The hilarious meltdown of men who hate women

[accelafine]

''I’ve found my soundtrack for spring: the caterwauling of fellas in dresses following yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling. It’s delicious. They’re raging about the ‘fascism’ of no longer being allowed to get their knobs out in the women’s changing room. They’re agonising over where they’re supposed to take a shit now. Their Adam’s apples are getting a mighty fine workout as they wail into the void about being ‘erased’ by ‘transphobes’. It’s the sound of men being stripped of their entitlements by women who’ve had enough of their crap, and I am so here for it.

No sooner had the Supreme Court said what even the Neanderthals knew – that men are men and women are women – than these blokes were fuming. First out of the traps was thin-lipped loon India Willoughby. He branded the court’s decision ‘evil’. Yes, it is apparently wicked and immoral to say that if you have a todger you’re a fella. Willoughby spent the day furiously doubling down on his delusions of womanhood. ‘I have always been a woman’, he said. Tell that to the jizz you sired your kid with.

It’s a ‘grim day’, they cry. The ruling threatens trans people’s ‘safety’, they say. That’s big talk from a movement that expects female prisoners to live cheek by jowl with rapists and girls to share changing rooms with hulking blokes in ill-fitting bikinis. There are dark mutterings about ‘fascism’. Munroe Bergdorf shared a post saying: ‘There is no trans debate. There are trans people and there are fascists who wish to dominate and eliminate trans people.’ Dude, it’s not fascism to say women should be free to seek rape counselling without fearing there’ll be a weirdo in a boob tube listening in.

Imagine the colossal levels of self-regard it must require to think it’s ‘fascism’ when you’re politely asked to use the right loo. It’s amazing how many of these ‘literal women’ sound like entitled men. Slandering TERFs as ‘fascists’ has been all the rage for ages, of course. Professor of gibberish Judith Butler calls gender-critical feminism ‘one of the dominant strains of fascism in our time’. It used to be alt-right wankers who called feminists ‘feminazis’. Now it’s nonbinary wankers. Two cheeks of the same arse.

Trans folk are hilariously cosplaying as civil-rights activists. The Supreme Court ruling is ‘very bleak’ but ‘we will carry on’, said Shon Faye, as if his march into women-only spaces were akin to MLK’s march on Selma. There are dire warnings about the ‘elimination’ of ‘transwomen’. Fellas, listen: no one’s saying you can’t exist. We’re just saying you can’t exist in women-only spaces. You can wear women’s clothing if you like – you just can’t take it off in front of actual women who’d rather not see your moobs and balls. It’s not complicated. It’s certainly not fascism.

There’s been the usual shite. One trans ally sneered at ‘the little ladies… nervously clutching their handbags [and] fumbling for their pearl necklaces’ over the prospect of seeing one of those ‘terrifying creatures with… a PENIS’. Yeah, you daft bints, why won’t you obediently behold the estrogen-shrivelled cock of every deluded man who intrudes into your spaces? I’m old enough to remember when we called this ‘flashing’ – now we’re meant to call it ‘trans rights’.

Some of the angry fellas say they intend to carry on going into women-only areas. ‘You will never stop me accessing female spaces. It is my right to use them’, says one. Not anymore it isn’t, you p****. Trans activist Charlie Craggs says it’s terrible that he’ll now be expected to ‘use men’s spaces’
alongside ‘predatory men’. How can TERFs sleep at night, he says, knowing ‘they’re sending transwomen into bathrooms with predatory men’. What depthless gall. The men who demanded that women throw open their changing rooms, refuges, swimming pools and sports to any bloke who fancied waltzing in are now blubbing that they’ll have to share spaces with those very same blokes. Honestly, what these people lack in XX chromosomes they more than make up for with brass neck.

Then, best of all, came ‘the allies’. Is there anything funnier than a fiftysomething public-school arse trying to stay relevant by saying ‘transwomen are women’? Barrister Jolyon Maugham – famous for killing foxes and losing cases – declared in his haughty headmaster’s drawl that the court’s ruling is ‘profoundly unfair’. LBC knob jockey James O’Brien asked TERFs how they feel being on the same side as Donald Trump on the trans issue. I don’t know, James, I think I’m happier being on the side of Trump than on the side of a movement that mutilates young lesbians, calls women cunts and puts rapists in women’s jails so they can rape more women.

