Evolution

[Age]

Word trace the races of man, back to their shared ancestry.
Words represent how particular peoples related to particular environments; how they related to their own existence.

Words, and how they are defined, exposes motive, and motive exposes the essence of men....of entire cultures, or entire ethnicities and races.

Words, like money, are human forms of intercourse.
words are how men groom one another, establishing and maintaining relationships.
Words seed minds, transferring ideas, as physical intercourse seeds ova, transferring DNA.
Words transport memories from mind to mind.

Yet what words like 'mind' and 'men' mean and/or are referring to, exactly, are, still, not yet understood, and known, by human beings in the days when this was being written. As can be clearly seen, here.

[Age]

Word trace the races of man, back to their shared ancestry.
Words represent how particular peoples related to particular environments; how they related to their own existence.

Words, and how they are defined, exposes motive, and motive exposes the essence of men....of entire cultures, or entire ethnicities and races.

Words, like money, are human forms of intercourse.
words are how men groom one another, establishing and maintaining relationships.
Words seed minds, transferring ideas, as physical intercourse seeds ova, transferring DNA.
Words transport memories from mind to mind.

I put it simply a long time ago.
Grammar is the currency by which human behavior is exchanged.

This is basically how the author of the Bible put it. Judgment is the currency by which mankind buys and sells his life.

Yet the adult human beings, in the days when this was being written, still, 'judged' one and another, which explains why 'their True value' was not yet known.

[Pistolero]

And life is not yet understood, but we still experience it, because it exists.
Like Will.
As for 'man'....that one is easy.
Man is how we describe the masculine reproductive type within social contexts.

Man/Woman - sexual reproductive specialization.....hormonally determined.
Hormones adjust the development of psychosomatic traits, determining the effectiveness, i.e., fitness, of a particular male/female.

Mind originates in the nervous system, where brain/body merge information inputs: internal and external.
Some call it 'spirit'.

[Age]

See what I mean by illiteracy, the fool, AGE, above did not understand a word of what was posted.

Not that you will ever clarify what I supposedly did not understand, because you fear, absolutely, of the consequences if you ever did.

But, he would make a nice barking dog, if someone could teach him how to bark an Xmas song, like they have done with other dogs, maybe he might one day pass for an entertainer.

'Trying to' deflect is never going to help you.

Now, what is going to happen is 'this one' will never ever provide the supposed True and Right understanding. As 'this one' will prove me absolutely True, again.

I have already shown and proved where, when, how, why, and what, exactly, the words are that "phil8659", still, does not yet understand. So, I have done what is necessary, here, to back up and support my claim.

But, what will be shown and proved True is that "phil8659" will not provide absolutely any thing at all that will back up and support its claim, here.

[Phil8659]

Someone should show Age where Guttenberg is online, he could use the OCR'd versions of works to bark all day long.

[Age]

See what I mean by illiteracy, the fool above did not understand a word of what was posted. But, he would make a nice barking dog, if someone could teach him how to bark an Xmas song, like they have done with other dogs, maybe he might one day pass for an entertainer.

Why do you pay attention to swine?
He can never know what his mind prevents him from understanding.

These forums have no true philosophers, friend.
They come here for other reasons, and use philosophy as a pretext.

They can never udnerstand what language is....and they are trained on its use by those who wish to control them.

'This one' speaks as though 'it knows' but no one else does.

[Age]

This one is the forum's welcoming committee.
He attacks....hoping to glean your essence.

All bark, and no bite.

I am the only one, here, who is backing and supporting its claims with actual irrefutable proof. Thus, what I say and claim, here, is backed up with actual Facts.

Which is a lot more than can said for what you two are doing, here. All words, but no actual Facts.

[Age]

And life is not yet understood, but we still experience it, because it exists.

But, you speak as though you already understand 'life'.

Like Will.
As for 'man'....that one is easy.
Man is how we describe the masculine reproductive type within social contexts.

Yet, you used the word 'man' to speak of, and describe the, 'women', as well. So, could you be more contradictory and/or more hypocritical, here?

Man/Woman - sexual reproductive specialization.....hormonally determined.
Hormones adjust the development of psychosomatic traits, determining the effectiveness, i.e., fitness, of a particular male/female.

Here 'we' have another prime example of one choosing and using particular words in an attempt to sound like it knows what it does and/or to sound like it knows more than it really does.

However, if I was to question and challenge 'this one', again, it will show and prove that it knows far less than it actually does, here.

Mind originates in the nervous system, where brain/body merge information inputs: internal and external.
Some call it 'spirit'.

So, what is 'mind', exactly? And, how does 'mind' work, exactly?

[Age]

Someone should show Age where Guttenberg is online, he could use the OCR'd versions of works to bark all day long.

Again, your attempts at deflection are not helping you. In fact your attempts at deflect are showing and proving just how Truly incompetent you are, here.

Imagine, still believing, absolutely, that one human being 'discovered' a parcel of land where human beings had been living for thousands of years already.

And, what makes 'this' absolutely hilarious is that 'this one' likes to go on about 'grammar' and having the understanding of what words 'mean', but then uses an actual example that proves that it, still, has a long way to go in the learning of what the actual words that it uses, here, actually mean and/or are referring to, exactly.

