Equality

[Darkneos]

I needed to have it explained to me because your question suggested that you, Binary Recursion man, don't understand what binary means (as opposed to ternary for example). But surely you can't be that clueless? Right? Right?

What do you mean by "get to three" (the third value?) in a binary computer? You don't. There is no third value. That's why it's a binary computer.

Quit with the bull shit.

You have material difference and can only parse it. Show the world that is not so, that this process is not binary.
We want your answer not more bull shit.
the verb is a relative, it is parsed by the noun. So, show us genius that this is not binary and the only thing you can do with a relative.

What bullshit. Binary computers use two values (like 0 and 1) and ternary computers use three values (like 0 1 2 or -1 0 1). Ternary computers have been physically built. All you are offering in comparison are word salads.

I'll help you out. The Western basic laws of thought also use binary because it is most efficient. But that doesn't mean that binary is inherent in the universe.

Ummm....what does that mean?

[Phil8659]

Quit with the bull shit.

You have material difference and can only parse it. Show the world that is not so, that this process is not binary.
We want your answer not more bull shit.
the verb is a relative, it is parsed by the noun. So, show us genius that this is not binary and the only thing you can do with a relative.

What bullshit. Binary computers use two values (like 0 and 1) and ternary computers use three values (like 0 1 2 or -1 0 1). Ternary computers have been physically built. All you are offering in comparison are word salads.

I'll help you out. The Western basic laws of thought also use binary because it is most efficient. But that doesn't mean that binary is inherent in the universe.

Ummm....what does that mean?

What does what mean? finish the question.

Grammar is based on what you can actually name. Quality, verb, Quantity, noun, or the shape of things and the material difference of that thing. Shape or form as a container, i.e., the parsing, or cut, applied to some material. Just like taking a board and cutting it to some shape. The material of the Universe is a given, we simply learn to parse it, i.e., apply form to it, to make things with. Grammar is not different. Binary, quality and quantity. noun and verb.
We have 2 concepts, and repeat them. The repetition of which is called recursion.

That is it. However, if you are too simple to accept obvious fact, you can never be literate.

So, philosophy is very simple, you make the most of what you got, or simply spend a life whining that someone else wont do it for you.

[Atla]

What does what mean? finish the question.

Grammar is based on what you can actually name. Quality, verb, Quantity, noun, or the shape of things and the material difference of that thing. Shape or form as a container, i.e., the parsing, or cut, applied to some material. Just like taking a board and cutting it to some shape. The material of the Universe is a given, we simply learn to parse it, i.e., apply form to it, to make things with. Grammar is not different. Binary, quality and quantity. noun and verb.
We have 2 concepts, and repeat them. The repetition of which is called recursion.

That is it. However, if you are too simple to accept obvious fact, you can never be literate.

So, philosophy is very simple, you make the most of what you got, or simply spend a life whining that someone else wont do it for you.

Recursion isn't just any repetition, recursion is a kind of repetition where a function calls itself. Are you now implying that you, Binary Recursion Man, not only don't know what binary means but also don't know what recursion means?

Also, you claim to be a genius, do you have a certificate of that IQ test or is it just how you remember it now?

[promethean75]

I had my IQ tested back in 2011 for my prison classification (is he a retard, an evil genius, we gotta know where to house this guy) and I scored seventeen...

[promethean75]

.. hundred and eleven.

[Phil8659]

.. hundred and eleven.

I am glad to see you take every advantage you can of displaying and exercising you pathology. Keep up the good work. I like to see people doing their best work.

[Atla]

My IQ is 286, I can no longer find the certificate, but you can trust me on this one.

[Phil8659]

My IQ is 286, I can no longer find the certificate, but you can trust me on this one.

As the function of intelligence is to produce behavior, it trumps paper. Everyone can see, you left out the mathematical operators in your number. 2 divided by 8, multiplied by 6 = 1.5

[Atla]

My IQ is 286, I can no longer find the certificate, but you can trust me on this one.

