Ah I get it too, Only a man would think a woman is thinking a man is complaining.
Questions to Christians
Re: Questions to Christian’s
Now your just being ridiculous.
It's someone who used to post at this forum actually, you see, men are just naturally attracted to me as a nondual writer, not romantically or in a sexual way, but there's been quite a few men from this forum who have PM'd me. I've never once PM'd a man.
Anyway, it's not Roy I am talking about, let me assure you, although I could if I wanted to, move away from England, I could sell my own house and make an absolute fortune, and go and live at Roy's amazing multi-million pound residential spiritual retreat complex in Canada, if I so desired to do so. The world is my oyster right now, my cup runneth over, But nah, I might save that for later on maybe, but not right now. Heck I could even pop in and see my other male friend who lives just a stone throw across the border of Canada while I'm there, that would be great fun meeting with him in the physical for the very first time.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
thank God it's not roydopFairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 4:54 pmNow your just being ridiculous.
It's someone who used to post at this forum actually, you see, men are just naturally attracted to me as a nondual writer, not romantically or in a sexual way, but there's been quite a few men from this forum who have PM'd me. I've never once PM'd a man.
Anyway, it's not Roy I am talking about, let me assure you, although I could if I wanted to, move away from England, I could sell my own house and make an absolute fortune, and go and live at Roy's amazing multi-million pound residential spiritual retreat complex in Canada, if I so desired to do so. The world is my oyster right now, my cup runneth over, But nah, I might save that for later on maybe, but not right now. Heck I could even pop in and see my other male friend who lives just a stone throw across the border of Canada while I'm there, that would be great fun meeting with him in the physical for the very first time.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
Umm I'm not feeling particularly sad for people who can be happy alone, why should I. Their loss.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
Re: Questions to Christian’s
Social life would be impossible if nobody trusted anyone else. Honesty is the default attitude with regards not only to personal relationships but also to shopping, medical care, insurance, and I don't know what else. Without trust as the default we would all be paranoid.Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 11:56 amYou still don't get it do you.Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 10:47 am Thanks, Fairy for the warning but I still say that a forum like this can't function if pen -name personas are abused for their private lives and personal characters. You could have warned women on the forum in a general way , without naming anyone in particular.
Look around on Youtube, millions of people are abusing each other all the time. Calling out other peoples BS, character shaming and blaming, and naming names even. Is Youtube doing anything to stop this abuse? NO it isn't. It's all about ''money'' how much can be made out of other peoples misery of being exposed for their personal characters on the internet. Children are being filmed left right and centre by their own parents without their consent, these children are just being promised lots of money, and they are too inexperienced to know what is actually happening to them. They just love the idea of no school, loads of luxury holidays, and tons and tons of presents every christmas and birthday. Of course the children are not going to question their parents motive for filming them on the internet for any predator to drool over.
Children are just seen as ways of making money for their parents. Why isn't anything being done to protect these vulnerable children that are being sold by their parents love of money. Look at how much money Youtube content creators are making these days, especially the one that involve children.
Same with all social media platforms, including facebook, and the dark web. Abuse is a normal human activity, please stop with your paragon of virtue attitude.
If H did not want his personal true characteristics plastered all over his beloved forum, so that other people would be made aware of them, then why did he think it was ok to tell me about his true personal characteristics?
So it was ok for me to know, who in case he hadn't noticed is a forum member aswell. But it wasn't ok for other forum members to know his true personal characteristics, but he thought it was ok for me to know...What now, are you saying that he thought he could trust me to not reveal to anyone else his true nature? Why would he care unless he had something to hide, and yet was quite happy to share his mental content with me?
What if I had told everybody on this forum that he was an amazing loving, caring compassionate, considerate intelligent generous cannot do enough to help other people out of their desperate lives. What if I'd disclosed all those characteristics about him to everyone on this forum, would that have made everyone happy? Seems like we only want people to know we are good people, even though that's just one side of the human psyche right?
Do good hearted people leave the people they confess to love? See how the word LOVE just turns out to be an abusive and meaningless stupid word?
It's like I love my children but I am going to expose them in every human situation to the entire world via the internet because I cannot be bothered to get a proper 9 to 5 job like everyone else, no, I can just make easy money at the expense of my children's no right to privacy, it's an abusive violation of their natural privacy. For even a child is intelligent enough to know when they are being manipulated by their own parents.
