To Age: I am in the wrong. I went too far.

[Age]

And what did you 'set out to do' exactly?

Creating a Truly PEACEFUL world for EVERY one.

If you have created a peaceful world for everyone,

I NEVER said I have ALREADY.

How long do you think or imagine 'that world' would take to create?

ONCE MORE, I will suggest NOT reading FROM ASSUMPTIONS, NOR FROM the BRAIN, and INSTEAD reading FROM the Truly OPEN perspective ONLY, or FROM the Mind INSTEAD, and ONLY.

then it must be the case that you created a peaceful world for Accelafine also. Is that correct?

your first MISREAD INTERPRETATION and ASSUMPTION was Wrong, so your CONCLUSION, here, is Wrong as well, meaning AND making your QUESTION, here, completely MOOT, also.

And yet Accelafine doesn't seem to feel at peace. Therefore, have you truly created a peaceful world for "everyone"?

SEE and NOTICE, here, how just one very simple and one very EASILY MADE False ASSUMPTION can and DID LEAD one COMPLETELY and UTTERLY ASTRAY.

AGAIN, I WILL SUGGEST that if you not make ANY assumptions, AT ALL, then you can NEVER Wrong, Inaccurate, NOR Incorrect. you will also NEVER make and have False views and conclusions.

Also, notice the PRETEND asking of a question, here, although this one OBVIOUSLY BELIEVES that it ALREADY KNEW the ANSWER. Which, AGAIN, this one HAD, AGAIN, JUMPED TO THE Wrong CONCLUSION.

AGAIN, IF you READ ONLY the ACTUAL WORDS that I SAY, WRITE, and USE, here, ONLY, WITHOUT MAKING ANY ASSUMPTIONS AT ALL, then you will NOT make SO MANY Wrong and False CONCLUSIONS, and will NOT have AS MANY False and Wrong BELIEFS as you OBVIOUSLY DO, here.

It takes some time to RECTIFY, Correct, and CLEAR UP yours and other's MISTAKES and Wrong doings, here. Which a lot of this could all be AVOID if you people, here, would just STOP MAKING ASSUMPTIONS, and you would just STOP JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS.

[Age]

And what did you 'set out to do' exactly?

Creating a Truly PEACEFUL world for EVERY one.

Damn dude, seems like your techniques are failing. What's peaceful about this place with your presence?

Me.

By what metric are you succeeding? I would love to know

By the metric of 'It' having ALREADY BEGUN, and by the metric of ALREADY KNOWING HOW TO ACHIEVE 'It', ALREADY, then this KNOW HOW can be SHARED and PASSED ON. Obviously you people can NOT ACHIEVE some thing if one does NOT YET have the Knowledge AND KNOW HOW of HOW to CREATE, and thus ACHIEVE that thing.

Also, by the metric of KNOWING the T.R.A.C.K. and BEING ON the Right PATH, in Life.

WATCHING 'It' UNFOLD is also ANOTHER metric.

[Flannel Jesus]

Sounds like bullshit to me. You sound like a failure.

[Gary Childress]

Creating a Truly PEACEFUL world for EVERY one.

If you have created a peaceful world for everyone,

I NEVER said I have ALREADY.

How long do you think or imagine 'that world' would take to create?

ONCE MORE, I will suggest NOT reading FROM ASSUMPTIONS, NOR FROM the BRAIN, and INSTEAD reading FROM the Truly OPEN perspective ONLY, or FROM the Mind INSTEAD, and ONLY.

then it must be the case that you created a peaceful world for Accelafine also. Is that correct?

your first MISREAD INTERPRETATION and ASSUMPTION was Wrong, so your CONCLUSION, here, is Wrong as well, meaning AND making your QUESTION, here, completely MOOT, also.

And yet Accelafine doesn't seem to feel at peace. Therefore, have you truly created a peaceful world for "everyone"?

SEE and NOTICE, here, how just one very simple and one very EASILY MADE False ASSUMPTION can and DID LEAD one COMPLETELY and UTTERLY ASTRAY.

AGAIN, I WILL SUGGEST that if you not make ANY assumptions, AT ALL, then you can NEVER Wrong, Inaccurate, NOR Incorrect. you will also NEVER make and have False views and conclusions.

Also, notice the PRETEND asking of a question, here, although this one OBVIOUSLY BELIEVES that it ALREADY KNEW the ANSWER. Which, AGAIN, this one HAD, AGAIN, JUMPED TO THE Wrong CONCLUSION.

