RACISM Is it ethical to call people RACIST with NO evidence?

[Age]

I refer you to my response to Belinda on page 1. You are constantly obsessed with immigration, not to complain about Polish entrants to the UK, always to complain about Muslims and Africans. There's no debate to be had about whether you are a racist, that's just a silly waste of my time.

Have you got a complaint to air about POLISH immigrants?

LET ME HEAR IT YOU RACIST.

The WORST immigrants in the whole world have been the ones from that parcel of land called the "united kingdom", have they not?

They have SPREAD their many different forms of "christianity" and FORCED others to accept their Truly 'idiotic', 'wack-job', DISTORTED and TWISTED BELIEFS along the way.

[Age]

Seems fishpi is "tired and emotional" again, not much point in any more of this.

Anymore what?

"You are constantly obsessed with immigration, not to complain about Polish entrants to the UK, always to complain about Muslims and Africans."

Really? ...Let's see how Polish appear on the stats of violence in a country not too STUPID to not gather important stats:

Oh, look at those terrible Polish people in Denmark (Europe)...

Yes, they cause about 1.3 violent crimes in comparison to the native Danes.

This is ANOTHER PRIME example of just how CLOSED and NARROWED sighted some human beings had become and were, back in those very 'olden days' when this was being written.

..am I racist to point out that those of the Middle East & Africa (mostly Islamic) cause > 6 times the violent crime rate of the native Danes.. how terribly racist of me to point out the true statistics...

Once again you have completely and utterly MISSED what has been going on, here.

...we should let them all in, they need our refuge.

Should the "british" have been 'let in' in all of those countries that they FORCED their way into, and which they completely DESECRATED, along the way, as well?

We shouldn't care about our women being RAPED...

Talk about a Truly IMMATURE way of 'trying to' argue for or justify RACISM.

[Age]

..ooh don't the stats fit with your belief that:-

--> the MEN flooding in from Africa & M.E. (on average) would be of an EQUAL ethical standard of that of an average European

QUICK BELINDA!! find an excuse for these POOR asylum seekers (that left ALL their women behind )

Their women? Uh oh. Racist and sexist?

Also, what's with the statistics from Denmark? Denmark? How many Kuwaiti immigrants live in Denmark? Two?

One more thing. Why are Europeans so much more violent than Japanese? It's good to see my fellow Americans behave well in Denmark. We enjoy shooting people in our own country, but when we emigrate to Denmark we behave ourselves. Well done, USA!

Are you serious? Or do you have some intellectual incapacity beyond just being American that I should make an exception for?

FFS lefties, throw someone with some intellectual clout my way!

I have ALREADY PROVED HOW, WHEN, and WHERE 'you' were being 'racist' here, in this forum.

But, AGAIN, you have REFUSED to even just respond to what I wrote and POINTED OUT, here.

Oh, that's right, whoever/whomever would have to admit that stats don't lie,

It has been said that about 85% of deaths in motor vehicle accidents were when wearing seat belts. So, is it safer to wear your seat belt, or not? 'The statistics' do not lie, well so you claim.

Statistics can be 'skewed' to come across in so many different ways. And, without ALL of the different scenarios, variables, causes, and reasons presented, statistics can become so MISLEADING.

that atto is not racist and that keeping illegal immigrants out of Europe is best, especially for women and children.

I mean LMFAO at this idiot.

Er, AMERICAAAAN...there were enough for 8 Kuwaitis to get locked up in comparison to 1 Danish person for committing a violent crime within the time period the stats were gathered for the graph...U vegetable brain.

Will you provide the statistics of what those from "united kingdom" did to the peoples, and to the lands, that the citizens from "united kingdom" have INVADED?

If no, then why not?

WHY ONLY present some statistics and ONLY 'the ones' that you want others to 'look at', and 'see'?

[Age]

Two Kuwaitis, with only one of them managing to behave himself in a country that traditionally had almost no crime? That's not a good look.

Here 'we' have another prime example of how and when people will only 'see' what they 'want to see'.

Again, the 'belief-system', and 'confirmation bias', at work, and at play.

Older people have a huge tendency to only 'look at', and 'see', only what they want to 'look at', and 'see'. As this forum attests to this Fact.

[Alexiev]

Two Kuwaitis, with only one of them managing to behave himself in a country that traditionally had almost no crime? That's not a good look.

Traditionally no crime? Haven't you read Hamlet?

[Belinda]

Two Kuwaitis, with only one of them managing to behave himself in a country that traditionally had almost no crime? That's not a good look.

Traditionally no crime? Haven't you read Hamlet?

But Denmark as in Hamlet is not modern Denmark!Hamlet's Denmark was not a general comment about all states but a warning that states can become rotten. Syria was rotten until Assad fled, and is now at a huge political cross road: Denmark not so.

There is something rotten in every state, but politically at least we may evaluate states using reason and human kindness. Reason dictates that statistics are interpreted sans bias.

[Alexiev]

But Denmark as in Hamlet is not modern Denmark

Thanks. I'll try to remember that.