The foundation of Philosophy

[Phil8659]

As Plato noted, the foundation of philosophy is a concept we must be able to grasp in order to "Do our own Work." Aristotle put Plato's demonstrations which attempt to get us to realize what our own work is into a simple sentence.
"That which has a function exists for that function."
Plato ran through simple examples of this. Therefore, one must be able to grasp what the function of a human mind is.
Now, if you actually believe that your function, as a mind, is your call, then you are hopelessly an idiot unable to spot fundamental self-referential fallacies. Our function is determined prior to our existence. We are evolving to become the most powerful life support system possible. That power is the regulation of our own behavior, this is called free will. We are free to will, if and only if, we know what we are, why we are, and are capable of doing that work, our own work.
In short, we are a biological, and we have a biological work to do in regard the whole of the environment. We are a developing life support system, the most powerful possible, accomplished by predictive behavior, i.e., the ability to virtualize a future and to make that future happen.
This was once put into a puzzle What is the name of the Beast 666. which, as the Book tells you, will be solved, in text by one person which will be a marker point in human evolution. What is called today, a punctuation in the equilibrium of evolution.
The solution to the Name of the Beast is actually given more than four times in the text. In my work, Universal Grammar, which contains the Art of Prophecy, is
To regulate behavior so as to turn the past into a future and to bring that future to pass. I.e. a concise statement of the function of a human mind as a life support system.

We must virtualize the environment, called modeling, etc., and those models are used to show the results of a pile of if such and such, then such and such, or in short Logic, the Art of Names. Grammar is for the express purpose of efficient and simple virtualization in order to regulate first of all, our own behavior and secondly, the behavior of our entire environment, in short and in a concise metaphor, to Tend the Garden of God, or again Environmental Control, or again mastery of the Biosphere.

All of this is made possible by the very simple, virtual, definition of a thing as a binary construct, A thing is some relative difference within limits, Relative and Corelative. Boundary and material in a boundary, Shape, form etc and some material in a shape or form, or what Plato called a Noun and Verb.
Speaking, rendering information in accordance with the two parts of a thing, Plato called Dialectic, which today we call Binary information processing. From the Bible through history, to the computer, from birth you are shown that information processing is binary.
Language is Universal and Intelligible while Grammar is Particular and Perceptible.
One cannot Do their own work, if they do not have the intelligence to do so. It is as simple as that.
There are vastly more people, today, incapable of comprehending what they are, why they are nor can they comprehend How to do the Work man is ultimately being made to do. They are even incapable of caring to do their own work.
Stupid people cannot act in accordance with the intelligence that they do not nave.

Binary recursion of the two parts of a thing, as a universal definition, is accomplished by multiplying the definition by our own behavior in establishing Grammar Systems. In the short of it, it produces a Grammar Matrix, Common Grammar, Arithmetic Algebra and Geometry.
Of those four, Geometry is that grammar which places an arithmetic identity, often called a one-to-one correspondence between the behavior of the hand, and the elements of the definition of a thing. This in turn will establish a one-to-one correspondence between a geometric expression and indelible concepts in the mind. Which brings us back to the Biblical Name of the Beast, and the Mark made by the hand which writes the mark in the Mind put into Biblical Metaphor, in both the OT and Nt.
As Plato pointed out, we can be led to understanding, through the study of Geometry which is actualy the study of our own behavior coupled with our own intelligence using Pattern Recognition.

So, the study of how to do our own work is given both religiously, scientifically, and biologically, as a matter itself, of an intelligible binary recursion, which, as noted throughout6, is contingent upon our own ability to do our own work.

So, if anyone claims to be a Philosopher, ask them to show you their work in Grammar, starting with their comprehension of Geometry.
You will find mine, in Universal Language, The Art of Prophecy, etc. on the Internet Archive, and it will take you a very long time to work out and study the demonstrations, unless you are the typical idiot who thinks they already know it all.

Now, there are those who actually believe that they can change other people, when they have been shown, their whole life, that people are not very bright. What we can do, is exactly what we have learn from our environment. People respond to environmental artifacts, but if, and only if, they, themselves, examine them.
We can populate the environment with these artifacts, but not even God can make any thing what it is not. The Law of Identity.
Psychology is commensurate with the Principles of Language functionally resident in the mind as Grammar Systems. I.e., We are only functional in accordance with our ability to Do Our Own Work. And, we give evidence of our functionality, through one, and only one, formal grammar system, called Geometry.
Seriously, if you cannot master your own hand, such that it teaches you the intelligible, then you have no reason to claim you know anything. The ability we need to Do our own work is contingent upon binary recursion.
A thing, is also describe, as A Standard of Behavior, i.e, that which an intelligent mind accomplishes firs for themselves in regard to Grammar Systems, our Grammar Matrix, Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry. Our goal, at this early stage in human evolution should be, making those Grammar books, as the artifacts we leave in the environment.
The Job of a Philosopher, as Plato and the Bible point out, is Dialectic, Binary information processing, to learn it, teach it, and live by it. which in the simple, is called judgment.
Judgment Day is the day mankind learns to do their own work.