AGAIN, IF you READ ONLY the ACTUAL WORDS that I SAY, WRITE, and USE, here, ONLY, WITHOUT MAKING ANY ASSUMPTIONS AT ALL, then you will NOT make SO MANY Wrong and False CONCLUSIONS, and will NOT have AS MANY False and Wrong BELIEFS as you OBVIOUSLY DO, here.

It takes some time to RECTIFY, Correct, and CLEAR UP yours and other's MISTAKES and Wrong doings, here. Which a lot of this could all be AVOID if you people, here, would just STOP MAKING ASSUMPTIONS, and you would just STOP JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS.

So is it fair to say that you are creating a peaceful world for everyone one interaction at a time? Or is that incorrect? Or what exactly do you mean by the statement that you 'set out' to "create a truly peaceful world for everyone?"

[Age]

If you have created a peaceful world for everyone,

I NEVER said I have ALREADY.

How long do you think or imagine 'that world' would take to create?

ONCE MORE, I will suggest NOT reading FROM ASSUMPTIONS, NOR FROM the BRAIN, and INSTEAD reading FROM the Truly OPEN perspective ONLY, or FROM the Mind INSTEAD, and ONLY.

then it must be the case that you created a peaceful world for Accelafine also. Is that correct?

your first MISREAD INTERPRETATION and ASSUMPTION was Wrong, so your CONCLUSION, here, is Wrong as well, meaning AND making your QUESTION, here, completely MOOT, also.

And yet Accelafine doesn't seem to feel at peace. Therefore, have you truly created a peaceful world for "everyone"?

SEE and NOTICE, here, how just one very simple and one very EASILY MADE False ASSUMPTION can and DID LEAD one COMPLETELY and UTTERLY ASTRAY.

AGAIN, I WILL SUGGEST that if you not make ANY assumptions, AT ALL, then you can NEVER Wrong, Inaccurate, NOR Incorrect. you will also NEVER make and have False views and conclusions.

Also, notice the PRETEND asking of a question, here, although this one OBVIOUSLY BELIEVES that it ALREADY KNEW the ANSWER. Which, AGAIN, this one HAD, AGAIN, JUMPED TO THE Wrong CONCLUSION.

AGAIN, IF you READ ONLY the ACTUAL WORDS that I SAY, WRITE, and USE, here, ONLY, WITHOUT MAKING ANY ASSUMPTIONS AT ALL, then you will NOT make SO MANY Wrong and False CONCLUSIONS, and will NOT have AS MANY False and Wrong BELIEFS as you OBVIOUSLY DO, here.

It takes some time to RECTIFY, Correct, and CLEAR UP yours and other's MISTAKES and Wrong doings, here. Which a lot of this could all be AVOID if you people, here, would just STOP MAKING ASSUMPTIONS, and you would just STOP JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS.

So is it fair to say that you are creating a peaceful world for everyone one interaction at a time?

NOT from EVERY perspective.

ONLY the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE FULL or WHOLE Truth is so-called 'fair', here.

Or is that incorrect?

Incorrect. But depending on what perspective, exactly, of course.

Or what exactly do you mean by the statement that you 'set out' to "create a truly peaceful world for everyone?"

I mean that I have 'set out THE goal', TO 'create a Truly peaceful world for EVERY one'.

I am NOT SURE HOW I could elaborate ANY further.

Have you ever 'set out A goal' "gary childress"?

If yes, then did you do things to achieve, fullfil, create, and/or to make 'that goal' happen/a reality?

If yes, then SURELY you KNOW, EXACTLY, what I MEAN, here.

But, if 'No', to both or either question, then okay. I am NOT sure HOW TO EXPLAIN, EXACTLY, what it MEANS to set A goal, and TO BE ACHIEVING it.

[Age]

Sounds like bullshit to me.

Okay.

You sound like a failure.

To 'you', 'I' sound like A FAILURE in relation to 'what', EXACTLY?

[Flannel Jesus]

Cockroaches

[Gary Childress]

Or what exactly do you mean by the statement that you 'set out' to "create a truly peaceful world for everyone?"

I mean that I have 'set out THE goal', TO 'create a Truly peaceful world for EVERY one'.

I am NOT SURE HOW I could elaborate ANY further.

Goals usually require certain actions, don't they? Otherwise, it's difficult to think that one can achieve a goal if one does not act in ways to bring about that goal.

