Christianity is a personality cult and not a religion

[godelian]

My man is past the age of consent and I don't have to pay him, unlike your underage prostitute 'bride'. He also has a large penis

A woman providing for a man, is quite uncommon. Is he willing to provide for you? Since you must be incessantly talking shit to him with your big foul mouth, how long is he going to stay this time? We know that you cannot keep a man. So, what makes you believe that you will be able to keep this one?

You are insane. That's what happens when generation after generation of your forebears, including your parents, were siblings. No wonder you had to move to a third world dump to buy an unfortunate child-bride forced into prostitution with the ugly, stinky American man with the micro penis.

So, if I understand it right, your man does not want to provide for you, not even one dollar. Correct? I am not surprised. No man will ever do anything for you, because of that big foul mouth of yours. It's obvious that he is going to leave you rather sooner than later, just like all the previous men who have dumped you.

[attofishpi]

Oi - micro-dick. Stop talking nonsense to the women on the site.. address your hypocrisy below:


Why are you continually avoiding addressing my statements?


Here they are again..

Christ obviously wasn't a god, because no man is.

So you don't believe in the Torah? - I thought you said something to the effect of Judaism & Islam are infallible, but Christianity is not.

Genesis 1:26–27 (KJV)
26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

GOD, created man in his own image, thus I am a man, thus GOD system had incarnated himself as a man, possibly before the Earth was created.

I think that many Christians really believe that Christ would be God himself.

I never came across a Christian that said they did, but then, I never befriended Christians. All my friends were faithless atheists pretty much, open to concepts, just not particularly interested. More interested in partying in between working hard, stealing (borrowing) the odd car to get home which was too expensive from the city to where we lived via taxi, ya know, basic Aussie stuff.

Eventually, through my own reasoning it was obvious. GOD being a MAN, would not send another to do what He intended - crucifixion.

He stated he was merely the son of GOD and the son of man at the time, for reasons that should be obvious.

They worship a man as their god.

I don't worship GOD nor any man. I love Christ with all my heart, He seems to be happy with that.

In fact, when I was put through the TEST_A-MEN-Ts GOD showed me more respect when I told IT to fuck off. (once it pushed me to the EDGE - The Tree of KNOW_LEDGE).

[godelian]

He stated he was merely the son of GOD and the son of man at the time, for reasons that should be obvious.

Christ referred to himself as "bar Adam" or "bar Abbah". This typically gets translated as "son of Man" or "son of the Father". What it should get translated into, is "son of a(n unknown) man" or "son of a(n unknown) father". In other words, it just means "bastard".

Christ had a habit of turning every insult hurled at him into a badge of honor. When they insulted him as the scapegoat of Israel, he turned that into the lamb of God.

Every designation for Christ in the Gospels is an insult, including "Jeshu" (heretic) and including "son of Mary". Except for Messiah/Christ.

So, Jeshu Barabbas means heretical bastard. The Rabbis hated him. So, they kept coming up with that kind of stuff.

[attofishpi]

..still have no answers to the above. Your submission to Mecca - bow to the ego of a MAN - the MAN you worship, you fucking hypocrite.

[godelian]

..still have no answers to the above.

I do not particularly subscribe to your interpretations.

Your submission to Mecca - bow to the ego of a MAN - the MAN you worship, you fucking hypocrite.

That is what you wish it were. I don't worship any man. I do not believe that any man is a god.

I use axiomatizations all the time.

I use Peano's arithmetic for the axiomatization of natural numbers and Zermelo and Fränckel for the axomatization of sets. Furthermore, I am perfectly fine with Jewish law, originally proposed by Moses, and Islamic law, originally proposed by Muhammad, as axiomatizations for morality.

For some strange reason, you seem to believe that I would care about who originally proposed a particular axiomatization.

One more time. I don't.

[attofishpi]

..still have no answers to the above.

I do not particularly subscribe to your interpretations.

I do not believe that any man is a god.

What? You don't believe in the Abrahamic texts that MorHamMad based his tales upon?

The Torah, that declares that GOD is a man and created man in His image..

Genesis 1:26–27 (KJV)
27:- So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him

godelian, is the above line from the Torah just another lie of the Abrahamic scripture, are you correct in stating that GOD is no man?

Your submission to Mecca - bow to the ego of a MAN - the MAN you worship, you fucking hypocrite.

