If it's so 'trivial' then why are men in frocks screaming with rage at the thought of not being allowed to use womens toilets and changing rooms, play in women's sports, be housed in women's prisons, access women's refuges and rape crisis centres? Do you think those men find this 'trivial'? Why do you think they are so ANGRY? Do you think those men are safe to be around women, especially the ones with signs saying they want to kill women? I'm sure you will easily find them since I can't post photos on here. Not that you would care about something so 'trivial'.Alexiev wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 1:04 amSince I never read your posts (unless they are responding to me) I had no idea what you were ranting about. Maia was discussing unisex changing rooms.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 12:48 am Where did I write the word 'unisex'? Obviously men in frocks (and not in frocks) can use unisex spaces and always have done.
As most of the male dummies on this site can't read, I will say it as simply as I possibly can. The supreme court decision hasn't changed the law. All it has done is clarify what the Equality Act means by the word 'woman'. Is that simple enough for your porn-fuddled manbrain?
I don't care about the Supreme Court decision, as you could have guessed if you knew what the word "trivial" means.
You need your head read. It's none of your business anyway. The erasure of women isn't trivial to women.