Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun Jul 06, 2025 11:43 am
Give me some that was used in '64. Do you understand that? Can you comply with that basic evidentiary requirement? Don't answer with any more questions. Don't claim and troll. @amihart would be able to answer, stoop to conquer. Reach up.
Used for WHAT? You on drugs?
Goodbye Troll.
Why is someone as braindead as you even here? Go talk to Walker.
Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun Jul 06, 2025 1:00 pm
You're just trapped in grandiose trollery, troll grandiosity. Give evidence and reason.
Evidence for WHAT? Let's see if you can name it. The recombination afterglow idea gained popularity because the CMB was found and they assumed that these two are the same, but the CMB IS the evidence here.
If you post anywhere in a manner that isn't that of a grandiose troll, either substantiating your empty claims with evidence, or, as that is impossible, actually recanting and apologizing, I'm sure somebody will flag that and I'll run to embrace you like the father of the prodigal.
Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun Jul 06, 2025 2:44 pm
If you post anywhere in a manner that isn't that of a grandiose troll, either substantiating your empty claims with evidence, or, as that is impossible, actually recanting and apologizing, I'm sure somebody will flag that and I'll run to embrace you like the father of the prodigal.
But anyone can see that you're the grandiose troll here, in dire need of parental guidance.
Go talk to Walker.