That is what you wish it were. I don't worship any man. I do not believe that any man is a god.

I use axiomatizations all the time.

So Y do you and every Muzzlem bow down to the birthplace of a man, many times every day?

I use Peano's arithmetic for the axiomatization of natural numbers and Zermelo and Fränckel for the axomatization of sets. Furthermore, I am perfectly fine with Jewish law, originally proposed by Moses, and Islamic law, originally proposed by Muhammad, as axiomatizations for morality.

So according to you under Islam, it's moral to chop the hand off of a thief.

According to you under Islam, it's moral for a grown man to have sexual intercourse with a girl as young as 8 years old that has had her first menstrual cycle.


Islam is clearly a disgusting form of "morality".

..that you think Islam is based on any moral law from a divine being is beyond any rational comprehension.

[godelian]

..that you think Islam is based on any moral law from a divine being is beyond any rational comprehension.

Yes, I do. The fact that you don't, is obviously irrelevant to me.

[attofishpi]

..since when has being irrational irrelevant per anything philosophical?

[accelafine]

..still have no answers to the above.

I do not particularly subscribe to your interpretations.

Your submission to Mecca - bow to the ego of a MAN - the MAN you worship, you fucking hypocrite.

That is what you wish it were. I don't worship any man. I do not believe that any man is a god.

I use axiomatizations all the time.

I use Peano's arithmetic for the axiomatization of natural numbers and Zermelo and Fränckel for the axomatization of sets. Furthermore, I am perfectly fine with Jewish law, originally proposed by Moses, and Islamic law, originally proposed by Muhammad, as axiomatizations for morality.

For some strange reason, you seem to believe that I would care about who originally proposed a particular axiomatization.

One more time. I don't.

At least Christ wasn't a paedophile like your hero, Mohamdid.
I thought christianity was misogynistic and obsessed with sex, but islam leaves it for dead by a massive margin. The woman-hatred is into the stratosphere and beyond. Christians don't lose their marbles. What other religion is so weird and unnatural that it can even over-ride even the human instinct for survival?

[godelian]

At least Christ wasn't a paedophile like your hero, Mohamdid.

Shit talking the prophet of Islam won't get you anywhere. Furthermore, he did not do anything that is forbidden in Islam.

You have your rules on the matter and we have ours. Christians clearly do not want to respect that.

That is less of a problem than it looks like.

If Christians want to impose their views onto others, then they should feel free to prove that they are willing to risk their lives and die for what they believe in.

So, they will have to sacrifice their lives for that weird personality cult of theirs. Stalin would be proud of them.

In my opinion, it may also be necessary to resurrect the 6th Department of the Soviet OGPU, and to task them again with burning the churches and mass executing the Christian clergy.

The French and Russian revolutions did a great job at eradicating Christianity. It seems to be time for some maintenance update on their efforts. Seriously, it looks like it is time to cut the grass again.

[accelafine]

At least Christ wasn't a paedophile like your hero, Mohamdid.

Shit talking the prophet of Islam won't get you anywhere. Furthermore, he did not do anything that is forbidden in Islam.

You have your rules on the matter and we have ours. Christians clearly do not want to respect that.

That is less of a problem than it looks like.

If Christians want to impose their views onto others, then they should feel free to prove that they are willing to risk their lives and die for what they believe in.

So, they will have to sacrifice their lives for that weird personality cult of theirs. Stalin would be proud of them.

In my opinion, it may also be necessary to resurrect the 6th Department of the Soviet OGPU, and to task them again with burning the churches and mass executing the Christian clergy.

The French and Russian revolutions did a great job at eradicating Christianity. It seems to be time for some maintenance update on their efforts. Seriously, it looks like it is time to cut the grass again.

Oh my god. You are openly defending paedophilia. I'm not a christian. Do you seriously think that being revolted by the rape of children is a 'christian thing'? It's a normal, sane, human thing.

[godelian]

Oh my god. You are openly defending paedophilia. I'm not a christian. Do you seriously think that being revolted by the rape of children is a 'christian thing'? It's a normal, sane, human thing.

I do not care if you are Christian or not. I also do not care what you think the rules should be.

We have our rules and you have yours.

If you want to try to impose your rules onto us, then fine, because we are now waiting for you to prove that you are willing to risk your life and die for what you believe in.

