The Democrat Party Hates America

[mickthinks]

This one incident in itself is enough to screw the process.

No it isn’t. Not only is there no reason to suppose that all those incorrectly registered are non-citizens, it may that none of them are.

[mickthinks]

… that has Democrats PANICKING

The Blaze made that bit up just for Walker’s clicks.

… Bucks County for turning away Republican voters.
Bucks County turned away some voters. The Judge ruled they shouldn’t have. No reason to think they were all, or even half of them, likely to vote Republican.

[accelafine]

Don't worry your little woke head about Tuesday, stinkyMick, I'm sure your side is doing everything in its power to cheat itself into a win.

[BigMike]

Alright, Trump voters, let’s have a real talk. Look, I know we may not know each other personally, but I do feel like I know you, because we share a lot of the same core beliefs. You believe in personal responsibility, right? If you mess something up, you should be the one to fix it. And guess what? That’s a Democratic value too. You believe in hard work and think that if you put in the effort, you should be able to get ahead. Well, Democrats believe that too. And fairness? You bet, that’s a shared value. Family values, minimizing wasteful government spending, making sure taxpayer money isn’t thrown away on nonsense—these aren’t just Republican values. They’re American values. We all agree on these things.

Now, where we might differ is in the *how*. How do we make sure that people who work hard actually get ahead? How do we ensure families are supported? And every four years, we have this huge national discussion about which path we think is best to reach those goals. We started with a dozen candidates, each pitching their plans to solve these issues, but now we’re down to two: Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. And it’s on us to choose who’s got the best plan to actually uphold these values we all care about.

So let’s talk specifics. Let’s take one value we share—just one, “If you work hard, you should get ahead.” Because that’s what Americans do. We work hard. Many of us have two jobs, maybe even three, all just to keep food on the table, keep the lights on, and get the bills paid. But what happens when one of those bills is a massive medical emergency? Or some accident blindsides you, and you’re left with no safety net?

Now, let’s look at what Trump’s plan would do about that. He’s offering tax cuts, alright—big ones, but they’re for billionaires and corporations, not for working people. And those tax cuts, guess what? They get paid for by slapping a 20% tariff on imported goods—clothes, toys, phones—all the things we need. You know what that means? Everything you buy costs more. Sure, the folks at the top might be pocketing more from their tax cuts, maybe even buying up stocks. Some of that profit might trickle back into the company you work for. But at the end of the day, the benefit is going to shareholders, not to the workers who keep things running.

So where’s the fairness? Where’s the part where *you* get ahead?

Now, compare that to Kamala Harris’ plan. She’s looking to give tax cuts directly to you and to 100 million other middle- and working-class Americans. Imagine that boost. Imagine getting a $6,000 tax credit the first year you have a child, or $25,000 to put toward a downpayment on your first home. Imagine $50,000 to help start your own business, if that’s your dream. She’s pushing to expand affordable healthcare, to bring down the costs of prescription drugs, so you’re not paying an arm and a leg just to stay healthy.

Wouldn’t any of those changes put more money in your pocket? Isn’t that what really helps you get ahead?

This isn’t about who’s “left” or “right” or who wears a red tie or a blue one. This is about looking at the plans on the table and asking: *Which one of these really aligns with the values I believe in?* Which one will make life fairer, more stable, more supportive for families who work hard every single day?

In the end, it’s about the real things that affect your life and mine. And as Americans, we have a duty to look past the labels and make a choice that reflects who we are and who we want to be.

[henry quirk]

I'm votin' for RED MAN DEFIANT, not the café au lait whore.

I'm votin for the state capitalist, not the state communist.

I'm votin' for the felon, not the criminal.

I'm votin' for he who grabs 'em by the vadge, not the life support system for a vadge.

I'm votin' for the speed freak, not the drunk.

I'm votin' for the racist, not the race baiter.

I'm votin' old, not worn out and tore up.

I'm votin' for the rapist, not she who slobbered on a knob for a leg up.

I'm votin' for portly, not saggy.

I'm votin' for the maniac, not the retard.

I'm votin' for the dog, not the dog shit.

[mickthinks]

There’s a litany of hate. I leave it to you to judge whether it’s hate for America.

[henry quirk]

There’s a litany of hate. I leave it to you to judge whether it’s hate for America.

Which America?

Yours? Oh absolutely I hate that one.

Mine? I got nuthin' but love for her.

[Alexis Jacobi]

...

What you posted here was exactly what you posted on an adjacent thread. What gives?

[Walker]

I'm votin'

Why You Should Always Double-Check Your Ballot: Kentucky Voting Machine Showed Trump Vote As Vote For Harris
https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/01/wh ... or-harris/

Commentary:
Those pesky glitches. Must be gremlins in the works.
Funny (not haha) how glitches always seem to work in favour of Democrats.

[Walker]

This one incident in itself is enough to screw the process.

No it isn’t. Not only is there no reason to suppose that all those incorrectly registered are non-citizens, it may that none of them are.

Sure it is. The process of voting has become who can prove what. Turn it over to the courts and use Lawfare judges. Corruption of the process and let the complications begin. Chaos. Mission accomplished by The Democrat Party That Hates America.

Until you look at the big picture you'll continue to have small thoughts.

[Impenitent]

do you know who doesn't pay tariffs? manufacturers in America...

made in America used to mean something...

vote for made in China by Kamala and her commie buddies

the revolution is near

-Imp

[Walker]

Pennsylvania Voter Rolls Infested With Active Voters Living in Anomalous Addresses and Voters with Birth Dates Under the Voting Age
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/1 ... anomalous/

“The StopBogusBallots.com team has begun posting videos about the wildly anomalous voter rolls in the swing states.

“Voters by the thousands, tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands living in anomalous addresses like hotels, casinos and parking lots – now being made visible with Fractal quantum-speed technology.”

“This is the first of several such videos demonstrating that Secretaries of State, in every swing state, have voter rolls so wildly anomalous they cannot claim to run a free, fair election.”

[Walker]

Don't believe the promises of Kamalala. Her talk is cheap.

However, you can believe the successful presidential record of Trump, although much in the future administration depends on Congressional majority.

[Walker]

Report: Migrants Voting Would Allow Democrats to Win 12 Extra States
https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2 ... ra-states/

Make no mistake about it. Kamalala’s numero uno priority, whether or not they've told her yet, is amnesty for every illegal, and also their considerably sized extended families once they’re citizens.

Power to the Party!

[BigMike]

Walker, I totally get it—skepticism about campaign promises is wise, especially in a political climate where it’s hard to know who to trust. That’s why I think it’s important to look at real, tangible plans and get insight from experts who study the effects of these policies. Several Nobel laureates in economics have actually analyzed and commented on the economic plans of both candidates.

For example, some prominent economists—including Nobel winners—have noted that Harris’s focus on middle- and working-class tax relief, accessible healthcare, and affordable housing could have real positive impacts on everyday Americans’ financial security and long-term economic mobility. These are measurable, well-documented benefits to the middle class that many Nobel economists agree would help people get ahead in a meaningful way.

In contrast, when Trump implemented his tax cuts during his presidency, multiple Nobel laureates warned that the main beneficiaries would be corporations and the wealthiest Americans. And that’s pretty much what we saw: the biggest boosts were at the top, with limited trickle-down to working families. If there are specific examples of Trump’s policies you think had a positive impact for middle-class Americans, I’d really like to hear them! But from an economic standpoint, a lot of experts agree that Harris’s plan addresses more of what working families actually need.