Gary's Corner

Can philosophers help resolve the real problems that people have in their lives?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:59 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:54 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:43 am
But 'i' didn't insist.
If you EVER look BACK OVER 'your writings', then 'you' MIGHT SEE what 'we' CLEARLY DID, and DO.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:43 am Anyway, are you a boy or a girl?
WHY AFTER 'this MANY years' you have DECIDED TO ASK A CLARIFYING QUESTION, here, now?

Also, like others, here, you WILL NEED TO DISCOVER, COMPREHEND, and UNDERSTAND what the words like, 'you', 'boy', 'girl', and 'me' are MEANING and REFERRING TO, EXACTLY, TO NOTICE IF 'your question' is even AN ACTUAL Accurate one TO ASK and/or TO BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND what the ACTUAL Truth IS, here, EXACTLY?

For example, If 'I' were to ASK 'you', the one known, here, as "atla", if 'you' are a 'boy' or a 'girl', then HOW would you RESPOND, EXACTLY?

And, COULD 'you' BACK UP and SUPPORT 'that response' WITH ACTUAL PROOF and IRREFUTABLE CLARITY?
But 'i' didn't insist.
Oh but you HAVE.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:59 am 'i' already asked you 2-3 times what your sex is, but you never answer that clarifying question, so 'i' can't know for sure. Anyway, are you a boy or a girl?
See, HOW 'this one' WILL NOT ANSWER CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, BUT EXPECTS others TO.

Also, it TOOK A WHILE but AT LEAST 'this one' has come to GRASP the CONCEPT, and Fact, that human beings can NOT KNOW some thing, like what sexual organs another body has UNTIL 'they' have OBTAINED and GAINED ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, and thus ACTUAL CLARITY, FIRST.

Now, and OBVIOUSLY, IF the sexual organs of a body had ABSOLUTELY ANY thing TO DO with ABSOLUTELY ANY thing, here, then CLARIFICATION, and thus CLARITY, MIGHT BE PROVIDED. BUT, BECAUSE they DO NOT, then it, REALLY, DOES NOT MATTER, AT ALL.

Unless, OF COURSE, you have SOME REASON, which is REALLY VERY IMPORTANT, TO you "atla" FOR 'you' IN LEARNING and KNOWING, here, and you PROVIDE that or those REASON/S, then things MIGHT CHANGE, here.

But, and as some are NOTING, your MISOGYNY is STARTING TO BECOME MORE CLEARER, here.
Atla
Posts: 9936
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Atla »

Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:08 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:59 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:54 am

If you EVER look BACK OVER 'your writings', then 'you' MIGHT SEE what 'we' CLEARLY DID, and DO.



WHY AFTER 'this MANY years' you have DECIDED TO ASK A CLARIFYING QUESTION, here, now?

Also, like others, here, you WILL NEED TO DISCOVER, COMPREHEND, and UNDERSTAND what the words like, 'you', 'boy', 'girl', and 'me' are MEANING and REFERRING TO, EXACTLY, TO NOTICE IF 'your question' is even AN ACTUAL Accurate one TO ASK and/or TO BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND what the ACTUAL Truth IS, here, EXACTLY?

For example, If 'I' were to ASK 'you', the one known, here, as "atla", if 'you' are a 'boy' or a 'girl', then HOW would you RESPOND, EXACTLY?

And, COULD 'you' BACK UP and SUPPORT 'that response' WITH ACTUAL PROOF and IRREFUTABLE CLARITY?
But 'i' didn't insist.
Oh but you HAVE.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:59 am 'i' already asked you 2-3 times what your sex is, but you never answer that clarifying question, so 'i' can't know for sure. Anyway, are you a boy or a girl?
See, HOW 'this one' WILL NOT ANSWER CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, BUT EXPECTS others TO.

Also, it TOOK A WHILE but AT LEAST 'this one' has come to GRASP the CONCEPT, and Fact, that human beings can NOT KNOW some thing, like what sexual organs another body has UNTIL 'they' have OBTAINED and GAINED ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, and thus ACTUAL CLARITY, FIRST.

Now, and OBVIOUSLY, IF the sexual organs of a body had ABSOLUTELY ANY thing TO DO with ABSOLUTELY ANY thing, here, then CLARIFICATION, and thus CLARITY, MIGHT BE PROVIDED. BUT, BECAUSE they DO NOT, then it, REALLY, DOES NOT MATTER, AT ALL.