[Atla]

As Plato noted, the foundation of philosophy is a concept we must be able to grasp in order to "Do our own Work." Aristotle put Plato's demonstrations which attempt to get us to realize what our own work is into a simple sentence.
"That which has a function exists for that function."
Plato ran through simple examples of this. Therefore, one must be able to grasp what the function of a human mind is.
Now, if you actually believe that your function, as a mind, is your call, then you are hopelessly an idiot unable to spot fundamental self-referential fallacies. Our function is determined prior to our existence. We are evolving to become the most powerful life support system possible. That power is the regulation of our own behavior, this is called free will. We are free to will, if and only if, we know what we are, why we are, and are capable of doing that work, our own work.
In short, we are a biological, and we have a biological work to do in regard the whole of the environment. We are a developing life support system, the most powerful possible, accomplished by predictive behavior, i.e., the ability to virtualize a future and to make that future happen.
This was once put into a puzzle What is the name of the Beast 666. which, as the Book tells you, will be solved, in text by one person which will be a marker point in human evolution. What is called today, a punctuation in the equilibrium of evolution.
The solution to the Name of the Beast is actually given more than four times in the text. In my work, Universal Grammar, which contains the Art of Prophecy, is
To regulate behavior so as to turn the past into a future and to bring that future to pass. I.e. a concise statement of the function of a human mind as a life support system.

We must virtualize the environment, called modeling, etc., and those models are used to show the results of a pile of if such and such, then such and such, or in short Logic, the Art of Names. Grammar is for the express purpose of efficient and simple virtualization in order to regulate first of all, our own behavior and secondly, the behavior of our entire environment, in short and in a concise metaphor, to Tend the Garden of God, or again Environmental Control, or again mastery of the Biosphere.

All of this is made possible by the very simple, virtual, definition of a thing as a binary construct, A thing is some relative difference within limits, Relative and Corelative. Boundary and material in a boundary, Shape, form etc and some material in a shape or form, or what Plato called a Noun and Verb.
Speaking, rendering information in accordance with the two parts of a thing, Plato called Dialectic, which today we call Binary information processing. From the Bible through history, to the computer, from birth you are shown that information processing is binary.
Language is Universal and Intelligible while Grammar is Particular and Perceptible.
One cannot Do their own work, if they do not have the intelligence to do so. It is as simple as that.
There are vastly more people, today, incapable of comprehending what they are, why they are nor can they comprehend How to do the Work man is ultimately being made to do. They are even incapable of caring to do their own work.
Stupid people cannot act in accordance with the intelligence that they do not nave.

Binary recursion of the two parts of a thing, as a universal definition, is accomplished by multiplying the definition by our own behavior in establishing Grammar Systems. In the short of it, it produces a Grammar Matrix, Common Grammar, Arithmetic Algebra and Geometry.
Of those four, Geometry is that grammar which places an arithmetic identity, often called a one-to-one correspondence between the behavior of the hand, and the elements of the definition of a thing. This in turn will establish a one-to-one correspondence between a geometric expression and indelible concepts in the mind. Which brings us back to the Biblical Name of the Beast, and the Mark made by the hand which writes the mark in the Mind put into Biblical Metaphor, in both the OT and Nt.
As Plato pointed out, we can be led to understanding, through the study of Geometry which is actualy the study of our own behavior coupled with our own intelligence using Pattern Recognition.

So, the study of how to do our own work is given both religiously, scientifically, and biologically, as a matter itself, of an intelligible binary recursion, which, as noted throughout6, is contingent upon our own ability to do our own work.

So, if anyone claims to be a Philosopher, ask them to show you their work in Grammar, starting with their comprehension of Geometry.
You will find mine, in Universal Language, The Art of Prophecy, etc. on the Internet Archive, and it will take you a very long time to work out and study the demonstrations, unless you are the typical idiot who thinks they already know it all.

