Why God cannot be seen.

[Age]

Can a label ever occupy the nameless one?

Have you ever considered and/or pondered over the claim that there is not 'a thing' in the whole Universe, which is 'nameless'?

Therefore this is, nor could even be, a so-called 'nameless one'.

And, if 'you' were Truly 'awake', then 'you' would have already seen and recognized 'the label' for what 'you' call 'the nameless one'.

Although 'that label' is a misnomer, it still exists.

Gobbledygook is a noisy appearance, an illusory auditory light and sound show for no one.

Labels are an illusory secondary reality upon the real silent unknowable.

Again, 'little old you', still, wants to claim that there exists 'an unknowable'. And, once again, for the very slow of learning, just because some thing is, still, 'unknown', to you, in the days when 'you' are/were around, never ever means that 'it' is 'unknowable'.

'This one' just loves to keep on claiming things, here, which are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. As 'I' have, just once again, proved irrefutably so.

Ok, if you say so, as you word it, then so be it, for you there, but not for me here.

But, it does not make sense for there to be a so-called 'unknowable'. Sure, for 'you', in the 'current' moment, there may well be a myriad of things that are 'not yet known', to you, but that certainly does not mean that 'those things' are 'unknowable'.

For 'you', so-called 'there', to claim that there is 'an unknowable' besides being just plain old absurd and ridiculous it is also, obviously, completely and utterly False, and Wrong, as well.

you obviously do not know what 'the future', so please stop talking as 'you', there, knows absolutely every thing, here, forever more.

So as much as you love to seeketh here and seeketh there, frantically looking for fault or error in every fairy-tale you can possibly find, please know, that you are wasting your time and energy communicating with me, and that your futile responses are not in the slightest bit interesting or have any significant benefit or value for me here.

Obviously one like you would say some thing like this. If what one believes is true, but which is shown to be False, then 'that one' would not find the actual Truth the slightest bit interesting. people like you only what to 'see' and 'hear' what they believe, or hope, will align with their 'current' beliefs.

Also, I am certainly not 'looking for' fault, nor error, in what you people say and write, here, but some of what is said and written is so blatantly False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect. And, I usually only show and highlight the Falsehoods when they are written as though they are absolutely true.

When, and if, one just presents a view as though it 'might be true', then I rarely saying any thing about 'that'. However, when you people speak and write, here, as though you know, when you clearly do not, then I just like to reply.

I’m awake, I’m in alignment with truth,

Even you have acknowledged that you are, really, only aligned with 'your own truth', and with ' your own version of 'the truth' ', only.

and it’s not pretty, and I also believe that 95% the world is not ready to hear the ugly un-sugar-coated truth.

Which is, exactly, why you do not like to hear the actual and irrefutable Truth, which goes against your own personal only truth', when I point 'It' out for you, and others, here.

And that’s one of the reasons why you keep on analysing and dissecting my fairy-tales to death with zero success.

What do you mean by 'zero success'?

Every time I have pointed out and shown where, why, how, when, and what is False in 'your claims', which there have been many upon many times, then this is 'success'. Well to me and others anyway. But may be not 'success' to, nor for, you, obviously.

Some other reasons maybe because you’re a foolish idiot.

And 'this claim' is based upon 'what', exactly?

[Fairy]

Have you ever considered and/or pondered over the claim that there is not 'a thing' in the whole Universe, which is 'nameless'?

Therefore this is, nor could even be, a so-called 'nameless one'.

And, if 'you' were Truly 'awake', then 'you' would have already seen and recognized 'the label' for what 'you' call 'the nameless one'.

Although 'that label' is a misnomer, it still exists.


Again, 'little old you', still, wants to claim that there exists 'an unknowable'. And, once again, for the very slow of learning, just because some thing is, still, 'unknown', to you, in the days when 'you' are/were around, never ever means that 'it' is 'unknowable'.

'This one' just loves to keep on claiming things, here, which are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. As 'I' have, just once again, proved irrefutably so.

Ok, if you say so, as you word it, then so be it, for you there, but not for me here.

But, it does not make sense for there to be a so-called 'unknowable'. Sure, for 'you', in the 'current' moment, there may well be a myriad of things that are 'not yet known', to you, but that certainly does not mean that 'those things' are 'unknowable'.

