What is Dark Energy? FEB 05, 2024. By Chelsea Gohd.

[Age]

October 25, 2024. After Decades of Searching, Are Physicists Closing In on Dark Matter?
With no conclusive laboratory results, researchers are turning to other methods to find the elusive substance
/Dan Falk/
…

We don't need a lab, we need a brain. Matter is "implanted" into physical space (aether), it is actually a damaged, deformed physical space, elementary particles are basically defects in the regular structure of physical space, and the massive movement of stars in galaxies is actually the overall movement of physical space (aether), pulled by "ingrown" matter...

And, WHERE did so-called 'luminerous ether' come from, EXACTLY?

Also, WHAT is so-called 'luminerous ether', EXCTLY?

[Age]

'Dark energy' is just the made up name that astronomers gave to the mysterious "something" that is claimed to be causing the False PRESUMPTION and BELIEF that Universe, Itself, is expanding at an accelerated rate.

[socrattus]

'Dark energy' is just the made up name that astronomers gave to the mysterious "something" that is claimed to be causing the False PRESUMPTION and BELIEF that Universe, Itself, is expanding at an accelerated rate.

The universe (as a whole) is flat and static.
The universe (as a whole) is neither expanding nor accelerating.
Only in some places there are different disturbances of galaxies.
The proof.
The critical density (cosmological constant) of the material universe (in the cosmic vacuum)
is about 5.96×10^−27 kg/m^3. Such small amount of mass cannot create a "big bang" and therefore
the universe (as a whole) is static, flat, cold, and isotropic.
Such state mathematician Minkowski called "an absolute 4D spacetime".
This mathematically "beautiful" trick made science "strange".
‘’Since the mathematical physicists have taken over, theoretical physics has gone to pot.
The bizarre concepts generated out of the overuse and misinterpretation of mathematics
would be funny if it were not for the tragedy of the waste in time, manpower, money,
and the resulting misdirection.’’ /Richard Feynman. Nobel Prize in Physics 1965/

[Age]

'Dark energy' is just the made up name that astronomers gave to the mysterious "something" that is claimed to be causing the False PRESUMPTION and BELIEF that Universe, Itself, is expanding at an accelerated rate.

The universe (as a whole) is flat and static.

Although in ALL directions objects can be seen, and can be seen to be changing. But the Universe, as a whole, is static in that It is always changing.

The universe (as a whole) is neither expanding nor accelerating.

As an infinite in size thing could NOT expand, NOR accelerate.

Only in some places there are different disturbances of galaxies.

Which is just as expected, and normal.

The proof.
The critical density (cosmological constant) of the material universe (in the cosmic vacuum)
is about 5.96×10^−27 kg/m^3. Such small amount of mass cannot create a "big bang" and therefore
the universe (as a whole) is static, flat, cold, and isotropic.

In relation to 'what', exactly?

Such state mathematician Minkowski called "an absolute 4D spacetime".
This mathematically "beautiful" trick made science "strange".
‘’Since the mathematical physicists have taken over, theoretical physics has gone to pot.
The bizarre concepts generated out of the overuse and misinterpretation of mathematics
would be funny if it were not for the tragedy of the waste in time, manpower, money,
and the resulting misdirection.’’ /Richard Feynman. Nobel Prize in Physics 1965/

The Universe, Itself, is ABSOLUTE SIMPLE, in the way It works, and functions.

[Noax]

‘’Since the mathematical physicists have taken over, theoretical physics has gone to pot.
The bizarre concepts generated out of the overuse and misinterpretation of mathematics
would be funny if it were not for the tragedy of the waste in time, manpower, money,
and the resulting misdirection.’’ /Richard Feynman. Nobel Prize in Physics 1965/

Feynman said no such thing, but that exact quote is perpetuated regularly in social media.
So do you have a non-social media reference that shows he actually said that?

[Cerveny]

‘’Since the mathematical physicists have taken over, theoretical physics has gone to pot.
The bizarre concepts generated out of the overuse and misinterpretation of mathematics
would be funny if it were not for the tragedy of the waste in time, manpower, money,
and the resulting misdirection.’’ /Richard Feynman. Nobel Prize in Physics 1965/

Feynman said no such thing, but that exact quote is perpetuated regularly in social media.
So do you have a non-social media reference that shows he actually said that?

Regardless of who wrote it, it's accurate

[Cerveny]

We don't need a lab, we need a brain. Matter is "implanted" into physical space (aether), it is actually a damaged, deformed physical space, elementary particles are basically defects in the regular structure of physical space, and the massive movement of stars in galaxies is actually the overall movement of physical space (aether), pulled by "ingrown" matter...

