The Democrat Party Hates America

[Alexis Jacobi]

P’nut exists.

Unicorns? Hmmmmm. I still have my doubts.

And all my lemons are greenish.

[BigMike]

Hold on! Hold on!

Alexis, it’s clear that we’re operating on entirely different wavelengths here. Mocking foundational principles like Noether’s theorem, challenging the laws of nature, and ultimately dismissing logic itself leaves us without the very tools needed for any meaningful, rational discourse.

At this point, enough said. It’s simply not possible to have a constructive conversation when even the basics of scientific and logical reasoning aren’t shared.

[Alexis Jacobi]

You are I think self-deluding. What I mean is that just a few posts back you were — when talking like a reasonable and obsequious bot — affirming that in “back and forth” some understanding, which you say is your object, might be reached. In truth however you do not have any such intention. When it did not go your way you (seem to) throw up your hands in frustration.

There is not one thing about you “wavelength” that is incomprehensible to me. Sheer determinism, backed up by scientistic predicates and a species of reductionism is your “wave”. You do not (seem to) have any other perceptual or conceptual means to understand the metaphysical dimension of man. But this is not incomprehensible to me — by that I mean the state of mind in which you have your perceptual home. It is extremely common.

Your perspectives seem to me limited and reductionist and I am aware of people who have I think more background than you seem to have in the clash of science-perspective with religious-perspective. But there is no doubt in my mind that each faction operates within limitations.

The wielding of perspectives — definitely in our present — does indeed seem to also involve power-dynamics. For this reason I was and still am interested in your idrological commitment to ”Harris” (here an emblem or a metaphor representing a set of determining powers operating in our world.)

At this point, enough said. It’s simply not possible to have a constructive conversation when even the basics of scientific and logical reasoning aren’t shared.

An absurd statement really. All that you define as “scientific” and “logical” operate beautifully within their domain.

[Alexis Jacobi]

Additionally, you (seem to me to) take yourself too seriously. Have a bit of fun!

[commonsense]

From what you’ve posted here, as well as the elsewhere, I take it that you already understand that individuals on each side firmly believe that his opponent is irrational.

Is that really it?

For me part I see particular tendentious viewpoints as being, often, partial and incomplete.

Factionalism in understanding is fatal.

Is what really what?

[Alexis Jacobi]

From the NY Times:

Vice President Kamala Harris was preparing on Wednesday to concede the presidential race to President-elect Donald J. Trump at Howard University in Washington. Campaign officials invited supporters to the campus, with doors scheduled to open at 1 p.m. Ms. Harris held what was meant to be a victory party at Howard on Tuesday evening, but as results turned in Mr. Trump’s favor, she never made an appearance. Sources close to her have revealed that, seeking solace snd pondering the meaning of her loss, she was counseled by a visitation of the recently martyred P’nut the Squirrel who was assassinated by corrupt State actors at the behest of Democrat agents. The sources, who insisted to remain anonymous to protect their lives and livelihood, indicated that portions of the wise squirrel’s supernal wisdom would be woven into her concession speech to be given later today.

You see, Big Mike?! The Spirit is moving mysteriously!

[Alexis Jacobi]

Is what really what?

Way too complex a question for me. Can you rephrase?

[Gary Childress]

Looks like we have a climate crisis denier in the White House now. I guess that's one way to fight climate change.

https://thebulletin.org/2024/11/america ... st-heading

[Walker]

They fought the climate and the climate won ... by distracting attention from the way things are and addling the brains of humans.

Been listening to Lefty news. Rationalizations. Finger pointing. Dire predictions. The rhythms of gnashing teeth and the scents of desperation, but they are all practiced affectationists, however CNN's Tapper looked like he had genuinely flop-sweated his baggy suit 'specially when he discovered that Kamalala failed to match Biden's performance everywhere, which is objective evidence of just how out-of-touch and stupid was the decision to manipulate the process and anoint a candidate.

Funny thing. Trump had about the same number of votes as 2020, but this time he won both the popular vote and the electoral college. What does that tell you?

[Walker]

Here's the problem with the Democrats losing so convincingly.

When the chickens come home to roost, get used to the smell of chickenshit.




Trump should fire some people. Make some examples. He should say, You're fired!

[seeds]

Looks like we have a climate crisis denier in the White House now. I guess that's one way to fight climate change.

https://thebulletin.org/2024/11/america ... st-heading

I'm thinking that in an ironic twist of fate, Vice President Kamala Harris should take a page from Trump's playbook and refuse to certify the election. Wouldn't that be a hoot?
_______

[Walker]

Looks like we have a climate crisis denier in the White House now. I guess that's one way to fight climate change.

https://thebulletin.org/2024/11/america ... st-heading

I'm thinking that in an ironic twist of fate, Vice President Kamala Harris should take a page from Trump's playbook and refuse to certify the election. Wouldn't that be a hoot?
_______

They're getting her in shape to face the world without giggling or crying or shouting while the real losers, her handlers, are pouring over lawfare options to delay this thing. She hasn't even conceded yet.

[Atla]

This term could be (even) much wilder than the first one, because of revenge. When a half-insane president loses the next election and has a few years to go fully bananas because of the defeat, and is then re-elected, unbelievable things can happen in my experience.

I wonder if we'll see nukes this time.

[Walker]

This term could be (even) much wilder than the first one, because of revenge. When a half-insane president loses the next election and has a few years to go fully bananas because of the defeat, and is then re-elected, unbelievable things can happen in my experience.

I wonder if we'll see nukes this time.

When they lose, the Democrats always say ... Awww, now's the time for bipartisanship*. Can't we all just get along and get things done?

When they win it's time to do all the mean and nasty things they fear.

You have to admit, Trump is fearless and tenacious as a badger. The guy just doesn't go away. Lesser men would have faded away long ago. They guy thrives on adversity and to Americans, that's admirable. Especially with historic effectiveness against long odds.

Revenge against the Lawfarers would be sweet to see ... and best served cold. Has Jack Smith skipped town yet?


* That could be the next gender because of the bi.

[Atla]

This term could be (even) much wilder than the first one, because of revenge. When a half-insane president loses the next election and has a few years to go fully bananas because of the defeat, and is then re-elected, unbelievable things can happen in my experience.

I wonder if we'll see nukes this time.

When they lose, the Democrats always say ... Awww, now's the time for bipartisanship*. Can't we all just get along and get things done?

When they win it's time to do all the mean and nasty things they fear.

You have to admit, Trump is fearless and tenacious as a badger. Lesser men would have faded away long ago. They guy thrives on adversity and to Americans, that's admirable.

Revenge against the Lawfarers would be sweet to see ... and best served cold. Has Jack Smith skipped town yet?


* That could be the next gender because of the bi.

Grow up. Trump isn't a man, he's an NPD.