Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
Age wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:02 am
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 9:31 am
He’s right about God as existing for real.
I, for One, have NEVER DISPUTED this.
I am just curious in HOW "immanuel can" could even be backed up and supported its OWN personal version of God. And, as of 'now', when i write this, "immanuel can" has NEVER ONCE been able to.
Please pay attention to the words I've written and what they say.
I said, or meant to say, I'm not defending or supporting IC's version of God, nor am I supporting or defending him as a personality.
LOL
I, literally, can NOT 'pay attention' TO 'the words' that you 'MEANT TO SAY'. I, however, can and was 'paying attention' to 'the words' that you have ACTUALLY said and written, here, and, to 'what those words say'. But, as for 'what those are saying', or 'meaning', exactly, from your perspective, can ONLY ever be KNOWN, for sure, through clarifying questions, and answers.
Now, what you ACTUALLY SAID, and WROTE, FROM the 'very outset', in this thread, is;
Yes, he’s ["immanuel can"] right about God.
If you, REALLY, just want to SAY, and MEAN, some thing like;
God is real and exists', then you could have just SAID and WRITTEN 'these words' ALONE, without introducing "immanuel can", and defending its view/s, here.
For example, you could have titled this thread - 'God is real and exists', and left out ANY mention of "immanuel can" from ANYWHERE in this thread.
After all as some of 'us', here, ALREADY KNOW, "immanuel can" BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that God, Itself, IS a 'male gendered being, creature, or person, who created absolutely EVERY thing, all at once'.
In saying 'this', I would also like to take 'us' BACK to what I ACTUALLY SAID, and MEANT, above, as well.
I NEVER EVER once thought, let alone SAID, nor IMPLIED, that you were defending "immanuel can's" ABSOLUTELY LUDICROUS 'version of God', nor that you were supporting or defending 'the personality' known, here, as "immanuel can", either.
I was JUST POINTING OUT that I have NEVER disputed that God, Itself, is real. I was, also, JUST MAKING it KNOWN that I have been, and still are, CURIOUS as to HOW "immanuel can" could even be ABLE TO back up and support its OWN personal version of God.
I am, if ANY one cares, here, STILL INTERESTED in SEEING HOW "Immanuel can" could even BEGIN TO START backing up and supporting A MOST LUDICROUS version AND belief.
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
I'm defending the belief in God as real. I'm defending IC's belief that there is a God and that this God definitely exists.
And, 'this' is, EXACTLY, what I SAW, and SEE, in what you SAID, and WROTE, in your opening post, here.
I DEFINITELY did NOT SEE you defending ANY thing ELSE.
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
I was all over the place in a lot of my nondual contexed previous posts.
you WERE ABSOLUTELY ON the 'right track' IN 'some ways' BECAUSE you HAD 'the CONCLUSION' ABSOLUTELY True, Right, Accurate, AND Correct. you just had 'your story' and 'words' just NOT YET IN the 'right order', and nor WITH the 'right definitions'. But, you were A LOT CLOSER than others, here, to BEING ON the 'Right PATH', and thus OBTAINING the 'Right T.R.A.C.K.', AS WELL.
I offered a few times to HELP you, so that TOGETHER you could FIND and OBTAIN the Right words, and thus the Right Knowledge, and the Right language, but 'you' wanted to go 'it' ALONE.
See, it is ONLY WHEN 'we' work TOGETHER that the ACTUAL IRREFUTABLE Truth of things CAN, and WILL 'come-to-LIGHT', and NOT just FOR 'us' but FOR ABSOLUTELY EVERY one, AS One.
'This', here, is like the 'human being' and a 'rescue dog'. 'They' can ONLY FIND, and ACHIEVE, 'the goal' WHEN, and IF, 'they' ARE working TOGETHER.
Singularly, 'they' can NOT, and thus will NOT, ACHIEVE 'the GOAL'. 'Two' are ALWAYS NEEDED TO make, create, or ACHIEVE ANY thing 'new' or 'more'.
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
I made a bloody big mess on this forum with my ideas.
I would NOT SAY 'this', but I will SAY that 'you' were making COMPREHENDING and UNDERSTANDING FAR, FAR HARDER and MORE COMPLEX that it REALLY HAD TO BE.
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
But I've recently changed my mind. I am now admitting I was wrong, and are now saying God exists, God is real, and so I just wanted to make this thread to say I agree with IC, that God exists.
WHY ONLY WITH "immanuel can"? WHY NOT WITH ANY and/or EVERY one ELSE who SAYS, 'God exists'?
Also, what are you 'now' ADMITTING that you were 'WRONG' ABOUT, EXACTLY?
See, 'now' SAYING, 'God exists', in ABSOLUTELY NO WAY CONTRADICTS nor is in ANY WAY IN ANY OPPOSITION of 'nonduality', itself.
In fact 'God' AND 'nonduality' are more or less the EXACT SAME Thing.
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
Age wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:02 amWho and/or what, to you, is even God, EXACTLY?
I am the WORD and the word is GOD.
AND, if and when one LOOKS AT 'these words', here, they ARE LITERAL. Except,
'I' am A WORD, and that word IS God.
The 'I', in the question, 'Who AM 'I'?' which 'you' human beings have been WONDERING ABOUT, and, LOOKING FOR, for quite a relative 'while', is God, Itself, which is just, also, the WHOLE One Universe, Itself, which is made up, fundamentally, of BOTH the 'visible' AND the 'invisible'.
The 'visible' just being 'matter', itself, and the 'invisible' just, literally, being the 'Spirit', Itself, which is, also, known as the Mind, Itself.
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
God is the WORD and the word is GOD..is my answer to that question. Is my version of God.
1. God is A word.
2. What is 'that question', EXACTLY, which 'your answer', here, is REFERRING TO?
3. 'your version' of God, here, is NOT REALLY SHOWING NOR EXPLAINING MUCH. Which, by the way, IS somewhat SIMILAR TO 'your version' OF 'nonduality'.
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
While IC may have a different version of what God is, I don't know what that version is.
"immanuel can's" version of God is that God has male genitals, and created absolutely EVERY thing, and thus absolutely EVERY species, ALL AT ONCE, as there is NO 'evolution' AT ALL, in "immanuel can's" version, and theory, here.
Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:07 pm
All I'm saying is that God is, God is real.
And, just like I was NEVER DISAGREEING WITH 'your view' that there is ONLY 'nonduality' I am ALSO NOT DISAGREEING WITH 'your view', here, that 'God is real'. However, and just like BEFORE, and ALWAYS, would you like HELP in NOT JUST EXPRESSING, but ALSO IN SHOWING, and PROVING, that the One True, and ONLY God, REALLY DOES EXIST, then just let 'me' know. As 'I' KNOW that WHEN 'you' and 'I' work TOGETHER, absolutely ANY thing can be, and WILL BE ACHIEVED, and CREATED.