For 'you', so-called 'there', to claim that there is 'an unknowable' besides being just plain old absurd and ridiculous it is also, obviously, completely and utterly False, and Wrong, as well.

you obviously do not know what 'the future', so please stop talking as 'you', there, knows absolutely every thing, here, forever more.

So as much as you love to seeketh here and seeketh there, frantically looking for fault or error in every fairy-tale you can possibly find, please know, that you are wasting your time and energy communicating with me, and that your futile responses are not in the slightest bit interesting or have any significant benefit or value for me here.

Obviously one like you would say some thing like this. If what one believes is true, but which is shown to be False, then 'that one' would not find the actual Truth the slightest bit interesting. people like you only what to 'see' and 'hear' what they believe, or hope, will align with their 'current' beliefs.

Also, I am certainly not 'looking for' fault, nor error, in what you people say and write, here, but some of what is said and written is so blatantly False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect. And, I usually only show and highlight the Falsehoods when they are written as though they are absolutely true.

When, and if, one just presents a view as though it 'might be true', then I rarely saying any thing about 'that'. However, when you people speak and write, here, as though you know, when you clearly do not, then I just like to reply.

I’m awake, I’m in alignment with truth,

Even you have acknowledged that you are, really, only aligned with 'your own truth', and with ' your own version of 'the truth' ', only.

and it’s not pretty, and I also believe that 95% the world is not ready to hear the ugly un-sugar-coated truth.

Which is, exactly, why you do not like to hear the actual and irrefutable Truth, which goes against your own personal only truth', when I point 'It' out for you, and others, here.

And that’s one of the reasons why you keep on analysing and dissecting my fairy-tales to death with zero success.

What do you mean by 'zero success'?

Every time I have pointed out and shown where, why, how, when, and what is False in 'your claims', which there have been many upon many times, then this is 'success'. Well to me and others anyway. But may be not 'success' to, nor for, you, obviously.

Some other reasons maybe because you’re a foolish idiot.

And 'this claim' is based upon 'what', exactly?

I know the truth. I share my truth here. No one is obligated to like it, or agree with it. Take it or leave it, I don’t care.

Your responses are just BLAH to me, so take your blah and go pin it on your bedroom blah board, hopefully there’s still enough room on there, else you might want to consider buying a new blah board. Maybe a bigger one.

[Age]

Ok, if you say so, as you word it, then so be it, for you there, but not for me here.

But, it does not make sense for there to be a so-called 'unknowable'. Sure, for 'you', in the 'current' moment, there may well be a myriad of things that are 'not yet known', to you, but that certainly does not mean that 'those things' are 'unknowable'.

For 'you', so-called 'there', to claim that there is 'an unknowable' besides being just plain old absurd and ridiculous it is also, obviously, completely and utterly False, and Wrong, as well.

you obviously do not know what 'the future', so please stop talking as 'you', there, knows absolutely every thing, here, forever more.

So as much as you love to seeketh here and seeketh there, frantically looking for fault or error in every fairy-tale you can possibly find, please know, that you are wasting your time and energy communicating with me, and that your futile responses are not in the slightest bit interesting or have any significant benefit or value for me here.

Obviously one like you would say some thing like this. If what one believes is true, but which is shown to be False, then 'that one' would not find the actual Truth the slightest bit interesting. people like you only what to 'see' and 'hear' what they believe, or hope, will align with their 'current' beliefs.

Also, I am certainly not 'looking for' fault, nor error, in what you people say and write, here, but some of what is said and written is so blatantly False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect. And, I usually only show and highlight the Falsehoods when they are written as though they are absolutely true.

When, and if, one just presents a view as though it 'might be true', then I rarely saying any thing about 'that'. However, when you people speak and write, here, as though you know, when you clearly do not, then I just like to reply.

I’m awake, I’m in alignment with truth,

Even you have acknowledged that you are, really, only aligned with 'your own truth', and with ' your own version of 'the truth' ', only.

and it’s not pretty, and I also believe that 95% the world is not ready to hear the ugly un-sugar-coated truth.

Which is, exactly, why you do not like to hear the actual and irrefutable Truth, which goes against your own personal only truth', when I point 'It' out for you, and others, here.

And that’s one of the reasons why you keep on analysing and dissecting my fairy-tales to death with zero success.

