Footage of Islamic Hate Preach in UK Mosques

[godelian]

They would still be alive if those scummy, inbred, psychopathic muslim shit-stains hadn't taken them in the first place.

If the Zionists did not detain Gaza and West Bank Palestinians without trial, there would be no need to give them a taste of their own medicine. Furthermore, either the Zionists abide by UNSC Resolution 242 concerning the illegal occupation, or else they will be made to abide. The choice is theirs.

[accelafine]

They would still be alive if those scummy, inbred, psychopathic muslim shit-stains hadn't taken them in the first place.

If the Zionists did not detain Gaza and West Bank Palestinians without trial, there would be no need to give them a taste of their own medicine. Furthermore, either the Zionists abide by UNSC Resolution 242 concerning the illegal occupation, or else they will be made to abide. The choice is theirs.

What do you mean 'the Zionists'? They are Israelis. Zionism was an organisation that came into existence specficially for the creation of Israel. Well in case you hadn't noticed it achieved that. Being a Zionist now would be rather pointless.
There is no such thing as 'palestinians'. They are Syrians and Jordanians. If Israel hadn't been attacked in 1967 then Gaza and the West Bank would still be in Syrian and Jordanian hands. Funny how those countries hate them as much as everyone else does and won't have them because they make so much trouble. Egypt has an even bigger wall than Israel to keep them the fuck out.

[attofishpi]

There is no such thing as 'palestinians'. They are Syrians and Jordanians. If Israel hadn't been attacked in 1967 then Gaza and the West Bank would still be in Syrian and Jordanian hands. Funny how those countries hate them as much as everyone else does and won't have them because they make so much trouble. Egypt has an even bigger wall than Israel to keep them the fuck out.

Yep, the Lebanese made that BIG mistake of letting Palestinian "refugees" in. Much of the West is daft enough to let them settle among us.

Again. Brigitte Gabriels plight as a former Lebanese prior the Palestinians screwing Lebanon up.

Brigitte Gabriel on panel explains issue with alarming stats - transcript below
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaNRd4R ... x=1&t=172s


Brigitte Gabriel is one person warning everyone from her own experience living in Lebanon back in 60s to 70s when Lebanon was considered the "Switzerland of the Middle East.", it had a good economy at the time.
She emphasizes the cosmopolitan nature of pre-civil war Lebanon, which was home to a variety of religious and ethnic communities, including Maronite Christians, Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims, Druze, and others.

I watched a video years ago where she stated how Lebanaon started taking in Palestinian refugees. Her next door neighbours were Muslims, they were friends would have BBQs together etc.. The main point she is always attempting to make is the point I am attempting to pass on: that once Muslims get the numbers up - their united vote starts to dictate policy and laws. She witnessed this in Lebanon, and in her video she stated once they had the power they called "Jihad" - her neighbours turned on her and eventually the Civil War & chaos errupted - she fled.
This is a transcript of this video I came across recently where she points out concerning stats:-

STUDENT:
University I am here to ask you a simple question. I know that we portray Islam and all Muslims as that, but there are 1.8 billion Muslim followers of Islam, we have 8 million plus Muslim Americans in this country and I don't see them represented here. But my question is, how can we fight an ideological war with weapons? How can we ever end this war, the jihadist ideology that you talk about? It's an ideology. How can you ever win this thing if you don't address it?

Brigitte Gabriel:
..and since you brought it up, allow me to elaborate with my answer. There are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world today. Of course, not all of them are radicals. The majority of them are peaceful people. The radicals are estimated to be between 15 to 25% according to all intelligence services around the world. That leaves 75% of them as peaceful people. But when you look at 15 to 25% of the world Muslim population, you're looking at 180 million to 300 million people dedicated to the destruction of Western Civilization.

That is as big as the United States, so why should we worry about the radicals, 15 to 25%?

Because it is the radicals that kill, because it is the radicals that behead and massacre.

When you look throughout history, when you look at all the lessons of history, most Germans were peaceful, yet the Nazis drove the agenda, and as a result, 60 million people died, almost 14 million in concentration camps, 6 million were Jews. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.
When you look at Russia, most Russians were peaceful as well, yet the Russians were able to kill 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.
When you look at China, for example, most Chinese were peaceful as well, yet the Chinese were able to kill 70 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.
When you look at Japan prior to World War II, most Japanese were peaceful as well, yet Japan was able to butcher its way across Southeast Asia, killing 12 million people, mostly killed with bayonets and shovels. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.