It’s been a 24-hour temper tantrum, the hissy fit heard round the world. And I’m loving it. For while this noisy orgy of self-pity might doll itself up as a cry for civil rights, in truth it’s the death rattle of trans activism’s neo-misogyny. They know the jig is up, or very nearly up. They know the days are over when people with penises could say ‘I’m a woman!’ and get a nod of approval rather than a one-way ticket to the nuthouse. The sight of angry men bashing their keyboards in fury at the uppity bitches who went to the Supreme Court has exposed the truth about the trans lobby – it’s a men’s rights movement in drag.

The real reason they’re enraged about being booted out of women’s spaces is because they think the whole world should revolve around their made-up identities. They expect women to be the passive validators of their delusions, to bow, compliantly, to their presence in women’s spaces and their insistence on being women. When women withdraw their consent from this post-truth shitshow and say ‘NO’, the lie of their identity starts to crumble. That’s why men are angry – because women are revolting. It’s a story as old as time.

Brendan O’Neill is spiked’s chief political writer and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show. ''

[Maia]

This is a very welcome, and actually quite surprising decision, given recent trends. It seems like hardly a month goes by without their being some rumour at work about them trying to make the changing rooms unisex, or the bathrooms, or staff uniforms, or whatever. Since it's a leisure centre, this is a very important issue, with regard to changing rooms, and so on, and the explicit reason for doing all this is to accommodate the trans lobby. We had to go on strike a few years ago over this very issue, but there was no clear resolution. Hopefully this will now put a stop to the whole thing, but we shouldn't underestimate the backlash. As I've made it clear to them, many times, having men in our changing rooms and bathrooms would be a bridge too far, for me, and I would have to resign, very regretfully.

[accelafine]

I wonder how long it will last though. These men aren't going to just quietly accept it. There will be scurrying behind the scenes in Govt. chambers trying to find ways to get around it. I'm predicting they will repeal the Equality Act 2010. What's to stop them from changing it to simply add '+ transwomn' to 'women'? Or some convoluted hogwash about 'gender identity'. Starmer is obviously a rabid misogynist and utter moron.
How stupid ARE people exactly? Why do they THINK men are so desperate to get into women's spaces??? Is that really something that normal, non-predatory men want to do?
This isn't over by a long shot.
The law hasn't even been changed. The court case was only needed because people have lost their minds over less than a decade and forgotten (pretended to forget) what a female human being is. The word 'gender' has driven the human race collectively insane. I'm not sure that a cure is possible now.

[Maia]

I wonder how long it will last though. These men aren't going to just quietly accept it. There will be scurrying behind the scenes in Govt. chambers trying to find ways to get around it. I'm predicting they will repeal the Equality Act 2010. What's to stop them from changing it to simply add '+ transwomn' to 'women'? Starmer is obviously a rabid misogynist and utter moron.
How stupid ARE people exactly? Why do they THINK men are so desperate to get into women's spaces??? Is that really something that normal, non-predatory men want to do?
This isn't over by a long shot.
The law hasn't even been changed. The court case was only needed because people have lost their minds over less than a decade and forgotten (pretended to forget) what a female human being is. The word 'gender' has driven the human race collectively insane. I'm not sure that a cure is possible now.

I certainly wouldn't put it past this government to amend the law for that very purpose. Jess Phillips, the "Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls" is actually my own MP, and I'd write to her if I thought it would do any good, but given her stance on the rape gang issue, I wouldn't hold my breath. I might still try, though.

[accelafine]

I wonder how long it will last though. These men aren't going to just quietly accept it. There will be scurrying behind the scenes in Govt. chambers trying to find ways to get around it. I'm predicting they will repeal the Equality Act 2010. What's to stop them from changing it to simply add '+ transwomn' to 'women'? Starmer is obviously a rabid misogynist and utter moron.
How stupid ARE people exactly? Why do they THINK men are so desperate to get into women's spaces??? Is that really something that normal, non-predatory men want to do?
This isn't over by a long shot.
The law hasn't even been changed. The court case was only needed because people have lost their minds over less than a decade and forgotten (pretended to forget) what a female human being is. The word 'gender' has driven the human race collectively insane. I'm not sure that a cure is possible now.