What do you mean by 'zero success'?

Every time I have pointed out and shown where, why, how, when, and what is False in 'your claims', which there have been many upon many times, then this is 'success'. Well to me and others anyway. But may be not 'success' to, nor for, you, obviously.

Some other reasons maybe because you’re a foolish idiot.

And 'this claim' is based upon 'what', exactly?

I know the truth.

But, just believing or thinking that you know the truth never means that you actually do.

Prove to the readers, here, that 'the truth', which you claim 'to know', is the actual Truth, which no one could refute.

I have already proved some of your 'truth claims' to not be true at all.

I share my truth here. No one is obligated to like it, or agree with it. Take it or leave it, I don’t care.

For some one who claims to 'not care' you seem to spend quite some time sharing your concerns and complaints, here.

Now, obviously you are absolutely free to share what you call 'your truths', which is all perfectly fine, and acceptable. What is Truly unacceptable is 'trying to' claim that 'your truth' is the irrefutable Truth, when 'your truth' is clearly not.

And, do you think or believe that if, and when, some one does not agree with 'your truth', then they are not allowed to point out nor show how and why 'your truth' is not, actually, 'the Truth', at all?

Your responses are just BLAH to me, so take your blah and go pin it on your bedroom blah board, hopefully there’s still enough room on there, else you might want to consider buying a new blah board. Maybe a bigger one.

you seem to keep forgetting that you are making your claims in a 'public philosophy forum'.

And, just like my responses, to you, are so-called 'blah', to you, so to are your False claims, here, not worth reading and listening to as well.

The only difference is what you call 'blah' is because you are a very closed individual, and what I call 'not worth reading and listening to' is because I am open to seeing where and why 'your claim' is False, and/or wrong

Have you ever considered checking to see if you could back up and support, irrefutably, 'the claim' you want to make known, publicly, before you even consider actually doing it?

If you did, then doing so might help you, here, somewhat.

For example, let 'us' 'look at' the claim you just made in your response, here, 'I know the truth'.

Now, if 'this' is actually irrefutably True, then,

1. Inform the readers of what 'the truth' is in relation to, exactly.

2. Prove that that supposed and alleged 'truth' is actually irrefutably True.

3. Inform the readers of how you knew 'this truth'.

If you do not, then 'your claim' that you 'know the truth' remains just another of your many unsubstantiated claims, here

[Fairy]

But, it does not make sense for there to be a so-called 'unknowable'. Sure, for 'you', in the 'current' moment, there may well be a myriad of things that are 'not yet known', to you, but that certainly does not mean that 'those things' are 'unknowable'.

For 'you', so-called 'there', to claim that there is 'an unknowable' besides being just plain old absurd and ridiculous it is also, obviously, completely and utterly False, and Wrong, as well.

you obviously do not know what 'the future', so please stop talking as 'you', there, knows absolutely every thing, here, forever more.


Obviously one like you would say some thing like this. If what one believes is true, but which is shown to be False, then 'that one' would not find the actual Truth the slightest bit interesting. people like you only what to 'see' and 'hear' what they believe, or hope, will align with their 'current' beliefs.

Also, I am certainly not 'looking for' fault, nor error, in what you people say and write, here, but some of what is said and written is so blatantly False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect. And, I usually only show and highlight the Falsehoods when they are written as though they are absolutely true.

When, and if, one just presents a view as though it 'might be true', then I rarely saying any thing about 'that'. However, when you people speak and write, here, as though you know, when you clearly do not, then I just like to reply.


Even you have acknowledged that you are, really, only aligned with 'your own truth', and with ' your own version of 'the truth' ', only.


Which is, exactly, why you do not like to hear the actual and irrefutable Truth, which goes against your own personal only truth', when I point 'It' out for you, and others, here.


What do you mean by 'zero success'?

Every time I have pointed out and shown where, why, how, when, and what is False in 'your claims', which there have been many upon many times, then this is 'success'. Well to me and others anyway. But may be not 'success' to, nor for, you, obviously.


And 'this claim' is based upon 'what', exactly?

I know the truth.

But, just believing or thinking that you know the truth never means that you actually do.

Prove to the readers, here, that 'the truth', which you claim 'to know', is the actual Truth, which no one could refute.

