Philosophy of Gender

[Pistolero]

Gender is the cultural adaptation of naturally selected reproductive roles.

By the time posts are "approved" the discussion has moved on.

Weird system you've got here.

suddenly my posts are immediately posted.
A security measure.

Within their reproductive role, women are so adept at triggering hot emotional reactions that the tendency tends to also appear outside of reproductive situations, such as when power jousting for control.

For example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA8RtJLdQhA

yes, reproductive traits, in both sexes/genders, have multiple applications.
The primary one, if successful, gives rise to secondary uses.

[Walker]

yes, reproductive traits, in both sexes/genders, have multiple applications.
The primary one, if successful, gives rise to secondary uses.

Have you noticed these days the woke use of the word gender to describe the idiosyncratic behaviors of individuals who are one sex, or the other sex.

The word gender is used in place of the word sex because when gender is used as a verb*, even in these days of multi-functional f-bombs raining down from media and entertainment the word gender generally doesn’t get the same reactions as sex the verb, however that cultural prudence is fading along with the fading, rich vocabulary that more specifically describes what the f-bombs try to implicitly describe, sometimes successfully.

The reason why all men don’t need the dress-wearing statement of identity, is the same reason why one individual does not exhibit every possible human self-concept.

In other words, gender variation beyond the two genders that correlate with the two sexes, is actually describing idiosyncratic behavior of one of the two, but elevated to the separate concept of gender when self-concept hinges on behavior.

*as in gendering and misgendering

[Pistolero]

Sex is biological and apparent. they cannot claim that it's a "social construct."
But gender is how sexual roles are integrated within a particular culture...and so socially determined.
This does not make them arbitrary nor contrary to sex.
Both refer to a particular set of physical AND psychological traits that facilitate the success of each reproductive role.
The "range" they refer to refers to the range of traits that are necessary for the success of either reproductive role.

Any "gender" in antithesis to these sexual roles are, by definition unfit - meaning they contradict the productive role, and make it unlikely that reproduction will succeed....this is what "fitness" refers to in biology.
Therefore, a truly ideologically based, socially engineered, 'gender' cannot reproduce, and is unfit.
They project, accusing ALL genders as being social constructs to conceal the fact that their dozens of socially constructed 'gender's are contrary to nature, and are parasitical. They depend on natural sexual roles to propagate because they cannot propagate themselves.

Nature produces mutations with every replication, but this does not mean all of them are fit, or offer an advantage to the individual.
In nature these unfit mutation are culled out of the gene pool but in manmade and maintained environments, governed by nihilistic ideals - like Americanism and postmodernism - they are sheltered and allowed to propagate and compound, resulting in all kinds of monstrosities.
Dutton calls them "spiteful mutants". They are prone to feel resentfulness towards their own kind and to seek allies in the enemies of their kind....Leftists.