How do you plan on achieving the goal of creating a truly peaceful world for every one? By what method? How do you, Age, create a peaceful world in order to accomplish your goal of creating a peaceful world for every one?

2) Is your goal to only make a peaceful world for every one? Or are you going to try to make the world peaceful for twos, threes and other numbers?

[Age]

Cockroaches

AGAIN, this WAS A 'philosophy forum'. So, if they responded like this, here, then you can imagine how they spoke TO and responded BACK TO each other, outside of this forum, BACK in the 'olden days' when this WAS being written.

[Gary Childress]

Cockroaches

AGAIN, this WAS A 'philosophy forum'. So, if they responded like this, here, then you can imagine how they spoke TO and responded BACK TO each other, outside of this forum, BACK in the 'olden days' when this WAS being written.

I think most people respond differently to real life interactions with others. At least I do. The Internet tends to bring out my worst. So maybe we aren't as bad in real life as we are on the Internet. Is that possible too?

[Age]

Or what exactly do you mean by the statement that you 'set out' to "create a truly peaceful world for everyone?"

I mean that I have 'set out THE goal', TO 'create a Truly peaceful world for EVERY one'.

I am NOT SURE HOW I could elaborate ANY further.

Goals usually require certain actions, don't they?

I use the word 'behaviours', instead of the 'actions' word. The reason for this will come about later on as 'we' progress, here. But, 'Yes', to achieve or create goals certain behaviours are necessary.

Otherwise, it's difficult to think that one can achieve a goal if one does not act in ways to bring about that goal.

Okay.

How do you plan on achieving the goal of creating a truly peaceful world for every one?

If 'this' is just what you were MEANING, previously, then WHY did you NOT just ASK 'this clarifying question', BEFORE?

Now, BY SHOWING and REVEALING the 'HOW TO' of HOW the Truly peaceful world, for EVERY one CAN BE and WILL BE ACHIEVED, and CREATED, is HOW I plan on achieving 'the goal', here.

See, you human beings can NOT CREATE and ACHIEVE some thing UNTIL you have LEARNED and/or OBTAINED 'the Knowledge' of HOW to ACHIEVE or CREATE 'that thing'. So, you all JUST NEED to LEARN and/or OBTAIN 'the Knowledge' and/or 'the KNOW HOW', FIRST.

By what method?

BY, and THROUGH, TEACHING and LEARNING.

Which is the EXACT SAME WAY that EVERY thing that you human beings HAVE CREATED, WAS ACHIEVED.

How do you, Age, create a peaceful world in order to accomplish your goal of creating a peaceful world for every one?

BY JUST SHOWING HOW ACHIEVING 'It' IS DONE, EXACTLY.

OH, and by the way, ACHIEVING 'world peace' IS, ACTUALLY, FAR, FAR SIMPLER and EASIER than you people in the days when this is being written could have even possibly imagined.

2) Is your goal to only make a peaceful world for every one? Or are you going to try to make the world peaceful for twos, threes and other numbers?

EVERY one.

Otherwise, OBVIOUSLY, it would NOT BE A 'peaceful world'

[Gary Childress]

I mean that I have 'set out THE goal', TO 'create a Truly peaceful world for EVERY one'.

I am NOT SURE HOW I could elaborate ANY further.

Goals usually require certain actions, don't they?

I use the word 'behaviours', instead of the 'actions' word. The reason for this will come about later on as 'we' progress, here. But, 'Yes', to achieve or create goals certain behaviours are necessary.

Otherwise, it's difficult to think that one can achieve a goal if one does not act in ways to bring about that goal.

Okay.

How do you plan on achieving the goal of creating a truly peaceful world for every one?

If 'this' is just what you were MEANING, previously, then WHY did you NOT just ASK 'this clarifying question', BEFORE?

Now, BY SHOWING and REVEALING the 'HOW TO' of HOW the Truly peaceful world, for EVERY one CAN BE and WILL BE ACHIEVED, and CREATED, is HOW I plan on achieving 'the goal', here.

See, you human beings can NOT CREATE and ACHIEVE some thing UNTIL you have LEARNED and/or OBTAINED 'the Knowledge' of HOW to ACHIEVE or CREATE 'that thing'. So, you all JUST NEED to LEARN and/or OBTAIN 'the Knowledge' and/or 'the KNOW HOW', FIRST.

By what method?

BY, and THROUGH, TEACHING and LEARNING.

