attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 5:34 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 4:29 pm
Belinda wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 12:10 pm
It's not ethical because , without evidence ,no allegation should be regarded as true: if you misrepresent another person (or even give a dog a bad name) you do them a disservice.
Read what he's been writing about immigration in the "political philosophy" sub,
What? That illegal immigration & people that are invading Europe & UK are proven statistically to commit far more violent crime than the citizens of the countries they are invading.
NOTE: That is not RACIST - that is FACT.
If one was to count up the EXACT number of human beings who have had violent crimes inflicted upon them by the illegal "invaders" from the "united kingdom" upon the citizens, in comparison to the illegal "invaders" to the "united kingdom" inflicting violent crimes upon the citizens, then the number from "united kingdom" would be FAR, FAR HIGHER. And, that is A Fact, also.
attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 5:34 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: and then bear in mind that Rick deleted several entire threads in there, and gave fishpi at least two temp bans for the contents of those.
I called Sadiq Khan a particular name that Rick didn't like and thus banned me (*and deleted the thread)
What was the 'particular name', exactly, that you USED?
If you do not share 'that name', then you might well be 'trying to' HIDE the fact that you were being "racist", by using a racist term.
I would suggest that there are a LOT of things that 'we' say and write here that "rick" does 'not like', but which 'we' do not get banned for, nor deleted. Which could imply that what you said and wrote was more than some thing that was just disliked.
attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 5:34 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote:Fishpi has misquoted me in the OP, I called him a drunken racist slob, not just a racist. All parts of that are adequately evidenced, so he can fuck off, and you can fuck off too.
So.
I like a few bevvies. GOD has approved that, since I have pretty much eaten the entire tree of knowledge - i am done with GODs wrath (HELL)
When you say and write things like this, then there is absolutely NO WONDER AT ALL WHY others do not take you seriously "attofishpi".
When you write things like this you come across as you are drunk at the time.
attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 5:34 pm
..as far as RACIST goes - no I am NOT RACIST'
you want others to provide 'evidence' of you being a 'racist' when they just say you are, but are you under any obligation to provide 'evidence' that you are not a 'racist' when you just say you are not?
If no, then WHY NOT? What is the difference, here, exactly?
attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 5:34 pm
I am a CULTURIST - I am certain that my culture with its ethics and what it values within a Christian foundation surpasses what is being eroded by the LEFT and their disgusting vile erosion of everything that our forebears fought and died for..
LOL
LOL
LOL 'fought for'.
your forebears just got SUCKED IN, by so-called "leaders", with some ending up 'DEAD' for their GULLIBILITY.
Now, inform 'us' "attofishpi" what were the ACTUAL 'things' that your forbears, supposedly, 'fought for', exactly.
And, if you have enough courage to have a full open and honest discussion, then a lot will come-to-light, and BE SEEN.
attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 5:34 pm
Oh ye of NO faith and NO respect
You are not worthy of being British, and you are not worth_
Y of Christ.
LOL
you are NOT "british" "yourself" "attofishpi"
you have left and deserted 'that country' and 'those people' one could assume for a 'better place' and/or 'better people'.
And, ABSOLUTELY LOL, what makes one 'worthy' of "christ", exactly?
What does the sentence, 'you are not worth of Christ', even mean, exactly?
Also, if you can NOT see your racist overtones even in just what you wrote above here, then you really are MORE BLIND than I first noticed.