Unless, OF COURSE, you have SOME REASON, which is REALLY VERY IMPORTANT, TO you "atla" FOR 'you' IN LEARNING and KNOWING, here, and you PROVIDE that or those REASON/S, then things MIGHT CHANGE, here.

But, and as some are NOTING, your MISOGYNY is STARTING TO BECOME MORE CLEARER, here.
As 'i' said, 'i' didn't insist because 'i' can't know for sure. Anyway, are you a boy or a girl? Or intersex?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:17 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:08 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:59 am

But 'i' didn't insist.
Oh but you HAVE.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:59 am 'i' already asked you 2-3 times what your sex is, but you never answer that clarifying question, so 'i' can't know for sure. Anyway, are you a boy or a girl?
See, HOW 'this one' WILL NOT ANSWER CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, BUT EXPECTS others TO.

Also, it TOOK A WHILE but AT LEAST 'this one' has come to GRASP the CONCEPT, and Fact, that human beings can NOT KNOW some thing, like what sexual organs another body has UNTIL 'they' have OBTAINED and GAINED ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, and thus ACTUAL CLARITY, FIRST.

Now, and OBVIOUSLY, IF the sexual organs of a body had ABSOLUTELY ANY thing TO DO with ABSOLUTELY ANY thing, here, then CLARIFICATION, and thus CLARITY, MIGHT BE PROVIDED. BUT, BECAUSE they DO NOT, then it, REALLY, DOES NOT MATTER, AT ALL.

Unless, OF COURSE, you have SOME REASON, which is REALLY VERY IMPORTANT, TO you "atla" FOR 'you' IN LEARNING and KNOWING, here, and you PROVIDE that or those REASON/S, then things MIGHT CHANGE, here.

But, and as some are NOTING, your MISOGYNY is STARTING TO BECOME MORE CLEARER, here.
As 'i' said, 'i' didn't insist because 'i' can't know for sure.
ONCE AGAIN, you NOT KNOWING has NOT STOPPED you FROM INSISTING, previously.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:17 am Anyway, are you a boy or a girl? Or intersex?
WHY would it MATTER AT ALL, here, IN A 'philosophy forum'?

you, OBVIOUSLY, do NOT even ATTEMPT TO ATTACK 'my words', here, however, you DO 'TRY TO' to KEEP ATTACKING 'me' or 'the writer', INSTEAD.

If you can NOT ATTACK, COUNTER, NOR REFUTE 'words', themselves, then 'TRYING TO' ATTACK 'others', "themselves", will NOT HELP 'you' in ANY WAY AT ALL, here, "atla".
Atla
Posts: 9936
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Atla »

Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:42 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:17 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:08 am

Oh but you HAVE.



See, HOW 'this one' WILL NOT ANSWER CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, BUT EXPECTS others TO.

Also, it TOOK A WHILE but AT LEAST 'this one' has come to GRASP the CONCEPT, and Fact, that human beings can NOT KNOW some thing, like what sexual organs another body has UNTIL 'they' have OBTAINED and GAINED ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, and thus ACTUAL CLARITY, FIRST.

Now, and OBVIOUSLY, IF the sexual organs of a body had ABSOLUTELY ANY thing TO DO with ABSOLUTELY ANY thing, here, then CLARIFICATION, and thus CLARITY, MIGHT BE PROVIDED. BUT, BECAUSE they DO NOT, then it, REALLY, DOES NOT MATTER, AT ALL.

Unless, OF COURSE, you have SOME REASON, which is REALLY VERY IMPORTANT, TO you "atla" FOR 'you' IN LEARNING and KNOWING, here, and you PROVIDE that or those REASON/S, then things MIGHT CHANGE, here.

But, and as some are NOTING, your MISOGYNY is STARTING TO BECOME MORE CLEARER, here.
As 'i' said, 'i' didn't insist because 'i' can't know for sure.
ONCE AGAIN, you NOT KNOWING has NOT STOPPED you FROM INSISTING, previously.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:17 am Anyway, are you a boy or a girl? Or intersex?
WHY would it MATTER AT ALL, here, IN A 'philosophy forum'?

you, OBVIOUSLY, do NOT even ATTEMPT TO ATTACK 'my words', here, however, you DO 'TRY TO' to KEEP ATTACKING 'me' or 'the writer', INSTEAD.