Which is the EXACT SAME WAY that EVERY thing that you human beings HAVE CREATED, WAS ACHIEVED.

How do you, Age, create a peaceful world in order to accomplish your goal of creating a peaceful world for every one?

BY JUST SHOWING HOW ACHIEVING 'It' IS DONE, EXACTLY.

OH, and by the way, ACHIEVING 'world peace' IS, ACTUALLY, FAR, FAR SIMPLER and EASIER than you people in the days when this is being written could have even possibly imagined.

2) Is your goal to only make a peaceful world for every one? Or are you going to try to make the world peaceful for twos, threes and other numbers?

EVERY one.

Otherwise, OBVIOUSLY, it would NOT BE A 'peaceful world'

Who or what is a "one"? If something or someone isn't a "one", then does that mean you will not try to make a peaceful world for them?

[Age]

Cockroaches

AGAIN, this WAS A 'philosophy forum'. So, if they responded like this, here, then you can imagine how they spoke TO and responded BACK TO each other, outside of this forum, BACK in the 'olden days' when this WAS being written.

I think most people respond differently to real life interactions with others.

1. What do you MEAN by 'real life interactions'? And, compared to what 'OTHER life interactions' ARE THERE?

2. WHY did you say and write that you, only, 'think most people respond differently to, (real life), interactions with others'? Does NOT EVERY person respond DIFFERENTLY to interactions with others, to you?

I KNOW EVERY one responds DIFFERENTLY to interactions with others.

At least I do.

Okay, but does you saying this have ANY thing AT ALL to do with what you quoted me saying above, here?

If yes, then what is 'that', EXACTLY?

The Internet tends to bring out my worst.

Okay, interesting, 'Why is that's, EXACTLY?

What is 'it', about the internet that CAUSES 'this phenomenon' in you, exactly?

So maybe we aren't as bad in real life as we are on the Internet.

Okay.

Is that possible too?

I NEVER thought otherwise.

Again, it appears as though your ASSUMING HAS LED you ASTRAY, here, ONCE MORE.

Just in case you have some interest, my point was that 'philosophy forums' are 'set up' with the intention of being just 'a place' for having 'philosophical discussions'. Which, obviously, is where 'critical thinking' and 'logical reasoning' is MEANT TO 'take place', AND if ANY 'attacking' were to 'take place', then it would only EVER BE ON 'an idea' or 'a view' ONLY, and NEVER ON 'a person's NOR 'people', EVER.

So, what I was saying was if this was how 'these people' spoke to and interacted with, 'each other', here, in A 'philosophy forum', back in the days when this was being written, then one could imagine how they spoke TO and WITH each other outside of where 'logical thinking' was NOT necessarily meant to be 'taking place'.

Does 'this' now CHANGE what you, previously, thought I was saying and meaning?

[Gary Childress]

AGAIN, this WAS A 'philosophy forum'. So, if they responded like this, here, then you can imagine how they spoke TO and responded BACK TO each other, outside of this forum, BACK in the 'olden days' when this WAS being written.

I think most people respond differently to real life interactions with others.

1. What do you MEAN by 'real life interactions'? And, compared to what 'OTHER life interactions' ARE THERE?

Meeting someone in person, face to face as opposed to corresponding on the Internet through typing words.

2. WHY did you say and write that you, only, 'think most people respond differently to, (real life), interactions with others'? Does NOT EVERY person respond DIFFERENTLY to interactions with others, to you?

I KNOW EVERY one responds DIFFERENTLY to interactions with others.

At least I do.

Okay, but does you saying this have ANY thing AT ALL to do with what you quoted me saying above, here?

If yes, then what is 'that', EXACTLY?

The Internet tends to bring out my worst.

Okay, interesting, 'Why is that's, EXACTLY?

What is 'it', about the internet that CAUSES 'this phenomenon' in you, exactly?

So maybe we aren't as bad in real life as we are on the Internet.

Okay.

Is that possible too?

I NEVER thought otherwise.

Again, it appears as though your ASSUMING HAS LED you ASTRAY, here, ONCE MORE.

Just in case you have some interest, my point was that 'philosophy forums' are 'set up' with the intention of being just 'a place' for having 'philosophical discussions'. Which, obviously, is where 'critical thinking' and 'logical reasoning' is MEANT TO 'take place', AND if ANY 'attacking' were to 'take place', then it would only EVER BE ON 'an idea' or 'a view' ONLY, and NEVER ON 'a person's NOR 'people', EVER.

