Most people, having to work for a living, have little or no time for reading. Yet, while working, they can listen to their headphones.
In that regard, I put the Works of Aristotle into audio book format. It consists of 3 iso files, which can be put on a drive or phone, so that one can listen to Aristotle, as if one were a Peripatetic.
https://archive.org/details/aristotle3_202003
Aristotle
Re: Aristotle
Who cares?Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 2:51 am Most people, having to work for a living, have little or no time for reading. Yet, while working, they can listen to their headphones.
In that regard, I put the Works of Aristotle into audio book format. It consists of 3 iso files, which can be put on a drive or phone, so that one can listen to Aristotle, as if one were a Peripatetic.
https://archive.org/details/aristotle3_202003
others also put who they also 'LOOK UP TO' and 'WORSHIP' into 'audio book format', as well. But, also, WHO CARES?
Lots of you different human beings BELIEVE (IN) lots of different things, that you BELIEVE IN "aristotle" is NOTHING REALLY exciting, NOR WORTHY OF WRITING ABOUT, here.
Re: Aristotle
Now, if you have viewed the essay, you might notice the quote from Theaetetus where Socrates says one element represents existence and the other non-existence, i.e,, assertion and denial. Plato named these two states in grammar as Noun and Verb. He also called them the one and the many and he outright tells you in his dialogs, that these two elements, the grammar formed by them is Dialectic. Today, we call it binary and the computer today proves exactly what Plato was saying, by it all information is processed. And as he knew this full for Geometry is why he recommended using Geometry to follow chains of reasoning.
And if you actually study Aristotle, Aristotle will repeat this, one part must play the role of matter, and the other of form. And thus, Aristotle tells you point blank, not only what Plato said, but also what is meant by form, exactly the same as normal grammar, nothing mystical or theoretical about it.
Aristotle on Definition
https://archive.org/details/AristotleOnDefinition
And if you actually study Aristotle, Aristotle will repeat this, one part must play the role of matter, and the other of form. And thus, Aristotle tells you point blank, not only what Plato said, but also what is meant by form, exactly the same as normal grammar, nothing mystical or theoretical about it.
Aristotle on Definition
https://archive.org/details/AristotleOnDefinition
Re: Aristotle
Posting, again, just made no sense.
Re: Aristotle
this is a thing!Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 2:51 am Most people, having to work for a living, have little or no time for reading. Yet, while working, they can listen to their headphones.
In that regard, I put the Works of Aristotle into audio book format. It consists of 3 iso files, which can be put on a drive or phone, so that one can listen to Aristotle, as if one were a Peripatetic.
https://archive.org/details/aristotle3_202003
If you were to cite here Aristotle's text on the topic:
God is the form of the world, and it is immaterial and immutable, it does not have potentiality, it is only actual.
You would have helped local forum members get out of the darkness.
Re: Aristotle
I am afraid that you are greatly mistaken.Janoah wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:44 pmthis is a thing!Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 2:51 am Most people, having to work for a living, have little or no time for reading. Yet, while working, they can listen to their headphones.
In that regard, I put the Works of Aristotle into audio book format. It consists of 3 iso files, which can be put on a drive or phone, so that one can listen to Aristotle, as if one were a Peripatetic.
https://archive.org/details/aristotle3_202003
If you were to cite here Aristotle's text on the topic:
God is the form of the world, and it is immaterial and immutable, it does not have potentiality, it is only actual.
You would have helped local forum members get out of the darkness.
There is one and only one way to help humanity. Not give them more words that they cannot mentally process, but as I have stated, Mankind need to learn grammar from the floor up.
Not grammar as taught in school, but by their own hand. If a person cannot master the behavior of their own hand, Grammar is the only thing a mind can do.
Not what to repeat, but how to actually think. Why do you think I went and solved for all the mathematical operations using Geometry? Did what was claimed impossible. I do not give a shit about telling anyone what to think, but how. That is why I work on the Grammar Book.
I only came here as a diversion. This work is not easy, even for me.
I cannot help anyone, I can provide an artifact whereby they can learn to help themselves.
Re: Aristotle
So, if you do ACTUALLY KNOW what you CLAIM TO KNOW, then just TELL 'us' 'how to think'.Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 21, 2025 8:05 amI am afraid that you are greatly mistaken.Janoah wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:44 pmthis is a thing!Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 2:51 am Most people, having to work for a living, have little or no time for reading. Yet, while working, they can listen to their headphones.
In that regard, I put the Works of Aristotle into audio book format. It consists of 3 iso files, which can be put on a drive or phone, so that one can listen to Aristotle, as if one were a Peripatetic.
https://archive.org/details/aristotle3_202003
If you were to cite here Aristotle's text on the topic:
God is the form of the world, and it is immaterial and immutable, it does not have potentiality, it is only actual.
You would have helped local forum members get out of the darkness.
There is one and only one way to help humanity. Not give them more words that they cannot mentally process, but as I have stated, Mankind need to learn grammar from the floor up.
Not grammar as taught in school, but by their own hand. If a person cannot master the behavior of their own hand, Grammar is the only thing a mind can do.
Not what to repeat, but how to actually think. Why do you think I went and solved for all the mathematical operations using Geometry? Did what was claimed impossible. I do not give a shit about telling anyone what to think, but how.
If you do NOT, then you have JUST PROVED that you do NOT, ACTUALLY, KNOW what you CLAIM TO KNOW, here.
you WILL therefore just be ANOTHER one who can NOT back up and support their CLAIMS, AT ALL.
But, your so-called 'grammar book' is FILLED WITH FLAWS and FAULTS. Which, because you are STILL NOT YET FULLY AWARE, you are NOT YET ABLE TO RECOGNIZE and SEE.
LOL 'even for me'.
LOL you have NOT YET EVEN SHOWN and PROVED that you have EVEN DONE ANY ACTUAL WORK.
And, if you think or BELIEVE that ANY 'work', here, to just SHOW and PROVE the Truths in Life is 'not easy', then you REALLY, REALLY DO have A LONG WAY TO GO, here.
So, WHEN are you GOING TO LEARN TO HELP "your" 'self', EXACTLY?