Donald Trump

[Atla]

More importantly, what is a "real woman"? There are some females here who don't qualify.

[Fairy]

More importantly, what is a "real woman"? There are some females here who don't qualify.

A “real woman” is an interpretation of something, an object looked upon. In looking, the looker simply doesn’t know what it is looking at. So an interpretation forms, somehow, magically from out of the ethers, just like that, on demand, it’s just the magic of silence sounding, or nothing somethingin…..

That’s my philosophical answer, so love it or leave it, I couldn’t give a shite, I’m not changing my mind.
Life’s too short to care.

[accelafine]

More importantly, what is a "real woman"? There are some females here who don't qualify.

Every woman is a 'real woman' just as every man is a 'real man'. There is no requirement apart from to be born female and grow up. You're welcome.

[Atla]

Incorrect.

[FlashDangerpants]

Okay.

So instead of climbing on your high horse and accusing Flannel Jebus of delivering a "ridiculous argument" way back on page 2 of this thread, you should probably have given it an extra mulling over because he's quite smart, the argument he presented was a valid criticism, and it would be useful for you to realise that.

I’m not terribly afraid of being ridiculous or systemically ridiculed by ridiculously ignorant folks like you. My god, next you’ll be trying to ban me from ever daring to think for myself ffs.

I wasn’t even thinking past the age bearing capacity for women to get pregnant at the time when I was simply agreeing with Trump’s point that seemed like a fairly reasonable definition of what is a woman. I understand posting this stuff triggers some people to become highly critical. Because how dare anyone express their opinions about anything. It’s just unacceptable that we can just say whatever we like without being ripped to shreds for even daring to open our mouths. I mean the tolerance could even reach such a level that intelligent people will be banned from ever thinking again so as not to offend the imbeciles.

It seemed ridiculous to me to take my agreement any further, by turning my agreement into a full blown argument about who’s going to be seen as right or wrong on the matter, as at the time I wasn’t going to change my mind one iota. I don’t understand why it had to turn into such a big ordeal, and why you just can’t accept my opinion and leave it at that, rather than leave it, it seemed like you just wanted to shame me into someone who is dense, dull, a psycho and all the other negativity you projected onto to me, even being so mean and spiteful as to drag Harbal into the conversation for fucks sake, what the hell is wrong with you?


And it’s also perfectly okay to make ridiculous definitions, I have no problem with the ridiculous nature of human reasoning. Especially when it involves personal opinions, assumptions, or beliefs.

I’m just not that hung up on perfecting what I can only make a personal interpretation of, due to my own unique mental capacity to understand my reality and of how I perceive it to be. And I’m sure others feel the same way about how they perceive their points of view.


Just as you thought the FJ rebuttal against my agreement was valid, and you took it upon yourself to okay and validate the FJ rebuttal….I okayed and validated Trump’s comment.Why can’t you just accept my agreement. And accept that I had no thoughts or intentions to take it any further. So I don’t need your validation or approval as to what I choose to agree with when I’m making my own mind up about what I agree with. I am the one who gets to decide what I want to agree with, not you, okay!

So now you are back to holding the definition so that you can say other people are wrong? Or are you back to nobody being right and nobody being wrong? It's just a question of in which way you are disagreeing yourself.

You certainly do feel sorry for yourself no matter what though.

[accelafine]

Incorrect.

So tell us what make a woman 'unreal' then? Or a man for that matter?

[Fairy]

So instead of climbing on your high horse and accusing Flannel Jebus of delivering a "ridiculous argument" way back on page 2 of this thread, you should probably have given it an extra mulling over because he's quite smart, the argument he presented was a valid criticism, and it would be useful for you to realise that.

I’m not terribly afraid of being ridiculous or systemically ridiculed by ridiculously ignorant folks like you. My god, next you’ll be trying to ban me from ever daring to think for myself ffs.

I wasn’t even thinking past the age bearing capacity for women to get pregnant at the time when I was simply agreeing with Trump’s point that seemed like a fairly reasonable definition of what is a woman. I understand posting this stuff triggers some people to become highly critical. Because how dare anyone express their opinions about anything. It’s just unacceptable that we can just say whatever we like without being ripped to shreds for even daring to open our mouths. I mean the tolerance could even reach such a level that intelligent people will be banned from ever thinking again so as not to offend the imbeciles.

