What if there is no before or after - but just the eternal now

[Age]

It wasn’t rubbish, it was fascinating. To me anyway. I don’t care if you think it was rubbish. I thought it was everything but rubbish.

Would you like to DISCUSS what IS Right AND what IS Wrong in that video, or, do you just prefer to REMAIN BELIEVING what you do?

See, if it is the former, then i will go and watch 'that video', and then 'we' can DISCUSS.

If, however, it is the latter, then I will leave you WITH, and IN, your BELIEFS.

I have no beliefs about any one else’s theory, not even my own theory.

I will ask this question, AGAIN, 'WHY do you even make up 'theories', about 'what IS' or 'what could be', WHEN what IS ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY True is, HERE, BEFORE 'us' for ALL to 'LOOK AT', and 'SEE'/UNDERSTAND?

I can only know myself from the information and knowledge that is available to me.

you KNOW, FROM the senses of 'that body'.

you TURN the 'information', which comes from 'those senses', of 'that body', INTO 'knowledge', which you then BELIEVE some of to BE TRUE.

What IS 'available' TO 'you' ARE 'the experiences' OF 'that body'. 'Those experiences' ARE the ACTUAL Truth OF things. 'The way' you, as an elder one, VIEW, and LOOK AT, 'those experiences' can, and have, become DISTORTED, BECAUSE OF THE 'past experiences' of 'that body'.

For example, if 'that body' has ONLY 'grown up' 'experiencing' and HEARING words like, 'The Universe BEGAN', and/or words like, 'At the origin of the Universe', then 'you', the one, INSIDE of 'that body' can then START BELIEVING that the Universe did ACTUALLY BEGIN. And, once 'that BELIEF' has SET IN, then it is MUCH, MUCH HARDER FOR 'you' TO LEARN, and UNDERSTAND, what the ACTUAL Truth IS, HERE, EXACTLY.

IN FACT, WHILE one IS BELIEVING some thing like, 'The Universe DID BEGIN', then it is an ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBILITY for 'that one' TO LEARN what the ACTUAL Truth, REALLY, IS.

Else I have absolutely no concept of myself.

AGAIN, the word "myself" is A MISNOMER, A CONTRADICTION IN TERMS, and/or AN OXYMORON. it IS, AGAIN, literally, A 'self-contradiction'. As the word 'my' is in reference to THE 'self' OR 'Self'. And, HOW can A 'self' or 'Self' HAVE or OWN ANOTHER 'self' or 'Self', EXACTLY?

In reality I have absolutely no idea or knowledge of what is reality, but imagination builds a fairly good simulator of it, which is a good substitute for this not knowing, even if it’s just a theory, that’s all I’ve got to work with anyway, a theoretical idea.

If 'that' is what 'you' BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that ALL your have got to work with, then 'that' is ALL you WILL, REALLY, have.

And, if 'you' REALLY DO HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA NOR KNOWLEDGE of 'what is' REALITY, then okay.

But, if you would like to LEARN and UNDERSTAND 'what REALITY, REALLY, is', then 'I' could help 'you', here, EXACTLY.

[accelafine]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1KMjZYb3nk


Brian Cox: Something Terrifying Existed Before The Big Bang



In this captivating episode, renowned physicist Brian Cox explores the mind-boggling concept of what existed before the Big Bang. Was there a universe before ours? Could the laws of physics as we know them have existed in some form? Join Brian as he delves into the mysteries of time, space, and the origins of our universe, challenging everything we think we know about the beginning of reality itself.

From quantum theories to cosmic structures beyond our comprehension, this journey takes us to the very edge of science, where facts and imagination collide.

It’s click bait… yes, I know.

It’s how YouTube draws people into watching.

It’s still based on the ideas of BC …so my intelligence draws me to watch it, even while knowing it’s not actually him narrating.
It’s still about his ideas.

I understand how click baiting works… but I don’t care about that, I care only for information I am interested in, and that video was something I am interested in, there’s no need to turn this into something it’s not.

Which part of it is 'based on his ideas'?

[Fairy]

I will ask this question, AGAIN, 'WHY do you even make up 'theories', about 'what IS' or 'what could be', WHEN what IS ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY True is, HERE, BEFORE 'us' for ALL to 'LOOK AT', and 'SEE'/UNDERSTAND?

——-

Response:
Because while “what is” is irrefutable and actual truth.

