Equality

[Atla]

Okay, explain to every one how not to make 3 from three binary 1's. That you have a mystical method of doing it.

Don't know what you mean. Three binary 1s are parts of a binary computer.

Well how do you get to three without them, do you have to have a simple sentence explained to you. How do you get to three, as three distinct binaries without three distinct 1's.

I needed to have it explained to me because your question suggested that you, Binary Recursion man, don't understand what binary means (as opposed to ternary for example). But surely you can't be that clueless? Right? Right?

What do you mean by "get to three" (the third value?) in a binary computer? You don't. There is no third value. That's why it's a binary computer.

[Phil8659]

Don't know what you mean. Three binary 1s are parts of a binary computer.

Well how do you get to three without them, do you have to have a simple sentence explained to you. How do you get to three, as three distinct binaries without three distinct 1's.

I needed to have it explained to me because your question suggested that you, Binary Recursion man, don't understand what binary means (as opposed to ternary for example). But surely you can't be that clueless? Right? Right?

What do you mean by "get to three" (the third value?) in a binary computer? You don't. There is no third value. That's why it's a binary computer.

Quit with the bull shit.

You have material difference and can only parse it. Show the world that is not so, that this process is not binary.
We want your answer not more bull shit.
the verb is a relative, it is parsed by the noun. So, show us genius that this is not binary and the only thing you can do with a relative.

[Phil8659]

And what the fuck is this, saying you have to have someone explain tertiary to you when you assert you do know?

[Atla]

Well how do you get to three without them, do you have to have a simple sentence explained to you. How do you get to three, as three distinct binaries without three distinct 1's.

I needed to have it explained to me because your question suggested that you, Binary Recursion man, don't understand what binary means (as opposed to ternary for example). But surely you can't be that clueless? Right? Right?

What do you mean by "get to three" (the third value?) in a binary computer? You don't. There is no third value. That's why it's a binary computer.

Quit with the bull shit.

You have material difference and can only parse it. Show the world that is not so, that this process is not binary.
We want your answer not more bull shit.
the verb is a relative, it is parsed by the noun. So, show us genius that this is not binary and the only thing you can do with a relative.

What bullshit. Binary computers use two values (like 0 and 1) and ternary computers use three values (like 0 1 2 or -1 0 1). Ternary computers have been physically built. All you are offering in comparison are word salads.

I'll help you out. The Western basic laws of thought also use binary because it is most efficient. But that doesn't mean that binary is inherent in the universe.

[Phil8659]

I needed to have it explained to me because your question suggested that you, Binary Recursion man, don't understand what binary means (as opposed to ternary for example). But surely you can't be that clueless? Right? Right?

What do you mean by "get to three" (the third value?) in a binary computer? You don't. There is no third value. That's why it's a binary computer.

Quit with the bull shit.

You have material difference and can only parse it. Show the world that is not so, that this process is not binary.
We want your answer not more bull shit.
the verb is a relative, it is parsed by the noun. So, show us genius that this is not binary and the only thing you can do with a relative.

What bullshit. Binary computers use two values (like 0 and 1) and ternary computers use three values (like 0 1 2 or -1 0 1). Ternary computers have been physically built. All you are offering in comparison are word salads.

I'll help you out. The Western basic laws of thought also use binary because it is most efficient. But that doesn't mean that binary is inherent in the universe.

You are just another dumbass who falls easily for bull shit of those selling quantum computing. Tell me, genius, why do the still use binary programming languages to run it? Using a third bit does not mean it is not binary contrary to the bull shit.
It is still programmed using binary programming.

[Atla]

And what the fuck is this, saying you have to have someone explain tertiary to you when you assert you do know?

No, I said you genuinely don't understand what tertiary means. You're an ignoramus.

[Atla]

Quit with the bull shit.

You have material difference and can only parse it. Show the world that is not so, that this process is not binary.
We want your answer not more bull shit.
the verb is a relative, it is parsed by the noun. So, show us genius that this is not binary and the only thing you can do with a relative.

What bullshit. Binary computers use two values (like 0 and 1) and ternary computers use three values (like 0 1 2 or -1 0 1). Ternary computers have been physically built. All you are offering in comparison are word salads.

I'll help you out. The Western basic laws of thought also use binary because it is most efficient. But that doesn't mean that binary is inherent in the universe.

You are just another dumbass who falls easily for bull shit of those selling quantum computing. Tell me, genius, why do the still use binary programming languages to run it?

Now you are confusing ternary computers with quantum computers. Heh

[Phil8659]

And what the fuck is this, saying you have to have someone explain tertiary to you when you assert you do know?

No, I said you genuinely don't understand what tertiary means. You're an ignoramus.

Draw one for me.
Geometry can produce any equation.

I personally have drawn figures whose equations span several pages.

[Phil8659]

Every idiot claims, they are smarter than every genius in history, You claim you are smarter than Plato, than Euclid, than your own body, your own biology, that mathematics. You are simply a waste of space.

[Atla]

Maybe if we would learn one day that our observable universe has a mirror antimatter counterpart (or something along those lines), then inherent binary in the universe might have some merit. But even that would be irrelevant, because we are forever restricted to this matter-dominated region, this region has no internal dichotomies.

And even that is assuming that the universe would have a 2-fold symmetry. Instead of say 6-fold or 36-fold or infinite symmetry or whatever.

[Phil8659]

Maybe if we would learn one day that our observable universe has a mirror antimatter counterpart (or something along those lines), then inherent binary in the universe might have some merit. But even that would be irrelevant, because we are forever restricted to this matter-dominated region, this region has no internal dichotomies.

And even that is assuming that the universe would have a 2-fold symmetry. Instead of say 6-fold or 36-fold or infinite symmetry or whatever.

More bull shit.

The word definition, itself, every thing is defined as the combination of quality and quantity, noun and verb.

So, if a third state actually exist, show where the definition of a thing is in error.

put up or shut the fuck up.

No one in history has been able to find this third man. Show us.

Your so called mystery man, is what Plato called the mean. Yes, it is used in decision making, but it is still done in binary

[Atla]

More bull shit.

The word definition, itself, every thing is defined as the combination of quality and quantity, noun and verb.

So, if a third state actually exist, show where the definition of a thing is in error.

put up or shut the fuck up.

No one in history has been able to find this third man. Show us.

I don't like explaining the obvious again. A 'thing' is never two components, only one. Ok so Plato was high, doesn't mean we have to worship him.

[Phil8659]

More bull shit.

The word definition, itself, every thing is defined as the combination of quality and quantity, noun and verb.

So, if a third state actually exist, show where the definition of a thing is in error.

put up or shut the fuck up.

No one in history has been able to find this third man. Show us.

I don't like explaining the obvious again. A 'thing' is never two components, only one. Ok so Plato was high, doesn't mean we have to worship him.

I see, things are not composed of material and shape, materials and limits? I bet your parents had to pay someone to let you go to kindergarten.

[Atla]

More bull shit.

The word definition, itself, every thing is defined as the combination of quality and quantity, noun and verb.

So, if a third state actually exist, show where the definition of a thing is in error.

put up or shut the fuck up.

No one in history has been able to find this third man. Show us.

I don't like explaining the obvious again. A 'thing' is never two components, only one. Ok so Plato was high, doesn't mean we have to worship him.

I see, things are not composed of material and shape, materials and limits? I bet your parents had to pay someone to let you go to kindergarten.

Of course they aren't. 2000-2500 years ago the idea that there is material and shape, may have been an acceptable approximation. Today it's clear that they are one and the same thing, abstracted in two different ways.

[Phil8659]

Don't tell me your parents had to Forrest Gump you into school? I guess they did.