It seemed ridiculous to me to take my agreement any further, by turning my agreement into a full blown argument about who’s going to be seen as right or wrong on the matter, as at the time I wasn’t going to change my mind one iota. I don’t understand why it had to turn into such a big ordeal, and why you just can’t accept my opinion and leave it at that, rather than leave it, it seemed like you just wanted to shame me into someone who is dense, dull, a psycho and all the other negativity you projected onto to me, even being so mean and spiteful as to drag Harbal into the conversation for fucks sake, what the hell is wrong with you?


And it’s also perfectly okay to make ridiculous definitions, I have no problem with the ridiculous nature of human reasoning. Especially when it involves personal opinions, assumptions, or beliefs.

I’m just not that hung up on perfecting what I can only make a personal interpretation of, due to my own unique mental capacity to understand my reality and of how I perceive it to be. And I’m sure others feel the same way about how they perceive their points of view.


Just as you thought the FJ rebuttal against my agreement was valid, and you took it upon yourself to okay and validate the FJ rebuttal….I okayed and validated Trump’s comment.Why can’t you just accept my agreement. And accept that I had no thoughts or intentions to take it any further. So I don’t need your validation or approval as to what I choose to agree with when I’m making my own mind up about what I agree with. I am the one who gets to decide what I want to agree with, not you, okay!

So now you are back to holding the definition so that you can say other people are wrong? Or are you back to nobody being right and nobody being wrong? It's just a question of in which way you are disagreeing yourself.

You certainly do feel sorry for yourself no matter what though.

Dude, I don’t care whether my agreement is wrong or right. This entire thread topic has turned into is a semantic debacle. Gosh I should’ve known better than to create a thread like this.

Winning or losing arguments is not something on the top of my list of priorities when creating threads. I simply be myself, say stuff honestly in the moment. I simply agreed with Trump’s assessment when defining what is a woman. There’s nothing complicated about that. I’m not going to backpedal on my agreement. I don’t even care if my agreement was right, wrong, or whatnot.

Dude, if you want to be right, be right, I don’t give a shite, I’ll happily be delighted for you to be right. Life’s too short to care.

Gosh, now I’m even feeling sorry for myself just because a little big alpha egoistical man arguing for his entitled right to be right said so. I just can’t !!

Just be right then. It’s not difficult or complicated. Just own your right. If that’s what you want.

I couldn’t care less. My agreement still stands, what else can I say. FJ had a fantastic rebuttal on my agreement. It was valid and amazing, wow, I’m happy for him. You agreed with FJ, wow, I’m happy for you too. There, are we all satisfied now.

If not, then tough, it’s not going to create a massive shift in perception for me.Nothing has changed. I still agree with the comments made on the video I posted.

So I guess I’ll See you on the next thrilling instalment of this rather odd “what is a woman” according to a man episode…

It’s not like you are ever going to shut up about it, so do carry on in vain.

[FlashDangerpants]

I’m not terribly afraid of being ridiculous or systemically ridiculed by ridiculously ignorant folks like you. My god, next you’ll be trying to ban me from ever daring to think for myself ffs.

I wasn’t even thinking past the age bearing capacity for women to get pregnant at the time when I was simply agreeing with Trump’s point that seemed like a fairly reasonable definition of what is a woman. I understand posting this stuff triggers some people to become highly critical. Because how dare anyone express their opinions about anything. It’s just unacceptable that we can just say whatever we like without being ripped to shreds for even daring to open our mouths. I mean the tolerance could even reach such a level that intelligent people will be banned from ever thinking again so as not to offend the imbeciles.

It seemed ridiculous to me to take my agreement any further, by turning my agreement into a full blown argument about who’s going to be seen as right or wrong on the matter, as at the time I wasn’t going to change my mind one iota. I don’t understand why it had to turn into such a big ordeal, and why you just can’t accept my opinion and leave it at that, rather than leave it, it seemed like you just wanted to shame me into someone who is dense, dull, a psycho and all the other negativity you projected onto to me, even being so mean and spiteful as to drag Harbal into the conversation for fucks sake, what the hell is wrong with you?


