Is open sexism getting worse here?

[MyNameGoesHere]

Says a clearly shitty, inadequate little man.

Are you referring to me? Because I assure you I am a woman. Not shitty, not inadequate, but with years of experience. If you have a problem with my arguments, then attack the argument, not me.

[accelafine]

How unfortunate then that you come across as a shittly little man. But yes, there are plenty of shitty, misogynistic women around like you.

[MyNameGoesHere]

How unfortunate then that you come across as a shittly little man. But yes, there are plenty of shitty, misogynistic women around like you.

Again, what in my argument tells you that I am misogynistic? Are you really trying to say that all women are blameless? That's naive at the very least.

[accelafine]

Your 'observations' have nothing to do with the topic. Where in the topic does it say that all women are perfect saints? Why would you even bring up such a stupid assertion? You come barging into the thread ranting and raving about 'shitty women', after jointing the forum yesterday That's pretty bizarre.

[MyNameGoesHere]

Your 'observations' have nothing to do with the topic. Where in the topic does it say that all women are perfect saints? Why would you even bring up such a stupid assertion? You come barging into the thread ranting and raving about 'shitty women', after jointing the forum yesterday That's pretty bizarre.

They have everything to do with the assorted arguments that came up in this multi-page mess of stuff. Did you read it?

Where did I even say anything in my argument that a reasonable woman would find fault with? I said 1) women are entitled to full rights and responsibilities under the law.

[accelafine]

The facts speak for themselves. Males make up 96 percent of the UK prison population and commit nearly 100 percent of sex crimes. That's pretty 'shitty'. What you are talking about are women who have what you consider to be horrible personalities. FFS. Get a grip.

[MyNameGoesHere]

The facts speak for themselves. Males make up 96 percent of the UK prison population and commit nearly 100 percent of sex crimes. That's pretty 'shitty'. What you are talking about are women who have what you consider to be horrible personalities. FFS. Get a grip.

No, I gave a specific example of something that I consider criminal that women have done. Also, horrible personalities have serious repercussions in the world. If you want to seriously consider why open sexism might be getting worse, it is relevant.

[accelafine]

You obviously don't know what sexism means. Has anyone on here suggested that women never do any crimes?
Here's a bit of 'non sexism' for you: you are clearly as misogynistic and nutty as most of the males who regularly post on this forum.

[MyNameGoesHere]

You obviously don't know what sexism means. Has anyone on here suggested that women never do any crimes?
Here's a bit of 'non sexism' for you: you are clearly as misogynistic and nutty as most of the males who regularly post on this forum.

Yes, I'm sure as a woman, I've never encountered sexism or the patriarchy disrupting my life.

[Eodnhoj7]

Without standard definitions there is no conversation. Bigotry is exactly what was presented. Your response to it is your personal morality or ethical system, but bigotry has a definition that must be maintained or we cannot communicate.

What constitutes bigotry is not a fixed standard but is dependent upon changing cultural norms. It is relative.

No. Your ethics/morality may change, but bigotry remains the same. Are you actually trying to say that being a nazi is something that would be ok if cultural norms change? That somehow you'd be less a nazi if there were more people who thought like you?

I am NOT calling you a nazi, btw, just following your argument to the end. It is illogical.

Labeling someone a bigot is illogical as hatred is a subjective state that cannot be proven. Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied, discriminating one friend from another can be construed as an act of hatred, is that bigotry too?

[FlashDangerpants]

Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied, discriminating one friend from another can be construed as an act of hatred, is that bigotry too?

Like that time I didn't consider your experiment with divining rods that detected psychic pyramid-related mental anguish to be proper science, and you though I was bigotted against witchcraft?

[Eodnhoj7]

Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied, discriminating one friend from another can be construed as an act of hatred, is that bigotry too?

Like that time I didn't consider your experiment with divining rods that detected psychic pyramid-related mental anguish to be proper science, and you though I was bigotted against witchcraft?

I would like to see where and if I used the term bigoted in that conversation, please show me a context of use. A quote please.

Regardless I forgot about the conversation until now, and I still don't remember you being a part of it. It is not that I doubt you where a part of it, I am sure your memory is correct, it just shows how little value I put to our interactions.

Anyhow, how is constantly being critical of other's going for you, considering that is all you offer to these forums? It must be rough when you are all alone and have to stand in front of a mirror looking at yourself...oh wait when you talk into it to motivate yourself does that count as witchcraft too? "Mirror mirror on the wall...."

[accelafine]

Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied, discriminating one friend from another can be construed as an act of hatred, is that bigotry too?

Like that time I didn't consider your experiment with divining rods that detected psychic pyramid-related mental anguish to be proper science, and you though I was bigotted against witchcraft?

I would like to see where and if I used the term bigoted in that conversation, please show me a context of use. A quote please.

Regardless I forgot about the conversation until now, and I still don't remember you being a part of it. It is not that I doubt you where a part of it, I am sure your memory is correct, it just shows how little value I put to our interactions.

Anyhow, how is constantly being critical of other's going for you, considering that is all you offer to these forums? It must be rough when you are all alone and have to stand in front of a mirror looking at yourself...oh wait when you talk into it to motivate yourself does that count as witchcraft too? "Mirror mirror on the wall...."

Flashysmartypants is a compulsive untruther. He can't help it. Par for the course with wokies.

[FlashDangerpants]

Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied, discriminating one friend from another can be construed as an act of hatred, is that bigotry too?

Like that time I didn't consider your experiment with divining rods that detected psychic pyramid-related mental anguish to be proper science, and you though I was bigotted against witchcraft?

I would like to see where and if I used the term bigoted in that conversation, please show me a context of use. A quote please.

The whole thread was full of stuff like this, complaining about not being taken seriously when you wanted to make witchcraft a branch of science and declare pyramids a source of harmful emotional turmoil:

You can beat up the dowsing rods all you want, to strawman both the Russian studies and the fact I have claimed the study should not be limited to dousing rods but they are used as a base context.

Sure seems like you were accusing me of unfair discrimination.

[Eodnhoj7]

Like that time I didn't consider your experiment with divining rods that detected psychic pyramid-related mental anguish to be proper science, and you though I was bigotted against witchcraft?

I would like to see where and if I used the term bigoted in that conversation, please show me a context of use. A quote please.

The whole thread was full of stuff like this, complaining about not being taken seriously when you wanted to make witchcraft a branch of science and declare pyramids a source of harmful emotional turmoil:

You can beat up the dowsing rods all you want, to strawman both the Russian studies and the fact I have claimed the study should not be limited to dousing rods but they are used as a base context.

Sure seems like you were accusing me of unfair discrimination.

Seems? Anything can seem one way or another when context is changed. But I asked for the context if where the word "bigot" was used. I do not see it and you claimed I used that word, did you not?

And from what I read the quote said "you can beat up the dowsing rods", I don't see where you are directly attacking me, unless that is what you feel you where doing in which case you are accusing yourself of bigotry and not me.

Do you view yourself as a bigot? Don't be so harsh on yourself, you are not a bigot...you are just a thing ever flowing time will burn away.

Also from what I read the dousing rods where a context to start measuring from, I do not read where it is the permanent fixed standard.

I am flattered you where able to find such an old post from years ago, the reason why I am flattered is apparently you keep it in your porn collection, as you seem to have such things at a quick access, and if I knew my post did that for you I find that as good motivation to start a side hustle on onlyfans just posting my threads.