If you can NOT ATTACK, COUNTER, NOR REFUTE 'words', themselves, then 'TRYING TO' ATTACK 'others', "themselves", will NOT HELP 'you' in ANY WAY AT ALL, here, "atla".
As 'i' said, 'i' didn't insist because 'i' can't know for sure. You are lying. Anyway, are you a boy or a girl? Or intersex?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:46 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:42 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:17 am
As 'i' said, 'i' didn't insist because 'i' can't know for sure.
ONCE AGAIN, you NOT KNOWING has NOT STOPPED you FROM INSISTING, previously.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:17 am Anyway, are you a boy or a girl? Or intersex?
WHY would it MATTER AT ALL, here, IN A 'philosophy forum'?

you, OBVIOUSLY, do NOT even ATTEMPT TO ATTACK 'my words', here, however, you DO 'TRY TO' to KEEP ATTACKING 'me' or 'the writer', INSTEAD.

If you can NOT ATTACK, COUNTER, NOR REFUTE 'words', themselves, then 'TRYING TO' ATTACK 'others', "themselves", will NOT HELP 'you' in ANY WAY AT ALL, here, "atla".
As 'i' said, 'i' didn't insist because 'i' can't know for sure. You are lying. Anyway, are you a boy or a girl? Or intersex?
LOL 'I' am lying. LOL "atla".

WHY ONLY 'those choices', ONLY?

WHY can 'I' NOT BE ANY of the MANY OTHER 'things' that you have, previously, CLAIMED and/or HAVE INSISTED that 'I' AM?
Atla
Posts: 9936
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Atla »

Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:48 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:46 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:42 am

ONCE AGAIN, you NOT KNOWING has NOT STOPPED you FROM INSISTING, previously.



WHY would it MATTER AT ALL, here, IN A 'philosophy forum'?

you, OBVIOUSLY, do NOT even ATTEMPT TO ATTACK 'my words', here, however, you DO 'TRY TO' to KEEP ATTACKING 'me' or 'the writer', INSTEAD.

If you can NOT ATTACK, COUNTER, NOR REFUTE 'words', themselves, then 'TRYING TO' ATTACK 'others', "themselves", will NOT HELP 'you' in ANY WAY AT ALL, here, "atla".
As 'i' said, 'i' didn't insist because 'i' can't know for sure. You are lying. Anyway, are you a boy or a girl? Or intersex?
LOL 'I' am lying. LOL "atla".

WHY ONLY 'those choices', ONLY?

WHY can 'I' NOT BE ANY of the MANY OTHER 'things' that you have, previously, CLAIMED and/or HAVE INSISTED that 'I' AM?
But 'i' never claimed or insisted on or even mentioned any other 'things' other than boy, girl and intersex, when it comes to sex. So now you were lying again.

Also, why do you refer to yourself as 'I' when 'i' keep asking age the human?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:55 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:48 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:46 am
As 'i' said, 'i' didn't insist because 'i' can't know for sure. You are lying. Anyway, are you a boy or a girl? Or intersex?
LOL 'I' am lying. LOL "atla".

WHY ONLY 'those choices', ONLY?

WHY can 'I' NOT BE ANY of the MANY OTHER 'things' that you have, previously, CLAIMED and/or HAVE INSISTED that 'I' AM?
But 'i' never claimed or insisted or even mentioned any other 'things' other than boy, girl and intersex, when it comes to sex. So now you were lying again.
'you' appear, ONCE AGAIN, to you have COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISUNDERSTOOD 'me', here.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:55 am Also, why do you refer to yourself as 'I' when 'i' keep asking age the human?
But, 'you' were ASKING ABOUT the 'you', and NOT the 'human'.

As I SAID, PREVIOUSLY, you would have to UNDERSTAND what a few words MEAN and/or are REFERRING TO, EXACTLY, BEFORE 'you' could UNDERSTAND 'my ANSWER/S'.
Atla
Posts: 9936
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Atla »

Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:07 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:55 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:48 am

LOL 'I' am lying. LOL "atla".

WHY ONLY 'those choices', ONLY?

WHY can 'I' NOT BE ANY of the MANY OTHER 'things' that you have, previously, CLAIMED and/or HAVE INSISTED that 'I' AM?
But 'i' never claimed or insisted or even mentioned any other 'things' other than boy, girl and intersex, when it comes to sex. So now you were lying again.
'you' appear, ONCE AGAIN, to you have COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISUNDERSTOOD 'me', here.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:55 am Also, why do you refer to yourself as 'I' when 'i' keep asking age the human?
But, 'you' were ASKING ABOUT the 'you', and NOT the 'human'.

