If H wants to sue me for slander for revealing his true reputation on an internet forum, then I'm ok with that. I'll be more than willing to see him in the human court of law. And be put on trial and be judged and accept the jury's verdict, whatever the outcome.
Questions to Christians
Re: Questions to Christian’s
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Questions to Christian’s
By 'live' alone do you mean not co-habiting, or literally 'living' alone? I don't think it's possible for humans to 'live alone' in a literal sense. I believe that in a fundamental way we only exist in the minds of others. When we are truly alone is when there is no one left who is aware of our existence in any meaningful way. For all intents and purposes we cease to exist. This has nothing to do with simply not inhabiting the same living space as another person. Most people are quite happy to do that, especially as they get older. The elderly truly understand what loneliness really means. Sometimes every single person who ever cared about them has died. This is why they have a habit of talking to strangers. Having another human to tell things to (and yes, complain to) is a way of validating our existence. Perhaps they never had children and didn't think twice about that when they were young and carefree, with parents still and friends. Even if we don't like our parents, they are the only humans there will ever be who are guaranteed to truly and deeply care about us.Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:43 pmIt's obvious he was looking for a handmaiden.accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:58 am Definitely didn't get serial killer vibes from him. I just thought he was a bit clueless and 'detached'. Besides, America is the place for 'serial killing'. They love their serial killers.
It takes extremely strong, emotionally intelligent people to live perfectly happy alone, to live and die all alone. People like that are rare today, most people are weak, and have never grown out of the warm security blanket that was their childhood. Instead, they simply move from their child days to playing the role of Adultchild / Manchild. They move from their mothers to their wives. They just want to be loved and hugged and cared for.
Women carry men from womb to cradle to grave. And that's why women are the smarter and stronger of the species mentally and emotionally, although not quite physically. But that doesn't matter anymore because A.I. will make most men redundant and void anyway.
I guess nature had the last laugh, humans just didn't deserve to be a part of this planet.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
I mean not co-habiting. . not literally living alone as if I was the only person who ever existed.accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 6:27 pmBy 'live' alone do you mean not co-habiting, or literally 'living' alone? I do'n't think it's possible for humans to 'live alone' in a literal sense. I believe that in a fundamental way we only exist in the minds of others. When we are truly alone is when there is no one left who is aware of our existence in any meaningful way. For all intents and purposes we cease to exist. This has nothing to do with simply not inhabiting the same living space as another person. Most people are quite happy to do that, especially as they get older. The elderly truly understand what loneliness really means. Sometimes every single person who ever cared about them has died. This is why they have a habit of talking to strangers. Having another human to tell things to (and yes, complain to) is a way of validating our existence. Perhaps they never had children and didn't think twice about that when they were young and carefree, with parents still and friends. Even if we don't like our parents, they are the only humans there will ever be who are guaranteed to truly and deeply care about us.Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:43 pmIt's obvious he was looking for a handmaiden.accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:58 am Definitely didn't get serial killer vibes from him. I just thought he was a bit clueless and 'detached'. Besides, America is the place for 'serial killing'. They love their serial killers.
It takes extremely strong, emotionally intelligent people to live perfectly happy alone, to live and die all alone. People like that are rare today, most people are weak, and have never grown out of the warm security blanket that was their childhood. Instead, they simply move from their child days to playing the role of Adultchild / Manchild. They move from their mothers to their wives. They just want to be loved and hugged and cared for.
Women carry men from womb to cradle to grave. And that's why women are the smarter and stronger of the species mentally and emotionally, although not quite physically. But that doesn't matter anymore because A.I. will make most men redundant and void anyway.
I guess nature had the last laugh, humans just didn't deserve to be a part of this planet.
People can be happy on their own without the need to co-habit with other people. I don't mean living alone in the context of one who is choosing to live on a deserted island in the middle of the pacific ocean where it seems they are the only single person alive, and there is no another person around in sight. No man is an island as they say. But I'm not talking about that sort of living aloneness. I'm simply talking about people who choose not to co-inhabit with others, those people who choose not to co-inhabit, are still human beings who can be just as happy living alone, as compared to say someone who is happy co-habiting with someone else.
