Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 6:08 am
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 5:06 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 2:22 pm
It's the people who keep clamouring to stop the investigations that are the ones who are doing the fraud. That's obvious.
What do you mean by "stop the investigations"? Who is trying to stop investigations and what "investigations" are you referring to?
Wow. So you haven't been watching any news?
This is ONE REALLY WEIRD PRESUMPTION that you have CONCLUDED IS TRUE, and which you OBVIOUSLY 'now' BELIEVE and CLAIM IS TRUE.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 6:08 am
DOGE is investigating USAID,
LOL
LOL
LOL
'investigating' LOL
That is like SAYING, 'I have sent the CHILDREN INTO the CANDY STORE', and then, LAUGHINGLY, 'TRYING TO' CLAIM that it is the CHILDREN who are 'investigating' the CANDY STORE.
LOL IMAGINE HOW Truly STUPID and BLIND one would HAVE TO BE to BELIEVE that one "billionaire" sends its "billionaire friends" INTO the MONEY STORE, and who then, LAUGHINGLY, 'TRIES TO' CLAIM that is the "billionaire's" 'chosen friends' who are 'investigating' the MONEY STORE.
Does ANY one, here, REALLY BELIEVE, that "billionaires" and 'their friends' are REALLY 'investigating' 'those' previous "watcher overs" OF the MONEY STORE with the INTENDED of GETTING 'the money' to SHARE AMONG 'others'?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 6:08 am
the Department of Education, and a whole bunch of other agencies, and have already uncovered oceans of waste, graft and corruption.
OF COURSE there WAS WASTE and/or CORRUPTION, that is what GOVERNMENTS, all around the world, ARE KNOWN FOR, EXACTLY, and they are even EXPERTS AT CORRUPTION, and WASTE.
But was there ANY one, here, UNDER some sort of ILLUSION that 'the government', here in question, is NOT CORRUPT, is NOT GOING TO WASTE MONEY, and ISS GOING TO ACTUALLY SHARE AROUND 'the money', which they WILL 'now' HAVE ABSOLUTE POWER and CONTROL OVER?
If ANY one, here, BELIEVES that "those billionaires" are going TO SHARE 'the money' around, AFTER they TAKE POSSESSION of 'it', then, just out of curiosity, WHY DID they NOT, PREVIOUSLY, SHARE 'the money' that they HAVE SOUGHT OUT, OBTAINED, and POSSESSED, BEFORE?
As it has been SAID and WRITTEN:
'Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority.” “Despotic power is always accompanied by corruption of morality.'
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 6:08 am
Just check out the list of nonsense that USAID was getting away with taking money for, for example...
1. What are those, SUPPOSED and ALLEGED, things, EXACTLY?
2. WHO are the ones 'investigating' INTO whether the ALLEGATIONS are ACTUALLY ABSOLUTELY True AND Correct?
3, In the scheme of things, what did ALL of 'those few, or relatively, few things ADD UP TO, EXACTLY?
4. 'you', "immanuel can" just TOLD 'us' TO CHECK OUT 'the list' of nonsense that "usaid" was GETTING AWAY WITH. So, how about you PROVIDE 'the list' or, at least, A 'link' to 'the list'.
If you do NOT, then WHY NOT? What are have you got to HIDE FROM, here, EXACTLY?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 6:08 am
and remember that every penny of it was coming out of the pockets of ordinary people like you.
And, REMEMBER, WHERE YOUR MONEY IS 'now' 'GOING TO GO', and END UP.
Also, WHY does 'this one' CALL 'you' 'ordinary people'?
WHO does this one CLASS as the 'extraordinary people', EXACTLY?