I certainly wouldn't put it past this government to amend the law for that very purpose. Jess Phillips, the "Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls" is actually my own MP, and I'd write to her if I thought it would do any good, but given her stance on the rape gang issue, I wouldn't hold my breath. I might still try, though.

Perhaps she's one of the better ones. I'm not sure. You can see how insane the whole thing is when her title is 'Safeguarding and Violence against Women and Girls' (that makes it sound as if she's promoting violence against women and girls. It doesn't even make sense) when 'women and girls' includes 'men and boys'.

[Maia]

I wonder how long it will last though. These men aren't going to just quietly accept it. There will be scurrying behind the scenes in Govt. chambers trying to find ways to get around it. I'm predicting they will repeal the Equality Act 2010. What's to stop them from changing it to simply add '+ transwomn' to 'women'? Starmer is obviously a rabid misogynist and utter moron.
How stupid ARE people exactly? Why do they THINK men are so desperate to get into women's spaces??? Is that really something that normal, non-predatory men want to do?
This isn't over by a long shot.
The law hasn't even been changed. The court case was only needed because people have lost their minds over less than a decade and forgotten (pretended to forget) what a female human being is. The word 'gender' has driven the human race collectively insane. I'm not sure that a cure is possible now.

I certainly wouldn't put it past this government to amend the law for that very purpose. Jess Phillips, the "Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls" is actually my own MP, and I'd write to her if I thought it would do any good, but given her stance on the rape gang issue, I wouldn't hold my breath. I might still try, though.

Perhaps she's one of the better ones. I'm not sure. You can see how insane the whole thing is when her title is 'Safeguarding and Violence against Women and Girls' (that makes it sound as if she's promoting violence against women and girls. It doesn't even make sense) when 'women and girls' includes 'men and boys'.

Yes, it's a rather ill-thought out title. She has consistently blocked any inquiry into the rape gangs, but I suppose it's worth a try. It couldn't do any harm, anyway.

[accelafine]

I certainly wouldn't put it past this government to amend the law for that very purpose. Jess Phillips, the "Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls" is actually my own MP, and I'd write to her if I thought it would do any good, but given her stance on the rape gang issue, I wouldn't hold my breath. I might still try, though.

Perhaps she's one of the better ones. I'm not sure. You can see how insane the whole thing is when her title is 'Safeguarding and Violence against Women and Girls' (that makes it sound as if she's promoting violence against women and girls. It doesn't even make sense) when 'women and girls' includes 'men and boys'.

Yes, it's a rather ill-thought out title. She has consistently blocked any inquiry into the rape gangs, but I suppose it's worth a try. It couldn't do any harm, anyway.

We will have to wait and see. The trannies have organised a protest over there, scheduled for 1pm. The ridiculous thing is that the law hasn't been changed. It has only been clarified what it means by 'women'. FFS. Did I even just say that? Do these degenerate misfits even know what they are 'protesting'?
Has that creep of a PM of yours come out from under his rock yet to make a statement?

[Maia]

Perhaps she's one of the better ones. I'm not sure. You can see how insane the whole thing is when her title is 'Safeguarding and Violence against Women and Girls' (that makes it sound as if she's promoting violence against women and girls. It doesn't even make sense) when 'women and girls' includes 'men and boys'.

Yes, it's a rather ill-thought out title. She has consistently blocked any inquiry into the rape gangs, but I suppose it's worth a try. It couldn't do any harm, anyway.

We will have to wait and see. The trannies have organised a protest over there, scheduled for 1pm. The ridiculous thing is that the law hasn't been changed. It has only been clarified what it means by 'women'. FFS. Did I even just say that? Do these degenerate misfits even know what they are 'protesting'?
Has that creep of a PM of yours come out from under his rock yet to make a statement?

I haven't heard anything, yet, about the PM or the protests, but then, I've been out. I know that a number of Labour MPs have come out and criticised the ruling.

