A Better Democrat Party

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

Comey must feel so betrayed. He was only being a good Democrat …
https://revolver.news/2025/05/update-ja ... es-a-turn/
A formal letter has just been sent to Secret Service Director Sean Curran and FBI Director Kash Patel, calling for an immediate joint investigation into James Comey after he posted a disturbing message on social media using the phrase “86” in reference to President Trump. That term is widely understood to mean kill or eliminate.

The letter demands a full probe into potential violations of federal law, including 18 U.S.C. § 871 (threats against the President) and 18 U.S.C. § 875 (interstate threats). It also presses for answers on whether Comey still holds a security clearance or has access to classified material.
Commentary: If Comey should be railroaded without due process, the tears of the Left would be the nectar of their hypocrisy. (That’s a pretty good one.)
Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Fri May 16, 2025 9:41 pm
Gosh, that's so unfair. Where's the violin. Give the man his due process or better yet, give him a heathy ration of equity.
Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Fri May 16, 2025 9:41 pm Obviously not, you can see that by just following the link I already gave you you weird old mad idiot.
Just because I'm answering your insults doesn't mean I'm following your links.

Actually, they were throwing so much crap lawfare at Trump, denying so much due process, one would have needed to maintain an ongoing spreadsheet to keep track, and that degree of madness requires a paycheck.

I'm just a casual, apolitical observer with an interest in Truth, Justice, and The American Way.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Fri May 16, 2025 10:03 pm I'm just a casual, apolitical observer with an interest in Truth, Justice, and The American Way.
You are not apolitical, you despise truth, and nobody who holds the American Way in high regard could possibly be so cavalier about the fifth and fourteenth amendments as you.

You are interested in nothing besides brute injustice and American Cheese.
Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Fri May 16, 2025 10:24 pm
Walker wrote: Fri May 16, 2025 10:03 pm I'm just a casual, apolitical observer with an interest in Truth, Justice, and The American Way.
You are not apolitical, you despise truth, and nobody who holds the American Way in high regard could possibly be so cavalier about the fifth and fourteenth amendments as you.

You are interested in nothing besides brute injustice and American Cheese.
Grow a brain, dimwit.
Comey IS the better Democrat Party.

Comey should probably be run into bankruptcy with the attorney fees required to defend his harmless, boyish whimsey.

After all, after two recent assassination attempts on Trump it’s absolutely outrageous to suggest that 86ing president 47 is anything but a spontaneous, naturally-caused shell formation indicating the will of the universe ... for some lunatic to interpret as a green light.

The sea-critters must be reading Charlotte's Web.

Apolitically, objectively speaking, Justice for Comey is long overdue.
Last edited by Walker on Sat May 17, 2025 3:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 3:26 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: Fri May 16, 2025 10:24 pm
Walker wrote: Fri May 16, 2025 10:03 pm I'm just a casual, apolitical observer with an interest in Truth, Justice, and The American Way.
You are not apolitical, you despise truth, and nobody who holds the American Way in high regard could possibly be so cavalier about the fifth and fourteenth amendments as you.

You are interested in nothing besides brute injustice and American Cheese.
Grow a brain, dimwit.

Comey should probably be run into bankruptcy with the attorney fees required to defend his harmless, boyish whimsey.

After all, after two recent assassination attempts on Trump it’s absolutely outrageous to suggest that 86ing president 47 is anything but a spontaneous, naturally-caused shell formation indicating the will of the universe ... for some lunatic to interpret as a green light.

The sea-critters must be reading Charlotte's Web.

Apolitically, objectively speaking, Justice for Comey is long overdue.
This link here will take you to a tweet by Matt Gaetz (you may remember him as the procurer of child prostitutes that Trump tried to install as Attorney General) from Feb 28th 2024 where he celebrated the announcement that Mitch McConnell would not seek re-election with the words...
MAGA Matt Gaetz wrote: We’ve now 86’d:

McCarthy
McDaniel
McConnell

Better days are ahead for the Republican Party.
You are all hypocrites. Especially the ones who stood outside the Capitol with a noose demanding to hang Mike Pence. You reckon those are all good guys now don't you?
Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 3:34 am
Some things just don't change. You still sound like weird little girl, Flash, with the balancing of this for that, tit for tat. With hypocrite, hypocrite. Good grief, Ivory Tower. What do you think the game is? The hypocrisy is the Democrats breaking all the rules when in power, then expecting those broken rules to be suddenly healed and mended for them, when they're out of power. Yeah, those who the Dems crapped on will be sure to expedite those repairs. Aren't they the hypocrites, though.

