So, you just know that you are ignorant, but obviously you also do not want to be honest and just admit this Fact.
Now, was that 'a reaction' or 'an action', from 'your reaction', to 'my previous action and clarifying question'?
So, you just know that you are ignorant, but obviously you also do not want to be honest and just admit this Fact.
- No need to get defensive, Age. This will inhibit acceptance of your ignorance, an acceptance that has the power to change ignorance of your ignorance, into awareness of your ignorance, and then you become a judge of your own knowledge rather than an unlicensed, handyman inspector peppering out noise for the sake of noise.
What do you believe I was (trying to) 'defend/ing', here, exactly?
Do you SERIOUSLY BELIEVE that i am not yet aware that there are some things that i am not yet aware of?Walker wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:38 am This will inhibit acceptance of your ignorance, an acceptance that has the power to change ignorance of your ignorance, into awareness of your ignorance, and then you become a judge of your own knowledge rather than an unlicensed, handyman inspector peppering out noise for the sake of noise.
you people can determine this absolutely ANYWHERE, and not just, here, in this forum.
NOW, HERE, is, EXACTLY, what I have been alluding to, pointing to, and/or highlighting, here, in this forum.Walker wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:38 am In other words, in this situation your expressed lack of comprehension, or your need for feedback to validate your unstated assumptions which I don't care to hear, does not determine my need to explain the foundations of the castles that you construct with questions.
Walker wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:38 am - This basic simplicity of this point is illustrated with the understated ending of this scene, which shows how the meaning of a transmission is often a matter of what the receiver insists on understanding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pz2kXoDo_s
Again.mickthinks wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 5:42 pm attofishpi et al: racism isn’t real—it’s made up by the woke as a weapon to beat us with.
mick posts evidence that racism is real.
attofishpi et al: mick is ignoring the fact that black people deserve it—that’s so woke!
So, ONCE AGAIN, 'we' have another here who is completely and utterly ABSOLUTELY UNABLE to just CLARIFY.
He took a big hit when he bought Twitter, simply for the sake of ending that propaganda machine.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 2:28 am Apparently Musk paid around $300 million on Trump campaign promotion!
What a legend that bloke is. Hang on bro, let me see what cash I got spare in one of my pockets..
Not forgetting that Harris spent a lot more than Trump on her campaign, so the 'sour-grapers' can't claim that Trump's win was 'bought'.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 2:28 am Apparently Musk paid around $300 million on Trump campaign promotion!
What a legend that bloke is. Hang on bro, let me see what cash I got spare in one of my pockets..
What is, supposedly, a matter of frequency, here, exactly?
I will not ask you to elaborate on nor to clarify what you wrote here as you have already shown and proved that you are not capable of doing so.
Age, in a lawless forum you are receiving the frequency of ... others should serve your whimsical questions.
We can only hope Rand had no children. Those of us who do gladly serve as "a servant for their needs " If everyone agreed with Rand, the human species would disappear.
Don't be silly. Such a transmission is on the Compassion Frequency, not the extrapolated low end of the bell curve that is replete will all kinds of mean and nasty things.
Because you must, given your proclivities. Service that is done by public officials with OPM is often virtue signaling ... e.g., take in the world at citizen's expense, and against not only the needs but the desires of those fortunate enough to live in the promised land of milk and honey, but against the welfare of the poor unfortunates at the mercy of greedy, hungry coyotes.Those of us who do gladly serve as "a servant for their needs "
And, that is Right and Correct, in relation to 'I'.Walker wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 5:53 pmAge, in a lawless forum you are receiving the frequency of ... others should serve your whimsical questions.
That is not the frequency being transmitted, which you would have noticed if you were paying attention to your ignorance.
Here. She dials it in more eloquently than I, back in the days of analog when it was written.
"Neither am I the means to any end others may wish to accomplish. I am not a tool for their use. I am not a servant of their needs. I am not a bandage for their wounds. I am not a sacrifice on their altars." - Ayn Rand
![]()