The Democrat Party Hates America

[Walker]

pro swamp, pro violence, pro crime

Exactly so.

... pro Democrat.

Musk said that he and the attorney general (Pam Bondi) now know the names of the “generals” who are coordinating the theatrical protests and vandalism, and they have tracked down the funding. This should be interesting, maybe no more of the usual wink and a nod in response to criminal rioting and destruction. My guess is, the considerable money and organizing required to coordinate the nefarious nationwide display likely comes from some progressive, oxymoronic, government-funded, non-government agencies (NGO) run by Democrats. Criminal conspiracy. RICO.

[FlashDangerpants]

pro swamp, pro violence, pro crime

Exactly so.

... pro Democrat.

Musk said that he and the attorney general (Pam Bondi) now know the names of the “generals” who are coordinating the theatrical protests and vandalism, and they have tracked down the funding. This should be interesting, maybe no more of the usual wink and a nod in response to criminal rioting and destruction. My guess is, the considerable money and organizing required to coordinate the nefarious nationwide display likely comes from some progressive, oxymoronic, government-funded, non-government agencies (NGO) run by Democrats. Criminal conspiracy. RICO.

You fall for the absolute the dumbest bullshit every day. Why haven't you learned to even mildly doubt information from bad sources that just confirms all your biases?

[Walker]

Well, an interview with Musk is from the horse's mouth.

"My guess," that was referenced, is based on the reason of my reasoning.

I figure your reaction to my reasoning is knee-jerk.

[Impenitent]

"you say you want a revolution..."

-Imp

[Immanuel Can]

"you say you want a revolution..."

-Imp

"Meet the new boss,
Same as the old boss..."

IC

[Gary Childress]

"you say you want a revolution..."

-Imp

"Meet the new boss,
Same as the old boss..."

IC

No truer words have ever been said.

[Immanuel Can]

pro swamp, pro violence, pro crime

Exactly so.

... pro Democrat.

Musk said that he and the attorney general (Pam Bondi) now know the names of the “generals” who are coordinating the theatrical protests and vandalism, and they have tracked down the funding. This should be interesting, maybe no more of the usual wink and a nod in response to criminal rioting and destruction. My guess is, the considerable money and organizing required to coordinate the nefarious nationwide display likely comes from some progressive, oxymoronic, government-funded, non-government agencies (NGO) run by Democrats. Criminal conspiracy. RICO.

I notice that, for all the Democrats' squealing like pigs stuck under gates, none of them are saying, "You're not discovering corruption." They're not saying that jobs for non-working bureaucrats, or free hotels and credit cards for illegals, or condoms for the Taliban or funding gay theatre in Ireland are actually good uses of tax funds, or that massive theft has not been going on. They're just really, really annoyed it's all been discovered.

So if we step back, and view it from a non-partisan position, what, exactly is their objection?

It's that they got caught.

[Walker]

That’s right. Good point. The Swamp's insane baseline budgeting system is incentive to spend it or lose it, and they get so much money that they need to get creative with the "ostensible" reasons for spending, with excuses such as Climate Change.

*

This is an interesting explanation of the Democrats’ well known, treasonous ways of using delays to hate America.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfvaDZ2O0aU

- Twenty-seven universal injunctions were issued in the USA during the twentieth century.
- Eighty-six universal injunctions were issued against Trump in his first term.
- Thirty universal injunctions have been issued against Trump in the first weeks of his second term.

Those judges issuing the universal injunctions do not have that authority. They’re just doing it because, you know, they're Democrats and get Trump by any means necessary. Block the agenda of the people. The Democrat Party that Hates America is the fox in the hen house. It's like when The Supreme Court ruled that Biden could not pay off student loans, and Biden just the fox ignoring the legitimacy of the Supreme Court.

[Walker]

https://img.patriotpost.us/01JQP3A3KZN4 ... dpr=2&q=50

[Walker]

The Backstory: National Public Radio (NPR) receives government funding. Its programming is notoriously slanted to the Left. NPR is now on the DOGE chopping block because it is a known, effectively biased, slanted mouthpiece for The Democrat Party that Hates America.

The Story:
Rep. Gill (R-TX) Confronts NPR CEO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZjK7OdVi6U

[commonsense]

There's no comparison. The Civil Rights Movement actually achieved something. They were also non-violent, and non-kleptomaniac, and led in a dignified way by the Reverend Martin Luther King. Today's "protests" are about burning car dealerships, beating Korean store owners, and stealing free sneakers and Gucci bags.

There were violent riots after MLK was assassinated, though. Violence is a scary thing, undermining the legitimate grievances of protest organizers, and it just begets more violence. It would be nice if those who instigate violence wouldn't.

In the case of the Civil Rights marchers, it was the evil people who responded with violence to the peaceful protesters. In the present case, it's the evil people who are initiating the violence, and they ARE the protesters. Regardez la difference.

[Gary Childress]

In the case of the Civil Rights marchers, it was the evil people who responded with violence to the peaceful protesters. In the present case, it's the evil people who are initiating the violence, and they ARE the protesters. Regardez la difference.

So, do you believe that current protests are led by or full of "evil people"? Did you forget to type your response under the quote you pulled up?

[Immanuel Can]

In the case of the Civil Rights marchers, it was the evil people who responded with violence to the peaceful protesters. In the present case, it's the evil people who are initiating the violence, and they ARE the protesters. Regardez la difference.

So, do you believe that current protests are led by or full of "evil people"?

Don't you? If not, then maybe you can explain why looting, pillaging, burning, assaulting and trashing cities are not examples of doing evil.

[Gary Childress]

So, do you believe that current protests are led by or full of "evil people"?

Don't you? If not, then maybe you can explain why looting, pillaging, burning, assaulting and trashing cities are not examples of doing evil.

Violence is bad. However, what protests have been led and organized by looters, pillagers, arsonists, or violent people? Just because those things happen at a protest doesn't mean it was the organizers or leaders of the protest who are evil or responsible for whatever violence occurs in them.

[Immanuel Can]

So, do you believe that current protests are led by or full of "evil people"?

Don't you? If not, then maybe you can explain why looting, pillaging, burning, assaulting and trashing cities are not examples of doing evil.

Violence is bad. However, what protests have been led and organized by looters, pillagers, arsonists, or violent people?

All of them, recently.

Just because those things happen at a protest doesn't mean it was the organizers or leaders of the protest who are evil or responsible for whatever violence occurs in them.

"Organizers"? I said "protesters." I'm judging by what they actuall do, not by what the (perhaps well-intended) fools who ginned them up think is going to happen. I'm just pointing out that what we call "protest" today isn't pacific and dignified civil disobedience of the sort practiced in the Civil Rights era, but tawdry, criminal rioting, instead.