The Unified Field Doctrine of Causality.
By now, you know, just by the computer you use, that it can process all information. It achieves this ability by its parsing of electricity. It uses two types of identity to do this, arithmetic and geometric.
So here is what Plato did. In his day, the philosophical debates were over the idea that everything was in motion, or that everything was constant. Thus, we have finite and infinite. So, everything was either, one or the other, or what Plato demonstrated, they are both.
Thus whenever we make an assertion or denial, Are we using one or the other, as Aristotle claimed, or are we in fact using both? A thing is a combination of a relative within correlatives, i.e., every thing is a combination of both. In order to even reason, then you have to know the relative, the correlative, and some sense as to how they are combined into a unified whole.
For example, we are the product of a physical body which produces a system of intelligible management of the body. Let us apply this to the notion of why we do anything.
We respond both to the physical world, and the intelligible.
So, how do you create a unified concept of purpose? The physical is not the intelligible, nor is the intelligible the physical.
Some say God exists, some say no. But here we are back to all things are in motion, or all things are constant. How do you combine them to make something that is factually real?
Metaphysics is to the intelligible as physics is to the perceptible. That gives you four ways, four chances at getting a correct doctrine that involves one's own purpose in life.
Now, in terms of the perceptible, you can get physics right or wrong, One way of getting it always right is making a conditional statement which accepts correction.
IN terms of Metaphysics you have the same choices.
So, there you have it. his Unified Field Doctrine, the reason he is cited for being the founder of formal grammar, is
You have to get the relative paired with the correlative, and have some notion as to the reason they are paired.
Or as Marcus said, Matter, form, and purpose.
Thus, God, as he explained it, is the combination of all of our power we manage, all the physical power and all of the intellectual power by which both they and we function.
So this can be put into a metaphor, Man was created to tend the Garden of Life. This cannot be done, seeing how it is so vast, without correct judgment, i.e,, language processed in accordance with the truth of things.
Understanding any thing at all is a multiple choice question. A, B, C, or D.
Getting it right is based on one's own intelligence.
Intelligence means, the ability to learn. At what age do people essentially stop learning? When do their ideals become fossils? When they reach what is true, or when they cease to learn?
Any intelligent person can be corrected for typos, as can any ignorant fool. However, one cannot correct the truth, nor can you correct a fool.
So what is God? a purely rational mind to a factual physical Universe. The only two powers we can factually know or Man is in the Image of God.
Metaphysics is to the intelligible as physics is to the perceptible.