Logical Identity is Self-Contradictory
Logical Identity is Self-Contradictory
If an identity is an identity because it is not another identity, as evidenced by the LI and LNC, is identity merely absence of of other identities and the absence of absence is the identity itself thus sets the foundations of identity as self-contradiction?
Re: Logical Identity is Self-Contradictory
Please rephrase in English.
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Logical Identity is Self-Contradictory
we are change and nothing besides
-Imp
-Imp
Re: Logical Identity is Self-Contradictory
An identity is determined by what it is not thus making the antithesis of a thesis inherently tied to it. "A" exists because of "not A" and because of this "A" stands in opposition to "Not A" by standing apart from it and as such identity requires a context of contradiction.
Re: Logical Identity is Self-Contradictory
Nonduality meaning Two but Not Two is the divine paradox. It’s like how can One thing exist?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:08 amAn identity is determined by what it is not thus making the antithesis of a thesis inherently tied to it. "A" exists because of "not A" and because of this "A" stands in opposition to "Not A" by standing apart from it and as such identity requires a context of contradiction.
How can one tent pole stand alone.
Even two tent poles cannot stand stable A there has to be another force that binds two together as one.
Re: Logical Identity is Self-Contradictory
There is one thing.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 09, 2025 10:14 amNonduality meaning Two but Not Two is the divine paradox. It’s like how can One thing exist?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:08 amAn identity is determined by what it is not thus making the antithesis of a thesis inherently tied to it. "A" exists because of "not A" and because of this "A" stands in opposition to "Not A" by standing apart from it and as such identity requires a context of contradiction.
How can one tent pole stand alone.
Even two tent poles cannot stand stable A there has to be another force that binds two together as one.
Then another thing.
The relationship of these things.
Then there is the transition of these 3 things.
Paradoxes are merely points of transition in a perspective.