You see, people like you have to understand that we will kill without the slightest hesitation. The only way to make people like you understand this, is apparently to actually carry out the killings. It looks like we have to really do it. Otherwise, you just don't believe it, do you? Seriously, you are not going to fuck with us, because we are going to fuck with you.

The truth will eventually always come out of the barrel of a machine gun.

In fact, you already know this. It is rather a question of cutting the grass again. It will remind you of a certain reality.

[accelafine]

Oh my god. You are openly defending paedophilia. I'm not a christian. Do you seriously think that being revolted by the rape of children is a 'christian thing'? It's a normal, sane, human thing.

I do not care if you are Christian or not. I also do not care what you think the rules should be.

We have our rules and you have yours.

If you want to try to impose your rules onto us, then fine, because we are now waiting for you to prove that you are willing to risk your life and die for what you believe in.

You see, people like you have to understand that we will kill without the slightest hesitation. The only way to make people like you understand this, is apparently to actually carry out the killings. It looks like we have to really do it. Otherwise, you just don't believe it, do you? Seriously, you are not going to fuck with us, because we are going to fuck with you.

The truth will eventually always come out of the barrel of a machine gun.

In fact, you already know this. It is rather a question of cutting the grass again. It will remind you of a certain reality.

Go **** yourself. Of course I believe it. My opinion of your depraved cult couldn't get any lower.

[godelian]

Go **** yourself. Of course I believe it. My opinion of your depraved cult couldn't get any lower.

War is clearly part of human nature. That is undoubtedly why I don't mind it either. Since all respect is ultimately based on the fear for reprisals, may the severed arms and legs start flying around in the air. So, let's cut the grass because that will allow people like you to lick their wounds again.

[Phil8659]

Peano Arithmetic theory (PA) was originally proposed by Giuseppe Peano.

Imagine that Giuseppe Peano were a drug-addicted alcoholic gambler who lived in a brothel, would that change my opinion on PA?

You have a very simple minded view of Religion.
Now, if you have studied grammar at all, you find that every definitive sentence is under the rule of the elliptic equality. Which means, as early grammarieans realized, you can name a correlative, i.e., noun. You can name a relative, i.e. ver. and you can name their combination, which is again, a correlative. In a definitive sentence, one is grouping two previously given names which now serve as that names relative. Tom is a cat.

Now, every noun is established by an arithmetic identity. but every verb is a geometric identity. i.e., Every noun is literal, while every verb is metaphorical.

So, you have at least two ways to say the same thing, and the Bible tests your mind to see if you are, in some measure, grammatically function.

Take the Three stories of creation. The story of Adam and Eve, The Story of the Serpent, and the Story of why man was made.
The first story looks good, the second looks bad, but the third implies.both.
Now, let us take the second.
The Serpent spoke in the name of the Lord
What he said came to pass,
Marriage was attained
Man learnt judgment
Man was sent to have dominion over the Earth.

Now, if you are familiar with What is called Mosaic Law, which later became The Law of repeatability in Science, you find that first two stores are the same, and they are the same with the third.

You have never mastered the fundaments of simple grammar, that has been taught by true grammarians, since the time of Plato.

Here is another one: From the story of Adam and Eve, you should recognize a worldwide known definition.

A computer functions by binary recursion, it can process all information. This fact can then be put into a simple sentence.

0 and 1 aee a Conjugate Binary pair, whereby Complete Induction and Deduction processes all information.

Now let us use it as the founder of Formal Grammar used it, Plato.
A relative and correlatives are a Conjugate Binary (Dialectical) Pair, whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produces all reasoning.

Now, let us see it in the Story of Adam and Eve.

Adam and Eve wee a Conjugate Binary Pair, whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produces all of mankind.

Like most mid level intellects, you neglect Geometry.

A point and line are a Conjugate Binary Pair, whereby Complete Induction and Deduction, can construct any perceptible paradigm of any system of grammar. Both Plato and the Bible agree on this for,

Binary recursion can only produce a binary result. As all of man's literary works from religion to science, are written using the same grammars, using the same binary recursion, then, it follows. It is not what is said that contradicts anything, it is the reader, the writer or both.

And, if we heed the words of Confucius: A superior man, in regard shows a cautious reserve in that which he does not know.
And, it is clearly provable, you have learnt nothing about the rectification of names. There are four basic binary systems of Grammar; Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry. If you cannot use them to test your words, it is because you are too arrogant to marshal your own words.