Donald Trump

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:52 am
Fairy wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:48 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 am

But if I insert my sperm into your grandmother, who is post menopausal no doubt, a baby won't come. So she's no woman according to what you just said. Your grandmother must be a man pretending to be a woman.
That’s just a ridiculous argument. Grandmother’s are women, who have given birth at some time in the past.

Just because she’s not giving birth anymore doesn’t mean she’s no longer a woman.
What an absurd thing to say FJ
It is absurd, but it's the consequence of the logic you yourself provided. The criteria you gave for what makes a woman a woman.
I AM NOT SURE 'what' you are 'seeing' AND 'reading', here, "flannel jesus", but 'it' is CERTAINLY NOT what I am SEEING and READING, here.
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 am I totally agree that it's absurd, so your criteria must not be good enough.
Maybe if you COPIED and PASTED the EXACT WORDS that "fairy" has SAID and WRITTEN, here, which LED 'you' TO what you are SAYING And CLAIMING, here, then, and ONLY THEN, 'me' and "fairy" MIGHT SEE what you ARE 'seeing'.
User avatar
accelafine
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm

Re: Donald Trump

Post by accelafine »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:37 am
Age wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:21 am
All that yapping, yet it's still the case that there are people we should consider women, who can't give birth under any circumstance
Not all women can give birth but only women can give birth. Every human who was ever born was given birth to by a woman. Unless your father shat you out of his arsehole.
User avatar
accelafine
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm

Re: Donald Trump

Post by accelafine »

Funny how no one ever asks what a man is, or agonises over what the definition of a man is. Fucking misogynistic bullshit.
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Flannel Jesus »

Age wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:28 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:37 am
Age wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:21 am
All that yapping, yet it's still the case that there are people we should consider women, who can't give birth under any circumstance
WHY do you BELIEVE that there are 'people' that 'you' should consider 'women', but who can NOT give birth, under ANY circumstances?

Also, and OBVIOUSLY, there ARE some 'humans' who are OBVIOUSLY 'women', but who can NOT give birth, UNDER ABSOLUTELY ANY circumstances.
Because I believe people have 90 year old grandmothers...
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Flannel Jesus »

accelafine wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:34 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:37 am
Age wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:21 am
All that yapping, yet it's still the case that there are people we should consider women, who can't give birth under any circumstance
Not all women can give birth but only women can give birth. L
Exactly, so it surely makes no sense to define women as "people who can give birth". Seems like most people agree that that's not a good definition, given the existence of old women or women with serious fertility issues. Some people just need a bit of help understanding why that's not a great definition, like Fairy.
User avatar
accelafine
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm

Re: Donald Trump

Post by accelafine »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am
accelafine wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:34 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:37 am

All that yapping, yet it's still the case that there are people we should consider women, who can't give birth under any circumstance
Not all women can give birth but only women can give birth. L
Exactly, so it surely makes no sense to define women as "people who can give birth". Seems like most people agree that that's not a good definition, given the existence of old women or women with serious fertility issues. Some people just need a bit of help understanding why that's not a great definition, like Fairy.
Do you really need a definition of what a woman is? We're all doomed.
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Flannel Jesus »

accelafine wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:17 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am
accelafine wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:34 am

Not all women can give birth but only women can give birth. L
Exactly, so it surely makes no sense to define women as "people who can give birth". Seems like most people agree that that's not a good definition, given the existence of old women or women with serious fertility issues. Some people just need a bit of help understanding why that's not a great definition, like Fairy.
Do you really need a definition of what a woman is? We're all doomed.
Do I, EYE, ME? Do I need a definition?

No, I didn't ask for one sweetheart. You must be so confused little bug. I didn't ask Trump for a definition sweetheart. Need some help figuring out the context?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:07 am
Age wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:28 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:37 am

All that yapping, yet it's still the case that there are people we should consider women, who can't give birth under any circumstance
WHY do you BELIEVE that there are 'people' that 'you' should consider 'women', but who can NOT give birth, under ANY circumstances?

Also, and OBVIOUSLY, there ARE some 'humans' who are OBVIOUSLY 'women', but who can NOT give birth, UNDER ABSOLUTELY ANY circumstances.
Because I believe people have 90 year old grandmothers...
ONCE AGAIN, ABSOLUTELY NONSENSICAL.
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Flannel Jesus »

The existence of 90 year old women is nonsensical to this dweeb...