So, what I was saying was if this was how 'these people' spoke to and interacted with, 'each other', here, in A 'philosophy forum', back in the days when this was being written, then one could imagine how they spoke TO and WITH each other outside of where 'logical thinking' was NOT necessarily meant to be 'taking place'.

Does 'this' now CHANGE what you, previously, thought I was saying and meaning?

I usually behave differently when I meet someone in person. If I meet the same person online, and don't know who they are then I might argue politics or philosophy with them, however, with face to face meetings, I just let people be who they are and don't argue politics of philosophy with them. I usually just try to get along amicably with them. Are you not the same way? If you meet someone in person, face to face, do you ask them to clarify everything just like you do here?

[Age]

Goals usually require certain actions, don't they?

I use the word 'behaviours', instead of the 'actions' word. The reason for this will come about later on as 'we' progress, here. But, 'Yes', to achieve or create goals certain behaviours are necessary.

Otherwise, it's difficult to think that one can achieve a goal if one does not act in ways to bring about that goal.

Okay.

How do you plan on achieving the goal of creating a truly peaceful world for every one?

If 'this' is just what you were MEANING, previously, then WHY did you NOT just ASK 'this clarifying question', BEFORE?

Now, BY SHOWING and REVEALING the 'HOW TO' of HOW the Truly peaceful world, for EVERY one CAN BE and WILL BE ACHIEVED, and CREATED, is HOW I plan on achieving 'the goal', here.

See, you human beings can NOT CREATE and ACHIEVE some thing UNTIL you have LEARNED and/or OBTAINED 'the Knowledge' of HOW to ACHIEVE or CREATE 'that thing'. So, you all JUST NEED to LEARN and/or OBTAIN 'the Knowledge' and/or 'the KNOW HOW', FIRST.

By what method?

BY, and THROUGH, TEACHING and LEARNING.

Which is the EXACT SAME WAY that EVERY thing that you human beings HAVE CREATED, WAS ACHIEVED.

How do you, Age, create a peaceful world in order to accomplish your goal of creating a peaceful world for every one?

BY JUST SHOWING HOW ACHIEVING 'It' IS DONE, EXACTLY.

OH, and by the way, ACHIEVING 'world peace' IS, ACTUALLY, FAR, FAR SIMPLER and EASIER than you people in the days when this is being written could have even possibly imagined.

2) Is your goal to only make a peaceful world for every one? Or are you going to try to make the world peaceful for twos, threes and other numbers?

EVERY one.

Otherwise, OBVIOUSLY, it would NOT BE A 'peaceful world'

Who or what is a "one"?

EVERY thing, EVERY one of EVERY 'thing', or EVERY SINGLE 'thing' of ALL things.

And, when EVERY thing, or EVERY one, comes together, as One, then that 'Thing', or that One, is 'Everyone' or 'Everything'

To me, the words;
'one' refers to A 'part' of the ALL or WHOLE.
'One' refers to ALL or the WHOLE, together.

If something or someone isn't a "one", then does that mean you will not try to make a peaceful world for them?

Is starting a sentence with, 'If someone is NOT a one', really a logical way to begin a sentence? (But, in asking that it is GREAT TO SEE you pondering and wondering MORE, here.)

The VERY REASON WHY I WRITE the word 'every' capitalised IS TO EMPHASIZE the Fact that I AM referring to ABSOLUTELY ALL, and, literally, EVERY one.

So, WHEN I say or write 'A peaceful world for EVERY one', then that MEANS there is NOT a 'single one' that is 'left out'.


Now, I AM AWARE that at times, and even some times 'most times', you posters, here, say and use words like 'all' and 'every' when you do NOT ACTUALLY MEAN ALL nor EVERY at all. Which, AGAIN, IS WHY I HAVE CHOSEN TO EMPHASIZE SOME words in capital letters, so that they 'stick out MORE' and ARE HIGHLIGHTED TO EMPHASIZE the Fact that 'those words' ARE what I AM ACTUALLY MEANING, and by which I WILL USE to SHOW that I HAVE BEEN SAYING and CLAIMING 'this', whatever 'it' is], ALL ALONG, as I c CAN SHOW, and which HAD EVEN BEEN HIGHLIGHTING IN capital letters AGAIN, ALL ALONG, WHEN I WILL BE ACCUSED IF NOT BEING 'MORE CLEARER' in my writings, here