It really does seem preposterous that there's even a debate about this. The same with women's sports. Those men who take part in them are cheating, plain and simple, and should be ashamed of themselves.

[Alexiev]

Whether one agrees or disagrees, this issue is so trivial that the publicity surrounding it is ridiculous. OK. I get it. Men sometimes pee on the floor or the toilet seat. (That seems to be the biggest complaint about unisex bathrooms). That's bad -- but aren't there more important issues?

[Impenitent]

whenever I am using a "unisex" bathroom, I always put both the seat and the lid down when I am done...

if I have to lift something, everybody has to lift something...

-Imp

[Immanuel Can]

These aren't "men who hate women." These are men who want to BECOME women, or BE TREATED AS women, PREEN AS women, or REPLACE women. Nobody could be more fawningly fond of the trappings of womanhood -- though, of course, being men, they know absolutely nothing about the existential experiences of BEING a woman, and can only be making it all up out of their own fevered-male imaginations.

A good decision. That it needed a decision at all is the most amazing fact about it. It speaks to the level of delusion to which our society, en masse, is capable of stooping.

[accelafine]

These aren't "men who hate women." These are men who want to BECOME women, or BE TREATED AS women, PREEN AS women, or REPLACE women. Nobody could be more fawningly fond of the trappings of womanhood -- though, of course, being men, they know absolutely nothing about the existential experiences of BEING a woman, and can only be making it all up out of their own fevered-male imaginations.

A good decision. That it needed a decision at all is the most amazing fact about it. It speaks to the level of delusion to which our society, en masse, is capable of stooping.

All the death threats and the violence at women's speaking events would say otherwise. I don't want to know or care what's in their icky minds. They just need to fuck off out of women's spaces and events.

[accelafine]

Imagine how thick, unimaginative and self-absorbed a man would need to be to tell women and girls this is 'trivial' (because it doesn't personally affect HIM) and that they should just 'suck it up' when they get raped in prisons, robbed of sporting accolades and prizes, injured by men competing in women's sports, tarred with the brushes of rape and paedophilia by a police force that doesn't know what a woman is, charged with 'hate crimes' for making comments online that men aren't women, have to either put up with men at rape crisis centres or not use them, get strip-searched by fetishistic men, get called a 'cervix haver' or 'pregnant person' because the word 'woman' has lost its meaning and words that apply only to women might offend some men, be forced to change at work in a closet because men with a sexual fetish want to use the designated female changing room, lose your job because you called a man a man ( and as a medical professional are required to know the difference between men and women), become a sub-category of your own sex, be effectively erased from the human race.... Imagine being constantly told (ordered) to 'be kind' to these arseholes and 'respect their pronouns' etc. i.e. participate in their fetish. Not complying can often mean not having a job. Imagine being a mother with young chldren in a women's toilet or changing room and being confronted with a thunking great man wearing next to nothing (or nothing) taking selfies in front of the mirrors, or hear him masturbating in the next cubicle. Imagine being legally obliged to 'suck it up' because if you 'offend' him you are likely to be charged with a 'hate crime'.
So no, this is not just about a 'bit of pee on a toilet seat' (and that's the least of what men get up to in women's toilets). The consequences of erasing women from language and effectively existence (yes, that's exactly what has happened, because if men are women then 'woman' doesn't mean anything) are endless and all-encompassing.

[Alexiev]

Good grief! All this nonsense about unisex bathrooms? Aren't all bathrooms in people's houses unisex?

I looked it up. There is no evidence that sexual assaults are more common in unisex bathrooms than in single sex bathrooms (although they occasionally occur in both).

Unisex bathrooms were common before the furor surrounding trans rights. Objecting to them is nonsensical.

[accelafine]

Fuck off then. It's good to know that you have public toilets in your home, open to anyone who wants to use them. I hope you have a sign outside your house letting people know. Do you really think this is only about toilets? What's the point in women's toilets and changing rooms if men can use them you utter moron.
You really aren't very bright are you?

The law hasn't even been changed. All that's happened (after FIVE YEARS of deliberation and untold money spent) is that the supreme court has clarified that the word 'women' in the Equality Act 2010 doesn't mean 'women and men'.