As the function of intelligence is to produce behavior, it trumps paper. Everyone can see, you left out the mathematical operators in your number. 2 divided by 8, multiplied by 6 = 1.5

I have an IQ of 286 so I can tell that someone with 1.5 IQ can't use a computer. I can also tell that according to available evidence, you just invented the story that high intelligence has a universal function. I can even tell that paper isn't trumped, intelligence is intelligence whether or not you have a paper.

[Phil8659]

My IQ is 286, I can no longer find the certificate, but you can trust me on this one.

As the function of intelligence is to produce behavior, it trumps paper. Everyone can see, you left out the mathematical operators in your number. 2 divided by 8, multiplied by 6 = 1.5

I have an IQ of 286 so I can tell that someone with 1.5 IQ can't use a computer. I can also tell that according to available evidence, you just invented the story that high intelligence has a universal function. I can even tell that paper isn't trumped, intelligence is intelligence whether or not you have a paper.

Then show your work. You have always had a chance to prove anything I produced is faulty, by using the same programs it is written in. so do it.

[Atla]

As the function of intelligence is to produce behavior, it trumps paper. Everyone can see, you left out the mathematical operators in your number. 2 divided by 8, multiplied by 6 = 1.5

I have an IQ of 286 so I can tell that someone with 1.5 IQ can't use a computer. I can also tell that according to available evidence, you just invented the story that high intelligence has a universal function. I can even tell that paper isn't trumped, intelligence is intelligence whether or not you have a paper.

Then show your work. You have always had a chance to prove anything I produced is faulty, by using the same programs it is written in. so do it.

If you had a high IQ you would know that you can't expect people on a philosophy forum to spend weeks or months studying your work, especially after seeing that you don't even know what words like binary mean, so chances are high that all your work is nonsense. Again: if you want your work to be critiqued, start a thread where you present an example from your work. So far you haven't been able to tell what your work is even about and what it is good for (beyond creating screensavers that do nothing other than transform English sentences into diagrams according to some rules).

[Phil8659]

I have an IQ of 286 so I can tell that someone with 1.5 IQ can't use a computer. I can also tell that according to available evidence, you just invented the story that high intelligence has a universal function. I can even tell that paper isn't trumped, intelligence is intelligence whether or not you have a paper.

Then show your work. You have always had a chance to prove anything I produced is faulty, by using the same programs it is written in. so do it.

If you had a high IQ you would know that you can't expect people on a philosophy forum to spend weeks or months studying your work, especially after seeing that you don't even know what words like binary mean, so chances are high that all your work is nonsense. Again: if you want your work to be critiqued, start a thread where you present an example from your work. So far you haven't been able to tell what your work is even about and what it is good for (beyond creating screensavers that do nothing other than transform English sentences into diagrams according to some rules).

I got it. I am responsible for your laziness, your stupidity, and your lying ass. Ain't that what I said? You are a sociopath?
And of course, your story telling is right up there with Spot, Dick, and Jane.

[Atla]

Then show your work. You have always had a chance to prove anything I produced is faulty, by using the same programs it is written in. so do it.

If you had a high IQ you would know that you can't expect people on a philosophy forum to spend weeks or months studying your work, especially after seeing that you don't even know what words like binary mean, so chances are high that all your work is nonsense. Again: if you want your work to be critiqued, start a thread where you present an example from your work. So far you haven't been able to tell what your work is even about and what it is good for (beyond creating screensavers that do nothing other than transform English sentences into diagrams according to some rules).

I got it. I am responsible for your laziness, your stupidity, and your lying ass. Ain't that what I said? You are a sociopath?
And of course, your story telling is right up there with Spot, Dick, and Jane.

This just shows again that you really have nothing beyond screensavers. It's also curious that you think literally everyone you come across is a lying sociopath, even though they are less than 4% of the population.

[Phil8659]

This just shows again that you really have nothing beyond screensavers. It's also curious that you think literally everyone you come across is a lying sociopath, even though they are less than 4% of the population.

I see you have researched your probability of finding a friend. I have no doubt that out of 100 people four of them will not tell you to go fuck yourself. However, what does your mirror say?
When you say "Mirror, mirror, on the wall, whose the wittiest one of all?"
Does it say, Jack, I have no idea, but get your butt ugly dumb ass out of my face!"
Or something like that?