As I SAID, PREVIOUSLY, you would have to UNDERSTAND what a few words MEAN and/or are REFERRING TO, EXACTLY, BEFORE 'you' could UNDERSTAND 'my ANSWER/S'.
So you also don't understand what 'you' means? Okay.

Is age the human a boy, a girl, or intersex?
Wizard22
Posts: 3283
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 8:16 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Wizard22 »

accelafine wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 5:22 amHe seems to have created some kind of 'god' character where he's pretending that he's here to learn how to 'converse with mere mortals'. I suppose it's a bit sad really, living in one of the few remaining lunatic asylums, the ones reserved only for the worst of the worst, inventing imaginery characters and an imaginery social life. I thought he was AI but apparently AI can't lie yet and 'age' is a dirty little liar.
Even severely autistic boys can show emotions, unlike AgeGPT, which is why it seems like a chat-bot to me. That, in addition to its repetitious, formulaic behavior, seems like a pre-programmed response. The only 'nuance' it has demonstrated, is its increase in insults and outright lies, the last several months.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Age »

Wizard22 wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:12 am
accelafine wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 5:22 amHe seems to have created some kind of 'god' character where he's pretending that he's here to learn how to 'converse with mere mortals'. I suppose it's a bit sad really, living in one of the few remaining lunatic asylums, the ones reserved only for the worst of the worst, inventing imaginery characters and an imaginery social life. I thought he was AI but apparently AI can't lie yet and 'age' is a dirty little liar.
Even severely autistic boys can show emotions, unlike AgeGPT, which is why it seems like a chat-bot to me.
But, WHY ONLY 'seems like', now?

PREVIOUSLY, you have INSISTED that I am A 'chatgpt program'.
Wizard22 wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:12 am That, in addition to its repetitious, formulaic behavior, seems like a pre-programmed response. The only 'nuance' it has demonstrated, is its increase in insults and outright lies, the last several months.
LOL
LOL
LOL

ANOTHER one who MAKES CLAIMS and ACCUSATIONS, ABOUT 'me'.

So. let 'us' SEE if 'this one' can back up and support its CLAIMS, and ACCUSATIONS, here, WITH ACTUAL IRREFUTABLE PROOF.

WHERE and WHEN have I EVER 'insulted' absolutely ANY one, here, AND, WHERE and WHEN have I EVER 'lied', here?

So, now 'we' WAIT, TO SEE, HOW 'this one' RESPONDS, EXACTLY, IF it DOES.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:09 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:07 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:55 am
But 'i' never claimed or insisted or even mentioned any other 'things' other than boy, girl and intersex, when it comes to sex. So now you were lying again.
'you' appear, ONCE AGAIN, to you have COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISUNDERSTOOD 'me', here.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:55 am Also, why do you refer to yourself as 'I' when 'i' keep asking age the human?
But, 'you' were ASKING ABOUT the 'you', and NOT the 'human'.

As I SAID, PREVIOUSLY, you would have to UNDERSTAND what a few words MEAN and/or are REFERRING TO, EXACTLY, BEFORE 'you' could UNDERSTAND 'my ANSWER/S'.
So you also don't understand what 'you' means? Okay.
ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' EXPRESSES what it BELIEVES is ABSOLUTELY TRUE, but then ADDS A question mark at the end of its BELIEF.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:09 am Is age the human a boy, a girl, or intersex?
AGAIN, it would NOT matter HOW I ANSWERED and RESPONDED to that Truly UNNECESSARY QUESTION, in a philosophy forum, you would NOT UNDERSTAND what I ACTUALLY SAID, and MEANT.

And, AGAIN, this is BECAUSE of HOW CLOSED and NARROWED your ABILITY TO COMPREHEND, SEE, LEARN, and UNDERSTAND, here, REALLY IS. And FOR the VERY REASONS that I HAVE ALREADY EXPLAINED.
Atla
Posts: 9936
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Atla »

Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:37 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:09 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:07 am

'you' appear, ONCE AGAIN, to you have COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISUNDERSTOOD 'me', here.


But, 'you' were ASKING ABOUT the 'you', and NOT the 'human'.