In what world was it ok to tell me about his personal life story, but then ghost the other forum members as if he didn't want any of them to know, and yet he had no problem in thinking it was ok to tell me things, that he didn't want other forum users to know......So why do you think he is now not posting anymore Belinda?
We have good reason to distrust politicians and their opinion shapers. We have more reason to distrust others we know only on the internet than people we know in real life, but that does not mean that there is no use for trust when we are participating in an intellectual forum. You can be wary, for sure, however you can't go through life distrusting everybody. This forum will not work if members are allowed to characterise each other. It's not slander to characterise anyone as a good person,but it is slander to characterise them as bad person.
You mention love . I have told you before that love is more than affection, or sexual or other desire, love involves studying the other person to see what is in their best interest , I mean for instance it may be affectionate but it's not loving to feed your child whatever he demands.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
Who told you, you are a bad person?
No one is a bad person, more over no one is a good person...there's simply no one who is good or bad, except in this conception.
''You'' does not exist as a concept known: ie as a concept known as ''You''.
Concepts known, know nothing of their existence.
Lets just be clear on who we are actually talking about here.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
But very recently you said someone is a p****, and moreover that there are a lot of bad persons who infest the internet.Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 5:57 pmWho told you, you are a bad person?
No one is a bad person, more over no one is a good person...there's simply no one who is good or bad, except in this conception.
''You'' does not exist as a concept known: ie as a concept known as ''You''.
Concepts known, know nothing of their existence.
Lets just be clear on who we are actually talking about here.
Edited:
It's a pity that crude language which displeases only pearl -clutchers is disallowed whereas slander is not deleted.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Questions to Christian’s
Not talkin' about women, just a woman. An obviously loony one.Women are well accustomed to the 'you're nuts' line from men. It's not exactly original.
Not much. Commies, amoralists, and God haters are overwhelmingly over-represented here. And there's one or two unclassifiables.How much 'normal' do you see in this overwhelmingly male forum?
I don't know this, and I don't think you do either. You suspect. You may be right. Again: DAM is not a reliable source: it's foolish to take her word on it.Hairyballs is a predator in sheep's clothing
Some do, but not every man.men would consider that an admirable quality and worthy of a slap on the back
Re: Questions to Christian’s
No one ever slandered anyone. It only appears as if. Ultimately there is no one here responsible for anything said, or anything done, there's simply what's happening to no one or thing. Doing is done, no doer thereof.Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 6:05 pmBut very recently you said someone is a p****, and moreover that there are a lot of bad persons who infest the internet.Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 5:57 pmWho told you, you are a bad person?
No one is a bad person, more over no one is a good person...there's simply no one who is good or bad, except in this conception.
''You'' does not exist as a concept known: ie as a concept known as ''You''.
Concepts known, know nothing of their existence.
Lets just be clear on who we are actually talking about here.
Edited:
It's a pity that crude language which displeases only pearl -clutchers is disallowed whereas slander is not deleted.
Slander happens, offence is taken, yet no thing is making slander or offense happen, life simply happens as it does, life is simply just happening, to no one or thing.
You mistake the dream story for actual reality.
Lets put all social media people in prison for their crimes against humanity. Crimes to themselves. All partners in crime.
Re: Questions to Christian’s
I do actually wonder if there is anyone here on the website , moderating it.Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 6:16 pmNo one ever slandered anyone. It only appears as if. Ultimately there is no one here responsible for anything said, or anything done, there's simply what's happening to no one or thing. Doing is done, no doer thereof.Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 6:05 pmBut very recently you said someone is a p****, and moreover that there are a lot of bad persons who infest the internet.Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 5:57 pm
Who told you, you are a bad person?
No one is a bad person, more over no one is a good person...there's simply no one who is good or bad, except in this conception.
''You'' does not exist as a concept known: ie as a concept known as ''You''.
Concepts known, know nothing of their existence.
Lets just be clear on who we are actually talking about here.
Edited:
It's a pity that crude language which displeases only pearl -clutchers is disallowed whereas slander is not deleted.
Slander happens, offence is taken, yet no thing is making slander or offense happen, life simply happens as it does, life is simply just happening, to no one or thing.
You mistake the dream story for actual reality.
Lets put all social media people in prison for their crimes against humanity. Crimes to themselves. All partners in crime.