In reality you are attempting to justify Comey's sly suggestion to assassinate the sitting president, after the last two recent attempts failed.

Comey isn't just anybody. He's the former director of the FBI and certainly knows what 86 references ... despite his coy attempt at sanctimonious innocence. "But I didn't know it meant violence ... I hate violence." Isn't he the funny attorney.

You need to get a grip on reality, little fella, and stop wasting everyone's time with your childish gaslighting and silly name calling ... like a little girl.
Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 3:34 am(you may remember him as the procurer of child prostitutes that Trump tried to install as Attorney General)
You're saying that Trump nominated Gaetz because Gaetz was convicted of pimping child prostitutes? How in the world could that possibly be a qualification for the position?

No, sorry, that just doesn't ring true. I think you're just screwing around, as usual.
Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 3:34 am You are all hypocrites. Especially the ones who stood outside the Capitol with a noose demanding to hang Mike Pence. You reckon those are all good guys now don't you?
Yep, screwing around. Watch out, though. Someday maybe the Everyone Hypocrite will be out to get ya.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 4:08 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 3:34 am(you may remember him as the procurer of child prostitutes that Trump tried to install as Attorney General)
You're saying that Trump nominated Gaetz because Gaetz was convicted of pimping child prostitutes? How in the world could that possibly be a qualification for the position?

No, sorry, that just doesn't ring true. I think you're just screwing around, as usual.
Gaetz's nomination had to be withdrawn when Trump as unable to prevent the House Ethics Committee releasing its report in him.
How do you no know about that?

Here's a copy of their report courtesy of the house.gov site
https://ethics.house.gov/wp-content/upl ... Report.pdf
The Committee Found that Representative Gaetz Engaged in Commercial Sex

There is substantial evidence that Representative Gaetz paid women for sex, and had others
pay women for sex on his behalf. The Committee heard testimony from over half a dozen
witnesses who attended parties, events, and trips with Representative Gaetz from 2017-2020.
Nearly every young woman that the Committee interviewed confirmed that she was paid for sex
by, or on behalf of, Representative Gaetz. A few of the women characterized their relationship
differently, describing a date-for-hire arrangement that may not necessarily implicate state
prostitution laws. Even assuming the payments to those particular women would not violate
prostitution laws, the Committee found evidence that Representative Gaetz spent tens of thousands
of dollars on other women with whom he had a shared understanding that they would be
compensated for sexual activity with him. There were potentially additional amounts spent on
commercial sex that could not be specifically identified either because payments were made in
cash or through intermediaries. The Committee’s record thus indicates that Representative Gaetz
enticed and procured women to engage in sexual activity for hire and purchased the services of
women engaging in sexual activity for hire, in violation of Florida state law.

Representative Gaetz refused to answer the Committee’s questions about his payments to
women, despite opportunities to do so in sworn testimony or in writing. While he has been
unwilling to address the allegations under oath, Representative Gaetz has made several public
statements regarding the allegations under the Committee’s review, including that his “generosity
to ex-girlfriends” is being misconstrued and thathe has “never, ever paid for sex.” The Committee
found this to be untrue.

Members are required to uphold the laws of the United States and all governments therein,
and never be a party to their evasion. Through his violations of state prostitution laws,
Representative Gaetz acted contrary to this ethical obligation. Representative Gaetz took
advantage of the economic vulnerability of young women to lure them into sexual activity for
which they received an average of a few hundred dollars after each encounter. Such behavior is
not “generosity to ex-girlfriends,” and it does not reflect creditably upon the House. The
Committee thus found Representative Gaetz to be in violation of House Rule XXIII, clause 1.
And of course...
The Committee Found that Representative Gaetz Violated Florida’s Statutory Rape Law

There is substantial evidence that Representative Gaetz engaged in sexual activity with a
17-year-old girl. The Committee received credible testimony from Victim A herself, as well as
multiple individuals corroborating the allegation. Several of those witnesses have also testified
under oath before a federal grand jury and in a civil litigation. Representative Gaetz denied the
allegation but refused to testify under oath. He has publicly stated that Victim A “doesn’t exist”
and that he has not “had sex with a 17-year-old since I was 17.” The Committee found that to
be untrue and determined that there is substantial evidence that Representative Gaetz had sex with
Victim A in July 2017, when she was 17 years old, and he was 35. Representative Gaetz’s actions
were in violation of Florida’s statutory rape law.

