Mainstream misrepresentation of how taxation truly works, it is never about "taxing the rich"

[godelian]

you have CLAIMED that you would NOT HELP ABSOLUTELY ANY one, including children, UNLESS you GOT SOME thing, FROM them.

I have already clarified umpteen times what exactly I have said on the matter.

You are certainly not quoting what I have said. You are inventing your own interpretation expressed in your own words and certainly not mine.

The words that you write, cannot possibly be the words that I have written, since you did not copy them. Therefore , what you write, can never be a legitimate quotation. What is there so hard to understand about that?

My default position is transactional. So, yes, the default position is that I want something in return of equal value. Furthermore, I am not interested in discussing your imbecile hypotheticals.

Seriously, I do not care what you think about my default position.

As I have mentioned already, since it is about a matter of morality, and in accordance with Islamic doctrine, unless you justify your response on the basis of Islamic law, I spit, piss, and shit on what you write about it.

Your personal baseless opinion is completely irrelevant to me. I repeat, we do not take lessons in morality from the unbelievers.

[Age]

you have CLAIMED that you would NOT HELP ABSOLUTELY ANY one, including children, UNLESS you GOT SOME thing, FROM them.

I have already clarified umpteen times what exactly I have said on the matter.

YES you HAVE. you SAID and CLAIMED that you would NOT do ANY thing for ANY one, UNLESS you GOT some thing FROM them.

I THEN asked you some CLARIFYING QUESTIONS about if this includes helping and/or saving children's lives. you THEN CLARIFIED for 'us' readers, here, what your VIEWS, here, were, EXACTLY.

You are certainly not quoting what I have said. You are inventing your own interpretation expressed in your own words and certainly not mine.

REALLY?

The words that you write, cannot possibly be the words that I have written, since you did not copy them. Therefore , what you write, can never be a legitimate quotation. What is there so hard to understand about that?

LOL I have NEVER SAID NOR CLAIMED that 'the words' that I HAVE SAID OR WRITTEN, here, ARE 'the words' that you have written.

Why did you NOT understand 'this' ALREADY?

My default position is transactional. So, yes, the default position is that I want something in return of equal value.

So, you AGAIN, ADMIT that you have SAID and WRITTEN more or less EXACTLY what I have SAID, WRITTEN, and CLAIMED that you HAD SAID and WRITTEN, here, right?

Furthermore, I am not interested in discussing your imbecile hypotheticals.

LOL And what 'imbecile hypotheticals' are 'they', supposed to be, exactly?

I have just ASKED you TO CLARIFY what you ACTUALLY MEANT when you, more or less, SAID and WROTE that you would WANT some thing in return for HELPING or SAVING A child's life. Which you HAVE ALREADY.

Seriously, I do not care what you think about my default position.

This HAS BEEN OBVIOUS from the outset, here.

And, considering that you would NOT even HELP A dying child, WITHOUT WANTING some thing in return, it pretty well FOLLOWS, ABSOLUTELY, that you would NOT care what another just 'thinks', here, automatically.

As I have mentioned already, since it is about a matter of morality, and in accordance with Islamic doctrine, unless you justify your response on the basis of Islamic law, I spit, piss, and shit on what you write about it.

Just out of curiosity, would you think that I would care?

By the way what is the 'it' word referring to, which you claim is NOT about 'morality', itself, here?

Your personal baseless opinion is completely irrelevant to me.

'you HAVE BEEN 'the one' INFORMING 'us' readers, here, that you would NOT HELP another human being without WANTING some thing IN RETURN.

So, 'what', EXACTLY, are my, alleged and supposed, 'personal baseless opinions', here?

I repeat, we do not take lessons in morality from the unbelievers.

"unbelievers" in relation to 'what', EXACTLY?

Oh, and by the way, you FOLLOWING 'the words' of one TINY INSIGNIFICANT LITTLE human being, named and labeled "mohammed", in the COMPLETELY False AND Wrong INTERPRETATION that you and others HAVE BEEN DOING, is about as STUPID and those who FOLLOW 'the words' of OTHER SINGLE LITTLE human beings. LOL you or ANY one else who FOLLOWS 'the words' in your human being religious texts, as though you EACH have the true and right INTERPRETATION are AS BLIND and STUPID as EACH OTHER.

you FOOLS have been DECEIVED by 'words', and MISINTERPRETATIONS, WRITTEN by 'humans', like "mohammed", and thus you ALL have BEEN BELIEVING and WORSHIPING in False Gods.

you "believers" are BELIEVING in NOTHING AT ALL but your OWN False and Wrong CONCEPTS, and INTERPRETATIONS.

you are FOOLS "godelian". you ARE NOT BELIEVERS AT ALL OF WHAT IS MEANT TO BE BELIEVED IN.

you TAKE 'lessons' in 'morality' FROM FOOLS, and DECEIVERS. Which is WHY you have ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE as to what IS Right, and GOOD, in Life.

[Age]

As I have mentioned already, since it is about a matter of morality, and in accordance with Islamic doctrine, unless you justify your response on the basis of Islamic law, I spit, piss, and shit on what you write about it.

Did you KNOW people, like you, spit, piss, and shit on what "mohammed" wrote, and about its version of Allah, and morality, ALSO?

See, what you think OF and ABOUT other think the EXACT SAME of you and "mohammed's" False religion.

"mohammed", like the rest of you adult human beings, MISINTERPRETED 'the messages', with its OWN TWISTED and DISTORTED thinking and BELIEFS. And, as "mohammed" was TRICKED, FOOLED, and DECEIVED, SO TO are you people, here, AS WELL.

[godelian]

Furthermore, I am not interested in discussing your imbecile hypotheticals.

LOL And what 'imbecile hypotheticals' are 'they', supposed to be, exactly?

The following is one of your imbecile hypotheticals:

And, considering that you would NOT even HELP A dying child, WITHOUT WANTING some thing in return ...

I am not interested in elaborating on your imbecile hypothetical. That thing is not even legitimate thought experiment. Furthermore, what you write, are your words and not mine. I have never literally written a thing like that. You did not quote me on this matter. On the contrary, you have invented that on the fly by yourself.

Oh, and by the way, you FOLLOWING 'the words' of one TINY INSIGNIFICANT LITTLE human being, named and labeled "mohammed", in the COMPLETELY False AND Wrong INTERPRETATION that you and others HAVE BEEN DOING, is about as STUPID and those who FOLLOW 'the words' of OTHER SINGLE LITTLE human beings.

I don't care about what you think about the prophet of Islam or about his ministry.

Since you are an unbeliever, I do not expect you to subscribe to anything in Islamic moral theory. That is perfectly fine for me, because I am not interested in what other people believe or do not believe in matters of religion. That is simply not my problem. That is why I do not care about your opinion on the matter.

Let me repeat to you, I do not give a flying fart about what you believe or do not believe in matters of religion. I was not born into this world to tell other people what they should believe or not believe. Whatever they believe, if it works for them, fine. If not, also fine.