Now, there are those who actually believe that they can change other people, when they have been shown, their whole life, that people are not very bright. What we can do, is exactly what we have learn from our environment. People respond to environmental artifacts, but if, and only if, they, themselves, examine them.
We can populate the environment with these artifacts, but not even God can make any thing what it is not. The Law of Identity.
Psychology is commensurate with the Principles of Language functionally resident in the mind as Grammar Systems. I.e., We are only functional in accordance with our ability to Do Our Own Work. And, we give evidence of our functionality, through one, and only one, formal grammar system, called Geometry.
Seriously, if you cannot master your own hand, such that it teaches you the intelligible, then you have no reason to claim you know anything. The ability we need to Do our own work is contingent upon binary recursion.
A thing, is also describe, as A Standard of Behavior, i.e, that which an intelligent mind accomplishes firs for themselves in regard to Grammar Systems, our Grammar Matrix, Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry. Our goal, at this early stage in human evolution should be, making those Grammar books, as the artifacts we leave in the environment.
The Job of a Philosopher, as Plato and the Bible point out, is Dialectic, Binary information processing, to learn it, teach it, and live by it. which in the simple, is called judgment.
Judgment Day is the day mankind learns to do their own work.

Binary Recursion Man is BACK?

Can you teach me how to reverse climate change by using the right grammar?

[Phil8659]

Can I teach my cat, a rock, or a tree?
Can anyone teach an idiot?
What do you mean by a teacher, someone who puts things into another thing like we put milk in a fridge, or do you mean providing examples which you can only learn from if you are not a complete fool?

So, is binary recursion different from itself genius, and if not, who do you whine to when you are too stupid to figure a problem out?

[Atla]

I hope that global temperatures will drop by 0.2 degrees C after I improve my punctuation.

[Phil8659]

I hope that global temperatures will drop by 0.2 degrees C after I improve my punctuation.

Well I hope you complete your lessons on how not to be just another sociopathic fool.

[Atla]

I hope that global temperatures will drop by 0.2 degrees C after I improve my punctuation.

Well I hope you complete your lessons on how not to be just another sociopathic fool.

You mentioned providing examples, could you provide one?

[Phil8659]

You mentioned providing examples, could you provide one?

You called me the binary man. Does that mean you are non-binary and are suffering trauma from having lived your life in a closet, which explains why you are clearly illiterate?

[Atla]

You mentioned providing examples, could you provide one?

You called me the binary man. Does that mean you are non-binary and are suffering trauma from having lived your life in a closet, which explains why you are clearly illiterate?

There's three sides to every story. Do you feel threatened by non-binary people? Or the Trinity mentioned in the Bible? Ternary computers? Triune mind philosophies?

So can you provide an example of binary recursion in action? Yes, no, maybe? Explain the truth, otherwise you might end up like VA (some guy on this forum) who keeps getting bashed left, right and center.

[Phil8659]

Or the Trinity mentioned in the Bible? Ternary computers? Triune mind philosophies?

So can you provide an example of binary recursion in action? Yes, no, maybe? Explain the truth, otherwise you might end up like VA (some guy on this forum) who keeps getting bashed left, right and center.

Beat me, beat me, make me feel cheap!

As far as the Trinity Metaphor goes, that one is easy. The father, ( our teacher, perception), The Son, (the learner, the image) and Holy Spirt are One,
Which is just metaphorical definition of a a unit or one, again, a binary.
Ternary computers start still as binary, the name seems to confuse you.
as far as the word philosopher goes, as a noun, it does not take an adjective and your dividing the name, by an adjective is thus simply an expression of the illiterate.

As every thing is defined as a binary construct, by definition of a thing, you have to be more than simple not to know that every thing you experience is an example of it.

[Atla]

As far as the Trinity Metaphor goes, that one is easy. The father, ( our teacher, perception), The Son, (the learner, the image) and Holy Spirt are One,
Which is just metaphorical definition of a a unit or one, again, a binary.

You'll have to explain how one / a unit is binary.

Ternary computers start still as binary, the name seems to confuse you.

Maybe, how do they start as binary?

[Atla]

As every thing is defined as a binary construct, by definition of a thing, you have to be more than simple not to know that every thing you experience is an example of it.

You can't "experience" such a construct, other than as a way of thinking. It's a way how your experience gets structured in your head, and can be changed. I don't think my definition of a thing is that it's a binary construct.

[Phil8659]

As every thing is defined as a binary construct, by definition of a thing, you have to be more than simple not to know that every thing you experience is an example of it.

You can't "experience" such a construct, other than as a way of thinking. It's a way how your experience gets structured in your head, and can be changed. I don't think my definition of a thing is that it's a binary construct.

