/or Correct but which are NOT the answers being 'sought after'.
So, I suggest that if one would like to provide an example of a 'pattern of ACTUAL logic', then they provide an ACTUAL 'good' or 'working' example of 'logic', itself.
A good example of logic: Socrates is a man, all men are mortal, therefore Socrates is mortal.
Although that example is STILL NOT sound, 'it' IS SOMEWHAT BETTER an example than your previous one here.
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 8:00 am
AXXXAXAAAXAAAAAAXXAXAX
Is there a pattern?
What's funny is that you engaged in pattern recognition to make this post. You recognized the pattern that in contexts about pattern recognition, sequences of letters are used to test pattern recognition.
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 8:00 am
AXXXAXAAAXAAAAAAXXAXAX
Is there a pattern?
What's funny is that you engaged in pattern recognition to make this post. You recognized the pattern that in contexts about pattern recognition, sequences of letters are used to test pattern recognition.
Bravo for the meta pattern.
And binary representation is the first with pattern capability. Showing a minimal choice pattern.
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 9:58 pm
We experience all sorts of things from our birth to death. There are however patterns in what we experience. Thinking is a process which through it we recognize patterns in our experiences.
Any arrangement repeated is a pattern. What does the pattern mean to some consciousness, that would be both perceptions, the sensations, and the understanding, which provides the meaning. The meaning tells the organism how it relates to its survival and well-being or its insignificance.
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 9:58 pm
We experience all sorts of things from our birth to death. There are however patterns in what we experience. Thinking is a process which through it we recognize patterns in our experiences.
Any arrangement repeated is a pattern. What does the pattern mean to some consciousness, that would be both perceptions, the sensations, and the understanding, which provides the meaning. The meaning tells the organism how it relates to its survival and well-being or its insignificance.
"Organism" is a concept derived from patterns. The application of meaning is the awareness of what one thing leads to, the inherent transformation of a thing, meaning is not limited to organisms.
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 9:58 pm
We experience all sorts of things from our birth to death. There are however patterns in what we experience. Thinking is a process which through it we recognize patterns in our experiences.
Any arrangement repeated is a pattern. What does the pattern mean to some consciousness, that would be both perceptions, the sensations, and the understanding, which provides the meaning. The meaning tells the organism how it relates to its survival and well-being or its insignificance.
"Organism" is a concept derived from patterns. The application of meaning is the awareness of what one thing leads to, the inherent transformation of a thing, meaning is not limited to organisms.
Biology is the measure and the meaning of all things. Life, organism, and consciousness are the only sources of meaning in the world. You need to grasp that if nothing else.
Any arrangement repeated is a pattern. What does the pattern mean to some consciousness, that would be both perceptions, the sensations, and the understanding, which provides the meaning. The meaning tells the organism how it relates to its survival and well-being or its insignificance.
"Organism" is a concept derived from patterns. The application of meaning is the awareness of what one thing leads to, the inherent transformation of a thing, meaning is not limited to organisms.
Biology is the measure and the meaning of all things. Life, organism, and consciousness are the only sources of meaning in the world. You need to grasp that if nothing else.
Biology is a distinction, it is an occurence. Consciousness is inseperable from distinction for consciousness occurs through distinction as a distinction of itself. Biology is one of many distinctions but all existence is consciousness by nature of it being distinctions.
"Organism" is a concept derived from patterns. The application of meaning is the awareness of what one thing leads to, the inherent transformation of a thing, meaning is not limited to organisms.
Biology is the measure and the meaning of all things. Life, organism, and consciousness are the only sources of meaning in the world. You need to grasp that if nothing else.
Biology is a distinction, it is an occurence. Consciousness is inseperable from distinction for consciousness occurs through distinction as a distinction of itself. Biology is one of many distinctions but all existence is consciousness by nature of it being distinctions.
The terminology is rather crazy, but is what you are saying the same thing as what I have already said? The world of objects/patterns is the fuel of consciousness, and without consciousness, they cease to be. You live in your own subjective world; the truth of the statement is of necessity.
Biology is the measure and the meaning of all things. Life, organism, and consciousness are the only sources of meaning in the world. You need to grasp that if nothing else.
Biology is a distinction, it is an occurence. Consciousness is inseperable from distinction for consciousness occurs through distinction as a distinction of itself. Biology is one of many distinctions but all existence is consciousness by nature of it being distinctions.
The terminology is rather crazy, but is what you are saying the same thing as what I have already said? The world of objects/patterns is the fuel of consciousness, and without consciousness, they cease to be. You live in your own subjective world; the truth of the statement is of necessity.
That is your subjective state by degree of you claiming subjectivity as the pivotal means of truth.
Consciousness ceases without distinction, consciousness is a distinction made by consciousness thus relegating consciousness to purely the process of distinction.
Biology is a distinction, it is an occurence. Consciousness is inseperable from distinction for consciousness occurs through distinction as a distinction of itself. Biology is one of many distinctions but all existence is consciousness by nature of it being distinctions.
The terminology is rather crazy, but is what you are saying the same thing as what I have already said? The world of objects/patterns is the fuel of consciousness, and without consciousness, they cease to be. You live in your own subjective world; the truth of the statement is of necessity.
That is your subjective state by degree of you claiming subjectivity as the pivotal means of truth.
Consciousness ceases without distinction, consciousness is a distinction made by consciousness thus relegating consciousness to purely the process of distinction.
Does that mean the subjective perception of the physical world?
The terminology is rather crazy, but is what you are saying the same thing as what I have already said? The world of objects/patterns is the fuel of consciousness, and without consciousness, they cease to be. You live in your own subjective world; the truth of the statement is of necessity.
That is your subjective state by degree of you claiming subjectivity as the pivotal means of truth.
Consciousness ceases without distinction, consciousness is a distinction made by consciousness thus relegating consciousness to purely the process of distinction.
Does that mean the subjective perception of the physical world?
The physical is a median point of subjective states that leads to objectivity as share subjective states.
All of these things are but distinctions thus necessitating distinction being the means between the subjective states, these being distinctions, as an objective state, a distinction.
