Oh well, a self-quote instead of a self-edit, but you get the satirical drift.Walker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:59 amSheesh. Doesn’t he know he and Israel are supposed to curl up and die? Get with the program, Benny. You have heard the judgment. After thousands of years you are once again obsolete. Resistance against the judgement is futile, yet again.godelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:49 amWe've finally got that long-awaited ICC international arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant. There are no statutes of limitation for war crimes, including genocide. Whether they arrest them now or ten years from now, doesn't matter. The result will be exactly the same. Put them in a cage !!!
WW3 breaking out
Re: WW3 breaking out
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: WW3 breaking out
As if those hypocritical, Jew-hating, self-serving, bloated wankers hold any weightgodelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:49 amWe've finally got that long-awaited ICC international arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant. There are no statutes of limitation for war crimes, including genocide. Whether they arrest them now or ten years from now, doesn't matter. The result will be exactly the same. Put them in a cage !!!
Re: WW3 breaking out
Hey, the ICC (International Criminal Court) is a court!accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:25 amAs if those hypocritical, Jew-hating, self-serving, bloated wankers hold any weightgodelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:49 amWe've finally got that long-awaited ICC international arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant. There are no statutes of limitation for war crimes, including genocide. Whether they arrest them now or ten years from now, doesn't matter. The result will be exactly the same. Put them in a cage !!!If they had any integrity then every US president for the last several decades would have been arrested for war crimes. And it's pretty rich coming from a sociopath like you who boasts that you wouldn't save a child's life unless you were getting paid for it. What would you care even if there really was a genocide (which there clearly isn't)? Photos of flattened buildings and absurd pallywood videos don't count.
The defendants can appoint lawyers to argue the case in their defense. Furthermore, the prosecutor will still have to present conclusive evidence.
So, henceforth, law enforcement should no longer bring any case against any (alleged) criminal because the president of the United States is also one?
If Netanyahu and Gallant can successfully argue their innocence, I will be the first one to say that they must be released from prison.
In the meanwhile, however, these individuals have a red interpol notice attached to their names, and must be arrested on the spot by pretty much every immigration officer on the planet, and be extradited to La Hague in the Netherlands, where they will be remanded into custody (inside their "cage") awaiting their day in court.
Don't hesitate to visit them and to bring them bananas !!!
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: WW3 breaking out
Give me a break, weirdo. You are full of crap. The word 'genocide' is being used as a political weapon because obviously Jews really did suffer a genocide during WW11, in fact the word was coined specifically for that. So misusing that word is despicable in itself.godelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:20 amHey, the ICC (International Criminal Court) is a court!accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:25 amAs if those hypocritical, Jew-hating, self-serving, bloated wankers hold any weightgodelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:49 am
We've finally got that long-awaited ICC international arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant. There are no statutes of limitation for war crimes, including genocide. Whether they arrest them now or ten years from now, doesn't matter. The result will be exactly the same. Put them in a cage !!!If they had any integrity then every US president for the last several decades would have been arrested for war crimes. And it's pretty rich coming from a sociopath like you who boasts that you wouldn't save a child's life unless you were getting paid for it. What would you care even if there really was a genocide (which there clearly isn't)? Photos of flattened buildings and absurd pallywood videos don't count.
The defendants can appoint lawyers to argue the case in their defense. Furthermore, the prosecutor will still have to present conclusive evidence.
So, henceforth, law enforcement should no longer bring any case against any (alleged) criminal because the president of the United States is also one?
If Netanyahu and Gallant can successfully argue their innocence, I will be the first one to say that they must be released from prison.
In the meanwhile, however, these individuals have a red interpol notice attached to their names, and must be arrested on the spot by pretty much every immigration officer on the planet, and be extradited to La Hague in the Netherlands, where they will be remanded into custody (inside their "cage") awaiting their day in court.
Don't hesitate to visit them and to bring them bananas !!!
How about those vile, raping excrement give back the people they stole and then perhaps the building-flattening will end? Just a thought.
Re: WW3 breaking out
The burden of proof lies on the prosecutors, not the accused. It’s a foundational principle of justice: innocence is presumed until guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. That said, I agree with your conclusion—if conclusive evidence establishes guilt, justice should prevail accordingly.godelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:20 amHey, the ICC (International Criminal Court) is a court!accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:25 amAs if those hypocritical, Jew-hating, self-serving, bloated wankers hold any weightgodelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:49 am
We've finally got that long-awaited ICC international arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant. There are no statutes of limitation for war crimes, including genocide. Whether they arrest them now or ten years from now, doesn't matter. The result will be exactly the same. Put them in a cage !!!If they had any integrity then every US president for the last several decades would have been arrested for war crimes. And it's pretty rich coming from a sociopath like you who boasts that you wouldn't save a child's life unless you were getting paid for it. What would you care even if there really was a genocide (which there clearly isn't)? Photos of flattened buildings and absurd pallywood videos don't count.
The defendants can appoint lawyers to argue the case in their defense. Furthermore, the prosecutor will still have to present conclusive evidence.
So, henceforth, law enforcement should no longer bring any case against any (alleged) criminal because the president of the United States is also one?
If Netanyahu and Gallant can successfully argue their innocence, I will be the first one to say that they must be released from prison.
In the meanwhile, however, these individuals have a red interpol notice attached to their names, and must be arrested on the spot by pretty much every immigration officer on the planet, and be extradited to La Hague in the Netherlands, where they will be remanded into custody (inside their "cage") awaiting their day in court.
Don't hesitate to visit them and to bring them bananas !!!
Re: WW3 breaking out
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:35 am Give me a break, weirdo. You are full of crap. The word 'genocide' is being used as a political weapon because obviously Jews really did suffer a genocide during WW11, in fact the word was coined specifically for that. So misusing that word is despicable in itself.
How about those vile, raping excrement give back the people they stole and then perhaps the building-flattening will end? Just a thought.


- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: WW3 breaking out
Just wait until Netanyahu loses the next elections. The new prime minister will put him straight away on the plane to La Hague, The Netherlands.accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:26 pm I'm sure he's shaking in his shoesThe ICC is clearly a joke. It has only put out 'warrants for the arrest' of fewer than a handful of people. No Tony Blair. No Dubya Bush. Only one pisslamist leader.
You can add hypocrite to your general repulsiveness.


- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: WW3 breaking out
As I have said already, Netanyahu and Gallant will be given the opportunity to appoint lawyers to argue the case against them in their defense. In the meanwhile, we demand that they be locked up in a cage in the La Hague, The Netherlands, awaiting their day in court.


- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: WW3 breaking out
I am the first one to insist that he should get a fair trial.
Let his legal team put up the best defense they can.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11746
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: WW3 breaking out
It's not like people haven't tried to warn Netanyahu that he's gone too far. But he didn't listen to anyone (including allies) who tried to tell him to tone it down. The ICC represents every human being on Earth. Unless we all wish to potentially be treated like Gazans, then it sounds to me like the ICC has made a fair and pragmatic decision in the interest of those who wish for their human rights to be observed. None of us ought to say that we condone genocide. No one ought to be above the World Court.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: WW3 breaking out
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: WW3 breaking out
Stop believing bs propaganda. People were protesting against Israel after Oct 7 BEFORE it had so much as ruffled a hair on a 'precious Gazan head'. This whole PR stunt has been in the pipeworks for years. 'Protests' planned, organised and backed by big money interests. People are so thick.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:50 pm It's not like people haven't tried to warn Netanyahu that he's gone too far. But he didn't listen to anyone (including allies) who tried to tell him to tone it down. The ICC represents every human being on Earth. Unless we all wish to potentially be treated like Gazans, then it sounds to me like the ICC has made a fair and pragmatic decision in the interest of those who wish for their human rights to be observed. None of us ought to say that we condone genocide. No one ought to be above the World Court.
He has no reason to give a flying rat's arse what the world's Jew-haters have to say about it. And I'm pretty sure he cares about Gazan children a lot more than Gazans do. What other people on earth use their own children as humans shields, or deliberately store weapons in hospitals, schools and kindergartens, ensuring that even a stray spark will send them up like a fireworks factory?