Really? perception is just a way of thinking? Are you putting forth an effort to be stupid or does it come naturally.
One cannot know the ding an sich, simply because, as Plato pointed out, our sense systems are also binary. By some we abstract material, i.e., the verb, while others we abstract the limit, i.e., the noun, so, to experience any thing requires multiple sense systems. That is not new. 'However, claiming that perception is just a way of thinking means that you are not even out of grade school.

[Atla]

As every thing is defined as a binary construct, by definition of a thing, you have to be more than simple not to know that every thing you experience is an example of it.

You can't "experience" such a construct, other than as a way of thinking. It's a way how your experience gets structured in your head, and can be changed. I don't think my definition of a thing is that it's a binary construct.

Really? perception is just a way of thinking? Are you putting forth an effort to be stupid or does it come naturally.
One cannot know the ding an sich, simply because, as Plato pointed out, our sense systems are also binary. By some we abstract material, i.e., the verb, while others we abstract the limit, i.e., the noun, so, to experience any thing requires multiple sense systems. That is not new. 'However, claiming that perception is just a way of thinking means that you are not even out of grade school.

No, perception is not just a way of thinking. But you have absolutely no idea how perception actually works, do you. Neither Plato nor Kant even remotely got it right, but you even mixed them together in an unintelligible way.

Wtf does it even mean that our sense systems are binary? 'Abstract' from what? Are you 2400 years behind on psychology and neuroscience?

[Phil8659]

You can't "experience" such a construct, other than as a way of thinking. It's a way how your experience gets structured in your head, and can be changed. I don't think my definition of a thing is that it's a binary construct.

Really? perception is just a way of thinking? Are you putting forth an effort to be stupid or does it come naturally.
One cannot know the ding an sich, simply because, as Plato pointed out, our sense systems are also binary. By some we abstract material, i.e., the verb, while others we abstract the limit, i.e., the noun, so, to experience any thing requires multiple sense systems. That is not new. 'However, claiming that perception is just a way of thinking means that you are not even out of grade school.

No, perception is not just a way of thinking. But you have absolutely no idea how perception actually works, do you. Neither Plato nor Kant even remotely got it right, but you even mixed them together in an unintelligible way.

Wtf does it even mean that our sense systems are binary? Are you 2400 years behind on psychology and neuroscience?

Absolutely. I am just the guy who demonstrated what has traditionally been called impossible to do. I demonstrated in my Universal Language and the Art of Prophecy, how any one, by their own hand, can draw a computer faster than any binary computer. Input is commensurate with output and ever computation is exact. It is called geometry.
So, 2,400 years behind what and who? Negate the definition of a thing. Prove that you can name more than what you can experience, either a noun or a verb, a binary construct. You cannot do it.

You simply cannot think your way out of a paper bag. Show that your own biology your own perception, provides the whole of the naming convention.
What you see, is what you can say. Oh, and feel free to take it literally, like everyone who cannot reason.

Search Phil8659 on the Internet Archive for my posted works.

[Atla]

Really? perception is just a way of thinking? Are you putting forth an effort to be stupid or does it come naturally.
One cannot know the ding an sich, simply because, as Plato pointed out, our sense systems are also binary. By some we abstract material, i.e., the verb, while others we abstract the limit, i.e., the noun, so, to experience any thing requires multiple sense systems. That is not new. 'However, claiming that perception is just a way of thinking means that you are not even out of grade school.

No, perception is not just a way of thinking. But you have absolutely no idea how perception actually works, do you. Neither Plato nor Kant even remotely got it right, but you even mixed them together in an unintelligible way.

Wtf does it even mean that our sense systems are binary? Are you 2400 years behind on psychology and neuroscience?

Absolutely. I am just the guy who demonstrated what has traditionally been called impossible to do. I demonstrated in my Universal Language and the Art of Prophecy, how any one, by their own hand, can draw a computer faster than any binary computer. Input is commensurate with output and ever computation is exact. It is called geometry.
So, 2,400 years behind what and who? Negate the definition of a thing. Prove that you can name more than what you can experience, either a noun or a verb, a binary construct. You cannot do it.

You simply cannot think your way out of a paper bag. Show that your own biology your own perception, provides the whole of the naming convention.
What you see, is what you can say. Oh, and feel free to take it literally, like everyone who cannot reason.

Search Phil8659 on the Internet Archive for my posted works.

Word salad. Of course we can only name what we can experience (and naming happens in our "biological" heads). But how does this binary thing you're talking about (whatever it is) follow from that? Are you really as stupid as you appear to be?