Describing this truth using language based on thought is also a part of “what is”

[Fairy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1KMjZYb3nk


Brian Cox: Something Terrifying Existed Before The Big Bang



In this captivating episode, renowned physicist Brian Cox explores the mind-boggling concept of what existed before the Big Bang. Was there a universe before ours? Could the laws of physics as we know them have existed in some form? Join Brian as he delves into the mysteries of time, space, and the origins of our universe, challenging everything we think we know about the beginning of reality itself.

From quantum theories to cosmic structures beyond our comprehension, this journey takes us to the very edge of science, where facts and imagination collide.

It’s click bait… yes, I know.

It’s how YouTube draws people into watching.

It’s still based on the ideas of BC …so my intelligence draws me to watch it, even while knowing it’s not actually him narrating.
It’s still about his ideas.

I understand how click baiting works… but I don’t care about that, I care only for information I am interested in, and that video was something I am interested in, there’s no need to turn this into something it’s not.

Which part of it is 'based on his ideas'?

This part

https://youtu.be/aPOCP4GHJvI?si=q6ISfxGF6Lic0HkW

It doesn’t matter if he’s not narrating the op video, its still based on his ideas… it’s not a big deal.

[Fairy]

The information in the op video was linked to his name because it’s discussing a topic based on ideas that are linked to Brian Cox.

[accelafine]

They are completely different. And I would hazard a guess that Brian Cox DOES mind all the pseudo-scientific hogwash videos on Youtube that use his name to attract views. There are hundreds, if not thousands of them.

[Fairy]

YouTube content creators are just sharing information with the entire world. They are not plagiarising someone else’s ideas, especially when they attribute their own content to be about someone else’s idea. It just means the content creators are extending on some idea that is appealing and attractive to them. I’m sure Brian Cox would be delighted to see others showcasing his ideas.

It’s not misleading, nor is it a crime to do this, it’s simply sharing information.

[Fairy]

They are completely different. And I would hazard a guess that Brian Cox DOES mind all the pseudo-scientific hogwash videos on Youtube that use his name to attract views. There are hundreds, if not thousands of them.

Well that’s a matter for him to decide. We cannot make that judgment call. We can only guess he’s either pissed about it or he’s delighted.

Ultimately we will never know, unless we spoke to him in actual person and he told us in his own words what he thinks about his name being used.

Personally, I’d be delighted, but that’s just the sort of person I am.

Truth is it’s all speculation at the end of the day, maybe we’re all talking hogwash, who really knows anything. It’s all empty space and opinions at the end of the day.

[accelafine]

What a dip. You really do take the 'bimbo' act seriously don't you?

Yes, I'm sure someone would be 'delighted' to be impersonated to gain clicks for fake videos that gullible idiots watch.

[Fairy]

What a dip. You really do take the 'bimbo' act seriously don't you?

Yes, I'm sure someone would be 'delighted' to be impersonated to gain clicks for fake videos that gullible idiots watch.

I’m just not as cynical as you, that’s all I can say.

You can guess all you want about my personality, but ultimately you will never know me,. And I’m so delighted and relieved about that. I’m just so delighted to not be someone like you.

I don’t care about anything but information, because information is all there is anyway.

[accelafine]

That's funny. I don't know anything about you but you 'know' me? Dumb as a post.

[Fairy]

What a dip. You really do take the 'bimbo' act seriously don't you?

Yes, I'm sure someone would be 'delighted' to be impersonated to gain clicks for fake videos that gullible idiots watch.

He wasn’t being impersonated. That’s just your own brain rot of belief.

It was an informed video discussing the ideas of Brain Cox. No big deal.. I’m sure Brian Cox is right this minute suing everyone who mentions his name in their videos. Right! Yeah, as if he hasn’t got better things to do with his life than be that petty.

[Fairy]

That's funny. I don't know anything about you but you 'know' me? Dumb as a post.

Ass U me

You / me

All assumptions, what else is there dumb poster?

[Fairy]

ASSUME

[Age]

I will ask this question, AGAIN, 'WHY do you even make up 'theories', about 'what IS' or 'what could be', WHEN what IS ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY True is, HERE, BEFORE 'us' for ALL to 'LOOK AT', and 'SEE'/UNDERSTAND?

——-

Response:
Because while “what is” is irrefutable and actual truth.

Describing this truth using language based on thought is also a part of “what is”

If what you say, here, makes sense, to you, then okay.