I have shown the actual word and proved that 'this one' does not understand, here. However, 'this one' makes a claim that I do not understand words, here, but will never say and show what those words are, and will not say what the actual understanding is of those words, which I am supposedly and allegedly not understanding.

So, who is the one doing the so-called 'actual barking', here, is very, very clear and obvious.

[Phil8659]

As far as them days, Age, you can go on Amazon, and buy almost all of his works, The following is just under $28. Or you can down load all of his works for free, under my posting on the Archive, And, as a bonus, you can bark at the words for the rest of your life, and if there is a doggy fairy they might turn you into a real boy.

"A Practical Grammar"" is a book written by Stephen W. Clark in 1853. The book is a comprehensive guide to English grammar, which classifies words, phrases, and sentences according to their functions and relationships to each other. It aims to provide readers with a practical understanding of grammar that can be applied in everyday communication. The book covers a range of topics, including parts of speech, sentence structure, punctuation, and syntax. It also includes examples and exercises to help readers practice and reinforce their understanding of the concepts. Overall, ""A Practical Grammar"" is a valuable resource for anyone looking to improve their English language skills and develop a deeper understanding of grammar.Illustrated By A Complete System Of Diagrams.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.

[Age]

As far as them days, Age, you can go on Amazon, and buy almost all of his works, The following is just under $28. Or you can down load all of his works for free, under my posting on the Archive, And, as a bonus, you can bark at the words for the rest of your life, and if there is a doggy fairy they might turn you into a real boy.

Believing words to be absolutely true or right, just because your 'idol' said or wrote those words will never ever suffice.

"A Practical Grammar"" is a book written by Stephen W. Clark in 1853. The book is a comprehensive guide to English grammar, which classifies words, phrases, and sentences according to their functions and relationships to each other. It aims to provide readers with a practical understanding of grammar that can be applied in everyday communication.

Yet, here 'you' are, still believing that human beings 'discover' lands. Which is even more ridiculous when human beings have been already living on 'those lands'. Thus showing and proving that you, still, have not yet grasped 'grammar' nor 'understanding' of some words and their actual meanings, here.

The book covers a range of topics, including parts of speech, sentence structure, punctuation, and syntax. It also includes examples and exercises to help readers practice and reinforce their understanding of the concepts.

So, if you believe that 'that book' will help you in 'understanding concepts', then I suggest you read 'that book'.

For 'the meaning' of simple words like, 'discover', for example, can not occur when human beings are already living. One day you might come to comprehend and understand this really very, very simple Fact.

Overall, ""A Practical Grammar"" is a valuable resource for anyone looking to improve their English language skills and develop a deeper understanding of grammar.Illustrated By A Complete System Of Diagrams.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations.

Sounds like it might help you somewhat, here.

Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.

Who and/or what is the 'we' word, here, in reference to, exactly?

Now, and let 'us' not forget that you said and wrote:
See what I mean by illiteracy, the fool, AGE, above did not understand a word of what was posted.

I challenged you to show and prove where, when, and what, exactly, I do not, supposedly, understand.

The Fact that you keep 'running away' and will not show and prove any thing, here, shows and proves just how Truly incompetent you are, here.

Making False claims, or any claim, which one does not back up and support is, really, not the wisest of things to do anywhere, let alone in a 'philosophy forum' of all places.

Again, I showed and proved what words you clearly do not understand at all, here. But, you can not do this most simplest of thing, which obviously some already know the actual reason for.

[Phil8659]

Now the complete dumbass does not even know he is attributing to me, text from Amazon. I have never met anyone in my life so stupid as Age. He is truly as stupid and vicious as a mad dog.

Age, take it to Amazon, see if they will hire you as their new head of Advertising.

[Age]

Now the complete dumbass does not even know he is attributing to me, text from Amazon. I have never met anyone in my life so stupid as Age. He is truly as stupid and vicious as a mad dog.

Age, take it to Amazon, see if they will hire you as their new head of Advertising.

I do not care one iota how stupid 'I' am, to 'you'.

What 'I' am just looking for, from 'you', is some thing that could back up and support your beliefs and claims, here. But, 'you' obviously can not or will not provide any, even when you are continually questioned and challenged to.

Also, it is 'I' who does not believe that some parcel of land called "america" was so-called 'discovered' by a human being.

Now, once more, your claim that I do not understand your words, but you not showing what words, nor what the, supposed and alleged', misunderstanding is, exactly, shows and proves that you have not yet fully grasp 'grammar' nor 'understanding', itself.

Oh, and by the way, if you do not attribute words to some one/thing, then how is any one else meant to know where 'those words' came from, exactly?

Not that it really matters anyway.

[Phil8659]

Very noble of you. A blind boy dedicating his life looking everywhere for sense. Yet, he earned not a penny.

[Phil8659]

Age, I wrote this just for you. Will you critique it for me, every page, every line, and clearly write out your objections to how Sketchpad and Mathcad fucked up in each demonstration?


https://ia601309.us.archive.org/21/item ... 0Quest.pdf

If you do not mind, start on page 70, you will learn I use two kinds of geometry, descriptive and mathematical, which I invented myself. Both give the same answer to the figure but, by your own word, you know that they are wrong, so you can educate not only the people who make Sketchpad, but Mathcad as well.
Now, there are hundreds of thousands of equations in the work, I am sure you can find that these programs made at least one or two mistakes. Take all the time you need.