Those are your words.
Paradox Within Law of Identity
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
Yes, and I have realized where the contradiction is, or where the perceived contradiction is.
The questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. Just like all words, themselves, do not mean any thing, in and of themselves.
Only 'we' put 'meaning' in words, or give 'meaning' to words. But, again, questions, or words, themselves, do not mean any thing. So, the questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. However, the 'reason' I ask you questions is for the reason I already provided. Which you, obviously, interpret as 'meaning', right?
If yes, then what 'I mean' by asking you questions, or 'the reason' I ask you questions is to see how you answer, and if you actually clarify, or not.
So, is 'this' now settled?
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
You gave me an honest response so yes it is settled, we are on the same terms...loosely.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:40 amYes, and I have realized where the contradiction is, or where the perceived contradiction is.
The questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. Just like all words, themselves, do not mean any thing, in and of themselves.
Only 'we' put 'meaning' in words, or give 'meaning' to words. But, again, questions, or words, themselves, do not mean any thing. So, the questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. However, the 'reason' I ask you questions is for the reason I already provided. Which you, obviously, interpret as 'meaning', right?
If yes, then what 'I mean' by asking you questions, or 'the reason' I ask you questions is to see how you answer, and if you actually clarify, or not.
So, is 'this' now settled?
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
Have I ever not given an honest response?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:06 amYou gave me an honest response so yes it is settled, we are on the same terms...loosely.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:40 amYes, and I have realized where the contradiction is, or where the perceived contradiction is.
The questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. Just like all words, themselves, do not mean any thing, in and of themselves.
Only 'we' put 'meaning' in words, or give 'meaning' to words. But, again, questions, or words, themselves, do not mean any thing. So, the questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. However, the 'reason' I ask you questions is for the reason I already provided. Which you, obviously, interpret as 'meaning', right?
If yes, then what 'I mean' by asking you questions, or 'the reason' I ask you questions is to see how you answer, and if you actually clarify, or not.
So, is 'this' now settled?
If yes, then where and when, exactly?
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
Honesty occurs in degrees often times.Age wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 3:08 amHave I ever not given an honest response?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:06 amYou gave me an honest response so yes it is settled, we are on the same terms...loosely.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:40 am
Yes, and I have realized where the contradiction is, or where the perceived contradiction is.
The questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. Just like all words, themselves, do not mean any thing, in and of themselves.
Only 'we' put 'meaning' in words, or give 'meaning' to words. But, again, questions, or words, themselves, do not mean any thing. So, the questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. However, the 'reason' I ask you questions is for the reason I already provided. Which you, obviously, interpret as 'meaning', right?
If yes, then what 'I mean' by asking you questions, or 'the reason' I ask you questions is to see how you answer, and if you actually clarify, or not.
So, is 'this' now settled?
If yes, then where and when, exactly?
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
ONCE AGAIN, for the VERY SLOW, absolutely EVERY thing is relative, to the observer.
So, if you 'saw' 'an answer', then 'that' is relative, to you, right?
But, to me, you, still, have NOT YET 'answered' the ACTUAL QUESTION I posed, and asked you.
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity
As long as 'you' ARE AWARE that, to 'me', you have NOT, then all is well and good. Well as far as 'I' am concerned, anyway.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 4:39 pmTo me I have.