Is open sexism getting worse here?

[accelafine]

Oh my god. Who gives a flying fuck about those awful people? Why are you on a philosophy site?

Donald Trump is mentioned all over the site.

I haven't seen anyone else comparing themselves to him. You're boring anyway. Find someone else to annoy.

[godelian]

And, as "godelian" has already told 'us' "godelian" will NEVER EVER do absolutely ANY thing for ANY one, including even just saving a human baby's life, if "godelian' could not get some thing from 'the other'.

I am not a doctor, but if I were, I would not "save a human baby's life" for free. No doctor does that:

ChatGPT: Do doctors treat babies for free?

Whether doctors treat babies for free depends on several factors, including the country, healthcare system, and specific circumstances. Here's an overview:
In Countries with Universal Healthcare

In countries like the UK (NHS), Canada, or Australia, healthcare is often funded by the government through taxes.
Babies typically receive free or low-cost medical care, including routine check-ups, immunizations, and treatments.

In the United States

Healthcare is generally not free, but many programs assist families with babies:
Medicaid: Offers free or low-cost healthcare to low-income families, including care for babies.
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP): Covers children whose families earn too much for Medicaid but cannot afford private insurance.
Hospitals sometimes have charity programs or provide emergency care regardless of the ability to pay.

Charitable or Nonprofit Care

Some nonprofit organizations or hospitals offer free or subsidized care for babies and children, especially in underserved areas.

Emergency Situations

In many countries, babies receive emergency care regardless of payment ability. However, bills may follow if there's no insurance or government coverage.

Considerations

Routine or preventive care may not always be free, even in subsidized systems, depending on specific insurance plans or government programs.

If you're concerned about costs, researching local healthcare programs and support systems can help ensure affordable care for a baby.

If the hospital does not charge the baby's parents for emergency care, it will still receive payment from a specific government programme or from a charity organization. Furthermore, the hospital will always pay the doctor's salary, irrespective of whether they were able to charge the cost for his work to an outside organization.

There are no doctors who work for free. These people only exist in your fantasy.

[godelian]

Oh my god. Who gives a flying fuck about those awful people? Why are you on a philosophy site?

Donald Trump is mentioned all over the site.

I haven't seen anyone else comparing themselves to him. You're boring anyway. Find someone else to annoy.

Donald Trump represents wealth and Melania Trump represents youthful beauty. My private life looks very much the same as his.

[accelafine]

[Age]

And, as "godelian" has already told 'us' "godelian" will NEVER EVER do absolutely ANY thing for ANY one, including even just saving a human baby's life, if "godelian' could not get some thing from 'the other'.

I am not a doctor, but if I were, I would not "save a human baby's life" for free. No doctor does that:

LOL you really are Truly DELUSIONAL, before you claimed that you would NOT ever help a baby, in case of legal liability, and if you could not get some thing from them.

Also, human beings called "doctors" would and do save human babies lives.And, I will suggest that, unlike you, ALL of them would if given the chances to.

ChatGPT: Do doctors treat babies for free?

Whether doctors treat babies for free depends on several factors, including the country, healthcare system, and specific circumstances. Here's an overview:
In Countries with Universal Healthcare

In countries like the UK (NHS), Canada, or Australia, healthcare is often funded by the government through taxes.
Babies typically receive free or low-cost medical care, including routine check-ups, immunizations, and treatments.

In the United States

Healthcare is generally not free, but many programs assist families with babies:
Medicaid: Offers free or low-cost healthcare to low-income families, including care for babies.
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP): Covers children whose families earn too much for Medicaid but cannot afford private insurance.
Hospitals sometimes have charity programs or provide emergency care regardless of the ability to pay.

Charitable or Nonprofit Care

Some nonprofit organizations or hospitals offer free or subsidized care for babies and children, especially in underserved areas.

Emergency Situations

In many countries, babies receive emergency care regardless of payment ability. However, bills may follow if there's no insurance or government coverage.

Considerations

Routine or preventive care may not always be free, even in subsidized systems, depending on specific insurance plans or government programs.

If you're concerned about costs, researching local healthcare programs and support systems can help ensure affordable care for a baby.

If the hospital does not charge the baby's parents for emergency care, it will still receive payment from a specific government programme or from a charity organization. Furthermore, the hospital will always pay the doctor's salary, irrespective of whether they were able to charge the cost for his work to an outside organization.

There are no doctors who work for free. These people only exist in your fantasy.

LOL Obviously 'they' do NOT 'work' for free. The word 'work' usually hints at getting 'paid'.

your ATTEMPTS at DEFLECTION and DECEPTION here is really NOT WORKING, at all.

you said that you would. oT help a starving nor drowning baby, directly, even if it resulted in the death of that baby. Unless, if course, you got 'paid', and then you would 'steo in'. So, that much we KNOW, for sure.

Now, what we also KNOW, for sure, is that just about EVERY "doctor", if not ALL, would 'step in', if possible, and directly save a child's life, WITHOUT ABSOLUTELY ANY payment at all required.

[godelian]

Now, what we also KNOW, for sure, is that just about EVERY "doctor", if not ALL, would 'step in', if possible, and directly save a child's life, WITHOUT ABSOLUTELY ANY payment at all required.