I have already proved some of your 'truth claims' to not be true at all.

I share my truth here. No one is obligated to like it, or agree with it. Take it or leave it, I don’t care.

For some one who claims to 'not care' you seem to spend quite some time sharing your concerns and complaints, here.

Now, obviously you are absolutely free to share what you call 'your truths', which is all perfectly fine, and acceptable. What is Truly unacceptable is 'trying to' claim that 'your truth' is the irrefutable Truth, when 'your truth' is clearly not.

And, do you think or believe that if, and when, some one does not agree with 'your truth', then they are not allowed to point out nor show how and why 'your truth' is not, actually, 'the Truth', at all?

Your responses are just BLAH to me, so take your blah and go pin it on your bedroom blah board, hopefully there’s still enough room on there, else you might want to consider buying a new blah board. Maybe a bigger one.

you seem to keep forgetting that you are making your claims in a 'public philosophy forum'.

And, just like my responses, to you, are so-called 'blah', to you, so to are your False claims, here, not worth reading and listening to as well.

The only difference is what you call 'blah' is because you are a very closed individual, and what I call 'not worth reading and listening to' is because I am open to seeing where and why 'your claim' is False, and/or wrong

Have you ever considered checking to see if you could back up and support, irrefutably, 'the claim' you want to make known, publicly, before you even consider actually doing it?

If you did, then doing so might help you, here, somewhat.

For example, let 'us' 'look at' the claim you just made in your response, here, 'I know the truth'.

Now, if 'this' is actually irrefutably True, then,

1. Inform the readers of what 'the truth' is in relation to, exactly.

2. Prove that that supposed and alleged 'truth' is actually irrefutably True.

3. Inform the readers of how you knew 'this truth'.

If you do not, then 'your claim' that you 'know the truth' remains just another of your many unsubstantiated claims, here

You’re not worthy of my time and energy to explain anything to you.

Your responses are all the same BLAH and then some.

I know the truth, take it or leave it. I don’t care.

[Fairy]

God is known. Never seen.

It’s not known how God is known, that knowing knowledge is unknowable.

[Fairy]

Just like Jesus, Satan says to us: “Imitate me,” and he himself is an imitator. His supreme model is God the Father—the same model Jesus has.

Imitation is a characteristic of both Jesus and Satan. We always imitate someone when we desire, whether it is Jesus or Satan.

“Since Jesus recommends imitation, mimetic desire is good. It is even very good—the best thing in the world—since it is the only path to the true God. But it is also the same as human freedom, and it is also the path to Satan. What, then, is the difference between the mimetic desire of Jesus and the mimetic desire of Satan? The difference is that Satan imitates God with a spirit of rivalry. Jesus imitates God with the spirit of childlike and innocent obedience—and this is what he advises us to do as well. Since there is no acquisitive desire in God, the docile imitation of God cannot generate rivalry.”

[Age]

I know the truth.

But, just believing or thinking that you know the truth never means that you actually do.

Prove to the readers, here, that 'the truth', which you claim 'to know', is the actual Truth, which no one could refute.

I have already proved some of your 'truth claims' to not be true at all.

I share my truth here. No one is obligated to like it, or agree with it. Take it or leave it, I don’t care.

For some one who claims to 'not care' you seem to spend quite some time sharing your concerns and complaints, here.

Now, obviously you are absolutely free to share what you call 'your truths', which is all perfectly fine, and acceptable. What is Truly unacceptable is 'trying to' claim that 'your truth' is the irrefutable Truth, when 'your truth' is clearly not.

And, do you think or believe that if, and when, some one does not agree with 'your truth', then they are not allowed to point out nor show how and why 'your truth' is not, actually, 'the Truth', at all?

Your responses are just BLAH to me, so take your blah and go pin it on your bedroom blah board, hopefully there’s still enough room on there, else you might want to consider buying a new blah board. Maybe a bigger one.

you seem to keep forgetting that you are making your claims in a 'public philosophy forum'.

And, just like my responses, to you, are so-called 'blah', to you, so to are your False claims, here, not worth reading and listening to as well.

The only difference is what you call 'blah' is because you are a very closed individual, and what I call 'not worth reading and listening to' is because I am open to seeing where and why 'your claim' is False, and/or wrong

Have you ever considered checking to see if you could back up and support, irrefutably, 'the claim' you want to make known, publicly, before you even consider actually doing it?

