Hello from Cambridge: proposed synthesis

[Age]

The word, 'life', means, living; being alive.

Every thing is living; and thus alive. (Although some human beings can not see and recognize this Fact). Anyway, 'life', or just living; being alive is neither good, nor bad. So, 'life', itself, is neither 'good', nor 'bad'.

However, human beings interpret some things as being good, or bad. Obviously, "jamesconroyuk" interprets 'life' as being 'good', while some others do not. And, as 'we' all know, here, what some people interpret, or even believe is true, even if the some is most or even just about all, is not necessarily what is actually and irrefutably True, at all.

[FlashDangerpants]

Instead of posting links to your 'woteva' - how about addressing statements you make? You are being extremely obstinate in making any effort to back up what you state.

SO AGAIN.

being questioned analytically, rationally.

Mate, you're not being rational.

Quite the opposite. You're talking magic.

What magic? Explain yourself.

It would appear that he has worked out that you a delusional schizophrenic who thinks God communicates with you by telling you batshit insane nonsense. He's trying to be polite about it because he doesn't want to hurt your feelings. He has no idea that you are too much of an alcoholic to have any feelings left.

[attofishpi]

Instead of posting links to your 'woteva' - how about addressing statements you make? You are being extremely obstinate in making any effort to back up what you state.

SO AGAIN.

Mate, you're not being rational.

Quite the opposite. You're talking magic.

What magic? Explain yourself.

It would appear that he has worked out that you a delusional schizophrenic who thinks God communicates with you by telling you batshit insane nonsense. He's trying to be polite about it because he doesn't want to hurt your feelings. He has no idea that you are too much of an alcoholic to have any feelings left.

Actually you are wrong again Flash.

This "The Hedge" thang - that "cambridge" posted I am exposing as bollocks - he is not happy about that - refusing to answer every question I have of it - call that philosophy?

This guy agreed earlier in our conversation that IF GOD exists, then there must be a plausible reason for its existence. He agreed to stop using the 'mystical' term. He has now claimed I am stating "magic" somewhere..

My GOD you talk shite about me. You know I am rational in this conversation EVEN if it contradicts your incorrect position (atheism) - there is no need to continue to belittle me with such disgusting bullshit from you.

Why don't you WISE up for a change and discuss anything with me philosophically and respectfully - is it just because I don't agree with "gender" men can be women, AND I'm not in agreeement with open border policy..

[jamesconroyuk]

The word, 'life', means, living; being alive.

No, that's how you're erroneously misinterpreting it. The framework is clear.

LIFE is referring to ALL life - the process of life. NOT an individuals experience of it.

"Life (a system capable of preserving itself through adaptive structure and information transfer) is the necessary precondition for all value."

[jamesconroyuk]

It would appear that he has worked out that you a delusional schizophrenic who thinks God communicates with you by telling you batshit insane nonsense. He's trying to be polite about it because he doesn't want to hurt your feelings. He has no idea that you are too much of an alcoholic to have any feelings left.

Haha! Noted. Thanks for the heads up.

[Age]

The word, 'life', means, living; being alive.

No, that's how you're erroneously misinterpreting it.

That is how I am, supposedly, erroneously misinterpreting 'what', exactly?

The framework is clear.

What 'framework', exactly?

'your own personal views and beliefs framework'?

LIFE is referring to ALL life - the process of life. NOT an individuals experience of it.

Once again you have completely and utterly misinterpreted what I have said, and meant, here.

I never ever thought any individuals experience of 'it', here, let alone said or wrote that anywhere, here.

So, what you are 'seeing' and 'reading' is absolutely nothing at all in what I have said, wrote, and meant, here.

The actual definition I gave for the word, 'life', above here, refers to ALL life. Which can be very clearly seen and proved by the very definition that I provided.

That you believe, absolutely, that only some things are alive, and living, has only stopped and prevented you from learning and understanding what I have been referencing, meaning, and talking about

"Life (a system capable of preserving itself through adaptive structure and information transfer) is the necessary precondition for all value."