Representative Gaetz has suggested that the allegations against him have been
manufactured and that Mr. Greenberg and Victim A are not credible. The Committee has
acknowledged that Mr. Greenberg’s credibility is in doubt. The Committee received additional
evidence from Mr. Greenberg that is not included in this Report, much of it salacious but
unverifiable, although consistent with the nature of the conduct that the Committee learned of from
other witnesses. The Committee found no reason to doubt the credibility of Victim A.
Representative Gaetz has suggested the fact that she has, through her attorneys, expressed an
intention to seek civil redress against him for raping her means that she has a financial motive that
undermines the veracity of her claims. The Committee reviewed a letter from counsel to Victim
A to counsel for Representative Gaetz, which stated she intended to “pursue claims against
[Representative Gaetz] including child sex trafficking and statutory rape.” Regardless of
whether Victim A had any pecuniary motive in sending such a communication, she cooperated
with DOJ’s investigation for years and was let down by the justice system when reports circulated
that DOJ would be unlikely to pursue charges against Representative Gaetz. Victim A is entitled
to all of the protections and remedies available to her under civil laws, and her intention to pursue
claims against Representative Gaetz and others does not negate her credibility. Moreover, as
discussed above, the Committee obtained testimony and documentary evidence from other
witnesses corroborating the allegations.

Representative Gaetz’s statutory rape of Victim A was a violation of Florida law, the Code
of Official Conduct, and the Code of Ethics for Government Service. The Committee received
evidence that Representative Gaetz did not learn that Victim A was 17 years old until more than a
month after their first sexual encounters. However, statutory rape is a strict liability crime. After
he learned that Victim A was a minor, he maintained contact and less than 6 months after she
turned 18, he met up with her again for commercial sex. When Mr. Greenberg was prosecuted for
sex trafficking the same individual, Representative Gaetz denied that she existed. His conduct
reflects discreditably upon the House
Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 10:43 am
Of course I knew of the charges. They are accusations. The Democrats use Lawfare and accusations to destroy.

How you could miss that tendency? Trump is the prime example. However, the only news about Gaetz these days is rattling around in your biased head.

The disease de jour is Comey, who like Clinton, will most likely get another pass in the media.

*

Comey never received justice for the conspiracy against candidate and President Trump (and the office of The Presidency), which could still be an ongoing threat to the country. His justice is past due, as is the pre-dawn raid on his home by at least three armoured SWAT teams, and be sure to get the media there for that pajama perp walk on camera. When Comey was the FBI honcho:
August 30, 2019
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 157705001/

Comey’s abuse of power to undermine President Trump should be viewed in light of last year’s Inspector General report on the FBI’s kowtowing in their investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server. The FBI chose to exonerate Secretary Clinton despite her violations of federal laws on the handling of confidential information and despite the destruction of evidence and false statements by her aides and associates. The FBI intended to absolve her “absent a confession from Clinton” when they finally interviewed her in July 2016. Comey assured the IG that “by her demeanor, she was credible and open and all that kind of stuff” in that interview — even though FBI agents there believed Clinton had lied to them about not realizing she received confidential information.

More Truth about duplicitous Comey is in the link.


So far, there is no evidence to suggest that The Democrat Party and its pet RINOs are capable of reversing their descent into Evil.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 11:12 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 10:43 am
Of course I knew of the charges. They are accusations. The Democrats use Lawfare and accusations to destroy.
You just like him, so you want him to get away with it.
Walker
Posts: 16382
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A Better Democrat Party

Post by Walker »

July 5, 2016
Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases ... ail-system

- When I watched this live on the telly years ago, what I saw in real time was Comey lay out the case to fry Clinton’s fat ass.
- Then in conclusion to making that case, he turned around and said there was no evidence to light the stove.
- He said this just after he presented the evidence.

Amazing.

- Then, he took the extraordinary step of making an official, unofficial decree to absolve Clinton of wrong doing.
- And so, she was absolved.
- Not only the appearance of impropriety … it’s the appearance of conspiracy.
- You could have knocked me over with a feather after that one.
- That level of corruption is right up there with assuring the country that the border is secure, that Brandon is competent, that Harris is presidential material, and propagandized minions don't spread the fertilizer.

But you know the Democrat line. Move on. This stuff only distracts from the important work for the American people, and The Party has designated Trump a threat to the country.

The Democrat Party being better at what they do would not benefit the country.
Post Reply