If you did, then doing so might help you, here, somewhat.

For example, let 'us' 'look at' the claim you just made in your response, here, 'I know the truth'.

Now, if 'this' is actually irrefutably True, then,

1. Inform the readers of what 'the truth' is in relation to, exactly.

2. Prove that that supposed and alleged 'truth' is actually irrefutably True.

3. Inform the readers of how you knew 'this truth'.

If you do not, then 'your claim' that you 'know the truth' remains just another of your many unsubstantiated claims, here

You’re not worthy of my time and energy to explain anything to you.

Your responses are all the same BLAH and then some.

I know the truth, take it or leave it. I don’t care.

you, supposedly, know 'the truth' about 'what', exactly?

Every thing, one thing, or some things?

[Age]

God is known. Never seen.

It’s not known how God is known, that knowing knowledge is unknowable.

Even 'your claim' that God can never be seen is absolutely false, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. As has been and can be proved True, irrefutably so.

[Fairy]

God is known. Never seen.

It’s not known how God is known, that knowing knowledge is unknowable.

Even 'your claim' that God can never be seen is absolutely false, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. As has been and can be proved True, irrefutably so.

I don’t agree.

[Fairy]

“you, supposedly, know 'the truth' about 'what', exactly?

Every thing, one thing, or some things?”

About God.

[Impenitent]

Just like Jesus, Satan says to us: “Imitate me,” and he himself is an imitator. His supreme model is God the Father—the same model Jesus has.

Imitation is a characteristic of both Jesus and Satan. We always imitate someone when we desire, whether it is Jesus or Satan.

“Since Jesus recommends imitation, mimetic desire is good. It is even very good—the best thing in the world—since it is the only path to the true God. But it is also the same as human freedom, and it is also the path to Satan. What, then, is the difference between the mimetic desire of Jesus and the mimetic desire of Satan? The difference is that Satan imitates God with a spirit of rivalry. Jesus imitates God with the spirit of childlike and innocent obedience—and this is what he advises us to do as well. Since there is no acquisitive desire in God, the docile imitation of God cannot generate rivalry.”

screw 'em both... be yourself

-Imp

[Fairy]

Just like Jesus, Satan says to us: “Imitate me,” and he himself is an imitator. His supreme model is God the Father—the same model Jesus has.

Imitation is a characteristic of both Jesus and Satan. We always imitate someone when we desire, whether it is Jesus or Satan.

“Since Jesus recommends imitation, mimetic desire is good. It is even very good—the best thing in the world—since it is the only path to the true God. But it is also the same as human freedom, and it is also the path to Satan. What, then, is the difference between the mimetic desire of Jesus and the mimetic desire of Satan? The difference is that Satan imitates God with a spirit of rivalry. Jesus imitates God with the spirit of childlike and innocent obedience—and this is what he advises us to do as well. Since there is no acquisitive desire in God, the docile imitation of God cannot generate rivalry.”

screw 'em both... be yourself

-Imp

Both are characters in my dream.

[Age]

God is known. Never seen.

It’s not known how God is known, that knowing knowledge is unknowable.

Even 'your claim' that God can never be seen is absolutely false, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. As has been and can be proved True, irrefutably so.

I don’t agree.

'you' do not agree with 'what', exactly, here?

It has already been proved, irrefutably, True that God can be seen. So, 'I' am not at all sure how 'you' could logically disagree with 'this'. But, then 'you' might be disagreeing with something else, here, entirely. Once more 'we' will have to wait, to see.

[Age]

“you, supposedly, know 'the truth' about 'what', exactly?

Every thing, one thing, or some things?”

About God.

Okay. So, who and what is 'God', exactly?

[Fairy]

Even 'your claim' that God can never be seen is absolutely false, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. As has been and can be proved True, irrefutably so.

I don’t agree.

'you' do not agree with 'what', exactly, here?

It has already been proved, irrefutably, True that God can be seen. So, 'I' am not at all sure how 'you' could logically disagree with 'this'. But, then 'you' might be disagreeing with something else, here, entirely. Once more 'we' will have to wait, to see.

God cannot be seen. God is known, not seen.