That's what I mean.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
It's foolish to take your word on that accusation that is merely something you suspect.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 6:08 pm
Not talkin' about women, just a woman. An obviously loony one.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
There isn't anyone here.
H talks about people on this forum behind their backs. I agreed with him sometimes, by nodding my head. So is he slandering their reputations. Gosh he's even accused people on this forum by actually posting shit about them, I mean who hasn't done that? It happens all the time on this forum.
All I've done is simply draw awareness, make aware the people he has dished out defamation to behind their backs, without ever truly knowing if they are actually a good person or a bad person.
Good people cannot be defamed so if you already know you are a truly good person, then there is nothing to get hung up about, when it comes to what other people think of you. Only you know if you are a good or bad person, not others.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Questions to Christian’s
Ah, but there's a difference. I assess you as loony becuz of the entirety of your posting. Anyone with a mind to can go here...
search.php?author_id=25559&sr=posts&sid ... abe6e69d6d
...and review a substantial chunk of those postings (those you haven't *deleted).
With Har-Har, what he's supposedly done, who he supposedly is, we only have your word.
Of course, anyone with a mind to can also review his postings...
search.php?author_id=9107&sr=posts&sid= ... c7fc1f636d
*in the circles I work in, that's called destroying evidence
Last edited by henry quirk on Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
This is a philosophical entertainment/trolling forum, with the occasional real philosophical debate, but is there anyone here who cares about fame and reputation? 
Re: Questions to Christian’s
So according to Flintstone fred, what fairy has posted on this forum, is evidence of her character, her reputation... ok, but so what?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:07 pmAh, but there's a difference. I assess you as loony becuz of the entirety of your posting. Anyone with a mind to can go here...
search.php?author_id=25559&sr=posts&sid ... abe6e69d6d
...and review a substantial of those postings (those you haven't *deleted).
With Har-Har, what he's supposedly done, who he supposedly is, we only have your word.
Of course, anyone with a mind to can also review his postings...
search.php?author_id=9107&sr=posts&sid= ... c7fc1f636d
*in the circles I work in, that's called destroying evidence
H too, has posted things on this forum that have been evidence of his character and his reputation also, but so what?
What the heck is your point?
Re: Questions to Christian’s
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Questions to Christian’s
It is destroying evidence when it comes to what has been written on a forum, especially when stuff has been written and then deleted.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:07 pm
*in the circles I work in, that's called destroying evidence
But then you say you only have my word for what I have written to the forum readers, about what H has already told me to my actual face in real-time actuality. I've simply repeated what he actually said to me. Don't you believe me or something? Why would I Iie, why would H lie, we both hate liars, we both hate lying.
He is quite free to come here and defend himself in his own words if anything I have repeated that he has definitely said to me, is not what he actually said to my face as being the truth, and not a lie. But notice he's not doing that, you idiot, I wonder why that is, you dumb fool.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Questions to Christian’s
What it has been from the start of this lil melodrama of yours: you are not a reliable source of information.
Again: mebbe he did all things you say. It's possible. Your word, however, skewed and loony, cannot, for a sensible person, be the final one on that.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
Define abuser?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:20 pmI do. That doesn't mean he has a bad heart. I mean, he's a schmuck, yes, but an abuser? Can't take her word on that.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
If you are looking for reliable information then it looks like you are not going to get it, doesn't it. Until H ponies up with his side of the truth, you will just be left with your frustrations, and it's obviously bugging the crap out of you, you poor thing.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:27 pmWhat it has been from the start of this lil melodrama of yours: you are not a reliable source of information.
Again: mebbe he did all things you say. It's possible. Your word, however, skewed and loony, cannot, for a sensible person, be the final one on that.
But you love the melodrama don't you, you are the one who is choosing to be here getting involved in my drama, do you get off on it or something?