Looking at the post What is the concept of God, philosophically, makes me sad. How can one be a grown up and not know that the question is not a product of a literate person?
What is the, short for what is that, that being a gesture. In the perceptible, we point to, or nod in a given direction. It denotes the source of the topic, more often than not, a geographical location. In all events, once it has been agreed upon, often tacitly, it is used to denote an agreed upon memory reference, i.e., denotes that something has a prior shared experience about a particular.
What sense is denoted for the equality? philosophically. Really? We can answer using any particular sense, or in one of four particular grammar systems. But, what the fuck is, Philosophically, what is the, or that concept of God mean? Gibberish.
If I ask what is that, I am asking about a perceptible, which can be pointed to, or some intelligible, which has become a shared experience in memory. Or, I can fully describe something, using commonly shared memories of similar items, fictional construct from many memories of similar items.
But there is still no such thing as a philosophical answer, because philosophy is inclusive of every grammar system.
Y, what is X. Is construct which is not common, It means, Using the particular identity Y, such as sight, sound, touch, etc, what is the information X.
Visually, What is a square?
Audio, What is Joan Baez?
This has been covered, I believe by Plato, Y, What is X. Where Y denotes what sense is used to gather the information. In that sense, the answer can be given.
In the first example, I draw a square,
In the second, I play a recording.
In no case, does one claim that the answer can be given equally in the wrong sense. No matter how many words in common grammar you can spout out, you will not produce a visual square.
Nor, no matter how many words you paste together will you ever produce a memory of a song.
Memory is the preservation of parsed perceptions, The tools we use to manage memory is not the memory managed.
A great revealer of illiteracy is when one askes to make the one into the other as if everyone is a fucking magician.
Grammar is for information management. There is acquisition and retrieval. There is no magic in it, unless one is illiterate. Both can be either perceptible or intelligible. When asked to retrieve a memory, one has to know which format can actually do the job.
What is X, Y
Re: What is X, Y
So, there are fuzzy ways of saying, By Y, render X. Which means, there is a missing piece of education. As a mind is built on memory, parsed perceptions which have been virtualized, has there ever been a work of that kind available, except through by ways of, for example, how to assemble a bike, or a Heath Kit.
We can render a great many things with the correct use of grammar systems, We have Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry. Which are used as a Grammar Matrix and have been for a very long time. To show that one is ignorant of long standing standards of information retrieval, even displayed by Cook Books, is a grave want of intelligence.
"AGE", I want an EXACT rendition of a Corned Beef Sandwich on my screen now, or you are fired as a cook!" OMG, a freaking moron thinks I work for him. Please fire me. I thought Trump was suffering from senile dementia.
We can render a great many things with the correct use of grammar systems, We have Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry. Which are used as a Grammar Matrix and have been for a very long time. To show that one is ignorant of long standing standards of information retrieval, even displayed by Cook Books, is a grave want of intelligence.
"AGE", I want an EXACT rendition of a Corned Beef Sandwich on my screen now, or you are fired as a cook!" OMG, a freaking moron thinks I work for him. Please fire me. I thought Trump was suffering from senile dementia.
Re: What is X, Y
I will briefly explain the metaphor "You shall love the Lord, your God, with your whole body, mind and soul."
As the only power a mind has is information processing, that means that it is the only power we can understand. Everything we see, do, say, we see it with our body, we do it with our body, we say it with our body. It is not a hard thing to understand, unless you simply do not have the intelligence to do so.
Information management covers our whole life, from birth to death. In our intelligible grammars, and our perceptible behaviors, the products of our life. Everything we do, expresses our literacy. That is also why, it is said also, There is no hiding place down here.
As the only power a mind has is information processing, that means that it is the only power we can understand. Everything we see, do, say, we see it with our body, we do it with our body, we say it with our body. It is not a hard thing to understand, unless you simply do not have the intelligence to do so.
Information management covers our whole life, from birth to death. In our intelligible grammars, and our perceptible behaviors, the products of our life. Everything we do, expresses our literacy. That is also why, it is said also, There is no hiding place down here.
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: What is X, Y
an incomplete mapping of 3 dimensional space...
-Imp
-Imp
Re: What is X, Y
Have you ever tried not spewing gibberish?
Dimension, is a compound word meaning expressible, measurable by the two elements, noun and verb, of a thing. Each "mention" is then a line segment in Geometry. Measurable by 2, or binary.