On September 11th in the United States, we had 2.3 million Arab Muslims living in the United States. It took 19 hijackers, 19 radicals, to bring America down to its knees, destroy the World Trade Center, attack the Pentagon, and kill almost 3,000 Americans. That day, the peaceful majority were irrelevant. So, for all our powers of reason and us talking about moderate and peaceful Muslims, I'm glad you're here, but where are the others speaking out? And since you are the only Muslim representative, applause. Thank you. Thank you. And since you're the only Muslim representative in here, you took the limelight instead of speaking about why our government—and I assume, are you an American? You're an American citizen, so as an American citizen, you sat in this room and instead of standing up and saying a question or asking something about our four Americans that died and what our government is doing to correct the problem, you stood there to make a point about peaceful, moderate Muslims. I wish you brought 10 with you to question about how we can hold our government responsible. It is time we take political correctness and throw it in the garbage where it belongs.
[/quote]

[godelian]

They would still be alive if those scummy, inbred, psychopathic muslim shit-stains hadn't taken them in the first place.

If the Zionists did not detain Gaza and West Bank Palestinians without trial, there would be no need to give them a taste of their own medicine. Furthermore, either the Zionists abide by UNSC Resolution 242 concerning the illegal occupation, or else they will be made to abide. The choice is theirs.

What do you mean 'the Zionists'? They are Israelis. Zionism was an organisation that came into existence specficially for the creation of Israel. Well in case you hadn't noticed it achieved that. Being a Zionist now would be rather pointless.
There is no such thing as 'palestinians'. They are Syrians and Jordanians. If Israel hadn't been attacked in 1967 then Gaza and the West Bank would still be in Syrian and Jordanian hands. Funny how those countries hate them as much as everyone else does and won't have them because they make so much trouble. Egypt has an even bigger wall than Israel to keep them the fuck out.

Look, either the Israelis (or Zionists) withdraw from Gaza, West Bank, Golan Heights, and East Jerusalem, as clearly instructed to them in UNSC Resolution 242, or else, they will be made to withdraw. The choice is theirs.

What I think that the Zionists will do, however, is to rather wait for the next wholesale missile attack on Zionist military and dual-use facilities, which is scheduled already. I really do not care how many Zionists have to die during the enforcement of UNSC 242, because the enforcement of UNSC 242 is simply non-negotiable. UNSC 242 will forcibly be shoved down their throats, irrespective of whether it makes them gasp for air or not.

[accelafine]

[Even if they were killed accidentally by the IDF, there would be no reason to keep that secret.

Yes there is a very good reason.

On paper, the Hannibal directive has been revoked.

It is no longer legal for the IDF to preemptively kill Israeli military personnel or civilians taken captive by Hamas. They obviously still do it, but it is illegal now.

All IDF helicopter strikes on cars driving Israeli captives into Gaza were illegal.

WTF are you even on about? Go away you ridiculous person.

[godelian]

[Even if they were killed accidentally by the IDF, there would be no reason to keep that secret.

Yes there is a very good reason.

On paper, the Hannibal directive has been revoked.

It is no longer legal for the IDF to preemptively kill Israeli military personnel or civilians taken captive by Hamas. They obviously still do it, but it is illegal now.

All IDF helicopter strikes on cars driving Israeli captives into Gaza were illegal.

WTF are you even on about? Go away you ridiuclous person.

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Directive

The Hannibal Directive (Hebrew: נוהל חניבעל, romanized: Nóhal Khanibaál), also translated as Hannibal Procedure or Hannibal Protocol, is the name of a controversial procedure used by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces. According to one version, it says that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces."[2]

The full text of the directive was never published, and until 2003, Israeli military censorship forbade any discussion of the subject in the press.

Two versions of the Hannibal Directive may have existed simultaneously at times: a written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and an "oral law" version for division commanders and lower levels. In the latter version, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was 'better dead than abducted'".

There is ample evidence that the IDF attacked and destroyed Hamas cars with captives trying to reach Gaza.

[accelafine]

If the Zionists did not detain Gaza and West Bank Palestinians without trial, there would be no need to give them a taste of their own medicine. Furthermore, either the Zionists abide by UNSC Resolution 242 concerning the illegal occupation, or else they will be made to abide. The choice is theirs.

