"Sin: The Path to Excellence"

[Eodnhoj7]

That is why I defined it as I did. A positive to us and not a negative.

We all work towards our best end and do not want less.

But it would be a deeper sin not to sin and according to you sin is good.

Correct.

To not attempt to hit ideal marks or bulls eyes, is definitely not the way to go.

Sin is necessary, but given they produce losers who will think evil has come their way, some will see the evil part and not the culling of losers to get to the best part.

Christians sing of Adam's sin being a happy fault and necessary to God's plan, while the Jews see Original Virtue for man coming out of Eden.

Seems that I am in the intelligent majority position.

Intelligence is relative, if you where truly intelligent you would have known this...it is a meaningless term in many respects.

So...

You contradict yourself as usual:

You claim,

Sin is necessary to hit the mark.

It is a greater sin not to try to hit the mark.

To not try to hit the mark, by committing a paradoxical sin of not sinning, would effectively help you hit the mark.

But sin is necessary to hit the mark, and yet it is a great sin to not try hitting the mark.





You seem divided by your sins.

[Greatest I am]

But it would be a deeper sin not to sin and according to you sin is good.

Correct.

To not attempt to hit ideal marks or bulls eyes, is definitely not the way to go.

Sin is necessary, but given they produce losers who will think evil has come their way, some will see the evil part and not the culling of losers to get to the best part.

Christians sing of Adam's sin being a happy fault and necessary to God's plan, while the Jews see Original Virtue for man coming out of Eden.

Seems that I am in the intelligent majority position.

Intelligence is relative, if you where truly intelligent you would have known this...it is a meaningless term in many respects.

So...

You contradict yourself as usual:

You claim,

Sin is necessary to hit the mark.

It is a greater sin not to try to hit the mark.

To not try to hit the mark, by committing a paradoxical sin of not sinning, would effectively help you hit the mark.

But sin is necessary to hit the mark, and yet it is a great sin to not try hitting the mark.





You seem divided by your sins.

What can I say to your unqualified statements and opinions?

Nothing you want to read.

Try questions instead of garbage opinions.

[Eodnhoj7]

Correct.

To not attempt to hit ideal marks or bulls eyes, is definitely not the way to go.

Sin is necessary, but given they produce losers who will think evil has come their way, some will see the evil part and not the culling of losers to get to the best part.

Christians sing of Adam's sin being a happy fault and necessary to God's plan, while the Jews see Original Virtue for man coming out of Eden.

Seems that I am in the intelligent majority position.

Intelligence is relative, if you where truly intelligent you would have known this...it is a meaningless term in many respects.

So...

You contradict yourself as usual:

You claim,

Sin is necessary to hit the mark.

It is a greater sin not to try to hit the mark.

To not try to hit the mark, by committing a paradoxical sin of not sinning, would effectively help you hit the mark.

But sin is necessary to hit the mark, and yet it is a great sin to not try hitting the mark.





You seem divided by your sins.

What can I say to your unqualified statements and opinions?

Nothing you want to read.

Try questions instead of garbage opinions.

I would hardly equate following the inevitable logic of your opinions an opinion. I am just rationalizing what you claim as true. You contradict yourself and offer nothing but absurdity justified only by your innate self-prescribed feeling of being "deep".