And it’s also perfectly okay to make ridiculous definitions, I have no problem with the ridiculous nature of human reasoning. Especially when it involves personal opinions, assumptions, or beliefs.

I’m just not that hung up on perfecting what I can only make a personal interpretation of, due to my own unique mental capacity to understand my reality and of how I perceive it to be. And I’m sure others feel the same way about how they perceive their points of view.


Just as you thought the FJ rebuttal against my agreement was valid, and you took it upon yourself to okay and validate the FJ rebuttal….I okayed and validated Trump’s comment.Why can’t you just accept my agreement. And accept that I had no thoughts or intentions to take it any further. So I don’t need your validation or approval as to what I choose to agree with when I’m making my own mind up about what I agree with. I am the one who gets to decide what I want to agree with, not you, okay!

So now you are back to holding the definition so that you can say other people are wrong? Or are you back to nobody being right and nobody being wrong? It's just a question of in which way you are disagreeing yourself.

You certainly do feel sorry for yourself no matter what though.

Dude, I don’t care whether my agreement is wrong or right. This entire thread topic has turned into is a semantic debacle. Gosh I should’ve known better than to create a thread like this.

Winning or losing arguments is not something on the top of my list of priorities when creating threads. I simply be myself, say stuff honestly in the moment. I simply agreed with Trump’s assessment when defining what is a woman. There’s nothing complicated about that. I’m not going to backpedal on my agreement. I don’t even care if my agreement was right, wrong, or whatnot.

Dude, if you want to be right, be right, I don’t give a shite, I’ll happily be delighted for you to be right. Life’s too short to care.

Gosh, now I’m even feeling sorry for myself just because a little big alpha egoistical man arguing for his entitled right to be right said so. I just can’t !!

Just be right then. It’s not difficult or complicated. Just own your right. If that’s what you want.

I couldn’t care less. My agreement still stands, what else can I say. FJ had a fantastic rebuttal on my agreement. It was valid and amazing, wow, I’m happy for him. You agreed with FJ, wow, I’m happy for you too. There, are we all satisfied now.

If not, then tough, it’s not going to create a massive shift in perception for me.Nothing has changed. I still agree with the comments made on the video I posted.

So I guess I’ll See you on the next thrilling instalment of this rather odd “what is a woman” according to a man episode…

It’s not like you are ever going to shut up about it, so do carry on in vain.

I graciously accept your gift of the last word. You drove your own car off the cliff and then blamed others, and now you are sulking. Not my problem.

[Fairy]

You’re interpretation, not mine.

You’re welcome.

[attofishpi]

Incorrect.

So tell us what make a woman 'unreal' then? Or a man for that matter?

My girlfriend used to tell me I was unreal all the time..

[promethean75]

No, that was her talking in her sleep about the guy she was dreaming about. You were just half asleep yourself and thought she was talking to you.

[attofishpi]

No, that was her talking in her sleep about the guy she was dreaming about. You were just half asleep yourself and thought she was talking to you.

Actually, I think it's an Australian thing. She'd say it whenever I said something that pissed her off...like, as if I must be making stuff up.

[promethean75]

Oh well damn. I thought it was a clever sex joke or allusion to sex. You're constantly dropping them about. I gotta take back the star I gave you for that one, then.

[Gary Childress]

If Donald Trump can bring peace and end the Ukraine and Gaza conflicts, then I will say Trump did something wonderful.

Other than that, I give him at most a "C-" in his performance at this point. His tariffs, behavior toward Allies, the environment, and government agency shutdowns make me extremely nervous about the future, though.

[attofishpi]

Oh well damn. I thought it was a clever sex joke or allusion to sex. You're constantly dropping them about. I gotta take back the star I gave you for that one, then.

.. honestly I wondered if people would take it that way, but no - she just never believed/agreed to anything I would say/suggest, ergo according to her I was being unreal.

Although, she'd come home from a night out and say "It was unreal!" so maybe on those occasions she was referring to sex, with some dude or woman that was a lot better at it than me. lol

When we split up she delighted in showing me the stud she had just had impaled thru her tongue...clearly for felatio - but not for me. Oh, she was class, i feel like puking now..just thinking of that idiot.