But, only things like human beings give 'value', to things.

[jamesconroyuk]

What 'framework', exactly?

This one: https://www.academia.edu/128894269/Synt ... _All_Value

Your semantic sophistry is suffocating my thread. Please refrain. Engage properly or not at all.

[jamesconroyuk]

That

what does 'that' mean?

how

Be more specific...

am

am? Am what???

supposedly

can you clarify exactly what you mean?

erroneously

Eh?

misinterpreting

Did you mean to say this?

'what',

I don't quite understand...

exactly

Can you please be more precise? What do exactly do you mean 'exactly?

This isn't insightful. Go away!

[attofishpi]

It would appear that he has worked out that you a delusional schizophrenic who thinks God communicates with you by telling you batshit insane nonsense. He's trying to be polite about it because he doesn't want to hurt your feelings. He has no idea that you are too much of an alcoholic to have any feelings left.

Haha! Noted. Thanks for the heads up.

Wot R U , beyond a giggling twat attempting to form allegiances.

How much do you want to bet that Flashdangerpoo reads fuck all of your nonsense

[jamesconroyuk]

giggling twat

You got me, this sage is clearly real.

[Age]

What 'framework', exactly?

This one: https://www.academia.edu/128894269/Synt ... _All_Value

Your semantic sophistry is suffocating my thread. Please refrain. Engage properly or not at all.

What you are, still, not yet comprehending, and understanding, is when I say and write, 'Life means, living; being alive', this means the EXACT SAME as when you said and wrote, LIFE is referring to ALL life - the process of life.

Why you, still, can not yet comprehend and understand, here, would be quite bewildering, if I did not yet already know, exactly, why you are so slow, here.

And, if you really do want to believe, absolutely, that I have presented any thing false, here, then go ahead and show it, and prove it. For, if you do not, then it is you who is 'trying to' present false claims, here.

[Age]

That

what does 'that' mean?

how

Be more specific...

am

am? Am what???

supposedly

can you clarify exactly what you mean?

erroneously

Eh?

misinterpreting

Did you mean to say this?

'what',

I don't quite understand...

exactly

Can you please be more precise? What do exactly do you mean 'exactly?

This isn't insightful. Go away!

your, 'Life is Good', claim is just your own personal opinion, and does not relate to what 'Life', Itself, actually is, exactly.

Basing one's own personal views, opinions, and/or beliefs, on one's own personal assumptions from past experiences, will never necessarily provide 'them' with the actual Truths, in Life. As 'this one', here, is clearly showing and very clearly proving absolutely True.

[jamesconroyuk]

your, 'Life is Good', claim is just your own personal opinion

Do you understand what an AXIOM is?

Look it up.

This is getting silly - I came here for discourse...

[Age]

your, 'Life is Good', claim is just your own personal opinion

Do you understand what an AXIOM is?

Look it up.

This is getting silly - I came here for discourse...

Have you looked it up? It appears as though you obviously clearly have not.

you just keep making this sillier. you have been shown, exactly, where your so-called framework and beliefs,l are clearly not working, thus why you have not garnered any support at all, here. Yet you do not want to take on board what has been pointed out to you, thus why you do not want to change a single view, beliefs, nor word of yours, here.

you are absolutely free to keep holding onto absolutely your 'current' position and belief, here, but it just is not working.

you have not come, here, for discourse at all. you came, here, with a position, which you obviously want to keep holding onto very strongly, and you want to fight and argue for 'your position'

[jamesconroyuk]

An Axiom isn't an opinion - you're making yourself look foolish with your lack of simple understanding

Look it up.

Why are you even here?

I'm trying to discuss my published axiomatic framework - not ego battle/ ego stroke / argue for arguments sake because I have no life - unlike you. Either contribute or get lost.

You're ignorance is irritating.