But him talking like a time traveler from 2 centuries in the future, that's not nonsensical, that's perfectly normal...
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:17 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am
accelafine wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:34 am

Not all women can give birth but only women can give birth. L
Exactly, so it surely makes no sense to define women as "people who can give birth". Seems like most people agree that that's not a good definition, given the existence of old women or women with serious fertility issues. Some people just need a bit of help understanding why that's not a great definition, like Fairy.
Do you really need a definition of what a woman is? We're all doomed.
NO one 'needs' A DEFINITION.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am
accelafine wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:34 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:37 am

All that yapping, yet it's still the case that there are people we should consider women, who can't give birth under any circumstance
Not all women can give birth but only women can give birth. L
Exactly, so it surely makes no sense to define women as "people who can give birth".
Well CONSIDERING the Fact that ABSOLUTELY NO one, here, has defined 'women' in 'that way', WHY are you even BRINGING 'this' up, here?
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am Seems like most people agree that that's not a good definition, given the existence of old women or women with serious fertility issues. Some people just need a bit of help understanding why that's not a great definition, like Fairy.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:46 am The existence of 90 year old women is nonsensical to this dweeb...
LOL 'This one' could NOT HAVE INTERPRETED things, here, MORE FALSELY, and MORE WRONGLY.
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:46 am But him talking like a time traveler from 2 centuries in the future, that's not nonsensical, that's perfectly normal...
LOL WHY have you ASSUMED, and then JUMPED TO the CONCLUSION OF, 'two centuries' ONLY?
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Flannel Jesus »

Age wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:51 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am
accelafine wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:34 am

Not all women can give birth but only women can give birth. L
Exactly, so it surely makes no sense to define women as "people who can give birth".
Well CONSIDERING the Fact that ABSOLUTELY NO one, here, has defined 'women' in 'that way', WHY are you even BRINGING 'this' up, here?
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am Seems like most people agree that that's not a good definition, given the existence of old women or women with serious fertility issues. Some people just need a bit of help understanding why that's not a great definition, like Fairy.
Are you fucking stupid? Did you not watch the video?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:59 am
Age wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:51 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am

Exactly, so it surely makes no sense to define women as "people who can give birth".
Well CONSIDERING the Fact that ABSOLUTELY NO one, here, has defined 'women' in 'that way', WHY are you even BRINGING 'this' up, here?
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:15 am Seems like most people agree that that's not a good definition, given the existence of old women or women with serious fertility issues. Some people just need a bit of help understanding why that's not a great definition, like Fairy.
Are you fucking stupid?
To 'you', and 'others', here, in the days when this is being written, ABSOLUTELY 'I' AM. 'This' IS what 'you' and 'others', here, BELIEVE IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE, correct?

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:59 am Did you not watch the video?
YES.

And, although you WATCHED 'the video' you OBVIOUSLY DID NOT HEAR the ACTUAL WORDS, which WERE SAID. Which, REALLY DOES GO TO SHOW HOW WHEN one IS CLOSED, because of their PRE-EXISTING BELIEFS they, literally, ARE BEING ABSOLUTELY STUPID.

Also, what makes 'this' all the MORE FUNNIER is that there IS an ACTUAL VIDEO, which can be RE-RUN, OVER and OVER, FOR ABSOLUTELY ANY one TO FIND OUT WHAT WAS ACTUALLY SAID. you ARE just PROVING WHY FINDING the ACTUAL Truth of things IS SO VERY HARD, and VERY COMPLEX, FOR you. While it IS EXTREMELY SIMPLE and EASY FOR me TO RECOGNIZE, FIND, and SEE the ACTUAL Truth of things.

CONTRARY TO what you ARE STILL BELIEVING ABSOLUTELY NO one, here, in this forum NOR in 'that video' SAID ANY thing that you SAID and WROTE, here.

AGAIN, if ABSOLUTELY ANY one IS CURIOUS and/or INTERESTED in ALSO FINDING OUT HOW ABSOLUTELY SIMPLE and EASY IT REALLY IS TO FIND, RECOGNIZE, and KNOW the ACTUAL Truth of things, then just let me know, and then 'we' can HAVE A DISCUSSION.
Fairy
Posts: 3751
Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 7:07 pm
Location: The United Kingdom of Heaven

Re: Donald Trump

Post by Fairy »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:52 am
Fairy wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:48 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 am

But if I insert my sperm into your grandmother, who is post menopausal no doubt, a baby won't come. So she's no woman according to what you just said. Your grandmother must be a man pretending to be a woman.
That’s just a ridiculous argument. Grandmother’s are women, who have given birth at some time in the past.

Just because she’s not giving birth anymore doesn’t mean she’s no longer a woman.
What an absurd thing to say FJ
It is absurd, but it's the consequence of the logic you yourself provided. The criteria you gave for what makes a woman a woman.

I totally agree that it's absurd, so your criteria must not be good enough.
What the heck are you talking about. The question was answered, and quite obviously simply that a two year old child would understand it.

I was taught that the anatomically correct definition of a woman is a biological conscious body able to give birth to babies coupled with the natural capacity to feed that baby once born from it’s engorged milk nipples. This defines a woman quite correctly, in my humble opinion. There’s nothing complicated about that obviousness.

Trump answered the question anatomically correct. This is not difficult to comprehend.
Post Reply