Philosophy of Gender

[Phil8659]

How do you check the gender of a philosophy without asking a gynecologists' to break his oath of confidentiality?

[attofishpi]

How do you check the gender of a philosophy without asking a gynechologist to break his oath of confidentiality?

..this had better be a joke AND a joke that is actually funny.

[Pistolero]

Gender is the cultural adaptation of naturally selected reproductive roles.

[Phil8659]

Let us examine the phrase "Philosophy of Gender" This reasoning can be applied to all the phrases "The Philosophy of X."
Its immediate grammatical transform is
Gender Philosophy.

Now Gender is binary, which means it has four states.
Male, female, both, which has a name, and neither, which has a cause, sterility.

So, we then have four additional transforms.

A Male philosophy, which is an anthropomorphism.
B female philosophy, which is an anthropomorphism.
C both, which is a contradition.
D and neither which yields just the name Philosophy.

So, is the answer A, B, C or D?

Multiple choice question
Now, if a person cannot use binary to reason with, and they constantly display their lack of ability; is that person literate?

[Phil8659]

Let us now, going from a particular example, to the purely intelligible.

We have two parts of speech, noun and verb, but in the intelligible, it is limit and relative difference.

So, which is the point of the exercise given in Plato's Parmenides, What are the principles of predication?

Can a noun equal a noun? Only as a synonym.
Can a noun equal a verb? No.
Can a verb equal a noun? No.
Can a verb equal a verb? Only as a synonym.

Now, can a verb equal a noun and verb? No.
Can a noun equal a noun and verb? No.

What is the solution to the dilemma?
How do we effect recursion in grammar? By the perceptible or intelligible?
the definitive sentence equates a noun to a grouping of noun and verb. It directs the mind to perform an operation, not a one to one arithmetic assignment.
Thus grammar depends not only on the arithmetic one to one, in name assignments, but provides a way of grouping the same as if they were perceptible. This is required because verbs are the information, and nouns the limits of it.
thus in the definitive sentence, we equate noun as a container, to a name group, of container and contained, i.e., just like counting, in fact, it is the method common grammar uses for counting.

There are two types of identity. When we ask, do two things equal, we are treating them under an arithmetic assignment. But if we equate them by an operation, they may or may not be proportional, or again, metaphorical.

All systems of grammar depend upon both types of identity. the literal, or arithmetic, and the metaphorical, or geometric.

[promethean75]

This is great news, Phil.

[Phil8659]

This is great news, Phil.

Words, in of themselves, have no meaning, great or small. They what we do with them is either great or small.

[Walker]

This is great news, Phil.

Words, in of themselves, have no meaning, great or small. They what we do with them is either great or small.

Many do jousting.

Fake eyelashes vs butch body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA8RtJLdQhA

The clip illustrates a skilled female* Triggermeister winning the word joust via calmly sparking hot emotional reactions.

*redundancy

[Pistolero]

Gender is the cultural adaptation of naturally selected reproductive roles.

By the time posts are "approved" the discussion has moved on.

Weird system you've got here.

suddenly my posts are immediately posted.
A security measure.

[Age]

Gender is the cultural adaptation of naturally selected reproductive roles.

By the time posts are "approved" the discussion has moved on.

By the time you come back, next time, the discussion will have moved on, as well.

Weird system you've got here.

Is this from everyone's perspective, some people's perspective, or just from your own perspective, only?

suddenly my posts are immediately posted.

Are you saying this to inform us of this, or because you are amazed and just think out aloud, in written words? Or for some other reason?

A security measure.

What is this in relation to, exactly?

[Pistolero]

Thank you, friend, for identifying yourself to me.
I will make sure I adapt accordingly.

But...I believe the subject is gender.

[Age]

Thank you, friend, for identifying yourself to me.

Did 'I'?

If yes, then, 'Who am 'I'?'

And, 'you' do NOT even have to answer and clarify, EXACTLY.

But, if 'we' are to go on your past, here, already, you WILL NOT even ANSWER and CLARIFY this VERY SIMPLE QUESTION, which is BASED UPON your OWN BELIEF and CLAIM, here.

I will make sure I adapt accordingly.

But...I believe the subject is gender.

ONCE AGAIN 'this one' could not or did not just answer and clarify very simple questions.

[Walker]

Gender is the cultural adaptation of naturally selected reproductive roles.

By the time posts are "approved" the discussion has moved on.

Weird system you've got here.

suddenly my posts are immediately posted.
A security measure.

Within their reproductive role, women are so adept at triggering hot emotional reactions that the tendency tends to also appear outside of reproductive situations, such as when power jousting for control.

For example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA8RtJLdQhA

[Walker]

How do you check the gender of a philosophy without asking a gynechologist to break his oath of confidentiality?

..this had better be a joke AND a joke that is actually funny.

Could a man who calls himself a wife get away with acting like this wife?
A: Sure, if he is wealthy. Wealth forgives much.

Humour
Unlucky Husband of Viral Worst Wife Ever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk1-Cllu4T0
(note: the clip ends with a self-promoting sales pitch)

[accelafine]

How do you check the gender of a philosophy without asking a gynechologist to break his oath of confidentiality?

This is taking typos to an art form...