Southern Baptists overwhelmingly call for a ban on gay marriage

[godelian]

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/10/us/south ... e-ban-vote

A proposed resolution says legislators have a duty to “pass laws that reflect the truth of creation and natural law — about marriage, sex, human life, and family” and to oppose laws contradicting “what God has made plain through nature and Scripture.”

Division of a man's assets, alimony, and child support are not mentioned in Scripture and are absolutely not some kind of natural outcome.

So, it's not that these people want laws that are natural or scriptural. What they want, is their own brand of artificial bullshit.

Gay marriage discredits and even ridicules the Christian civil marriage nonsense, and that is an excellent thing!

The government should allow the utterly imbecile Christian marriage ceremony to take place between a cat and a dog, and "legalize" such so-called "sacred union". In case of breakup, they should give half of the dog's assets to the cat.

[accelafine]

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/10/us/south ... e-ban-vote

A proposed resolution says legislators have a duty to “pass laws that reflect the truth of creation and natural law — about marriage, sex, human life, and family” and to oppose laws contradicting “what God has made plain through nature and Scripture.”

Division of a woman's assets, alimony, and child support are not mentioned in Scripture and are absolutely not some kind of natural outcome.

So, it's not that these people want laws that are natural or scriptural. What they want, is their own brand of artificial bullshit.

Gay marriage discredits and even ridicules the Christian civil marriage nonsense, and that is an excellent thing!

The government should allow the utterly imbecile Christian marriage ceremony to take place between a cat and a dog, and "legalize" such so-called "sacred union". In case of breakup, they should give half of the dog's assets to the cat.

Glad you are being objective and not the misogynistic little squashed dog-turd of a wankstain that I thought you were.

[godelian]

Glad you are being objective and not the misogynistic little squashed dog-turd of a wankstain that I thought you were.

Hey, I thought that you were a strong and independent woman who doesn't need a man. So, why don't you pay your own bills?

[accelafine]

Glad you are being objective and not the misogynistic little squashed dog-turd of a wankstain that I thought you were.

Hey, I thought that you were a strong and independent woman who doesn't need a man. So, why don't you pay your own bills?

No clue what you are on about. Perhaps you should read my posts more carefully, wankstain.

[godelian]

Glad you are being objective and not the misogynistic little squashed dog-turd of a wankstain that I thought you were.

Hey, I thought that you were a strong and independent woman who doesn't need a man. So, why don't you pay your own bills?

No clue what you are on about. Perhaps you should read my posts more carefully, wankstain.

I am trying to make sense of your brain farts, but that is not an easy task.

So, a man who doesn't want to pay your bills, is "misogynistic". He should pay because you "deserve" that for all the shit talk that you have been slinging in his general direction.

So, how is all of that working out for you? Are the expected payments coming along already?

[accelafine]

Hey, I thought that you were a strong and independent woman who doesn't need a man. So, why don't you pay your own bills?

No clue what you are on about. Perhaps you should read my posts more carefully, wankstain.

I am trying to make sense of your brain farts, but that is not an easy task.

So, a man who doesn't want to pay your bills, is "misogynistic". He should pay because you "deserve" that for all the shit talk that you have been slinging in his general direction.

So, how is all of that working out for you? Are the expected payments coming along already?

What 'bills' are you talking about? Who mentioned my 'bills', wankstain? You are the one who pays women to marry him and left his country so that he could avoid his responsibilites and rape underage foreigners.

[godelian]

You are the one who pays women to marry him

The marriage payment is substantial only when the bride is credibly a virgin. Otherwise, it is just nominal. In this area of the world, i.e. SE Asia, this principle applies regardless of the religion, be it Buddhism or Islam.

The "credible" amount runs up to a few thousand dollars, typically not more than ten thousand. Concerning the nominal amount, something like a coffee is actually enough.

I have recently run into a Danish gemstone trader who paid seven thousand dollars. I met him here at the gym, but he's not here now. The parents actually gave the money back to the bride. Not sure why. This amount was just peanuts for him (for me too), and he really likes the girl. So, it is a fantastic deal for him. It is one of the few cases in which you can get what you want, just by paying for it.

The only men who pay, are the ones who are able to pay. The other ones may want to pay, but they can't.

There is something that you do not seem to understand. It is us who have the money. When push comes to shove, it is also us who have the weapons. Sooner or later, you will find out to your own risk and peril that all respect is ultimately based on the fear for reprisals. Hence, you are playing a very dangerous game.

[accelafine]

blah blah vomit that no one's going to bother reading.

[godelian]

blah blah vomit that no one's going to bother reading.

Why do men always spontaneously vomit on you? Is that even normal?

[Martin Peter Clarke]

Regression on the moral arc. America leads the way!

[FlashDangerpants]

Sooner or later, you will find out to your own risk and peril that all respect is ultimately based on the fear for reprisals.

You know that isn't how it works for those of us who aren't psychopaths right?

[godelian]

Sooner or later, you will find out to your own risk and peril that all respect is ultimately based on the fear for reprisals.

You know that isn't how it works for those of us who aren't psychopaths right?

Try being disrespectful to a police officer. At that point, you may very well learn your lesson. He will teach you that violence is rarely the problem. No, violence is almost always the solution to the problem.

This is clearly a general principle.

[FlashDangerpants]

Sooner or later, you will find out to your own risk and peril that all respect is ultimately based on the fear for reprisals.

You know that isn't how it works for those of us who aren't psychopaths right?

Try being disrespectful to a police officer. At that point, you may very well learn your lesson. He will teach you that violence is rarely the problem. No, violence is almost always the solution to the problem.

This is clearly a general principle.

I refer you to my previous comment

[godelian]

You know that isn't how it works for those of us who aren't psychopaths right?

Try being disrespectful to a police officer. At that point, you may very well learn your lesson. He will teach you that violence is rarely the problem. No, violence is almost always the solution to the problem.

This is clearly a general principle.

I refer you to my previous comment

You know, when people say "He (or she) had it coming", you know exactly what they mean.

[FlashDangerpants]

Try being disrespectful to a police officer. At that point, you may very well learn your lesson. He will teach you that violence is rarely the problem. No, violence is almost always the solution to the problem.

This is clearly a general principle.

I refer you to my previous comment

You know, when people say "He (or she) had it coming", you know exactly what they mean.

I've a fairly strong idea that I will know what it means when they say it about you, but in general your suggestion that all respect is ultimately based on the fear for reprisals is the mindset of a psychopath. That is simply the fact of the matter, and I don't believe for a second that you are undiagnosed because you make zero effort to mask.