Random nonsense about expansion

[Age]

You don't know what is actually true either,

OBVIOUSLY, if 'we' follow 'your logic' here, then, OF COURSE, 'I' do not know what is actually true. Because, according to you, ALONE, here, ABSOLUTELY NO one knows what is actually true.

Which, OBVIOUSLY, means that NO one knows if 'the claim' that no one knows what is actually true, is actually true, or NOT.

it seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

But, you do NOT know if that is actually true, right?

Right, but I already explained the above at least 5 times to you in the past.

But, I have, already, explained the above at least six times to you, in the past.

[Atla]

OBVIOUSLY, if 'we' follow 'your logic' here, then, OF COURSE, 'I' do not know what is actually true. Because, according to you, ALONE, here, ABSOLUTELY NO one knows what is actually true.

Which, OBVIOUSLY, means that NO one knows if 'the claim' that no one knows what is actually true, is actually true, or NOT.




But, you do NOT know if that is actually true, right?

Right, but I already explained the above at least 5 times to you in the past.

But, I have, already, explained the above at least six times to you, in the past.

You haven't explained anything, you just confirmed what I said.

[Age]

Right, but I already explained the above at least 5 times to you in the past.

But, I have, already, explained the above at least six times to you, in the past.

You haven't explained anything, you just confirmed what I said.

But, you do not know if this is actually true, correct?

Just like you do not actually know if you had already explained the above at least five times to me in the past is actually true, either.

you just keep claiming things, only.

[Age]

Once more, coming to a philosophy forum, especially, and just 'claiming things', only, without being able to clarify, substantiate, nor justify what one is 'claiming' is, really, not the 'smartest' thing to do.

But, then again, those who do this might have some parts of the 'mental functionality' MISSING.

[Atla]

But, I have, already, explained the above at least six times to you, in the past.

You haven't explained anything, you just confirmed what I said.

But, you do not know if this is actually true, correct?

Just like you do not actually know if you had already explained the above at least five times to me in the past is actually true, either.

you just keep claiming things, only.

There are big differences between for example not knowing something at all and being over 95% sure. It seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

[Atla]

Once more, coming to a philosophy forum, especially, and just 'claiming things', only, without being able to clarify, substantiate, nor justify what one is 'claiming' is, really, not the 'smartest' thing to do.

But, then again, those who do this might have some parts of the 'mental functionality' MISSING.

Exactly, that's why you shouldn't be here. It seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

[Atla]

And, once again, it is 'me' who is being talked about here.

And that is exactly because, once again, you force us to talk about your seeming lack of half of your brain, it seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

[Age]

You haven't explained anything, you just confirmed what I said.

But, you do not know if this is actually true, correct?

Just like you do not actually know if you had already explained the above at least five times to me in the past is actually true, either.

you just keep claiming things, only.

There are big differences between for example not knowing something at all and being over 95% sure.

But, you do not know if this is actually true, correct?

It seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

Again, if you say so, but, then again, you do not know if this is actually true, anyway.

Also, take notice how on just about every occasion this one interacts with me, what it just about all ends up doing is exactly what it is doing here now.

This one can not and thus does not back up, support, nor substantiate its claims when I question and/or challenge it over its claims. For the very reasons I have ALREADY EXPLAINED.

[Age]

Once more, coming to a philosophy forum, especially, and just 'claiming things', only, without being able to clarify, substantiate, nor justify what one is 'claiming' is, really, not the 'smartest' thing to do.

But, then again, those who do this might have some parts of the 'mental functionality' MISSING.

Exactly, that's why you shouldn't be here. It seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

But, and once again, you do not know if this is actually true.

It is like you can NOT comprehend that you do not know if it even actually 'seems like' this, let alone whether it is actually true, or not.

See, 'you', "atla", do not know what is actually true, ANYWHERE.

[Atla]

But, you do not know if this is actually true, correct?

Just like you do not actually know if you had already explained the above at least five times to me in the past is actually true, either.

you just keep claiming things, only.

There are big differences between for example not knowing something at all and being over 95% sure.

But, you do not know if this is actually true, correct?

Yes, no, being 100% uncertain about everything is not viable obviously either.

[Atla]

It seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

Again, if you say so, but, then again, you do not know if this is actually true, anyway.

Also, take notice how on just about every occasion this one interacts with me, what it just about all ends up doing is exactly what it is doing here now.

This one can not and thus does not back up, support, nor substantiate its claims when I question and/or challenge it over its claims. For the very reasons I have ALREADY EXPLAINED.

'Who' should take notice? I have backed up, supported, substantiated my claims more than enough to others, and they largely agree about you, it seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

[Atla]

Once more, coming to a philosophy forum, especially, and just 'claiming things', only, without being able to clarify, substantiate, nor justify what one is 'claiming' is, really, not the 'smartest' thing to do.

But, then again, those who do this might have some parts of the 'mental functionality' MISSING.

Exactly, that's why you shouldn't be here. It seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

But, and once again, you do not know if this is actually true.

It is like you can NOT comprehend that you do not know if it even actually 'seems like' this, let alone whether it is actually true, or not.

See, 'you', "atla", do not know what is actually true, ANYWHERE.

Again, 100% uncertainty isn't viable, it seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

[Age]

And, once again, it is 'me' who is being talked about here.

And that is exactly because, once again, you force us to talk about your seeming lack of half of your brain, it seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

So, this one starts an opening post with the words, What if the observable universe isn't expanding, to which all I more or less did was to just AGREE that that is 'random nonsense about expansion'. This one does NOT 'look at', and 'talk about', 'this', but rather prefers to 'look at', and 'talk about', 'me', INSTEAD. And, AGAIN.

Starting a sentence with the words, 'What if the observable universe is not expanding,', would be like starting a sentence with, 'What if the earth is flat.', or, 'What if the earth is in the center of the Universe'. There are, literally, NONSENSICAL.

you might as well start with, 'What if there was only nothing'.

From then on what would be said would be NONSENSICAL, AS WELL.

It is like you, REALLY, are MISSING some thing here "atla".

[Atla]

And, once again, it is 'me' who is being talked about here.

And that is exactly because, once again, you force us to talk about your seeming lack of half of your brain, it seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

So, this one starts an opening post with the words, What if the observable universe isn't expanding, to which all I more or less did was to just AGREE that that is 'random nonsense about expansion'. This one does NOT 'look at', and 'talk about', 'this', but rather prefers to 'look at', and 'talk about', 'me', INSTEAD. And, AGAIN.

Starting a sentence with the words, 'What if the observable universe is not expanding,', would be like starting a sentence with, 'What if the earth is flat.', or, 'What if the earth is in the center of the Universe'. There are, literally, NONSENSICAL.

you might as well start with, 'What if there was only nothing'.

From then on what would be said would be NONSENSICAL, AS WELL.

It is like you, REALLY, are MISSING some thing here "atla".

You're not saying anything here as usual, it seems like you just literally lack the half of the brain that would enable you to realize this.

[Age]

There are big differences between for example not knowing something at all and being over 95% sure.

But, you do not know if this is actually true, correct?

Yes, no, being 100% uncertain about everything is not viable obviously either.

But, you are ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that ABSOLUTELY NO one knows what is actually true, correct?

JUST MAYBE this one's CONTRADICTION and HYPOCRISY here is JUST STARTING TO 'sink in', as some call it.