What do you mean 'the Zionists'? They are Israelis. Zionism was an organisation that came into existence specficially for the creation of Israel. Well in case you hadn't noticed it achieved that. Being a Zionist now would be rather pointless.
There is no such thing as 'palestinians'. They are Syrians and Jordanians. If Israel hadn't been attacked in 1967 then Gaza and the West Bank would still be in Syrian and Jordanian hands. Funny how those countries hate them as much as everyone else does and won't have them because they make so much trouble. Egypt has an even bigger wall than Israel to keep them the fuck out.

Look, either the Israelis (or Zionists) withdraw from Gaza, West Bank, Golan Heights, and East Jerusalem, as clearly instructed to them in UNSC Resolution 242, or else, they will be made to withdraw. The choice is theirs.

What I think that the Zionists will do, however, is to rather wait for the next wholesale missile attack on Zionist military and dual-use facilities, which is scheduled already. I really do not care how many Zionists have to die during the enforcement of UNSC 242, because the enforcement of UNSC 242 is simply non-negotiable. UNSC 242 will forcibly be shoved down their throats, irrespective of whether it makes them gasp for air nor not.

Why the fuck should they? They won it all, fair and square. In case you hadn't noticed that's pretty much how countries come into existence. Idiot.

[accelafine]

Yes there is a very good reason.

On paper, the Hannibal directive has been revoked.

It is no longer legal for the IDF to preemptively kill Israeli military personnel or civilians taken captive by Hamas. They obviously still do it, but it is illegal now.

All IDF helicopter strikes on cars driving Israeli captives into Gaza were illegal.

WTF are you even on about? Go away you ridiuclous person.

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Directive

The Hannibal Directive (Hebrew: נוהל חניבעל, romanized: Nóhal Khanibaál), also translated as Hannibal Procedure or Hannibal Protocol, is the name of a controversial procedure used by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces. According to one version, it says that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces."[2]

The full text of the directive was never published, and until 2003, Israeli military censorship forbade any discussion of the subject in the press.

Two versions of the Hannibal Directive may have existed simultaneously at times: a written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and an "oral law" version for division commanders and lower levels. In the latter version, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was 'better dead than abducted'".

There is ample evidence that the IDF attacked and destroyed Hamas cars with captives trying to reach Gaza.

Israelis don't kill their own people. That's what plasticinians do.

[godelian]

What do you mean 'the Zionists'? They are Israelis. Zionism was an organisation that came into existence specficially for the creation of Israel. Well in case you hadn't noticed it achieved that. Being a Zionist now would be rather pointless.
There is no such thing as 'palestinians'. They are Syrians and Jordanians. If Israel hadn't been attacked in 1967 then Gaza and the West Bank would still be in Syrian and Jordanian hands. Funny how those countries hate them as much as everyone else does and won't have them because they make so much trouble. Egypt has an even bigger wall than Israel to keep them the fuck out.

Look, either the Israelis (or Zionists) withdraw from Gaza, West Bank, Golan Heights, and East Jerusalem, as clearly instructed to them in UNSC Resolution 242, or else, they will be made to withdraw. The choice is theirs.

What I think that the Zionists will do, however, is to rather wait for the next wholesale missile attack on Zionist military and dual-use facilities, which is scheduled already. I really do not care how many Zionists have to die during the enforcement of UNSC 242, because the enforcement of UNSC 242 is simply non-negotiable. UNSC 242 will forcibly be shoved down their throats, irrespective of whether it makes them gasp for air nor not.

Why the fuck should they? They won it all, fair and square. In case you hadn't noticed that's pretty much how countries come into existence. Idiot.

Yes, that is how they come into existence but that is also how to come to cease to exist.

[godelian]

Israelis don't kill their own people.

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

[accelafine]

Israelis don't kill their own people.

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

Israelis don't kill their own people.

[accelafine]

Weird the way Israel is held to a different standard from everywhere else. Hmm. I wonder why that would be. It's such a mystery...

[godelian]

Israelis don't kill their own people.

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

Israelis don't kill their own people.

You are in denial:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Directive

In the latter version, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was 'better dead than abducted'".

[godelian]

Weird the way Israel is held to a different standard from everywhere else. Hmm. I wonder why that would be. It's such a mystery...

Are you going to keep using that argument to justify war crimes? Read my lips. Sooner or later, Netanyahu will be apprehended, arrested, and extradited to The Hague in the Netherlands where he will stand trial for crimes against humanity.

[accelafine]

Oooh. Wikipedia