Are Ideas Eternal?

[Fairy]

To what extent is actuality more than other concepts, including the 'real'? It involves the distinction between existence and non-existence, as well as body/mind. Such dichotomies may blurry, including at a quantum level.

Regarding the idea of imagination and ideas, one idea which I was reading of recently is that of the akashic records. It involves ideas being stored in the 'ether' eternally and is from esoteric thought. The reason why I am thinking it may be importance is that it may be the basis on which information is transmitted, especially as the basis for information technology.

What is claimed to be known is belief, concept, idea, thought, imagination.

What is ACTUAL is unclaimed, it is beyond belief and imagination. What is ACTUAL is the only real reality, which is this immediate actual unknowing direct experience of aliveness before it is claimed, before it was famously known as 'me' which is a belief, not real.

It's not a 'me' or a 'someone' that is ACTUALITY ... there is only ACTUALITY. And that's what you are, you are this actual unknowing.

Eternal or eternity is an idea, a belief, imagined. Can these beliefs be observed to exist as actuality? Not really.

So what is actuality? ...actuality is an object SEEN. And how is an object seen? .... it is seen as and through the actual direct experience of SEEING.

There is no separation between here and there...between the seer and the seen. Except as a mental construction, a false divide, distinction, or differentiation is a false divide, a mental construction, an imagined reality upon the Actual... which is always this unborn, unwritten NOW..and never in some past or future, which is just more conceptual belief, fantasy and imagination.

[Age]

This one has, once again, COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISINTERPRETED things, here.

Hey age, 'i' have a question that only 'you' here can answer. Do 'you' know what a corpus callosotomy is?

1. Who and/what is the 'I', exactly, which is asking a 'you' this question, here?

2. No. So, what is a 'corpus callosotomy', to 'you', "atla", exactly?

[Atla]

This one has, once again, COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISINTERPRETED things, here.

Hey age, 'i' have a question that only 'you' here can answer. Do 'you' know what a corpus callosotomy is?

1. Who and/what is the 'I', exactly, which is asking a 'you' this question, here?

2. No. So, what is a 'corpus callosotomy', to 'you', "atla", exactly?

'i', not 'I'. Pay attention.

Okay the question was too difficult, i'll ask something simpler. Do you know what epilepsy is?

[Age]

Hey age, 'i' have a question that only 'you' here can answer. Do 'you' know what a corpus callosotomy is?

1. Who and/what is the 'I', exactly, which is asking a 'you' this question, here?

2. No. So, what is a 'corpus callosotomy', to 'you', "atla", exactly?

'i', not 'I'. Pay attention.

Very good point. And, very bad reading on my part.

So, thank you for noticing and bringing 'it' to my attention.

Okay the question was too difficult, i'll ask something simpler.

How, exactly, was your question so-called 'too difficult'?

And, to whom what it, supposedly, 'too difficult' to, exactly?

After all I, obviously, answered 'your question' very easily, and very simply, and thus without any difficulty at all.

Do you know what epilepsy is?

No, what is 'epilepsy', to you, "atla", exactly?

Although, going by your 'current' rate of answering clarifying questions, 'this question' will also never be answered and clarified, as well.

Also, is or was there some point that you want to make and/or get across here, in this, 'Are ideas eternal' thread?

If yes, then what is 'that point', exactly?