And, WHERE did so-called 'luminerous ether' come from, EXACTLY?

Also, WHAT is so-called 'luminerous ether', EXCTLY?

Aether = physical (real) space = (perfect) vacuum

[Age]

And, WHERE did so-called 'luminerous ether' come from, EXACTLY?

Also, WHAT is so-called 'luminerous ether', EXCTLY?

Aether = physical (real) space = (perfect) vacuum

Do the words 'vacuum' or 'perfect vacuum' imply 'physically free space'?

And, when you use the word 'physical (real) space' what is 'that', exactly? (Providing examples here would be very helpful.)

Also, what is the difference between '(real) space', and, '(not real), or (unreal) space', exactly?

[socrattus]

And, WHERE did so-called 'luminerous ether' come from, EXACTLY?

Also, WHAT is so-called 'luminerous ether', EXCTLY?

Aether = physical (real) space = (perfect) vacuum

Do the words 'vacuum' or 'perfect vacuum' imply 'physically free space'?

And, when you use the word 'physical (real) space' what is 'that', exactly? (Providing examples here would be very helpful.)

Also, what is the difference between '(real) space', and, '(not real), or (unreal) space', exactly?

WHAT is so-called 'luminiferous ether', Aether, nothingness, emptiness, perfect vacuum,
dark energy, dark matter, black holes, wormholes, 5D, 10D, 11D, 27D, MD,
and some 1000 quantum particles + god particles + ..... , EXCTLY? .....
if the ordinary matter in the universe is only about 5%.

[Cerveny]

The whole weakness of mainstream physics lies in the idea that the aether is something in some kind of (ideal) space. But the aether is that (real) space, I think.

[Cerveny]

The whole weakness of mainstream physics lies in the idea that the aether is something in some kind of (ideal) space. But the aether is that (real) space, I think.

And elementary particles are defects in the structure of physical (real) space (of aether), I think.

[socrattus]

The whole weakness of mainstream physics lies in the idea that the aether is something in some kind of (ideal) space. But the aether is that (real) space, I think.

And elementary particles are defects in the structure of physical (real) space (of aether), I think.

The whole weakness of mainstream physics is that it ignores the vacuum
as the source of the material world. ... Maybe 20 years ago I was talking to a physicist
(he was about 35 years old). I was trying to explain how important the vacuum is. ...
He looked at me from his tall height and said "My grandfather was a physicist,
my father is a physicist, and I am a physicist and vacuum is nothing."
I wanted to object, to say that quantum physics is based on vacuum,
but looking at his proud face, I said nothing.

[Age]

Aether = physical (real) space = (perfect) vacuum

Do the words 'vacuum' or 'perfect vacuum' imply 'physically free space'?

And, when you use the word 'physical (real) space' what is 'that', exactly? (Providing examples here would be very helpful.)

Also, what is the difference between '(real) space', and, '(not real), or (unreal) space', exactly?

WHAT is so-called 'luminiferous ether', Aether, nothingness, emptiness, perfect vacuum,
dark energy, dark matter, black holes, wormholes, 5D, 10D, 11D, 27D, MD,
and some 1000 quantum particles + god particles + ..... , EXCTLY? .....

So, to you anyway, so-called 'luminiferous ether' is BOTH the 'no thing', and, the some thing', which together makes up the Universe, Itself.

if the ordinary matter in the universe is only about 5%.

The Universe at Its most fundamental level is composed of two things, being 'matter', and, 'space'. But you want to claim that there is some thing classed as, and so-called, 'ordinary matter'. Now, how do you differentiate between 'ordinary matter', and ,'abnormal matter', exactly? And, how much of the Universe is composed of 'abnormal matter', exactly?

[Age]

The whole weakness of mainstream physics lies in the idea that the aether is something in some kind of (ideal) space. But the aether is that (real) space, I think.

And, what is '(real) space', exactly?

[Age]

The whole weakness of mainstream physics lies in the idea that the aether is something in some kind of (ideal) space. But the aether is that (real) space, I think.

And elementary particles are defects in the structure of physical (real) space (of aether), I think.

you human beings 'think' a lot of things, but really that does not help in just getting to and KNOWING what is actually True, and not.

Now, what are 'elementary particles' of, exactly? Find out 'this', then you will be getting somewhat closer to ALSO KNOWING what is actually True, here.