Why God cannot be seen.

[Fairy]

Try the mirror trick.

Notice as you look into a mirror, the mirror never smiles first.

So you are not the image you see of yourself in the mirror.

You are actually invisible.

This is the pure magical beauty of the absent presence of God.

[Fairy]

External otherness is your mirror image. The mirror is only reacting by reflecting an identical image to what is in pure essence always this one imageless unitary action.

You’re doing alright, there is absolutely nothing wrong with you, everything is you and you are everything.

There’s no other one. There’s no other reality. It’s all one single total auditory illusory light and sound show for no one.

This one couldn’t have happened any other way, if it could, it would have happened that way. So it can only happen the way it happens and never how it doesn’t happen. Happening is always unwritten until it’s experienced, and even then, it’s gone, never to be repeated.

This is imperfect perfection. There’s nothing wrong with any of this, this is total freedom, and not even that, as that implies captivity.

Nothing ever happened. This is the peace that passes all understanding. Everything else is noise, misery, and confusion.

[Martin Peter Clarke]

Who? What?

[Fairy]

https://youtu.be/RZ2oXzrnti4?si=IMKwKZQqegNz4Y7f

[LuckyR]

"absent presence", I love it!

[Fairy]

"absent presence", I love it!

Yes, it’s called illusory knowledge in the form of formless concepts known, by direct experience.

[LuckyR]

"absent presence", I love it!

Yes, it’s called illusory knowledge in the form of formless concepts known, by direct experience.

That's one label. Another is: gobbledygook.

[Fairy]

"absent presence", I love it!

Yes, it’s called illusory knowledge in the form of formless concepts known, by direct experience.

That's one label. Another is: gobbledygook.

Because God exists as an absolute all proofs of God must fail.

[Fairy]

"absent presence", I love it!

Yes, it’s called illusory knowledge in the form of formless concepts known, by direct experience.

That's one label. Another is: gobbledygook.

Can a label ever occupy the nameless one?

Gobbledygook is a noisy appearance, an illusory auditory light and sound show for no one.

Labels are an illusory secondary reality upon the real silent unknowable.

[Martin Peter Clarke]

"absent presence", I love it!

Yes, it’s called illusory knowledge in the form of formless concepts known, by direct experience.

That's one label. Another is: gobbledygook.

Bin using absent presence for years. It describes the intentional ground of being's perfect mode of operation. It proves Its existence by not only perfectly disproving its historical etiolation, but by perfectly pre-empting all reasoned invoking of It, starting afresh. Such utter perfection is surely divine.

[Alexiev]

Did you look under the bed?

[Walker]

Did you look under the bed?

The Queens found God in the closet and let her out, to be worshipped.

[Age]

Yes, it’s called illusory knowledge in the form of formless concepts known, by direct experience.

That's one label. Another is: gobbledygook.

Can a label ever occupy the nameless one?

Have you ever considered and/or pondered over the claim that there is not 'a thing' in the whole Universe, which is 'nameless'?

Therefore this is, nor could even be, a so-called 'nameless one'.

And, if 'you' were Truly 'awake', then 'you' would have already seen and recognized 'the label' for what 'you' call 'the nameless one'.

Although 'that label' is a misnomer, it still exists.

Gobbledygook is a noisy appearance, an illusory auditory light and sound show for no one.

Labels are an illusory secondary reality upon the real silent unknowable.

Again, 'little old you', still, wants to claim that there exists 'an unknowable'. And, once again, for the very slow of learning, just because some thing is, still, 'unknown', to you, in the days when 'you' are/were around, never ever means that 'it' is 'unknowable'.

'This one' just loves to keep on claiming things, here, which are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. As 'I' have, just once again, proved irrefutably so.

[Age]

God can be very easily and very simply seen, and heard.

However some just do not look, nor listen.

[Fairy]

That's one label. Another is: gobbledygook.

Can a label ever occupy the nameless one?

Have you ever considered and/or pondered over the claim that there is not 'a thing' in the whole Universe, which is 'nameless'?

Therefore this is, nor could even be, a so-called 'nameless one'.

And, if 'you' were Truly 'awake', then 'you' would have already seen and recognized 'the label' for what 'you' call 'the nameless one'.

Although 'that label' is a misnomer, it still exists.

Gobbledygook is a noisy appearance, an illusory auditory light and sound show for no one.

Labels are an illusory secondary reality upon the real silent unknowable.

Again, 'little old you', still, wants to claim that there exists 'an unknowable'. And, once again, for the very slow of learning, just because some thing is, still, 'unknown', to you, in the days when 'you' are/were around, never ever means that 'it' is 'unknowable'.

'This one' just loves to keep on claiming things, here, which are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. As 'I' have, just once again, proved irrefutably so.

Ok, if you say so, as you word it, then so be it, for you there, but not for me here.

So as much as you love to seeketh here and seeketh there, frantically looking for fault or error in every fairy-tale you can possibly find, please know, that you are wasting your time and energy communicating with me, and that your futile responses are not in the slightest bit interesting or have any significant benefit or value for me here.
I’m awake, I’m in alignment with truth, and it’s not pretty, and I also believe that 95% the world is not ready to hear the ugly un-sugar-coated truth. And that’s one of the reasons why you keep on analysing and dissecting my fairy-tales to death with zero success. Some other reasons maybe because you’re a foolish idiot.