Of course, because they will always get paid anyway. Isn't that very convenient?

[Age]

Now, what we also KNOW, for sure, is that just about EVERY "doctor", if not ALL, would 'step in', if possible, and directly save a child's life, WITHOUT ABSOLUTELY ANY payment at all required.

Of course, because they will always get paid anyway. Isn't that very convenient?

Sounds like someone is jealous, here.

Anyway, so 'we' are back to just about every one on earth WOULD save a human baby's life, for absolutely nothing in return, except, of course, the one here known as "godelian" would absolutely NEVER do this. The one known as "godelian" here is so SELFISH and GREEDY that it would only help a human baby if "godelian" WOULD get some thing in return.

[godelian]

Now, what we also KNOW, for sure, is that just about EVERY "doctor", if not ALL, would 'step in', if possible, and directly save a child's life, WITHOUT ABSOLUTELY ANY payment at all required.

Of course, because they will always get paid anyway. Isn't that very convenient?

Sounds like someone is jealous, here.

Anyway, so 'we' are back to just about every one on earth WOULD save a human baby's life, for absolutely nothing in return, except, of course, the one here known as "godelian" would absolutely NEVER do this. The one known as "godelian" here is so SELFISH and GREEDY that it would only help a human baby if "godelian" WOULD get some thing in return.

In your delusional Lalaland, the doctors work for free. In my world, they don't.

[Age]

Of course, because they will always get paid anyway. Isn't that very convenient?

Sounds like someone is jealous, here.

Anyway, so 'we' are back to just about every one on earth WOULD save a human baby's life, for absolutely nothing in return, except, of course, the one here known as "godelian" would absolutely NEVER do this. The one known as "godelian" here is so SELFISH and GREEDY that it would only help a human baby if "godelian" WOULD get some thing in return.

In your delusional Lalaland, the doctors work for free. In my world, they don't.

LOL Is this all you got? NOT ONCE did I ever bring up absolutely any thing like this, but now this is twice you have made this ABSOLUTELY False claim.

Let 'us' not forget what this is about here, and that is; "godelian' would let human children DIE if "godelian" would not get anything in return that "godelian" WANTED, FROM them.

[godelian]

Let 'us' not forget what this is about here, and that is; "godelian' would let human children DIE if "godelian" would not get anything in return that "godelian" WANTED, FROM them.

There are millions of people, including children, around the world who struggle with paying their medical bills. Why don't you go around the world paying these bills for them instead of complaining endlessly? Am I the one stopping you? Seriously, jump on the plane already and start forking out the cash since you are at it.

[Age]

Let 'us' not forget what this is about here, and that is; "godelian' would let human children DIE if "godelian" would not get anything in return that "godelian" WANTED, FROM them.

There are millions of people, including children, around the world who struggle with paying their medical bills. Why don't you go around the world paying these bills for them instead of complaining endlessly? Am I the one stopping you? Seriously, jump on the plane already and start forking out the cash since you are at it.

LOL you are ABSOLUTELY DELUSIONAL here "godelian".

Maybe being so ABSOLUTELY GREEDY and SELFISH has completely and utterly BLINDED you to what is ACTUALLY True. Which is; you would NOT even help a dying human being unless you were to get some thing FROM them.

Look, you can keep 'trying to' introduce things, in the hope that they might DETRACT some from just how Truly GREEDY and SELFISH you REALLY ARE. But those those will NEVER DETRACT FROM the ACTUAL Truth, to ALL of 'us'.

[godelian]

Look, you can keep 'trying to' introduce things, in the hope that they might DETRACT some from just how Truly GREEDY and SELFISH you REALLY ARE. But those those will NEVER DETRACT FROM the ACTUAL Truth, to ALL of 'us'.

Yes, I am greedy and selfish and that is why I won't give you anything. Happy now?

[Age]

Look, you can keep 'trying to' introduce things, in the hope that they might DETRACT some from just how Truly GREEDY and SELFISH you REALLY ARE. But those those will NEVER DETRACT FROM the ACTUAL Truth, to ALL of 'us'.

Yes, I am greedy and selfish and that is why I won't give you anything. Happy now?

you are also DEAF and BLIND. As I had ALREADY informed you that you have, ALREADY, given me what I WANTED, FROM you

[godelian]

Look, you can keep 'trying to' introduce things, in the hope that they might DETRACT some from just how Truly GREEDY and SELFISH you REALLY ARE. But those those will NEVER DETRACT FROM the ACTUAL Truth, to ALL of 'us'.

Yes, I am greedy and selfish and that is why I won't give you anything. Happy now?

you are also DEAF and BLIND. As I had ALREADY informed you that you have, ALREADY, given me what I WANTED, FROM you

Yes, I am undoubtedly somewhat deaf and blind to what you are telling me. Since you've got everything you wanted from me, what's your problem? Why are you still nagging?

[Age]

Yes, I am greedy and selfish and that is why I won't give you anything. Happy now?

you are also DEAF and BLIND. As I had ALREADY informed you that you have, ALREADY, given me what I WANTED, FROM you

Yes, I am undoubtedly somewhat deaf and blind to what you are telling me. Since you've got everything you wanted from me, what's your problem? Why are you still nagging?

But I have NO problem, here.

And, I NEVER nagged you.