As I SAID, PREVIOUSLY, you would have to UNDERSTAND what a few words MEAN and/or are REFERRING TO, EXACTLY, BEFORE 'you' could UNDERSTAND 'my ANSWER/S'.
So you also don't understand what 'you' means? Okay.
ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' EXPRESSES what it BELIEVES is ABSOLUTELY TRUE, but then ADDS A question mark at the end of its BELIEF.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:09 am Is age the human a boy, a girl, or intersex?
AGAIN, it would NOT matter HOW I ANSWERED and RESPONDED to that Truly UNNECESSARY QUESTION, in a philosophy forum, you would NOT UNDERSTAND what I ACTUALLY SAID, and MEANT.

And, AGAIN, this is BECAUSE of HOW CLOSED and NARROWED your ABILITY TO COMPREHEND, SEE, LEARN, and UNDERSTAND, here, REALLY IS. And FOR the VERY REASONS that I HAVE ALREADY EXPLAINED.
This isn't so difficult. Is age the human a boy, a girl, or intersex?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:38 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:37 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:09 am
So you also don't understand what 'you' means? Okay.
ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' EXPRESSES what it BELIEVES is ABSOLUTELY TRUE, but then ADDS A question mark at the end of its BELIEF.
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:09 am Is age the human a boy, a girl, or intersex?
AGAIN, it would NOT matter HOW I ANSWERED and RESPONDED to that Truly UNNECESSARY QUESTION, in a philosophy forum, you would NOT UNDERSTAND what I ACTUALLY SAID, and MEANT.

And, AGAIN, this is BECAUSE of HOW CLOSED and NARROWED your ABILITY TO COMPREHEND, SEE, LEARN, and UNDERSTAND, here, REALLY IS. And FOR the VERY REASONS that I HAVE ALREADY EXPLAINED.
This isn't so difficult. Is age the human a boy, a girl, or intersex?
It is OBVIOUSLY TO DIFFICULT FOR you TO COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND that the word and label "age", here, in this forum has NEVER been in relation to the 'human'.

And, ONCE MORE, you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND and COMPREHEND 'this' BECAUSE you are TO NARROWED and CLOSED, here.

I am NOT USE HOW MANY TIMES I WILL HAVE TO INFORM 'you' of what 'you' NEED TO DO FIRST, here, BEFORE 'you' ARE CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING and COMPREHENDING, here.
Atla
Posts: 9936
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Atla »

Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:42 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:38 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:37 am

ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' EXPRESSES what it BELIEVES is ABSOLUTELY TRUE, but then ADDS A question mark at the end of its BELIEF.


AGAIN, it would NOT matter HOW I ANSWERED and RESPONDED to that Truly UNNECESSARY QUESTION, in a philosophy forum, you would NOT UNDERSTAND what I ACTUALLY SAID, and MEANT.

And, AGAIN, this is BECAUSE of HOW CLOSED and NARROWED your ABILITY TO COMPREHEND, SEE, LEARN, and UNDERSTAND, here, REALLY IS. And FOR the VERY REASONS that I HAVE ALREADY EXPLAINED.
This isn't so difficult. Is age the human a boy, a girl, or intersex?
It is OBVIOUSLY TO DIFFICULT FOR you TO COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND that the word and label "age", here, in this forum has NEVER been in relation to the 'human'.

And, ONCE MORE, you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND and COMPREHEND 'this' BECAUSE you are TO NARROWED and CLOSED, here.

I am NOT USE HOW MANY TIMES I WILL HAVE TO INFORM 'you' of what 'you' NEED TO DO FIRST, here, BEFORE 'you' ARE CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING and COMPREHENDING, here.
Even more desperate evasion. Okay.

Is the human that wrote the posts under the label "age" here, a boy, a girl, or intersex?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Gary's Corner

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:46 am
Age wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:42 am
Atla wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:38 am
This isn't so difficult. Is age the human a boy, a girl, or intersex?
It is OBVIOUSLY TO DIFFICULT FOR you TO COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND that the word and label "age", here, in this forum has NEVER been in relation to the 'human'.

And, ONCE MORE, you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND and COMPREHEND 'this' BECAUSE you are TO NARROWED and CLOSED, here.

I am NOT USE HOW MANY TIMES I WILL HAVE TO INFORM 'you' of what 'you' NEED TO DO FIRST, here, BEFORE 'you' ARE CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING and COMPREHENDING, here.
Even more desperate evasion. Okay.

Is the human that wrote the posts under the label "age" here, a boy, a girl, or intersex?
you are getting CLOSER.
Post Reply